Ziggy Stardust wrote:Here is what
NASA is saying.
Why must this moonlet necessarily be the source of the G ring?
Astronomy.com has a good explanation for how it might be the source, but is it not just as possible that the ring came first, and the minimoon is a slowly accumulating mass of the matter in the ring (or maybe a meteor that got caught by gravity and ended up in the ring)? I know some people on these boards may know more about astronomy than I, so maybe they can answer this question.
Saturn's rings are unstable, and, as such, must have something to continuously provide dust to them, or else they would be gone by now (they've probably existed for most of the Solar System's history). There aren't enough random dust particles floating around out there to build the rings through dust capture, and such a process wouldn't form rings anyway. Therefore, something must be present to provide the dust for the rings (must of it is literally dust grain sized particles). This object fulfills that criterion, as it is big enough to have been shedding dust all this time. Ergo, it is almost certainly the source of the ring.
This moon is also not a recent capture/formation from a collision event, either. It's orbit is far, far too circular for that. The momentum shift due to a collision, or the dynamics of a gravitational capture would make the orbit extremely elliptical, and probably severely inclined to Saturn's equator. Since this object has both a nearly circular orbit, and orbits in the plane of Saturn's equator, it almost certainly formed at around the same time Saturn did, thus again making the most likely candidate for the G ring creator. Accretion within the rings is also not much of a factor, because the gravitational interactions between the extant moons and Saturn itself tend to keep the ring material relatively spread out, and moving in similar orbits, preventing large scale collisions.
In any case, the rings are not very massive, the G ring especially so (it isn't very bright, and thus has less stuff in it). They are only a few tens of meters thick in most places, and are not very dense. Which makes it all the more amazing that they are visible in even the most basic of amateur telescopes and binoculars (yes, I have seen them in 10x50's). The other outer planets' ring systems are generally very faint, though they do exist.