I saw some F-22s shoot missiles at Megatron. To this day I don't think anyone has actually determined whether or not Starscream was one of those F-22s. At best, they showed Starscream being surly, which is a fair thing with a giant evil robot.Admiral Valdemar wrote:Woah, wait, what? You didn't see Starscream pummel Megs at the end? It's clear even from his limited showing along with Megs, that he hated the guy's guts and Starscream was on the sidelines for most of the final fight, ready to take out whoever did most of the dirty work first. The subtle working in of Starscream adding to Megs' downfall was far more interesting than if we got a camp re-enactment of the cartoon endeavours (and Megatron being thick as a bucket of shit whenever it came to trusting Starscream anyway).
No, but I think it would help, and not just to free up budget, but trim down extraneous scenes. Actors get paid quite a bit. In alot of movies, actors salaries are the majority of the production cost. They could have easily have lifted out Sector 7 and all the miliary/government stuff and the movie wouldn't have missed it (of course, without sufficient military wanking Michael Bay might get bored and wander off).Honestly, I don't see how the movie failed at all. It was highly entertaining, and it had to have humans in by virtue of, well, being on Earth. Big robots on their own do not carry the story of first contact too well. And if you think cutting out some actors would pay for two straight hours of robot rumpus, you're on crack.
And you don't honestly see a problem with the fact that completely unimportant characters get more focus and screen time than the title characters? In what universe is bit human characters being more important than the Autobots in a Transformers movie not a failure?