Anyway, I'm back to work. My intardnet has been cut off at the office due to one technical reason or another, so see you all in the evening

Well, this could be all amicably solved by Q....PeZook wrote:Talk about lashing out...this may cause a breakup of the SNC.
Anyway, I'm back to work. My intardnet has been cut off at the office due to one technical reason or another, so see you all in the evening
I do operate PzH 2000s and T-80UM in the reserve.Karmic Knight wrote:On a completely different note, is anyone selling T-72s at reasonable prices? or PzH 2000s?
Well, not with ‘no consequences’... ‘Negligible consequences’ though is fine!Shroom Man 777 wrote:Can we have Mushroom Marines kill some San Doradoans without any consequences whatsoever now?
Alright, thanks. Phew, for a moment there I was worriedStas Bush wrote:Hardly. The Titan-II is pretty feasible, it's a 1962 design.
Hmm, okay, but it stretches credibility to immediately pick the best rocket family to modernize over the coming decades. I guess I'll just have to switch to another rocket design somewhere down the line. For now though Titan suits my purposes rather well, so that's fine by me.The Titan is a good design (though Delta or Atlas could be a better choice for the long term, since we know that it's modernization limit vs. lift capacity is higher than that of the Titan family).
Sure, we'll launch anything with very few questions asked, and at a very nice price! And we don't have any nosy neighbours either... That goes for Zoria, Byzantium, and anybody else looking to launch some satellites too, by the way: We really do see space as the future of Big Business, so we'll do our darned best to push Camp Kittyhawk into becoming the biggest commercial spaceport in the world. We've got the rockets, we're well-positioned, we're not so picky about our customers, we've got the infrastructure, we don't ask many questions, and we'll take all major credit cardsShroom Man 777 wrote:Siege, I'll pay you awesome moneys to launch my motherfucking ShroomStrats. It's not for science, so it's probably not FASTA priority. But it's for monies!
See, this is why the FUN is awesome. Everyone else is insane.Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Yes.PeZook wrote:Jesus christ, did Stas just plonk OD satellites?
And I'm going neutral.
Shroom Man 777 wrote:See, this is why the FUN is awesome. Everyone else is insane.Fingolfin_Noldor wrote:Yes.PeZook wrote:Jesus christ, did Stas just plonk OD satellites?
And I'm going neutral.
Coming from me, that means a lot too!
What???????????PeZook wrote:Talk about lashing out...this may cause a breakup of the SNC.
The 'first sign of trouble'? Are you frickin' kidding me? Have you paid attention to how your ally typically reacts to crises? He sends fleets to overthrow local governments if he feels they're not steadfast enough, conducts large-scale bombardments of foreign port cities if he feels a national government hasn't done enough to keep his citizens out of slavery, and shoots the crap out of satellite constellations when he feels... Yes, what precisely? "They may have other stuff up there too"?DarthShady wrote:What???????????
Mang I'm disappointed.![]()
What's the point of our alliance if at the first sign of trouble you react like that?
No. I mean, christ, nobody clued in onto the "Special Type" 26" tubes; considering that trick is so old; it was used by the Japs in 1939 onwards to designate their 18" guns as Special Type 16" guns.erik_t wrote:I know you read Shep's posts. Did you actually think about them?
What he said.MKSheppard wrote:IPresident Stanislav.
Well, there's always the other STGOD game to play.SiegeTank wrote:You people make me sick. *Runs off to cry on Shroom's shoulder*
For the record I think your ambassador to the FUN conference is fairly batshit insane too. Really. That however is an entirely different story, one which I hope to reveal to you shortly!Shroom Man 777 wrote:See, this is why the FUN is awesome. Everyone else is insane.
Coming from me, that means a lot too!
I see what Shepistan aspires to beMKSheppard wrote:IPresident Stanislav.
How would you feel when the CSR shoots up 100 Orbital Bombardment Warheads and lets them spin over the world, each able to go down on your head right on demand - but calls them, say "communication satellites"? There are no treaties banning either OBS or FOBS in this world.SiegeTank wrote:Yes, what precisely? "They may have other stuff up there too"?