Maths Question.

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
bobalot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Maths Question.

Post by bobalot »

Is it possible to get a distance set a over period of time from a acceleration vs velocity graph?

The graph looks like this:

Image

If I had the numbers for acceleration and velocity for that graph, is it actually possible to get a distance over lets say 30 seconds?
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi

"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant

"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai

Join SDN on Discord
User avatar
CaptainZoidberg
Padawan Learner
Posts: 497
Joined: 2008-05-24 12:05pm
Location: Worcester Polytechnic
Contact:

Re: Maths Question.

Post by CaptainZoidberg »

Do you have the actual function for that graph (as opposed to just the numbers). If so, you just have a differential equation:

dv/dt = f(v)

which you could solve by hand with laplace transforms, or with a TI-89 or maple

If you just have the data, then I think that you can solve the problem with eigenvectors, where you basically represent your differential equation

v' = f(v)

as:

Av = cv

where A is the matrix that has your data in it, and c is a constant that you compute as you solve the problem. I'm a little sketchy on the details of this method...
Last edited by CaptainZoidberg on 2009-01-10 09:08pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Jaepheth
Jedi Master
Posts: 1055
Joined: 2004-03-18 02:13am
Location: between epsilon and zero

Re: Maths Question.

Post by Jaepheth »

If you have a function A(v) that gives the acceleration for any given speed v, and an initial speed at time = 0, then You can probably convert it to a speed vs time graph and get your distance traveled from that.
Children of the Ancients
I'm sorry, but the number you have dialed is imaginary. Please rotate the phone by 90 degrees and try again.
User avatar
bobalot
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: 2008-05-21 06:42am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Maths Question.

Post by bobalot »

CaptainZoidberg wrote:Do you have the actual function for that graph (as opposed to just the numbers). If so, you just have a differential equation:

dv/dt = f(v)

which you could solve by hand with laplace transforms, or with a TI-89 or maple

If you just have the data, then I think that you can solve the problem with eigenvectors, where you basically represent your differential equation

v' = f(v)

as:

Av = cv

where A is the matrix that has your data in it, and c is a constant that you compute as you solve the problem. I'm a little sketchy on the details of this method...
Unfortunately I only have the data. It's actual field data. I do remember how to do laplace transforms, I have really forgotten matrices, eigen vectors and all that stuff. I will have to dig up my old notes on it.
"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi

"Problem is, while the Germans have had many mea culpas and quite painfully dealt with their history, the South is still hellbent on painting themselves as the real victims. It gives them a special place in the history of assholes" - Covenant

"Over three million died fighting for the emperor, but when the war was over he pretended it was not his responsibility. What kind of man does that?'' - Saburo Sakai

Join SDN on Discord
User avatar
Kuroneko
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: 2003-03-13 03:10am
Location: Fréchet space
Contact:

Re: Maths Question.

Post by Kuroneko »

Assuming dv/dt = A(v), then since dv/dt = [dx/dt][dv/dx] = v dv/dx, substition v dv/A(v) = dx, and therefore x = x₀ + Int_{v₀}^{v}[ ν dν/A(ν) ]. On the other hand, integrating without the substition gives t = t₀ + Int_{v₀}^{v}[ dν/A(ν) ], which for any particular t one can numerically solve for the velocity.
"The fool saith in his heart that there is no empty set. But if that were so, then the set of all such sets would be empty, and hence it would be the empty set." -- Wesley Salmon
User avatar
CaptainZoidberg
Padawan Learner
Posts: 497
Joined: 2008-05-24 12:05pm
Location: Worcester Polytechnic
Contact:

Re: Maths Question.

Post by CaptainZoidberg »

Hmm... Nice work Kuroneko. Do you by any chance know what the name is for that method?
User avatar
Steel
Jedi Master
Posts: 1122
Joined: 2005-12-09 03:49pm
Location: Cambridge

Re: Maths Question.

Post by Steel »

The key bit of this is the a=vdv/dx substitution. That's a pretty standard thing in dynamics, I don't think it is important enough to have a name. The rest is just rearranging.
Apparently nobody can see you without a signature.
Post Reply