I find this unlikely. Cameron specifically stated that the reason for switching from titanium-based alloys to tantalum-based alloys is heat resistance. The melting point of titanium is 1668°C, but the melting point of tantalum is 3017 °C. Tantalum is about 50% stronger than titanium by cross-sectional area, but it is four times as dense, so solid tantalum would be a little over a third as strong as titanium in weight-constrained applications (which terminators almost certainly are). Normal coltan is mostly tantalum; but in theory terminators could use the other main component instead; niobium has a melting point of 2477 °C, is about twice as dense as titanium and is slighly weaker by volume, only slightly better than tantalum at a significant loss in heat resistance.Lancer wrote:Losing a major stockpile of coltan to make hyperalloy with and making use of a substitute would explain why the recent batch of Terminators have been observed to be physically inferior to Cameron and the early T-888's (Cromartie, Carter, and Vick).
Of course terminators are not made out of elemental metal, they are made out of sophisticated (quite likely nanostructured) alloys, but based on my limited understanding of materials science I think the basic point stands. Skynet almost certainly made the switch in order to resist plasma weapons fire and the skeletal strength is either lower (for conventional alloys) or equivalent (e.g. if the metal just provides a bulk filler for a carbon nanotube composite).
Finally while this is relevant to the 'punch power cell out of chest' scene, it probably isn't relevant to cameron's fight with the other terminator. Any physical weakness there seemed to be in the joints and actuators, not in the main skeletal structure or armoring.