Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Abnett instead comes up with: wirewolves;
Warpcraft golems. Sorcerous creatures are a dime a dozen in 40k. Simply creating one type is hardly radical.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:whatever those things in His Last Command were;
You mean the re-worked Imperial Guardsmen? I hate to break it to you but that's hardly something surprising; the mutants from the Lost and the Damned list could easily fit the bill. He put a sort-of zombies in a space-age horror franchise. Again hardly anything radical.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:brass thief entities that existed before/separately from daemons;
You mean the daemon? There's nothing new about that. The brass thief was unusual, for 40k fiction, for predating the rise of the four major Chaos Powers but that's nothing too radical. We know that the warps been around from the beginning of time and has been littered since the beginning with such random creations. How is an old daemon particularly new? Heck, if you want to get nit-picky the daemon-lord from Hereticus is probably more canon breaking.
Nothing terribly radical for 40k and actually pretty common for WHFB fluff. If anything, just a logical extension of the fluff.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:blood pact;
Lost and the Damned list. He did put a stamp on things by creating a Chaos army that's not Chaos Marines or hordes of rampaging idiots. But that's one of those things that really ought to have been taken for granted in the fluff. We've heard of major defections of the Imperial Army/Guard since the days of the Horus Heresy. Why should they be limited to screaming maniacs?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:loxotl;
Admittedly freaky and admittedly Abnett's creation. But there's always been the understanding that there are a lot of nasty aliens out there. It's been part of the fluff from day one that there are hostile (or indifferent) alien species out there. Why not show them when you have the chance in a long running series?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Enuncia;
Ritual warpcraft. There's nothing new about the concept and the application isn't exactly that different from that of a whole lot of horror movies. It's a new creation but nothing that should be jarring.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:a daemon prince with chaos spaceship (that worked in real space!) who apparently predated Chaos;
Again, Chaos is incredibly ancient. The first of the entities were probably created by the wars of the first sapient species, the Old Ones and C'tan. Why should an ancient survivor come as a surprise, especially since we see the tomb of one in Hereticus?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Megarachnids;
Freaky freaky aliens. Neither new nor unexpected. The Great Crusade put foot to ass of a lot of species. Why is the depiction of one such race, especially with the classics not being around, something especially new?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Omegon;
Freaky freaky aliens?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:psykers with 'mutant abilities';
How so? They've been established for a long time to have wide-ranging abilities. Through in the fact that many of the are chaos dabblers and it's a pretty normal thing.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:stalk tanks, etc, etc.
Chaos has weird war-machines and they were created around the time of VDR. Why not have some chaos equipment that isn't a mirror image/rip off of Imperial tech?
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Many of these things fill a role that has already been filled by canonical entities or ideas. Many apparently exist as common chaotic creatures that are somehow isolated only in the Sabbat worlds, despite the nature of chaos.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:What has Sandy Mitchell made up, besides the occasional humorous reference?
The shadowlight for one. Working machinery from the Old Ones. Which may have played a part in spawning Chaos itself. And has a planetoid of Necrons watching it.
Pile on top of that the fact that Alex Stewart has done a huge amount with the culture of the Imperium, being one of the first to actually show 40ks pop-culture not least. The whole notion of Ciaphas Cain rests on something which is a huge break from the norm in 40k in general. There's a fair amount of world building and he's definitely put a stamp on things. Stewart may not have done as much as Abnett but he's done some rather far reaching things.
Bob the Gunslinger wrote:Now, I don't think it interferes with Abnett's writing too much (although Ravenor started to feel more like an X-Men novel than Warhammer), or with the setting, but it can be a frustrating habit for a reader who wants to have consistency.
True but consistency can also be the bane of creativity. Why should everything have to come from a source book? Why should the universe be stifled? Nothing he'd one has been exactly been setting breaking. Many of them are really things already implicit in the setting, either ignored or simply not explored previously.
Abnett contributed a lot because he was one of the early writers and is certainly the most prolific. With that in mind, it's not surprise what so ever that he created a lot. Why shouldn't he have?