RedImperator wrote:Gerald Tarrant wrote:Fred Thompson, mounted an anemic campaign during the Republican primary, by all accounts a conservative stalwart. Pros: would probably allay conservative suspicions of McCain. Cons: The 2 old-white-guys ticket what's not to like.
Thompson brings nothing. Which is sort of a shame for him, because a job where he doesn't have to do anything except look Presidential, go to funerals, and wait for McCain to die is right up his alley.
Why do people even suggest Thompson? It's not like McCain would be assuaging
anyone with him; Thompson was a nobody. It'd probably be more likely that McCain would pick Ghouliani.
Mitt Romney, mounted the biggest challenge to McCain during the primary. Pros: After McCain has the widest support among republican base. Cons: Would (probably) scare off independents, Baptists, and dog lovers. Also no one was all that satisfied with his tenure as governor, so that's a bit of a detraction to the ticket too.
I would suspect Mittens myself, except he reinforces the "out of touch millionaire" meme, he frightens the base, he's a flip-flopper so transparent even Republicans can see through him, and McSame hates his stinking guts. And actually, considering the rest of the field, he's still probably the best candidate. He's had more personal and political success than anyone else on the short list and he has great hair. If McSame is looking for a nice-looking mannequin he can use as a campaign prop, Mittens is the guy. The one thing which comes off a sign Mittens won't be picked is the fact McSame is running attack ads quoting Joe Biden from the primaries saying Obama isn't ready to be President. If he picks Mittens, the Democrats are going to return the favor in spades.
To be fair to Mitt, he has at least some managerial competence (in business, sort of) - he really helped pull together the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics when it was mired in scandal. I remember thinking that, considering that he's flip-flopped on various conservative issues (and comes from a family background that was moderate Republican), he'd probably be okay as long as you stuck him with an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress. "Okay" as in "not as good as having a competent democrat, but better than the other Republicans".
Tim Pawlenty is governor of Minnesota. Pros: The Republicans might think they can steal Minnesota, a squishy democratic state, getting that to swing might save some trouble in other swing states. Also Pawlenty is 48, and has executive experience. Cons: VP's winning their home state hasn't worked that well recently (as I believe RedImperator mentioned in another thread).
The Republicans are daft if they think they can steal Minnesota. It's a "squishy" Democratic state that hasn't gone Republican in decades. Other than the entirely imaginary chance of carrying Minnesota, Pawlenty brings nothing to the ticket. He undermines McCain's experience theme (same goes double for Jindal, Crist, Palin, and any other state governor early in his or her first term), and he'll get clobbered by Joe Biden in the VP debates. Apparently has the charisma of dry toast, too.
I've heard him described as the "plain white bread" choice of the Sam's Club Republicans. Watching him debate Biden would not be pretty, although perhaps he could goad Biden into saying something stupid.
Bobby Jindal is governor of Louisiana, elected recently after K. Blanco chose not to run again. Pros: Indian-American (as in the subcontinent) to balance the ticket. Governor once again giving some executive experience. Jindal is 37. Jindal is also Roman Catholic, maybe he'll pull some of those who'd choose Biden. Cons: Jindal doesn't have much gubernatorial experience, it's a little early to call his term a success.
You forgot to mention that he believes in exorcism (scary for independents and moderates) and he's a brown person (scary for the base). Also undermines McSame's experience argument, will also get demolished by Biden in the VP debate. At any rate, Jindal has stated flatly that he's not up for consideration and hasn't been vetted. He could just be lying, but that's pretty rare; most people who know they're on the short list but don't want to say just act coy about it.
Would the base really vote against Jindal just because he's of East Indian extraction? It's not like they have anyone else to vote for except Bob Barr, or not voting at all, and Jindal is at least liked by some prominent conservative figures like Rush Limbaugh. "Inexperience" would be a bitch for him, though, although perhaps McCain could play it up as a "Master and Apprentice" type of thing.
Charlie Crist governor of Florida has been listed as a possible, but I don't know enough to evaluate this.
Crist is on engagement number five, undermines the experience argument, and has some potentially killer scandals lurking in his background--among them, that as attorney general, he refused to investigate Lou Pearlman's Ponzi scheme because Pearlman was a big campaign donor.
So he's actually a womanizer? I thought I heard a rumor that he might be a closet homosexual.
Joe Lieberman former Democratic (now Independent) Senator from Connecticut. Pros: More "MAverick" cred. Cons: It would certainly scare some of the staunch conservatives, as Lieberman is much more liberal on social economic stuff than any Republican I can think of.
Holy Joe would cause the base to die of apoplexy
en masse. Look how they reacted to Tom Ridge's name; what do you think they'll do if McSame picks a pro-choice moderate Democrat? The only issue where Lieberman votes consistently with McCain and Bush is Iraq, and the Wonder Chimp just undermined McCain-Lieberman's entire position by agreeing to a withdrawal timeline with Malaki. PS: Holy Joe is a Jew, another reason the Neanderthal demographic won't like him.
I've heard this one discussed and promoted by Republitards on other forums, and it makes me laugh my ass off - they honestly don't realize that he's a moderate Democrat aside from foreign affairs area (probably why he was on the
Democratic ticket in 2000).
Former HP CEO Carly Fiorina, a McCain surrogate whose name has been floated. She would add youth to the ticket and probably win over the PUMAs, but she would seriously reinforce the "out of touch rich guy" meme for McCain. Her business record has been touted, but her actual business record goes like this: downsize 20,000 employees, push the stock price over a cliff, get fired for incompetence, collect $40 million in severance pay on the way out. She's also not nearly reactionary enough for the base--in one hilarious moment, she said the law should mandate health insurance companies cover contraception, which McSame has voted against multiple times.
I think at this point Romney is the most likely choice, but they're all flawed enough that I wouldn't be surprised if McSame picks someone totally out of left field.
Fiorina would be a hilarious choice. I would expect some amazing Internet ads attacking her if McCain was actually stupid enough to pick her.