Hey Sovereign, you lying sack of shit ...

Faram · Post by **Faram** » 2003-02-05 06:01pm

Just a *BUMP*

So or new VI don't miss it!

generator_g1 · Post by **generator_g1** » 2003-02-05 08:24pm

Darth Wong wrote:In this thread, you claimed that the Enterprise fired on a 6 km high mountain and destroyed it with their phasers. Luckily, one of my Bothan spies provided screenshots of the event in question, and guess what: pictures don't lie, but you do:

Enterprise firing

Impact on what you describe as a "6 km high mountain"

Small wonder you repeatedly ignored my demands for screenshots, eh? No one in his right mind is going to see that and think "6 km high mountain". Worthless little fucktard bullshitter troll ...

That's not a mountain....it's just a little hill...

Macross · Post by **Macross** » 2003-02-05 09:29pm

Obviously you people have never seen an episode of 'Enterprise" if you had, you would realize that Captain Archer is the biggest idiot to ever wear a Starfleet Uniform... Nothing he says should ever be taken seriously.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-05 09:31pm

Macross wrote:Obviously you people have never seen an episode of 'Enterprise" if you had, you would realize that Captain Archer is the biggest idiot to ever wear a Starfleet Uniform... Nothing he says should ever be taken seriously.

Tell that to Sovereign.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-02-06 12:06am

If we neglect the trivial initial separation of the beams and assume an angle of 10 degrees of a straight line, The Enterprise would have to have been about 11,000 km away.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-06 06:54pm

Anyone who doesn't understand the most basic economics policy after TWO attempts to explain it is unlikely to understand how the angle of the weapons could affect the scaling of the "mountain." We may be wasting our time.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-02-06 07:26pm

I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-06 07:31pm

Durandal wrote:I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.

Everyone's said that. It's pretty laughable that Sovereign ignored it.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-06 10:13pm

Master of Ossus wrote:
Durandal wrote:I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.
Everyone's said that. It's pretty laughable that Sovereign ignored it.

No, its sad. But it was expected. Thats his entire M.O.

Lord Edam · Post by **Lord Edam** » 2003-02-07 04:14am

Durandal wrote:I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.

The trekkie who brought out a mountain but took home a hill

Gravity causes beams to beam. As such all your images demonstrate it that it is a *really* big hill with a *lot* of gravity.

Gil Hamilton · Post by **Gil Hamilton** » 2003-02-07 05:20am

Lord Edam wrote:
Durandal wrote:I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.
The trekkie who brought out a mountain but took home a hill

Gravity causes beams to beam. As such all your images demonstrate it that it is a *really* big hill with a *lot* of gravity.

Except that if the beams were effected by gravity, they'd be bent downward toward the center of gravity of the planetoid itself, not a mountain on top of it. Even so, gravity does not effect energy beams that dramatically, even a solar mass will only bend such a beam a tiny amount. A mountain on a planet would not cause energy beams to dramatically change directions as to make the beams converge.

I do hope you are joking, Edam, because I fail to see how someone could seriously put forth your argument.

Durandal · Post by **Durandal** » 2003-02-07 11:32am

Lord Edam wrote:
Durandal wrote:I forgot to mention that we have to neglect the fact that the beams are converging upon impact with the mountain.
The trekkie who brought out a mountain but took home a hill

Gravity causes beams to beam. As such all your images demonstrate it that it is a *really* big hill with a *lot* of gravity.

You've got to be joking. If it had a lot of gravity, it wouldn't be a hill; it would have smoothed itself out.

Slartibartfast · Post by **Slartibartfast** » 2003-02-08 03:14am

Ok Mr. Smelly Cheese. You need a gravity like that of a black hole to actually "beam a beam", so stop posting that kind of crap.

Attentively
Me

PS: don't be a dumbass shithead mothafucka. appreciated. thx.

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2003-03-15 07:24am

I apologize for resurrecting this thread but it seemed to be the most appropriate. I just wanted to add an additional imagine and hear everyones comments on it. Does this image reveal any new findings? Or should we still consider that "mountain" to be really just a large hill?

I've added the original two pictures for clarity.

Enterprise firing

Impact on what you describe as a "6 km high mountain"

Thanks to www.ditl.org for the the third capture.

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2003-03-15 12:47pm

I guess G.K. can be useful for something after all....

erm read portal incase of someone swallowing something very bad?

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2003-03-15 03:20pm

How does that third picture change anything? Is this moon supposed to be huge or something? And why don't we see the cliffs surrounding the hill in that shot?

Post by **NecronLord** » 2003-03-15 03:37pm

The scow is clearly meant to be firing into the crater. The only problem with that explosion's size? it's a) crap, in that the crater walls have vanished and b) there's nothing to measure it against. That moon could be smaller than Phobos.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-03-15 03:38pm

I don't see that this changes anything. That moon just appears to be tiny, now.

Sovereign · Post by **Sovereign** » 2003-03-15 04:18pm

If Chatting With Me Is Something Everyone Wants, I Do Have AOL.

UltraDodgeTom or
AlphaSquadron85

Luke Starkiller · Post by **Luke Starkiller** » 2003-03-15 04:28pm

Sovereign wrote:If Chatting With Me Is Something Everyone Wants, I Do Have AOL.

UltraDodgeTom or
AlphaSquadron85

Whoa, he's back.

Darth Garden Gnome · Post by **Darth Garden Gnome** » 2003-03-15 04:30pm

Luke Starkiller wrote:Whoa, he's back.

I doubt he ever left. He probably just lurks around until his name is mentioned, and then hides away when his arguments have been crushed.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-03-15 05:00pm

Sovereign wrote:If Chatting With Me Is Something Everyone Wants, I Do Have AOL.

UltraDodgeTom or
AlphaSquadron85

[Vader]You should not have come back.[/Vader]

Sovereign, I find the first account name of yours the most amusing, and fitting of your personality of dodging debates and pertinent information.

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2003-03-15 05:26pm

Darth Wong wrote:How does that third picture change anything? Is this moon supposed to be huge or something? And why don't we see the cliffs surrounding the hill in that shot?

I never said it was suppose to change anything. I suspected that it wouldn't change anything to begin with, but on the chance this would fill in a piece of missing information I posted it.

Thus the conclusion is it doesn't change anything. Okay, thank you everyone for your time.

Sovereign · Post by **Sovereign** » 2003-03-15 05:54pm

And Yet Still None Wants To Chat With Me

All Ya Got To Do Is D/L Free AIM and Type My Name In

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2003-03-15 05:57pm

Sovereign wrote:And Yet Still None Wants To Chat With Me

All Ya Got To Do Is D/L Free AIM and Type My Name In

Nobody wants to chat with you because nobody likes you.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Hey Sovereign, you lying sack of shit ...

Re: Hey Sovereign, you lying sack of shit ...

Re: Hey Sovereign, you lying sack of shit ...