
Sure.
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... &start=900Shroom Man 777 wrote:Fingolfin, do you have information on these new weapons systems Byzantium is building?
The Russians had one for a long while... didn't you see Stas' posts? We started deploying the Kh-90 since last game year.Shroom Man 777 wrote:Hypersonic cruise missiles? Those don't even exist in real life, Fingolfin - how did you end up with em!?
It is no longer in effect with the armistice, and Shep had remarked that ships' courses would be measured before firing. Aside from a narrow band directly east of Sirnoth, it'd be hard to confuse a ship on course to Sirnoth heading toward Old Dominion.Norseman wrote:Zone of Death covers Sirnoth. a supposedly neutral state.
It's not really Stonehenge. It's just the equivalent of this and this.Steve wrote:Shroom, isn't Stonehenge a bit.... much for our "realistic" world?![]()
Next thing you'll tell me is that our aircraft can carry 70+ short-range multi-purpose missiles......
Yeah, but you are competing with us, aren't youShroomania is partner with PeZookia in building hypersonic missiles too..
Not to mention, we are conscious of the problem being aimed right back at us, unlike Shroomania.Stas Bush wrote:There's nothing um... bad about competing technical designsYour missile would compete against our missiles... actually the problem is that your missile is probably the only real advanced weapon sincerely offered for sale to any nations willing.
Me and Byzantium aren't so freely selling cruise hypersonic missiles and other advanced weaponry around...
....so is there a Gerald Shroombull who will get assassinated after helping some rogue state somewhere build a Babylon?Shroom Man 777 wrote:It's not really Stonehenge. It's just the equivalent of this and this.Steve wrote:Shroom, isn't Stonehenge a bit.... much for our "realistic" world?![]()
Next thing you'll tell me is that our aircraft can carry 70+ short-range multi-purpose missiles......
EDIT:
HOW THE HELL DO THE RUSSIANS GET HYPERSONIC CRUISE MISSILES AND OTHER SUPER COOL GIZMOS?!?!
That can be done, but the diameter of those weapons are more than double the existing P-1000 Vulkans and so forth. I think smaller warheads might be a better idea. It's not as if we can't fit a unitary warhead to them which is more than enough to punch through any known hull.Stas Bush wrote:That doesn't mean we won't build new missile cruisers with far larger tubes (think tonnage a little over the Slava, nuclear powerplant, and the classic "smile of socialism" zig-zag of missile tubes)
The thing is, I don't know jack shit about hypersonic cruise missile specs and it would be better if we were all using similar stuff since you people would know what your systems could do and could therefore tell me what my systems could do, rather than leaving me with no recourse but to make up lies about the stuff I've got since I don't know shit about hypersonic cruise missile specs and it would be better if we were all using similar stuff since you...Stas Bush wrote:There's nothing um... bad about competing technical designsYour missile would compete against our missiles... actually the problem is that your missile is probably the only real advanced weapon sincerely offered for sale to any nations willing.
Yes! He will die with a paper bag full of groceries!Steve wrote:....so is there a Gerald Shroombull who will get assassinated after helping some rogue state somewhere build a Babylon?![]()
I always liked that movie, too.
Well, our Crimson-Shroomanian collaboration could have a contract stipulating technology limitations to sales to less than reputable nations. Sort of like that real-life treaty limiting cruise missile capabilities.Stas Bush wrote:Yeah, I just noted that. Selling 100+ km missiles is okay. But 1000+km missiles which are real fast, and hard to intercept and constitute vital strategic assets for any nation?
Nyah...
That's cause Shroomania plays really nice and is Super Best Friends with everyone and don't go around annexing third world crapholes, in the Old Continent, Frequesue, and elsewhere, and neither does it do covert ops into neighboring nations to blow up rogue submarines that aren't there!Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Not to mention, we are conscious of the problem being aimed right back at us, unlike Shroomania.
Tell me what can and can't be exported to other people for outrageous fees and I'll stick with it. Seriously, put clauses and agreements in the CCCP and I'll swear on it.By the way, Shroom, with reference to the CCCP proposal, not all of us are particularly keen on the spread of our proprietary technologies. We don't want them ending up in the wrong hands.
Dude, the way Shep is leading this, I would hesitate to say it wouldn't lead to problems.Shroom Man 777 wrote:That's cause Shroomania plays really nice and is Super Best Friends with everyone and don't go around annexing third world crapholes, in the Old Continent, Frequesue, and elsewhere, and neither does it do covert ops into neighboring nations to blow up rogue submarines that aren't there!
Maybe we could work something out. But first, your observer status.Tell me what can and can't be exported to other people for outrageous fees and I'll stick with it. Seriously, put clauses and agreements in the CCCP and I'll swear on it.
Our (rich and powerful) allies in the Old Continent are more important than some hypercapitalistic mephistophlebitic metropolis in the F-ing continent.
(Sorry Siege. I'll sell you shorter-ranged hypersonic cruise missiles instead!)