Moderator: Edi
Shut upAlex Moon wrote:You've got a fundy gf huh?Exonerate wrote:No... In fact, I'm a teen myself. I'm there as part of my obligations to a certain organization I will not mention here...Robert Treder wrote:Obviously, this guy's a nutjob...but what I want to know is why the hell you were at one of these "teen" boards. Are you a masochist, Exonerate?
*shakes head* The things men will do for pussy...
Oh dont worry I know a freshman(sure he is a prick) that was fucking a senior(though, this senior is a very good friend of mine, and was nearly my sister considering our parents where engaged for a while, so my opinion of him isnt exactly high)Exonerate wrote:Releasing all that pent up tension
Seriously, I'm too young though. Maybe in a couple years
Didn't Iggy do something similar?Alyrium Denryle wrote:Oh dont worry I know a freshman(sure he is a prick) that was fucking a senior(though, this senior is a very good friend of mine, and was nearly my sister considering our parents where engaged for a while, so my opinion of him isnt exactly high)Exonerate wrote:Releasing all that pent up tension
Seriously, I'm too young though. Maybe in a couple years
one time is too many, lmao. I find it's true bout the fundy chicks tho. . .Alex Moon wrote:Bah, just find yourself a nice older woman whose hubby don't give her enough.Exonerate wrote:Releasing all that pent up tension
Seriously, I'm too young though. Maybe in a couple years
That's when everyone opens fire at once. If everyone conncentrates their firepower on one issue I'm sure it'll burn through their censor shields. Then we keep firing till it's a smoldering hole right through their hull. Then their arguments will go out the window (or rather the hull breach) and we can knock up another victory!Exonerate wrote:Grr... They probably censored all the posts. Only 3 got through.
I smell a story. Spill. Now.Enforcer Talen wrote:one time is too many, lmao. I find it's true bout the fundy chicks tho. . .Alex Moon wrote:Bah, just find yourself a nice older woman whose hubby don't give her enough.Exonerate wrote:Releasing all that pent up tension
Seriously, I'm too young though. Maybe in a couple years
Probably they are afraid of being gay themselves. I can remove the genetic defects from people who are gay, yet a homophobe... With a fucking machete...Alex Moon wrote:I doubt that would do anything. Most of these people have a hatred of homosexuality that stems from something far deeper than a simple mistranslation in their holy texts.The Dark wrote:*Sigh* Someone needs to teach Creed to read Greek. The oldest manuscripts don't say homosexual. It was a mistranslation in the KJV that somehow has persisted for the last ~300 years.
I wasn't necessarily postulating that homosexuality was beneficial from a purely evolutionary perspective, but rather that homosexuals could have fulfilled a useful role in early societal organizations. It would be broadly similiar in this case to a post-laydown society in which the people who'd been rendered sterile by radiation effects would be given the most dangerous tasks, regardless of gender. Our ancestors, after all, were as intelligent as we were, and the solution to every problem was not necessarily applied brutality.Darth Wong wrote:There is no need to postulate that bisexuality or homosexuality is beneficial from an evolutionary perspective. Evolution, unlike Christianity, is NOT a worldview. It is a scientific theory: nothing more and nothing less. If something is not advantageous from an evolutionary standpoint, that does not make it immoral.
It is disadvantageous from an evolutionary standpoint to find ways of treating genetic disease (as opposed to simply letting the victims die off). Does that mean it's immoral? Of course not. So there is no fucking reason to bring up the "purpose" of sex or imagined evolutionary advantages/justifications in order to refute their bullshit claims about homosexuality being a sin.
Like far too many Biblical "sin", it is victimless, hence not a sin. So the homophobes can just go fuck off.
