Batman wrote:Wars (capital ship) shields ARE radically different in that they are orders of magnitude more powerful than SG shields.
Unfortunately, that really isn't that much of a factor unless you're argueing drones brute-force their way past SG-verse shield, they seem to side step them entirely (unless you have Ancient tech), otherwise you'd have the situation wherein a single drone is capable of overloading a capital ships shields.
Analogy, if I am tunneling to get out of prison, it doesn't matter if the surface wall is made out of marshmallow, brick, granite or iridium, I'm circumventing it, not punching through it.
Batman wrote:
I also don't think we've ever seen skintight ship shields when in Wars for most ships they seem to be the norm.
Onus to prove that drones would be able to penetrate Wars shields is on the people who claim they CAN. NecronLord is perfectly correct to point out that since most of the shields in the series are closely technologically related (and appear to behave in much the same way) to assume they can penetrate any other shields is preposterous, especially when you have no fucking clue as to how they did it.
See below partially, but also, given that the stated ability of drones is to go through shields, that's their given basis, it would actually be up to SW to prove that they
can't go through. We don't know how they did it, but there is no real reason to say that unknown method wouldn't work on SW shields, they might, they might not, but you can't say either way with much certainty except for taking the base position, which is they can.
NecronLord wrote:
And then there's the fact that I'm talking about physics; in SG, there is, as far as we know, one way to make an energy shield. It's logical to presume that any species' shields follow the same physical principles. It is not the same when dealing with a different setting; a (Doctor Who) Dalek's personal force shields and a (warhammer) refractor field. Though obviously, they're both close enough for a wheel to be a wheel and a hammer to be a hammer, they come from universes with different physics, presumably their more sophisticated technologies have different functions.
Actually in the SG-verse there are multiple shielding technologies:
-Asguard, Goa'uld and Human shields do not appear to need any significant activation time, and are not visible until they interact with something. These 'flare' with their own 'shield colour' and the weapon they are taking the impact of. Further, they have a uniform colour and appear to be classic 'bubble' shapes.
-Tok'ra and some Goa'uld shields (The ones SG-1 ran through) have an 'ice crystal' appearance, only seem to generate in vertical planes, have noticable deformation and take time to 'raise' (literally).
-Ancient shields are adjutable in geometry, appear to take time to 'raise' but constrict in to a central point. They have a largely uniform appearance (albeit clear distortion, no colour) and are always visible.
That's just the main races. Ori shields seemed to share some features of both Ancient and Asguard/Goa'uld/Human designs. In fact, the use of doors and/or 'Ice' shields in Goa'uld ships seems to indicate they are not using Ancient derived shields as they need two seperate technologies for their ships and corridors.
Stargate Nerd wrote:
You can correct me if I'm wrong but I've always been under the assumption that armor is stronger the denser the material used is and that organic matter doesn't match metal in durability. Based on that assumption I think it's safe to assume that drones that have trouble penetrating really thick self generating organic armor would be equally troubled when faced with a set of armor that has to be able to protect a Star Destroyer from 3 digit Gigatons and higher level weaponry for at least a short while.
Not quite, structure or the material matters a great deal when it comes to strength, 50g of iron stretched over 1.3m would not resist a 10kg point load in the middle, 50g of balsa wood can if you build it into a requisite structure, but iron is 'stronger' than balsa. Furthermore, compounds are often greater than the sum of their parts anda lot of 'organic' stuff is compounds. Also, diamond is not a metal, but is in some ways stronger than any metal, yet all diamond is is structured carbon, which can also make pencil lead.
Moreover, drones have displayed little compunction in going straight through Naquadah, which when used in Goa'uld ships is a very dense metal several metres thick.
NecronLord wrote:
Aside from the crystals they use,
Actually radically different, the Goa'uld use crystals that look like natural quartz, the Ancients largely use crystals that are clearly artifically shaped for ease of use, the only Goa'uld to use those kind was Anubis, no real surprise there. You could argue both are using crystal tech, but then you could argue on the same basis that a Roman sword and an M1 Abrams use 'metal tech' and are therefore comparable.
NecronLord wrote:
and the transporter rings,
Granted, but that was specifically stated to have been nicked from Ancient sites.
NecronLord wrote:
and the fact that the knowledge of the ancients lets a character open the hood of a tel'tak and start modifying it proficiently, and hell, that he knows what the power cell of a staff weapon would be capable of...
The Ancient's supposedly discovered secrets of the universe, having that knowledge probably would let you understand
any tech you came across. A person with a degree in modern mechanics can still make a simple steam engine or hand pump work, knowledge of far superior technology gives you easy use of less advanced tech.