The world chose Obama

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7956
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

The world chose Obama

Post by ray245 »

Rest of world prefers Obama over McCain for US president: poll
AFP - Wednesday, October 22WASHINGTON (AFP) - - If the rest of the world could take part in the US presidential election, Democratic Party candidate Barack Obama would win four times more votes than his Republican rival John McCain, a poll showed Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

In surveys conducted by the Gallup Organization in 70 countries representing nearly half the world's population, 30 percent of people said they would choose Obama as president of the United States against eight percent who said they preferred McCain.

In four close US partners in Asia -- Australia, Japan, Singapore and South Korea -- residents came out clearly in favor of Obama.

Two-thirds of Japanese and Australian respondents said they preferred Obama to McCain, who only scored about 15 percent in the two countries.

In Singapore and South Korea, meanwhile, the pro-Obama vote outpaced the pro-McCain vote by around two to one.

"McCain and Obama have each pledged to reinvigorate and strengthen partnerships with the four developed Asian countries and take a more active role in Asian regional organizations," Gallup wrote.

Nine out of 10 people polled in India and Pakistan and seven in 10 in Bangladesh said they had no opinion about whom they would prefer to see in the White House in Washington come next January.

Gallup said the disinterest among South Asians revealed "a great disconnect between many of the world's poorest inhabitants and the politics of the United States."

Latin Americans showed a similar disconnect, with 68 percent of those polled in central America and Mexico and 58 percent in South America voicing no opinion about the US election.

Middle Easterners in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Lebanon and the Palestinian Territories chose Obama over McCain by a margin of at least two to one, although three-quarters of Palestinians said they didn't think the result of the US election would change much in their country.

A majority of Europeans in 14 countries said they wanted an Obama victory, with the Dutch and Norwegians the strongest Obama supporters in Europe: nearly three-quarters in both countries said they preferred him to McCain.

In France, 64 percent chose Obama against four percent for McCain, and in Germany, where an Obama rally in Berlin gathered some 200,000 people in July, the Democratic presidential contender was supported by 62 percent of those polled compared with 10 percent for McCain.

In Africa, a median of 56 percent of poll respondents chose Obama -- meaning the percentage who chose the African American presidential contender was higher than 56 percent in half the 22 countries polled and lower than 56 percent in the other half.

A median of nine percent chose McCain, who did not beat Obama anywhere in Africa, even though the current US administration of Republican President George W. Bush has a high approval rating on the continent.

Bush in July signed legislation tripling funds to fight the killer diseases of AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis in Africa under an initiative launched under his administration in 2003.

In Kenya, where Obama's father hailed from, the Democrat was supported by nearly nine in 10 poll respondents; McCain had the support of three percent of Kenyans.

Around 1,000 people were interviewed face-to-face earlier this year in most of the countries that took part in the surveys.

Survey sizes in Kuwait, Japan, Pakistan, Mexico and India were 484, 750, 804, 873 and 2,000 people respectively.
http://sg.news.yahoo.com/afp/20081021/t ... 2e412.html


I thought this is a less bias and manage to contact more people for their choice. South India don't seems to be that interested in the US politics, that's rather interesting.

Although it is sad that we do not have any infomation on China though.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: The world choose Obama

Post by Edi »

Could you at least try to speak English? That comment you posted after the article needs to be translated from gibberish to actual English before it can be understood to mean anything at all.
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7956
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: The world choose Obama

Post by ray245 »

Sorry about that. What I am trying to say was, despite being labeled as a rising nation, I am surprised that India did not have a strong opinion on US politics.

The second point was, I wish the Gallup Organization provided us with infomation, about the average chinese interest towards american politics.

I do hope that I have clarify my post.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
User avatar
Count Chocula
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1821
Joined: 2008-08-19 01:34pm
Location: You've asked me for my sacrifice, and I am winter born

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Count Chocula »

Why would what the rest of the world thinks influence the American voter? I don't recall any polls taken in America on the suitability of Georg Haider for Austria or how good Nicolas Sarkosy's presidency would be for America (other than to say "Damn, his wife is HOT!") Hell, Americans were never polled on the English elections when Tony Blair won against John Major and Paddy Ashdown back in '97 - and they're our #1 ally!

Not to be flippant or dismissive, but why would I as an American voter care what the Middle East (or the other polled countries) thinks?
Image
The only people who were safe were the legion; after one of their AT-ATs got painted dayglo pink with scarlet go faster stripes, they identified the perpetrators and exacted revenge. - Eleventh Century Remnant

Lord Monckton is my heeerrooo

"Yeah, well, fuck them. I never said I liked the Moros." - Shroom Man 777
User avatar
FireNexus
Cookie
Posts: 2131
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:10am

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by FireNexus »

It has less to do with whether you care or not and more to do with an understanding that the US presidential choice affects everyone. The US president has more impact on England than England's prime minister does on the US, I'd wager. That goes for France and Austria as well.

Beyond that, the fact that someone is inelligible to vote in the election does not make their opinion valueless. For instance, our national image is tarnished. Someone with the goal of improving that would certainly vote for the presidential candidate who is more popular in the rest of the world.
I had a Bill Maher quote here. But fuck him for his white privelegy "joke".

All the rest? Too long.
User avatar
Count Chocula
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1821
Joined: 2008-08-19 01:34pm
Location: You've asked me for my sacrifice, and I am winter born

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Count Chocula »

Fair enough - you're right, the US does have a larger footprint than most every other nation on Earth. It seems from a surface analysis, that Obama's stated policies and intents for government action are more like how governments overseas operate; my guess is that there's an element of "like attracts like" to foreign preference for Obama over McCain.

McCain, despite his effort to portray himself as a capital M "Maverick," is widely perceived as a Bush clone. Since Bush is wildly unpopular both in the US and overseas, it would appear that there's an element of "Hate Bush - Hate McCain" transference there as well.

Too bad for us that the banking industry (here and overseas) will have a greater effect worldwide than ANY president! No elections for those cock-knockers, unfortunately. :roll:
Image
The only people who were safe were the legion; after one of their AT-ATs got painted dayglo pink with scarlet go faster stripes, they identified the perpetrators and exacted revenge. - Eleventh Century Remnant

Lord Monckton is my heeerrooo

"Yeah, well, fuck them. I never said I liked the Moros." - Shroom Man 777
User avatar
White Haven
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6360
Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by White Haven »

Simply put, 'foreign policy' is a two-way street. The US exerts huge amount of influence world-wide, and 'can we work with this person?' is a perfectly valid and important question for non-US citizens to ask. If the answer is overwhelmingly 'no,' then military force becomes more and more attractive for the US, simply on the 'when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail' concept. I think we've seen enough of that recently to be fed up with it.

Plus, the US has been fucking up the numbers in recent years, so I don't think it's unreasonable to listen to the targets and bystanders of our screwups abroad what they think about who's best to reverse that trend.
Image
Image
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'

Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Darth Wong »

Count Chocula wrote:Why would what the rest of the world thinks influence the American voter?
If the average American voter were not a complete imbecile, he would recognize that if the rest of the world hates McCain, then we should take the oft-repeated "foreign policy is McCain's strength" line as the bullshit that it is. It's pretty hard to say that you're the guy who can best work with other nations if the people of those other nations hate you.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Crown
NARF
Posts: 10615
Joined: 2002-07-11 11:45am
Location: In Transit ...

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Crown »

Darth Wong wrote:
Count Chocula wrote:Why would what the rest of the world thinks influence the American voter?
If the average American voter were not a complete imbecile, he would recognize that if the rest of the world hates McCain, then we should take the oft-repeated "foreign policy is McCain's strength" line as the bullshit that it is. It's pretty hard to say that you're the guy who can best work with other nations if the people of those other nations hate you.
Can I post a; 'LoL Pwnd!' post here without getting reprimanded given my history on this board?

Half serious, but honestly that was the most concise and logical post that I happen to agree 100% with.
Image
Η ζωή, η ζωή εδω τελειώνει!
"Science is one cold-hearted bitch with a 14" strap-on" - Masuka 'Dexter'
"Angela is not the woman you think she is Gabriel, she's done terrible things"
"So have I, and I'm going to do them all to you." - Sylar to Arthur 'Heroes'
User avatar
Hotfoot
Avatar of Confusion
Posts: 5835
Joined: 2002-10-12 04:38pm
Location: Peace River: Badlands, Terra Nova Winter 1936
Contact:

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Hotfoot »

Darth Wong wrote:
Count Chocula wrote:Why would what the rest of the world thinks influence the American voter?
If the average American voter were not a complete imbecile, he would recognize that if the rest of the world hates McCain, then we should take the oft-repeated "foreign policy is McCain's strength" line as the bullshit that it is. It's pretty hard to say that you're the guy who can best work with other nations if the people of those other nations hate you.
Mike, Mike, don't you understand? They like Obama because they'll be able to push him around. I mean he's already stated that he's willing to sit down across the table with terrorists without preconditions. That's not surprising, given that he is a terrorist himself, but that's besides the point. They don't like McCain because he is good at foreign policy. He's tough on other countries in serving the best interests of America. He's so tough he won't even sit down with Spain without preconditions. That's showing the world he means business and he don't take crap from no one. Not like that stinking commie Obama. Of course, you'd love commie pinko bastards like that, wouldn't you, you Canukistani prick?

Damn Canukistani bastard. Don't you have a sickle to add to your Maple Leaf?

Sincerely,
Joe
Do not meddle in the affairs of insomniacs, for they are cranky and can do things to you while you sleep.
Image
The Realm of Confusion
"Every time you talk about Teal'c, I keep imagining Thor's ass. Thank you very much for that, you fucking fucker." -Marcao
SG-14: Because in some cases, "Recon" means "Blow up a fucking planet or die trying."
SilCore Wiki! Come take a look!
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Thanas »

^I have had that argument flung in my face everytime I use the "Obama is more popular" study. It's become something of a mantra for the right that being good on foreign policy means "screw the rest".
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
White Haven
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6360
Joined: 2004-05-17 03:14pm
Location: The North Remembers, When It Can Be Bothered

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by White Haven »

Sigh, these people need to learn the great advantage of talking to your enemies; if the talks go poorly and the other party ends up hating you. you haven't lost anything.
Image
Image
Chronological Incontinence: Time warps around the poster. The thread topic winks out of existence and reappears in 1d10 posts.

Out of Context Theatre, this week starring Darth Nostril.
-'If you really want to fuck with these idiots tell them that there is a vaccine for chemtrails.'

Fiction!: The Final War (Bolo/Lovecraft) (Ch 7 9/15/11), Living (D&D, Complete)Image
Dave B.
Redshirt
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-10-22 10:49am
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Dave B. »

Darth Wong wrote:
Count Chocula wrote:Why would what the rest of the world thinks influence the American voter?
If the average American voter were not a complete imbecile, he would recognize that if the rest of the world hates McCain, then we should take the oft-repeated "foreign policy is McCain's strength" line as the bullshit that it is. It's pretty hard to say that you're the guy who can best work with other nations if the people of those other nations hate you.
Foreign Policy is McCain's strength?!?! What a bunch of hooey!

http://www.nysun.com/national/mccains-f ... dth/72988/
WASHINGTON — Like no other candidate, Senator McCain has linked his campaign for president to an unpopular war — and to a lifelong focus on foreign issues that many voters ignore.

Mr. McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone, became famous as a Vietnam prisoner of war and has spent his long Senate career traveling to more foreign countries than most people could even name.

He makes his eighth trip to Iraq this weekend, a visit sure to get a lot of attention. But his weeklong overseas trip also includes Israel, Britain, and France — all countries where he's made many visits.

A defiant supporter of the 2003 invasion and President Bush's troop increase last year, Mr. McCain is likely to focus in Iraq on the drop in sectarian violence and American and civilian casualties since last summer.

His own situation has changed strikingly, too, since then. Now he's the Republican presidential nominee-in-waiting.

Last April, as Mr. McCain's chances for winning the nomination seemed uncertain, the four-term Arizona senator toured a Baghdad marketplace, hailing the progress even though he was protected by three Black Hawk helicopters, two Apache gunships and 100 U.S. troops.

He was widely ridiculed as being out of touch.

As he returns, a new Pentagon study shows sectarian violence down 90% and American and civilian casualties down 70% since last July.

Last December, nearly two-thirds of Americans said they opposed the war, including nearly a third of Republicans and nearly all Democrats, according to an Associated Press-Yahoo News poll. Opinions on the war have remained basically steady.

However, a poll released Friday by NBC News and The Wall Street Journal said about 35% of those questioned think Mr. McCain has the right approach for Iraq, compared with 30% for Senator Clinton and 27% for Senator Obama.

Mr. McCain calls the fight against Islamic extremism the "transcendent challenge of the 21st century."

"I've made it abundantly clear that I would much rather lose a campaign than a war," he said this week in New Hampshire.

The one may be tied to the other.

Says a foreign policy analyst at the Brookings Institution, Michael O'Hanlon: "I have a hard time seeing how he wins if Iraq falls apart between now and November, and I have a hard time seeing how the Democrats use Iraq against him over that time if things continue to improve."

As Democrats Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama fight over which of them has the credentials to be the next commander in chief, Mr. McCain offers a much lengthier foreign policy and military resume.

Now 71, he was born in the Canal Zone, where his father, a naval officer, was stationed. A graduate of the Naval Academy, Mr. McCain flew in Vietnam and was a prisoner of war for more than five years. In the Senate, he is the senior Republican on the Armed Services Committee.

He has visited every region of the world, including Antarctica and the Arctic Circle, and frequently meets with leaders of the countries to which he's traveled, both when he visits their countries and when they visit the United States.

Mr. McCain has been across the world so many times that aides named off the tops of their heads some 69 countries he's visited — including Azerbaijan, Estonia, Laos, and Palau — and warned the list was far from exhaustive.

Aides say he keeps up to speed on the politics and policies of many nations — a passion he regularly displays to reporters traveling with him — and understands the long-term ramifications of having well-established personal relationships with foreign leaders.

He makes it a point to meet with up-and-comers, too. Aides say he met Angela Merkel at a Munich conference several years ago before she became German chancellor. In summer 2004, Mr. McCain met at a restaurant with Viktor Yushchenko before the Orange Revolution when he was elected Ukrainian president.

Next week, Mr. McCain is expected to meet with Prime Minister Brown of Britain for the first time, and President Sarkozy of France for the third time. He met and corresponded with Mr. Sarkozy both before and after he was elected. The two last saw each other last summer.

Mr. McCain has relationships with every leader in Israel he plans to see, including Prime Minister Olmert, the foreign minister, Tzipi Livni, the defense minister, Ehud Barak, and the hawkish opposition leader, Benjamin Netanyahu.

The senator last met with Prime Minister al-Maliki of Iraq last Thanksgiving, and he's also gotten to know other members of the Iraqi government.

He returns with two of his chief presidential supporters, Senators Lieberman, an Independent of Connecticut, and Graham, a Republican of South Carolina, but he insists it is a fact-finding venture, not a campaign photo opportunity.

"There's nothing like being on the ground," he said. Mentioning a mountainous area in northwestern Pakistan, he added, "I went to Waziristan once and it gave me a much better understanding of how difficult it is to get Osama bin Laden."

The Brookings analyst who says he's a Democrat, Mr. O'Hanlon, says Mr. McCain has shown a more realistic vision than Mr. Bush about the number of troops needed to succeed in Iraq, as well as the problems that were likely to be encountered after the invasion.

"What that tells me in terms of future policy is McCain may be willing to stay the course, so to speak, in terms of future difficulties, but also assess if the strategy is really working or not," Mr. O'Hanlon said.

A former Bush administration aide who now runs the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Jon Alterman, notes that Bush's father spoke of "the vision thing."

"This president has always been strong on the vision thing, even when the implementation is lacking. I don't think John McCain is enamored with the vision thing. He talks about the task and focuses on the task. It's just a different orientation," Mr. Alterman said.

"The straight talk express is not often associated with diplomacy," he said. "But the advantage of it is you know what you're getting. And it may be that he's able to form quite valuable relationships precisely because of his bluntness."
Or better yet.... forget about the bipartisan efforts to normalize relations with Viet Nam.... the AP lies!!!!

http://asianweek.com/2001_10_12/biz_viet1.html
Congress completed work on an agreement normalizing trade between the United States and Vietnam, and President Bush is expected to sign the measure.

The Senate’s 88-12 vote on Oct. 3 “represents an important step in the healing process” between the two former enemies, said the Senate Finance Committee chairman, Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., “a step that has been a long time in coming.”

The House endorsed the measure last month, and Bush said he would sign it.

The trade agreement, negotiated by the Clinton administration last year, “will provide American companies with access to a large and growing market, and, through the reforms it promotes, will help create a more prosperous and engaged Vietnam,” Bush said in a statement after the Senate vote.

Vietnam would benefit from the same low tariffs the United States sets for its other trading partners. In return, Vietnam is to reduce its tariffs, eliminate non-tariff barriers, protect intellectual property rights and open its markets to American service and investment companies.

The United States and Vietnam had no formal relations and limited contacts in the two decades after U.S. troops left Vietnam in 1973. In 1994, President Clinton lifted the trade embargo and the next year he established diplomatic relations. In 1998, he issued the first waiver making commercial deals with Vietnam eligible for U.S. government loans and credit guarantees.

But Vietnam has remained one of only six nations denied normal trade relations, subjecting Vietnamese goods to far higher tariffs. The other countries are Afghanistan, Cuba, North Korea, Laos and former Yugoslavia.

Vietnam is the world’s 14th-most-populous nation, with 80 million people, but trade with the United States was only about $1.2 billion last year. Estimates are that Vietnam’s exports to the United States, mainly shrimp, coffee and light manufactured goods, could more than double with normal trade relations.

Opposition to the deal came mainly from lawmakers who asserted that Vietnam has not fully cooperated in accounting for MIAs from the Vietnam War and should not be entitled to normal trade because of its poor human rights record.

“If those who want to normalize relations with Vietnam choose to ignore the numerous human rights violations of that country, is that right?” asked Sen. Bob Smith, R-N.H.

Concerns were also raised by Mississippi Delta senators, who said the agreement lacked protections for the catfish industry. Vietnamese imports, said Sen. Tim Hutchinson, R-Ark., are “absolutely destroying our domestic catfish industry.”

Leading the effort to normalize ties with Vietnam were three senators who served in the Vietnam War: Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., Chuck Hagel, R-Neb., and John McCain, R-Ariz., a former prisoner of war.

Because Vietnam is a communist state, its normal trade status will still be subject to annual review, requiring the president to waive the requirement that Vietnam allow free emigration.

Vietnam’s prime minister initiated the ratification process in Vietnam by sending the trade agreement to President Tran Duc Long.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Darth Wong »

Dave B. wrote:Foreign Policy is McCain's strength?!?! What a bunch of hooey!

http://www.nysun.com/national/mccains-f ... dth/72988/
Wow, you found an editorial that agrees with you!

Listing the number of countries McCain has visited is like listing the number of people a cop has dealt with. It doesn't really tell you much about whether he's a good cop.

Citing Iraq as an example of his good judgment doesn't get you much when he claimed (prior to the invasion) that it would not be difficult or take a long time: he was wrong on both counts. If the success of the so-called "Surge" (which should be more accurately called the "Bribe") counts in his favour, then surely his horrible prior judgment call on the entire war should count against him.

And quoting his own aides talking about his good judgment is, well, just laughable. The man spouted sabre-rattling bullshit about Russia because he personally liked the Georgian president. That is not good judgment; that is a knee-jerking moron.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Dave B.
Redshirt
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-10-22 10:49am
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Dave B. »

Darth Wong wrote:Wow, you found an editorial that agrees with you!

Listing the number of countries McCain has visited is like listing the number of people a cop has dealt with. It doesn't really tell you much about whether he's a good cop.

Citing Iraq as an example of his good judgment doesn't get you much when he claimed (prior to the invasion) that it would not be difficult or take a long time: he was wrong on both counts. If the success of the so-called "Surge" (which should be more accurately called the "Bribe") counts in his favour, then surely his horrible prior judgment call on the entire war should count against him.

And quoting his own aides talking about his good judgment is, well, just laughable. The man spouted sabre-rattling bullshit about Russia because he personally liked the Georgian president. That is not good judgment; that is a knee-jerking moron.
Meh... you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who would agree to the notion that invading Iraq was a good idea. I think at this point that it's important to focus on what we're going to do in regards to leaving Iraq and the way we're going to leave it. As a person who has traveled Iraq extensively from 2005 to this past February, you're not going to convice me that the effects of the "surge" has been anything less than remarkable. I would like to know how you interpreted the surge as a "bribe". This isn't making much sense to me and you don't really explain yourself. In regards to Georgia, I fail to see what that has to do with anything. You have an enormous country invade a country with a democratically elected government. Everyone, including McCain and Obama, gave Russia a lot of shit for it. The fact that he likes the president of Georgia would seem to be on the back burner regarding this issue at hand. A lot of world leaders like each other. Should it have been Poland rather than Georgia, do you think you would have seen the same reaction from John McCain or anyone else for that matter? Or is that more politicized fodder?
User avatar
The Spartan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4406
Joined: 2005-03-12 05:56pm
Location: Houston

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by The Spartan »

Dave B. wrote:I would like to know how you interpreted the surge as a "bribe". This isn't making much sense to me and you don't really explain yourself.
Because the reason the militias and what not stopped attacking often was not that we had more troops in the country it's because we paid them not to. There was also the ethnic cleansing of various neighborhoods that helped contribute to the apparent success.
The Gentleman from Texas abstains. Discourteously.
Image
PRFYNAFBTFC-Vice Admiral: MFS Masturbating Walrus :: Omine subtilite Odobenus rosmarus masturbari
Soy un perdedor.
"WHO POOPED IN A NORMAL ROOM?!"-Commander William T. Riker
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

Dave B. wrote:Meh... you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who would agree to the notion that invading Iraq was a good idea. I think at this point that it's important to focus on what we're going to do in regards to leaving Iraq and the way we're going to leave it.
What an pathetic attempt to change the goalposts. You disputed his assessment of McCain's foriegn policy credentials with a lame-ass linking to someone who agreed with you, and when the factual claims were refuted and his laughable "surge" talking-point exposed as without credibility, you just are like, "uh, it doesn't matter if you thought it was a good idea" even though McCain's entire claim is that he knows better what is going to happen and what to do.
Dave B. wrote:As a person who has traveled Iraq extensively from 2005 to this past February, you're not going to convice me that the effects of the "surge" has been anything less than remarkable.
The entire stated purpose of the surge was to create security where a political reconciliation and progress could be made. The Iraqi government has failed that objective, with this year Shiite factions feuding amongst each other (specifically, the Iranian-backed Shiite government against Shiite Iraqi nationalists like Muqtada al Sadr; what political progress has been made has been Iran's, not ours). They cannot complete a budget. They cannot renew the force authorization that expires this year, and which our Secretary of Defense has admitted is a major problem. The surge's stated goals have not been met. It was not sold on the basis of "well, it'll continue to be a logjammed government of a failed state, but fewer people will die every month, but we'll keep throwing billions of dollars down the memory hole and pray it changes". This is exactly what the opposition to the Surge suspected, that the neoconservatives are keeping with their pollyanna interpretations of Middle Eastern politics, and if only we can slow the bleeding they will just spontaneously come together like some Disney film. We cannot force them to come together.
Dave B. wrote:I would like to know how you interpreted the surge as a "bribe". This isn't making much sense to me and you don't really explain yourself.
We paid off these Sunni Awakening councils.
Dave B. wrote:In regards to Georgia, I fail to see what that has to do with anything. You have an enormous country invade a country with a democratically elected government.
Yeah, the U.S. has never done that. Nope, not ever. Anyway, so what? Why is the United States obligated to spend treasure, soft power, diplomatic leverage, and its reputation on every local dispute worldwide? Even if Georgia was worth standing up for, we did it stupidly, by emboldening a moron of a president to engage in a ill-thought out war and despite the fact that there was very little probability for Georgia to ever recover Akhbazia and South Ossetia.
Dave B. wrote:Everyone, including McCain and Obama, gave Russia a lot of shit for it. The fact that he likes the president of Georgia would seem to be on the back burner regarding this issue at hand. A lot of world leaders like each other. Should it have been Poland rather than Georgia, do you think you would have seen the same reaction from John McCain or anyone else for that matter? Or is that more politicized fodder?
The point is that this not an example of McCain credibility on foreign policy, because he is substituting personal relationships and moral profundity and foreign policy idealism over America's best interests and prudent posturing.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Samuel »

You need to capitalize QUOTE so that the system recognizes it. Otherwise we just get normal text.

Just out of curiosity, did the article say which was the most pro-Obama country and which was the least?
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7956
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by ray245 »

Kenya or Indonesia I suppose, both nations claim to have a closer understanding of Obama.

For those that don't support Obama...if I remember correctly, it should be Georgia.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
BountyHunterSAx
Padawan Learner
Posts: 401
Joined: 2007-10-09 11:20pm

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by BountyHunterSAx »

White Haven wrote:Sigh, these people need to learn the great advantage of talking to your enemies; if the talks go poorly and the other party ends up hating you. you haven't lost anything.
I'm not much for politics, but I was under the impression that there were repercussions from having a failed peace talk. Particularly in the case of a terrorist organization, doesn't it give them legitimacy that they otherwise wouldn't have? Not that I'm arguing against it in this specific case; I'd say it does more good than it could do harm - but to say you lose nothing from it?

-AHMAD

PS: Ray, throughout the topic you break up your posts with 1/2 sentences per line. Could you please start typing in normal paragraphs, it's actually quite distracting and annoying to follow.
"Wallahu a'lam"
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by SirNitram »

I must admit, the 'negotiate with terrorist organization' thing comes out of left field. What?
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
Samuel
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4750
Joined: 2008-10-23 11:36am

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Samuel »

I believe they are referring to Iran.
Dave B.
Redshirt
Posts: 17
Joined: 2008-10-22 10:49am
Location: Arlington, VA

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Dave B. »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:What an pathetic attempt to change the goalposts. You disputed his assessment of McCain's foriegn policy credentials with a lame-ass linking to someone who agreed with you, and when the factual claims were refuted and his laughable "surge" talking-point exposed as without credibility, you just are like, "uh, it doesn't matter if you thought it was a good idea" even though McCain's entire claim is that he knows better what is going to happen and what to do.
I hadn't changed anything. Just because McCain was all for going to war doesn't mean that I felt the same way. Way to generalize! But in regards to the exit strategy, I'm going to say that the surge was a great idea and I think it's important to have some foresight because we obviously don't want to be caught off guard should the current status shift. Which is also why the immediate withdrawl from Iraq could possibly be catastrophic for their country. There a lot of things I like about Barack Obama. But his ideas and his "experience" regarding military matters are not something I'm willing to bet on. Now, if he has a kick ass SECDEF, my opinion on that matter would change significantly.

Illuminatus Primus wrote:The entire stated purpose of the surge was to create security where a political reconciliation and progress could be made. The Iraqi government has failed that objective, with this year Shiite factions feuding amongst each other (specifically, the Iranian-backed Shiite government against Shiite Iraqi nationalists like Muqtada al Sadr; what political progress has been made has been Iran's, not ours). They cannot complete a budget. They cannot renew the force authorization that expires this year, and which our Secretary of Defense has admitted is a major problem. The surge's stated goals have not been met. It was not sold on the basis of "well, it'll continue to be a logjammed government of a failed state, but fewer people will die every month, but we'll keep throwing billions of dollars down the memory hole and pray it changes". This is exactly what the opposition to the Surge suspected, that the neoconservatives are keeping with their pollyanna interpretations of Middle Eastern politics, and if only we can slow the bleeding they will just spontaneously come together like some Disney film. We cannot force them to come together.
I agree with some of the points that you've made here... well at least those which are regurgitated quotes. What's likely to happen is the UN mandate is going to be extended and they'll have more time to debate the SOFA issue. 17 of the 18 benchmarks set forth for the government has been met. The last being the SOFA issue. The economy is growing significantly. I hope you're aware of this... but the Iranians and the Iraqis have hated each other for awhile now. They even had a war in the 1980s!! Can you believe that?
Illuminatus Primus wrote:We paid off these Sunni Awakening councils.
You mean like the way we paid off the Japanese and the Germans to rebuild their economies? Or like the way we paid off Wall Street to get us out of this financial mess that we are currently in? You're absolutely delusional if you think money doesn't have to be passed between two parties when working through a crisis.
Illuminatus Primus wrote:Yeah, the U.S. has never done that. Nope, not ever. Anyway, so what? Why is the United States obligated to spend treasure, soft power, diplomatic leverage, and its reputation on every local dispute worldwide? Even if Georgia was worth standing up for, we did it stupidly, by emboldening a moron of a president to engage in a ill-thought out war and despite the fact that there was very little probability for Georgia to ever recover Akhbazia and South Ossetia.
Invaded a country with a democratically elected government in fairly recent history? Hmmm... I'm pretty sure that you're not refering to Iraq or Afghanistan.... you're definitely not refering to the Balkans.. possibly Grenada? But then again, the Grenadians celebrate the invasion every 25th of October and our actions there were justified according to the Grenadians. I know we've gone to the defense of other countries so I wouldn't necessarily classify it as an invasion...you know.. like ROK and Vietnam... you're going to have to educate me as to what country with a democratically elected government that we invaded. I also would like to know with your all knowing supreme intellect exactly how publicly condemning another nations actions will embolden the president of Georgia to do.. well.. anything. If they want to fight the Russians. Let them fight the Russians. Last time I checked, we're not.
User avatar
SirNitram
Rest in Peace, Black Mage
Posts: 28367
Joined: 2002-07-03 04:48pm
Location: Somewhere between nowhere and everywhere

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by SirNitram »

Samuel wrote:I believe they are referring to Iran.
I was gonna guess Hamas, but in either case that's pure crack-smoking stupidity. Iran is not a terrorist organization, it is in fact a country, and has been for some time. Hamas even qualifies as a 'foreign government' now, thanks to the US' insistance on democratic elections in the Palestinian Territories.
Manic Progressive: A liberal who violently swings from anger at politicos to despondency over them.

Out Of Context theatre: Ron Paul has repeatedly said he's not a racist. - Destructinator XIII on why Ron Paul isn't racist.

Shadowy Overlord - BMs/Black Mage Monkey - BOTM/Jetfire - Cybertron's Finest/General Miscreant/ASVS/Supermoderator Emeritus

Debator Classification: Trollhunter
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: The world chose Obama

Post by Darth Wong »

Dave B. wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:And quoting his own aides talking about his good judgment is, well, just laughable. The man spouted sabre-rattling bullshit about Russia because he personally liked the Georgian president. That is not good judgment; that is a knee-jerking moron.
Meh... you'd be hard pressed to find anyone who would agree to the notion that invading Iraq was a good idea.
Today, yes. What matters is who thought it was a fantastic idea in 2002. Any idiot can have good judgment six years after the fact. If McCain's vaunted military and foreign-affairs judgment is so good, then he should have shown this good judgment in 2002, before the invasion. But he didn't. In fact, he made preposterous statements that flew in the face of what more knowledgeable people were saying.
I think at this point that it's important to focus on what we're going to do in regards to leaving Iraq and the way we're going to leave it.
Nice try. We're talking about McCain's lousy judgment, using his cheerleading for the Iraq War as an example, and you try to change the subject to recommendations for the future of Iraq.
As a person who has traveled Iraq extensively from 2005 to this past February, you're not going to convice me that the effects of the "surge" has been anything less than remarkable. I would like to know how you interpreted the surge as a "bribe". This isn't making much sense to me and you don't really explain yourself.
So you've done all that traveling and you don't know that the Americans have been paying off the Sunni insurgents? The same ones they were fighting a few years ago?
In regards to Georgia, I fail to see what that has to do with anything.
It has to do with McCain's poor judgment.
You have an enormous country invade a country with a democratically elected government. Everyone, including McCain and Obama, gave Russia a lot of shit for it.
McCain's rhetoric was more inflammatory.
The fact that he likes the president of Georgia would seem to be on the back burner regarding this issue at hand.
It should be, but given the fact that he rushed to a press conference without even knowing what happened, I have to ask what he was basing his opinion on then, if it wasn't his friendship with the guy.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Post Reply