T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Thanas »

Source
Dollhouse averaged 4.72 million and a 2.0/6 (rating share) among 18-49 year olds in its serues premiere. Things weren’t as pretty for Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles: 3.71 million and a 1.4/5 with the 18-49 crowd.
The Friday time period premiere of TERMINATOR: THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES opened the night with a 1.3/5 at 8p, ranking No. 3 in its hour among Adults 18-49 and Adults 18-34 and No. 1 among Men 18-49/18-34.
At 9p, the series premiere of DOLLHOUSE increased to a 2.0/6 among Adults 18-49, ranking No. 2 in its time period among Adults 18-49 and Adults 18-34 and No. 1 among Male demos. DOLLHOUSE built upon its 8p lead-in by +54% among Adults 18-49 (2.0/6 vs. 1.3/5), by +55% among Adults 18-34 (1.7/6 vs. 1.1/4) and by +27% among Total Viewers (4.7 vs. 3.7 Mil.) while delivering FOX’s highest rated Friday series premiere in over four years (since 1/14/05, Jonny Zero) among Adults 18-49 and Adults 18-34.

The series debut of DOLLHOUSE also out-delivered FOX’s prior season average in the Friday 9p hour by +25% among Adults 18-49 (2.0/6 vs. 1.6/5) and by +21% among Adults 18-34 (1.7/6 vs. 1.4/5). Finally, DOLLHOUSE was the highest rated Friday FOX entertainment telecast of the broadcast season among Adults 18-49.


Friday night deathslot indeed. Unless both shows improve on the next week, I bet both will be pulled/cancelled soon.

Oh, and a :finger: to FOX, who only started promoting both shows two weeks before the premier, with one ad that was so bad it made third-grade horror movies look good.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Big Orange »

Ugh, don't get me started with American television networks, the most institutionally incompetent and inbred media outlets in Christendom. :banghead:
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
PREDATOR490
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2006-03-13 08:04am
Location: Scotland

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by PREDATOR490 »

I realise a few people have gotten to like T:SCC quite a bit and will not like to hear this but realistically, T:SCC's has been rather poor.

Granted, it dosent justify the rather obvious sabotage attempts against it but I find that merely the questionable means to an end.

The Terminator franchise just dosent strike me as suitable for turning into any kind of decent series. The time travel concept is far too complex and the budget constraints of trying to maintain the same kind of high action effects as the movies stick this series in a really difficult position.
Much as I can sympathise with the appeal of Summer Glau, relying on her to pull a series along stinks of the same kind of ploy as Seven of Nine in ST Voyager.
If it is going to get canned, I would prefer it do so with some sense of decent dignity rather than become a shit fest like Voyager or go down hill like Andromeda did after season 2.

From what I have heard, the ending of Season 2 was written so that it can function as the end of the series if it does get cancelled rather than leave us with an unfinished story. Personnally, I would prefer it if they ended it like Angel did with 'Not Fade Away' but we will see I imagine.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Stark »

I don't know - from what I've read people like SCC not for it's Terminator links but due to it's complex and interesting drama.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Havok »

Why would a network put shows aimed at 18-49 year olds on Friday night, when 18-49 year olds are looking to do pretty much anything but stay in and watch TV?
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Thanas »

PREDATOR490 wrote:I realise a few people have gotten to like T:SCC quite a bit and will not like to hear this but realistically, T:SCC's has been rather poor.

Granted, it dosent justify the rather obvious sabotage attempts against it but I find that merely the questionable means to an end.

The Terminator franchise just dosent strike me as suitable for turning into any kind of decent series. The time travel concept is far too complex
Just because you do not understand it, does not mean that the series is a failure due to that.
and the budget constraints of trying to maintain the same kind of high action effects as the movies stick this series in a really difficult position.
Actually, they didn't have any budget problems so far. Of course, if you are preferring non-stop mindless actions like T3, then you better watch that movie.

Much as I can sympathise with the appeal of Summer Glau, relying on her to pull a series along stinks of the same kind of ploy as Seven of Nine in ST Voyager.
Please. You must have been watching a different show if you think she is the only reason people watch the show or that she is the only compelling character.

Stark nailed it - the show is rooted in the T1-2 movies, but that does not mean it has to be like them.

havokeff wrote:Why would a network put shows aimed at 18-49 year olds on Friday night, when 18-49 year olds are looking to do pretty much anything but stay in and watch TV?
Because Fox is Fox and looks for any reason to cancel Sci-Fi shows. Look at what happened to Dark Angel and Firefly.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Peptuck
Is Not A Moderator
Posts: 1487
Joined: 2007-07-09 12:22am

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Peptuck »

Here's to hoping that Fox is smart enough to recognize that the ratings hit is entirely normal for moving a show to this timeframe. Not much of a hope, but....
X-COM: Defending Earth by blasting the shit out of it.

Writers are people, and people are stupid. So, a large chunk of them have the IQ of beach pebbles. ~fgalkin

You're complaining that the story isn't the kind you like. That's like me bitching about the lack of ninjas in Robin Hood. ~CaptainChewbacca
User avatar
PREDATOR490
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2006-03-13 08:04am
Location: Scotland

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by PREDATOR490 »

Thanas wrote:
PREDATOR490 wrote:I realise a few people have gotten to like T:SCC quite a bit and will not like to hear this but realistically, T:SCC's has been rather poor.

Granted, it dosent justify the rather obvious sabotage attempts against it but I find that merely the questionable means to an end.

The Terminator franchise just dosent strike me as suitable for turning into any kind of decent series. The time travel concept is far too complex
Just because you do not understand it, does not mean that the series is a failure due to that.
I never said it was a failure due to that. I said it dosent make for a decent series.
The complex and convoluted nature of T:SCC may make it interesting but it also makes it off putting to people who arent interested in that.
Inorder to actually get it you have to watch the rest of it AND potentially the movies which makes late comers to the franchise lagging behind.

And the 'if you dont like it, dont watch it' - Well, if the series dosent get a good viewing = it gets canned so if people arent watching it for one reason or another then thats it.
Thanas wrote:
and the budget constraints of trying to maintain the same kind of high action effects as the movies stick this series in a really difficult position.
Actually, they didn't have any budget problems so far. Of course, if you are preferring non-stop mindless actions like T3, then you better watch that movie.
They have done well with the budget they have had but the low key scale of the series thus far hasnt brought that to light except in places like the CGI.
As the series goes on the pressure to get bigger and better scenes is going to increase with expectations of larger fights and this series has already been sent to the graveyard to die. Complex and convoluted apparantly arent doing well from Fox's perspective and they are the ones with the power.
Thanas wrote:
Much as I can sympathise with the appeal of Summer Glau, relying on her to pull a series along stinks of the same kind of ploy as Seven of Nine in ST Voyager.
Please. You must have been watching a different show if you think she is the only reason people watch the show or that she is the only compelling character.

Stark nailed it - the show is rooted in the T1-2 movies, but that does not mean it has to be like them.
I did not say it had to.
Summer Glau is by far the most noticable character in this series thus far with a fair amount of the screen time going to her. Not surprising since I have heard it mentioned the part was written specifically for her because the guy wanted to work with Summer Glau.
Regardless, the plot has remained the same as T1-2 and has reduced it to a watered down series version with terminator-of-the-week using time-travel of-the-week to kill-somebody-of-the-week. Very repetative already without going into even more seasons of it.
There has been nothing very inspirational or new in this series to define it and the action is not up to the level of the movies so that leaves it failing at being a self standing series and a suitable match up to the movies.
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Stark wrote:I don't know - from what I've read people like SCC not for it's Terminator links but due to it's complex and interesting drama.
How about both? I love the fact that they bothered with using T2-type phased plasma rifles for the future scenes, rather than going with T3 and using stock G36s for "future weapons lulz" crap.

Of course, technically the phased plasma guns they're using for the future scenes were used only by the Terminators - the Resistance used a whole different, smaller-looking plasma rifle.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
charlemagne
Jedi Knight
Posts: 924
Joined: 2008-10-13 02:28am
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by charlemagne »

This is awful, of course. Next to BSG T:SCC is the only interesting scifi-series on TV right now, and Fox killing it with stupidity or rather outright villainy is... well, unfair. It just makes me angry.

Also makes me wonder if Joss Whedon is actually really that stupid, or if he's cursed or something. I just cannot believe that Fox of all stations was the only one who'd work with Whedon. Why the hell would he make the same mistake as with Firefly again, trusting Fox as a reliable station to make his creation work?
Image
User avatar
Instant Sunrise
Jedi Knight
Posts: 945
Joined: 2005-05-31 02:10am
Location: El Pueblo de Nuestra Señora la Reina de los Angeles del Río de Porciúncula
Contact:

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Instant Sunrise »

charlemagne wrote:This is awful, of course. Next to BSG T:SCC is the only interesting scifi-series on TV right now, and Fox killing it with stupidity or rather outright villainy is... well, unfair. It just makes me angry.

Also makes me wonder if Joss Whedon is actually really that stupid, or if he's cursed or something. I just cannot believe that Fox of all stations was the only one who'd work with Whedon. Why the hell would he make the same mistake as with Firefly again, trusting Fox as a reliable station to make his creation work?
Dushku had a contractual obligation with Fox and she brought Whedon on board. Plus, the executive at Fox who was behind a lot of the high-profile cancellations (Arrested Development, Family Guy, Futurama, Firefly) has since been canned.
Hi, I'm Liz.
Image
SoS: NBA | GALE Force
Twitter
Tumblr
User avatar
charlemagne
Jedi Knight
Posts: 924
Joined: 2008-10-13 02:28am
Location: Regensburg, Germany

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by charlemagne »

Instant Sunrise wrote: Dushku had a contractual obligation with Fox and she brought Whedon on board.
Aaah right, I remember now reading about that a while ago.
Image
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by neoolong »

Wait, Fox contract, but Fox produced or Fox distributed? I could see this playing on something more niche. I think Sci-Fi is workable. They had a 1.0 average for 2008, and from what I read, 1.8 for the first half of Season 4 of BSG.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Thanas »

PREDATOR490 wrote:I never said it was a failure due to that. I said it dosent make for a decent series.
You do realize the quality of a series is determined on the level of storytelling?
The complex and convoluted nature of T:SCC may make it interesting but it also makes it off putting to people who arent interested in that.
Inorder to actually get it you have to watch the rest of it AND potentially the movies which makes late comers to the franchise lagging behind.
Nice, but none of that proves your claim that the show is not a decent series. In case you do not know it, decent is an indicator of quality. You might have meant "the concept does not make for good serialization".
They have done well with the budget they have had but the low key scale of the series thus far hasnt brought that to light except in places like the CGI.
As the series goes on the pressure to get bigger and better scenes is going to increase with expectations of larger fights and this series has already been sent to the graveyard to die. Complex and convoluted apparantly arent doing well from Fox's perspective and they are the ones with the power.
Did you miss the S1 finale? Please point out to me why there was not a huge fight in it? Plus, Weaver's rampage from the last episode would be quite at home in T2, methinks.

I did not say it had to.
Summer Glau is by far the most noticable character in this series thus far with a fair amount of the screen time going to her. Not surprising since I have heard it mentioned the part was written specifically for her because the guy wanted to work with Summer Glau.
Regardless, the plot has remained the same as T1-2
What? How can you say that?
and has reduced it to a watered down series version with terminator-of-the-week using time-travel of-the-week to kill-somebody-of-the-week. Very repetative already without going into even more seasons of it.
Yeah, how nice of you to ignore the numerous episodes in which a terminator of the week did not appear. Or in which it was not there to kill someone.
There has been nothing very inspirational or new in this series to define it and the action is not up to the level of the movies so that leaves it failing at being a self standing series and a suitable match up to the movies.
Really? I guess we are watching a different show then. "Nothing new" indeed.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Darth Hoth
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2319
Joined: 2008-02-15 09:36am

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by Darth Hoth »

While I have only watched Season 1 as yet of the SCC, I have to agree that that one, at least, was rather boring and repetitive. Does this change substantially as the series moves on?
"But there's no story past Episode VI, there's just no story. It's a certain story about Anakin Skywalker and once Anakin Skywalker dies, that's kind of the end of the story. There is no story about Luke Skywalker, I mean apart from the books."

-George "Evil" Lucas
User avatar
18-Till-I-Die
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7271
Joined: 2004-02-22 05:07am
Location: In your base, killing your d00ds...obviously

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by 18-Till-I-Die »

Most people probably do watch Sarah Conner Chronicles for Summer Glau and the off chance of a massacre. I really don't know where this "deep complex" story shit comes from, it's a stock standard storyline really. It's not boring or repetitive, at least not to me, it's just standardized. And yes the target viewer demo is supposed to think River Tam is TEH HAQWT because...well that's the point, now isn't it. Or else why not get a dude to play the role? Why not just have Kyle's brother instead, he would serve an almost identical purpose, and i think people know that.

If you doubt this look at the target audience mentioned above. 18 year olds? What on Earth do you think the point of hiring a hot waif girl to play what is supposed to be a hulking cyborg moster was other than to cater to teenagers. And for the most part i think it works, and will probably stay on the air.

As an aside i saw Dollhouse and i thought it was ok, not stunning but it was enjoyable. The plot seemed a little ad hoc and one would expect some more development, but really, again, lets all be honest with ourselves...what other possible point do you think the show has than to show Eliza Dushku dressed like a hot librarian or geisha or whatever.
Kanye West Saves.

Image
User avatar
PREDATOR490
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1790
Joined: 2006-03-13 08:04am
Location: Scotland

Re: T:SCC and Dollhouse ratings disappoint

Post by PREDATOR490 »

Thanas wrote:
The complex and convoluted nature of T:SCC may make it interesting but it also makes it off putting to people who arent interested in that.
Inorder to actually get it you have to watch the rest of it AND potentially the movies which makes late comers to the franchise lagging behind.
Nice, but none of that proves your claim that the show is not a decent series. In case you do not know it, decent is an indicator of quality. You might have meant "the concept does not make for good serialization".
The show is too dark, too complex and comes with a sizeable amount of baggage from the movies that has to be addressed. Nevermind the numerous threads that vanished from Season 1 to Season 2.
Granted, having complex and suspense works but when nearly every fucking episode raises more questions than it answers and leaves various things unrevealed in an already non-linear story between future / past / present and alternate futures / past and present. That is simply far too excessive and makes it hard to follow for very little benefit.
Having to wait years to finally undestand what the fuck is going on is not the kind of series >I< would consider decent.
Thanas wrote:
They have done well with the budget they have had but the low key scale of the series thus far hasnt brought that to light except in places like the CGI.
As the series goes on the pressure to get bigger and better scenes is going to increase with expectations of larger fights and this series has already been sent to the graveyard to die. Complex and convoluted apparantly arent doing well from Fox's perspective and they are the ones with the power.
Did you miss the S1 finale? Please point out to me why there was not a huge fight in it? Plus, Weaver's rampage from the last episode would be quite at home in T2, methinks.
Weaver's rampage was hardly impressive. The majority of it was off screen compared to the movies and the series has taken a rather limp wristed approach to the gore and violence.
As for 'huge fight' - They have had battles suitable for the SCALE of the show thus far but I find it unlikely they are going to be able to REALLY have large scale fights with plasma guns in the street like T3 or T2 Cyberdyne standoff with a minigun, do you honestly see this show doing this ?
Are we going to see the Connors and co. in other countries fighting HK drones over Big Ben etc. ?
Or is this series going to try and convey a world wide apocolypse against a Skynet machine that is in a war with all of humanity from sunny deserts and streets of LA ?
Like I said, the concept of the movies is an impending world wide war against machines with the fate of the world resting on every mission, not back alley brawls against random-terminators-of-the-week between scenes of Lena / Summer fan service and Connor's repetative whining.
At this point I find Weaver more compelling and hope she kills them all rather than bear the thought of having multiple seasons of Connor acting like Buffy.
Thanas wrote:
I did not say it had to.
Summer Glau is by far the most noticable character in this series thus far with a fair amount of the screen time going to her. Not surprising since I have heard it mentioned the part was written specifically for her because the guy wanted to work with Summer Glau.
Regardless, the plot has remained the same as T1-2
What? How can you say that?
The plot IS the fucking same as T1-T2, Skynet goes nuts - Judgement Day - John Connor is the saviour of humanity - Time travel attempts to alter the future and prevent Judgement Day.
The implementation may be the different but it is the same goal, unless your honestly going to tell me you see it likely the writers would do something as bold as John Connor getting killed or completely going against the movies depiction of the future. Otherwise, this series is pretty much doomed to a known end.
If this series continues, John Connor is going to end up the leader of the resistance and do all these wonderful things etc.
Albeit, with a lot of fucking whining inbetween at this rate and angst 'growing up crap'.
Thanas wrote:
and has reduced it to a watered down series version with terminator-of-the-week using time-travel of-the-week to kill-somebody-of-the-week. Very repetative already without going into even more seasons of it.
Yeah, how nice of you to ignore the numerous episodes in which a terminator of the week did not appear. Or in which it was not there to kill someone.
The movies depicted the use of time travel and Terminator missions as being something vital and epic in implmentation. This series treats it casually with wave after wave of characters coming back to carry out this and that. Not only does that weaken the idea that time travel is hard to accomplish it also makes the Terminators being slaughtered weaken the idea of them being something to be really afraid of.
Are we going to be subjected to more seasons of simply watching Action Barbie fighting the same battles against an endless line of T-888s. Are we actually going to start seeing T-Xs, T-101s. T-800s etc. ?
The fact that the series needs regular jumps from the future to keep the sense of 'danger' and 'suspense' going because they have nothing else to actually do with the series does not bode well for it.
It's not like we can have John Connor helping old ladies cross the street since at 'any moment' a Terminator could magically appear and gun him down or so the pacing and message of the series would convey. Hence, there is almost no room for fillers to break up the pacing and without a decent amount of stage setting they are going to find it hard to setup a present day villain to fight rather than rely on the future Skynet angle to keep the series going.
So far that is all they have done.

Thanas wrote:
There has been nothing very inspirational or new in this series to define it and the action is not up to the level of the movies so that leaves it failing at being a self standing series and a suitable match up to the movies.
Really? I guess we are watching a different show then. "Nothing new" indeed.
Oh I'm sorry, it's not like we havent seen mass murdering machines, liquid metal mass murdering machines, time travel, nuclear apocolypse and 'teaching the machine to be human' before, right ?
I do not consider adding a little bit of trivia or tacked on details like Derek Reese being the brother of Kyle very inspirational or new but if thats what you think. Suit yourself.

If or when this series actually decides to try something actually different from the movies wether it be breaking away from the established future ideals or upping the scale into being a proper 'fight for humanity' rather than 'fight for America with some other nationalities briefly mentioned' I might consider it original.
Post Reply