N&P Rules change purposal.

Moderator: CmdrWilkens

Locked
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: N&P Rules change purposal.

Post by Thanas »

I honestly do not see a problem with holding N&P to a higher standard per se. As such, I do not have a problem with required link dressing and source naming.

I do have a bit of a problem with the comments, thought. I mean, what quality improvement does a comment like "I am fucking enraged by this." serve?
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
Top
User avatar
Keevan_Colton
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10355
Joined: 2002-12-30 08:57pm
Location: In the Land of Logic and Reason, two doors down from Lilliput and across the road from Atlantis...
Contact:
Contact Keevan_Colton

Re: N&P Rules change purposal.

Post by Keevan_Colton »

Thanas wrote:I honestly do not see a problem with holding N&P to a higher standard per se. As such, I do not have a problem with required link dressing and source naming.

I do have a bit of a problem with the comments, thought. I mean, what quality improvement does a comment like "I am fucking enraged by this." serve?
I don't mind a requirement that sources be named or that links be dressed (though they auto dress now) it's the insistence on some sort of standardized stylesheet that be enforced on users that is the problem. So long as it's clear where something is from, we really don't need any more than that.
Top
Locked

Return to “Senate V1”