FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

View threads from the forum's history which have been deemed important, noteworthy, or which do a good job of covering frequently raised issues.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Kanastrous wrote:Never seems to work. Whenever someone burbles at me about their 'miraculous' recovery, I always ask what about all the similarly afflicted people, for whom there was no 'miracle?' Does God just *like* you, better than them? and am invariably rewarded with a blank stare, a few seconds' silence, then the burble resumes.
I know, it's just supremely irritating.

Anyway, here's an antidote to that mentality:

From The Times Online:
January 16, 2009

Airmanship, not miracle, saved US Airways jet in New York

Charles Bremner

Image

After air crashes, everyone usually jumps to conclusions and gets the story wrong. This is unlikely to be the case with US Airways Flight 1549, the Airbus which ditched in the Hudson River just off Manhattan's west side. The facts seem straightforward and the credit goes to extraordinary old-fashioned airmanship.

The flying world is full of admiration for the pilots who put a big, all-electronic airliner, down so softly on water that it stayed in one piece. Bored passengers are used to briefings on the "unlikely event of water landings", but in reality, big planes more often break up and sink quickly, killing many of their occupants.

Along with his first officer, Captain Chesley Sullenberger achieved a text-book 'dead stick' landing only three minutes after hitting a flock of birds as their Airbus A320 was was climbing low over northern New York City. I can imagine the picture well because I used to pilot light aircraft along the same low path over the George Washington Bridge and down the Hudson beside Manhattan.

Praise is also going to the three cabin crew who organised the evacuation of the 155 passengers. And there is credit for the French-based European Airbus firm for building a tough airliner. Among other things, unlike Boeings, the Airbus has an emergency "Ditch button", which closes vents and makes the fuselage more watertight. Airbus pilots have always been sceptical about the button, on the overhead panel. Today, they are saying today "Oh, so that's what it's for."

Here is what is known about an episode that will go down in flying lore. We do not know if Sullenberger or his co-pilot was flying the leg when the the Airbus left La Guardia, a difficult airport on the water's edge inside the borough of Queens. They were at 3,200 feet in the climb when they reported hitting large birds. These stopped one engine and severely dropped the power or killed the other one. When that happens, there is no-where to go but down.

At that moment, the aeroplane driver is no longer a systems manager. He or she has to forget the electronics and call on the most old-fashioned aviator's skills. A Dutch airline captain called Denkraai decribed it on the PRUNE pilots' network this morning: "What a nightmare. We sit there in our cockpits for years and years and nothing goes wrong. Then all of a sudden you have seconds to decide. I salute you sir, and your crew."

Image

The US Airways plane had the good fortune to be under the command of an old-style stick-and-rudder pilot. Sullenberger, 58, is a former USAF fighter pilot and a man who lives for flying. He has 19,000 hours and among other things, he is also a glider instructor and he runs a company that advises on safety systems and crew procedures.

The pilots had two or three airports in potential gliding range, but from only 3,200 feet they could only glide a handful of miles, depending on the wind. Simply turning 90 degrees would cost them more than 1,000 feet. Captain Sullenberger decided that they would probably not be able to make Teterboro, the small airport on the New Jersey side of the Hudson (where I used to land). Everywhere is built-up and on the left were the dense high rise towers of Manhattan. The alternatives would have been trying to land on a highway or turn down the Hudson. Putting an airliner down at some 140 knots on busy roads would have been lethal so they chose the very long wet runway to their left.

The two pilots would have been flat out running through emergency procedures and configuring the plane for landing -- with flaps down to slow it, but wheels up (they only hinder in water). Just for the information, the plane can glide 2.5 nautical miles per 1,000 feet at an average descent rate of about 1,600 feet per minute. That meant that they had about two minutes once both engines were out.

When the "Fly-by-wire" A320 was first introduced in the 1980s, pilots dreaded the prospect of a powerless glide. Nothing physical connects them to the hydraulically-operated control surfaces on the wings and tail. The computers send their manual commands from a little side-stick and rudder pedals to the machinery. But the power apparently worked fine as they slowed the airliner on its glide. If both engines were completely dead, the juice would have come from the batteries and a Ram Air Turbine (a windmill that opens into the slipstream but is not much use at slow speeds). Perhaps they managed to start the Auxiliary Power Unit, the noisy internal turbine that normally provides power on the ground.

The computer's anti-stall system would have helped Captain Sullenberger slow the plane to the maximum. Flying by the seat of his pants, he would have flared it like a much smaller plane, pulling its nose up to let it settle in the edge of a stall at about 130 mph onto the water. Making things worse was a 10 knot tail-wind. At that speed water is like concrete. One of the motors and perhaps both, sheered off their pylons under the wings, as they are designed to do in a crash. That prevented the plane breaking. A passenger described the impact as no worse than a rear-end car collision.

Image

Very few airliners have remained intact after ditching. Two exceptions were a Japan Airlines DC-8 [above] which came down off San Francisco airport in November 1968. It was recovered and flew on for years. Another involved an Arabian registered Boeing 707 cargo jet in Africa in 2000. The most famous airliner ditching occurred in November 1996 when an Ethiopian Airlines Boeing was hijacked and came down off the Comoros islands [video below]. The plane, which had run out of fuel, caught a wing-tip and cartwheeled as it put down on a rough sea. Out of 175 on board, 50 survived.
Interesting that the aircraft pictured above was refurbished and continued to fly! I guess such water landings don't always result in a write-off after all. More interesting is that Boeings don't have the "ditch" button, according to this writer.
Image
User avatar
AMT
Jedi Knight
Posts: 865
Joined: 2008-11-21 12:26pm

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by AMT »

While annoyed that I couldn't fly back home for Charlotte for a day because of this (I was apparently supposed to be on the same plane for my flight back home at 6-ish pm after our regional office training) I am supremely gladdened to see that the worst complaint to be had due to this crash is the fact my flight was delayed.
Capt. Sullenberger and your first officer, my hats off to you.

Something tells me the pair of them will be getting a lot of christmas cards and gifts for the rest of their lives.
User avatar
Lonestar
Keeper of the Schwartz
Posts: 13321
Joined: 2003-02-13 03:21pm
Location: The Bay Area

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Lonestar »

Broomstick wrote:Graphic of the flight path:

Image

Reports are that the pilot considered Teterboro, and the graphic might make it appear he could have made it, but you have to recall that the area is full of very tall buildings and the aircraft was unable to climb. The Hudson river offered a VERY long "runway" with no buildings. The pilot clearly took the choice that presented the fewest potential causalities in the event he couldn't make a successful landing, and managed to resolve the problems without any loss of life.
The arrangement of the runways at Teterboro seem to preclude a landing there, and even if they didn't he still made the right decision in being "safe"(for the citizens below) and landing in the Hudson.
"The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own. Naturally, it may be used by evil men for evil purposes, but there are more good men than evil, and while the latter cannot be persuaded to the path of righteousness by propaganda, they can certainly be corrected by good men with rifles."
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Imperial Overlord »

On a lighter note, I think we have some BAMF award winners here.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Broomstick »

Someone supposedly got a picture of it coming in over the Hudson:

Image

Wonder if anyone got the touchdown?
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Kanastrous »

There's video of the plane flying toward the river, but so far no footage of the actual landing.

I'm mildly surprised that PETA hasn't yet gotten people out there to bemoan the loss of the ingested birds, and insist that we give up commercial aviation, in order to protect them.
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Enigma »

Kanastrous wrote:There's video of the plane flying toward the river, but so far no footage of the actual landing.

I'm mildly surprised that PETA hasn't yet gotten people out there to bemoan the loss of the ingested birds, and insist that we give up commercial aviation, in order to protect them.
"Will someone think of the air kittens!" :)
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
TempestSong
Youngling
Posts: 67
Joined: 2008-12-29 05:26pm

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by TempestSong »

Kanastrous wrote:I'm mildly surprised that PETA hasn't yet gotten people out there to bemoan the loss of the ingested birds, and insist that we give up commercial aviation, in order to protect them.
The media would shit all over them. Literally. Even O'Reilly was like "if a lawyer tries to make a case out of this, we'll bring them to attention here!"
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Skylon »

Broomstick wrote:
Reports are that the pilot considered Teterboro, and the graphic might make it appear he could have made it, but you have to recall that the area is full of very tall buildings and the aircraft was unable to climb. The Hudson river offered a VERY long "runway" with no buildings. The pilot clearly took the choice that presented the fewest potential causalities in the event he couldn't make a successful landing, and managed to resolve the problems without any loss of life.
Nor does the graphic indicate anything about factors like wind direction.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

I'd really like to see a picture of that bad boy skimming over the George Washington Bridge. THAT makes for a memorable commute.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
User avatar
Mayabird
Storytime!
Posts: 5970
Joined: 2003-11-26 04:31pm
Location: IA > GA

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Mayabird »

A video of the landing. Doesn't say specifically but it was probably taken by a security camera.
DPDarkPrimus is my boyfriend!

SDNW4 Nation: The Refuge And, on Nova Terra, Al-Stan the Totally and Completely Honest and Legitimate Weapons Dealer and Used Starship Salesman slept on a bed made of money, with a blaster under his pillow and his sombrero pulled over his face. This is to say, he slept very well indeed.
Kanastrous
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6464
Joined: 2007-09-14 11:46pm
Location: SoCal

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Kanastrous »

They hit the water right by the pier from which my wife and I took one of those around-Manhattan water tours, last visit to NYC. The boat by the wreck (people flinging life jackets) looks just like the boat we rode, maybe is the same one...
I find myself endlessly fascinated by your career - Stark, in a fit of Nerd-Validation, November 3, 2011
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23337
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by LadyTevar »

Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
Julhelm
Jedi Master
Posts: 1468
Joined: 2003-01-28 12:03pm
Location: Brutopia
Contact:

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Julhelm »

Edi wrote:Truly impressive work from the pilot. That man is a hero.

The most memorable plane crash that I remember is the passenger jet that went down in Sweden sometime in the late 1980s. Crashed in the middle of the forest, fuselage broke into three parts and all told less than ten people out of more than 100 died. It was remarkable precisely because usually everyone dies in crashes like that and almost everyone got out of that one alive. The aerial pictures of the crash site they showed on the news here were pretty amazing. Sadly, I don't have time to Google the event from work.
If you're thinking of the Gottröra crash in '91, everybody on the plane survived.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: FLASH! US Airlines Flight 1549 Down In Hudson River

Post by Edi »

Julhelm wrote:
Edi wrote:Truly impressive work from the pilot. That man is a hero.

The most memorable plane crash that I remember is the passenger jet that went down in Sweden sometime in the late 1980s. Crashed in the middle of the forest, fuselage broke into three parts and all told less than ten people out of more than 100 died. It was remarkable precisely because usually everyone dies in crashes like that and almost everyone got out of that one alive. The aerial pictures of the crash site they showed on the news here were pretty amazing. Sadly, I don't have time to Google the event from work.
If you're thinking of the Gottröra crash in '91, everybody on the plane survived.
That's the one. Thanks, now I found something on it: Link to wikipedia article. I got the time period wrong, but I still remember the aerial view. I had a recollection that it was supposed to have been without fatalities, but wasn't sure, that's why the comment on less than ten dead. 0<10, so it's still right. ;)
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
Locked