[VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

A failed experiment whereby board users were invited to advise the Senate, and instead attempted to replace the Senate.
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Ghost Rider »

Just a couple points.

1. Two moderators because History is a low maintinence forum. The reason for three and four are for places that in past attracted flames and still do. Same reason a couple have only one and barely need that.

2. The choice to become a moderator has more to do whether the person is actually doing what the admins see for moderation, with the bonus being that they have knowledge in the subject. Simply having knowledge would make the moderation landscape look far fucking different to be honest.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7955
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by ray245 »

Ghost Rider wrote:Just a couple points.

1. Two moderators because History is a low maintinence forum. The reason for three and four are for places that in past attracted flames and still do. Same reason a couple have only one and barely need that.

2. The choice to become a moderator has more to do whether the person is actually doing what the admins see for moderation, with the bonus being that they have knowledge in the subject. Simply having knowledge would make the moderation landscape look far fucking different to be honest.
Seconded. One of the few people who really moderated my post is Thanas and Stark. Both of them has help me by cutting down the amount of stupid stuff I posted.

Moreover, through their moderation, I have actually learned quite a lot from them.
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Thanas »

I was originally going to recuse myself from this topic, but I think I have to clarify a few things.
Lonestar wrote:Well, when I think of "History nuts" on this board, Shep, Zeon, and Stas come to mind(and Skimmer as well). I didn't even know who Thanas was when I saw the half-started recent match.
With respect, but you must not have wandered into any topic about History up to the eighteenth century if you did not know who I was.

Enigma wrote:
Thanas wrote:It was definitely intentional.
Care to explain? Your response alone to me sounds like an intentional jab.
I was running low on time so I just posted that response. It was not meant to be a jab or anything, just a clarification. Your insinuation is pretty insulting.

That said, let me state the following:

I am sorry if anybody feels that I am not qualified to do the job. Although I will not go into any great detail, let me state that I am in fact a university-educated historian who holds university degrees in both history and law and who is currently active in the field as well.

I want to make the following things as clear as possible:

- I was asked if I wanted the job
- At no time did I ask anyone on the staff to disregard the vote in the HoC
- Although I was not privy to the discussion, I am pretty sure this was not a snub at Shep, but as other people have already said an attempt to balance the skillset of the forum moderators

Shep, I am sorry if you feel cheated or if you are hurt right now. Please believe me when I say this was not my intention at all when I accepted the offer. I do believe you to be one of the best posters in the History forum and please do not let the fact that you did not get to be a mod deter you from posting. I value your posts and I would miss them dearly.

Finally, I will try to be as fair a mod as possible and both Stas and I will always be available via PM if anybody has any questions about our moderation of the forum.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Big Phil »

Thanas, to be blunt, you were asked to moderate by those in charge, and the whining of those not in charge is irrelevant. I look at the list of HoC nominations for Senator and I just shake my head, thankful this board isn't a democracy.

If I were you I'd just ignore everyone and do my job
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Thanas »

SancheztheWhaler wrote:If I were you I'd just ignore everyone and do my job
Oh, I'll certainly won't let anyone dictate my actions. But I think Shep deserved an explanation.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Pablo Sanchez
Commissar
Posts: 6998
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:41pm
Location: The Wasteland

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Pablo Sanchez »

Me wrote:Raw knowledge of history or your own personal familiarity with the candidate?
Lonestar wrote:Well, when I think of "History nuts" on this board, Shep, Zeon, and Stas come to mind(and Skimmer as well). I didn't even know who Thanas was when I saw the half-started recent match.
I think I'm answered.
But as long as we're talking about educational background being important(forgetting for the moment that the historical method isn't unknown to Shep, he goes out to college campuses and research centers on his own to look up archival stuff),
I wasn't suggesting that Shep doesn't know history, I was pointing out that Thanas is at least as knowledgeable with respect to his own field.
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Enigma »

Thanas wrote:I was originally going to recuse myself from this topic, but I think I have to clarify a few things.
Lonestar wrote:Well, when I think of "History nuts" on this board, Shep, Zeon, and Stas come to mind(and Skimmer as well). I didn't even know who Thanas was when I saw the half-started recent match.
With respect, but you must not have wandered into any topic about History up to the eighteenth century if you did not know who I was.

Enigma wrote:
Thanas wrote:It was definitely intentional.
Care to explain? Your response alone to me sounds like an intentional jab.
I was running low on time so I just posted that response. It was not meant to be a jab or anything, just a clarification. Your insinuation is pretty insulting.
You didn't explain yourself and thus your reply was open to interpretation. If you posted something like "It was the admins\super mods\whatever's decision to go that route."

Instead, to me at least, those four words you used could easily been interpreted as being a jab.

Personally I have nothing against you being one of the History mods and I bet you'll do well, it is just that reply didn't sit well with me. No hard feelings eh? :)
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Coyote »

It's been pointed out before, but I mentioned in the polls I ran that the results were going to be seen as suggestions for the Admin staff to consider, and that other factors (which may or may not be obvious) will influence their decisions.

I don't think think there's any doubt that Shep would be an excellent History mod; but for the purposes of the Admins, Thanas appeared to be the better choice. We're well past the point where Shep needs to "prove something" to anyone.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Darth Wong »

I think we need to clarify something about the House of Commons and the Senate. The reason for their existence is that we had a longstanding moratorium on people complaining about board policy, because so many trolls did that, especially in the early history of the board.

However, this meant there was no way for people to voice criticism or feedback, so the idea was to create forums specifically for people to do just that. And in the case of the Senate, votes were considered binding unless I personally intervened, which I am generally reluctant to do.

As for Shep not getting the History mod spot, I'll go on record saying that I think he would have been a fine choice since he did a good job in other similar positions. However, I was absent when the decision was made and at the moment I'm not sure how it was made.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
AdmiralKanos
Lex Animata
Lex Animata
Posts: 2648
Joined: 2002-07-02 11:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by AdmiralKanos »

Update: some of you may have noticed that I added Shep to the moderator list for the History forum. This was NOT done as a slight to Thanas or Stas Bush in any way, nor was it a comment on the stability of the History forum or a negative comment on the job they've done so far. It was mostly done because I didn't think it would do any harm, because Shep wanted to help, and because he's been reliable in the past on such matters. Please do not read anything deeper into it.
For a time, I considered sparing your wretched little planet Cybertron.
But now, you shall witnesss ... its dismemberment!

Image
"This is what happens when you use trivia napkins for research material"- Sea Skimmer on "Pearl Harbour".
"Do you work out? Your hands are so strong! Especially the right one!"- spoken to Bud Bundy
User avatar
Flagg
CUNTS FOR EYES!
Posts: 12797
Joined: 2005-06-09 09:56pm
Location: Hell. In The Room Right Next to Reagan. He's Fucking Bonzo. No, wait... Bonzo's fucking HIM.

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Flagg »

Congrats Shep!
We pissing our pants yet?
-Negan

You got your shittin' pants on? Because you’re about to
Shit. Your. Pants!
-Negan

He who can,
does; he who cannot, teaches.
-George Bernard Shaw
User avatar
Rogue 9
Scrapping TIEs since 1997
Posts: 18678
Joined: 2003-11-12 01:10pm
Location: Classified
Contact:

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by Rogue 9 »

Congratulations, Shep.

For those who may have concerns: Back when I ran a general discussion board (it died a couple years ago after Librium Arcana moved to its own server, but that's neither here nor there), I made Shep a moderator over the Politics forum, which is of course a more volatile subject than history. I was told I was nuts, but he never once abused his power or gave me any reason to doubt my decision. I have every confidence that he'll do his job well.

And I know that means jack shit to most of you. I just thought I'd add my vote of confidence.
It's Rogue, not Rouge!

HAB | KotL | VRWC/ELC/CDA | TRotR | The Anti-Confederate | Sluggite | Gamer | Blogger | Staff Reporter | Student | Musician
User avatar
The Duchess of Zeon
Gözde
Posts: 14566
Joined: 2002-09-18 01:06am
Location: Exiled in the Pale of Settlement.

Re: [VOTING] History Forum Moderation.

Post by The Duchess of Zeon »

Yeah, Shep's a good mod; he moderated the fanfics section at DS.com just fine when I was running that board, without ever having a problem, and I do trust him. Hell, if I started my own board again, I'd invite Shep back to that position, except that he refuses to talk to me right now.
The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- Wikipedia's No Original Research policy page.

In 1966 the Soviets find something on the dark side of the Moon. In 2104 they come back. -- Red Banner / White Star, a nBSG continuation story. Updated to Chapter 4.0 -- 14 January 2013.
Locked