Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
Moderator: NecronLord
Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
This is one thing i thought about involving science fiction, but have not actually seen directly that much.
Lets say you have a spaceship with a rocket/nuclear salt water/fusion/antimatter/ion drive with big notable end nossil/s (term correction if nessisary would be greatly) that in battle durring acceleration gets fired into it...
1-A Shell (ungided projectile)
2-A missile carrying a nuke
3-A Laser beam
I am going to assume that either of these could easily fuck up the delicate insides of such a craft's engine, but would the fact that it it is spewing out a stream of Plasma into said oncomming laser beam/missile/projectile be enough to stop the oncomming projectile?
Zor
Lets say you have a spaceship with a rocket/nuclear salt water/fusion/antimatter/ion drive with big notable end nossil/s (term correction if nessisary would be greatly) that in battle durring acceleration gets fired into it...
1-A Shell (ungided projectile)
2-A missile carrying a nuke
3-A Laser beam
I am going to assume that either of these could easily fuck up the delicate insides of such a craft's engine, but would the fact that it it is spewing out a stream of Plasma into said oncomming laser beam/missile/projectile be enough to stop the oncomming projectile?
Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
- Ford Prefect
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 8254
- Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
- Location: The real number domain
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
Yeah, it could. The plasma should be pretty opaque to a laser beam, and depending on how much energy you're pumping out, it could potentially just vapourise an incoming shell or missile, but there's lots of different factors involved hear regarding velocity, composition of the incoming projectile and such.Zor wrote:but would the fact that it it is spewing out a stream of Plasma into said oncomming laser beam/missile/projectile be enough to stop the oncomming projectile?
What is Project Zohar?
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
A decently programmed missile would probably try to avoid flying into the hot and destructive gas plume.
- Ryushikaze
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1072
- Joined: 2006-01-15 02:15am
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
You'd want to shoot for the 'taint' as it were, in essence any engine component just to the side of any of the jet streams but not armored or shielded. A much harder shot, but one much more likely to actually damage the engines and not get obliterated by the exhaust. Even if you just tear open a new exhaust hole, that's a new, possibly uncontrollable exhaust vector that ship now needs to contend with. The feasibility of such a shot, I shall leave for other people to figure out, though I wouldn't expect it to be particularly high, even on larger ships.
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
You're assuming that the gas in the outlet is being directed by the nozzle's physical geometry. If it is a highly collimated beam of some sort, you won't get any leakage from making an extra hole near the exhaust point.Ryushikaze wrote:You'd want to shoot for the 'taint' as it were, in essence any engine component just to the side of any of the jet streams but not armored or shielded. A much harder shot, but one much more likely to actually damage the engines and not get obliterated by the exhaust. Even if you just tear open a new exhaust hole, that's a new, possibly uncontrollable exhaust vector that ship now needs to contend with. The feasibility of such a shot, I shall leave for other people to figure out, though I wouldn't expect it to be particularly high, even on larger ships.
In sci-fi, it's common to have things like ion drives where they shoot out streams of particles at relativistic velocity. Damaging the outlet geometry won't really change anything in that case; it won't leak out the new hole in the side because it has no inclination to do so. It will remain a collimated beam for a long distance after leaving the nozzle anyway.
This reminds me of one of the big problems with underpowered weapon estimates in sci-fi: many fans seem to have no problem with enormously powerful ion-beam thrusters on starships but they turn around and think that high-powered weapons are "unrealistic" or "wanky", even if those weapons are orders of magnitude less powerful than the thrusters. If that were really the case, then why would these ship designers not adapt their thruster technology into weapons?
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Nyrath
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 2006-01-23 04:04pm
- Location: the praeternatural tower
- Contact:
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
As others have said, it depends upon other variables.Zor wrote:Lets say you have a spaceship with a rocket/nuclear salt water/fusion/antimatter/ion drive with big notable end nossil/s (term correction if nessisary would be greatly) that in battle durring acceleration gets fired into it...
1-A Shell (ungided projectile)
2-A missile carrying a nuke
3-A Laser beam
I am going to assume that either of these could easily fuck up the delicate insides of such a craft's engine, but would the fact that it it is spewing out a stream of Plasma into said oncomming laser beam/missile/projectile be enough to stop the oncomming projectile?
Zubrin's example nuclear salt water rocket has a thrust power of about 430 gigawatts. If a shell was moving slowly enough, it would be vaporized by the exhaust. A missile carrying a nuke would probably be damaged enough that the nuke would fail to detonate. The NSWR's exhaust has a mass flow of about 196 kg/s. I'm not sure how much protection this would provide against a laser beam, but my gut reaction is that the beam would punch right through and seriously damage the NSWR.
So the target ship would be damaged if the shell was moving fast enough, the missile was armored enough, or if a laser was used. As far as I can tell.
Nyrath's Atomic Rockets | 3-D Star Maps | Portfolio | @nyrath
- Nyrath
- Padawan Learner
- Posts: 341
- Joined: 2006-01-23 04:04pm
- Location: the praeternatural tower
- Contact:
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
Offhand I'd say it's because said fans have no idea that such propulsion systems have exhausts measured in gigawatts.Darth Wong wrote:This reminds me of one of the big problems with underpowered weapon estimates in sci-fi: many fans seem to have no problem with enormously powerful ion-beam thrusters on starships but they turn around and think that high-powered weapons are "unrealistic" or "wanky", even if those weapons are orders of magnitude less powerful than the thrusters. If that were really the case, then why would these ship designers not adapt their thruster technology into weapons?
This is known as John's Law for SF authors: "Any interesting space drive is a weapon of mass destruction. It only matters how long you want to wait for maximum damage. Interesting is equal to 'whatever keeps the readers from getting bored'".
Your second comment is of course the famous Kzinti Lesson: "a reaction drive's efficiency as a weapon is in direct proportion to its efficiency as a drive."
This is generally not used, since a drive optimized to be an efficient propulsion system will be a less than perfect weapon, and vice versa. A drive that can switch modes will suffer from the "Swiss Army Knife" syndrome, where it will be capable of performing both functions but will do both poorly.
Nyrath's Atomic Rockets | 3-D Star Maps | Portfolio | @nyrath
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
What is being said is that when a given civilization with a given level of technology can generate that that amount of power for propulsion, it damn well should be able to arm its ships with weapons with similar power levels.Nyrath wrote:This is generally not used, since a drive optimized to be an efficient propulsion system will be a less than perfect weapon, and vice versa. A drive that can switch modes will suffer from the "Swiss Army Knife" syndrome, where it will be capable of performing both functions but will do both poorly.Darth Wong wrote:This reminds me of one of the big problems with underpowered weapon estimates in sci-fi: many fans seem to have no problem with enormously powerful ion-beam thrusters on starships but they turn around and think that high-powered weapons are "unrealistic" or "wanky", even if those weapons are orders of magnitude less powerful than the thrusters. If that were really the case, then why would these ship designers not adapt their thruster technology into weapons?
Nobody is talking about a single device being engineered to serve both purposes.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator
"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus
"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus
"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
- GrandMasterTerwynn
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 6787
- Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
- Location: Somewhere on Earth.
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
This doesn't compute. To take a real-world example, a space shuttle launch has a power output of several gigawatts, with a total energy expenditure in the hundreds of terajoules. However, the only weaponry we have that can deliver that much energy are nuclear devices. Weapon power does not necessarily scale with propulsive power. Furthermore, it's possible to hit a point of diminishing returns for increasing weapon power. Barring unobtanium hulls and handwavium physics, a spaceship is going to be easy to kill with weapons not exceeding a few megajoules of energy delivery. Even if this spaceship has engines which can generate terajoules or exajoules of energy with power outputs of hundreds of gigawatts.Cykeisme wrote:What is being said is that when a given civilization with a given level of technology can generate that that amount of power for propulsion, it damn well should be able to arm its ships with weapons with similar power levels.
Tales of the Known Worlds:
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
2070s - The Seventy-Niners ... 3500s - Fair as Death ... 4900s - Against Improbable Odds V 1.0
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
Missiles have flown right up jet pipes in real life, which tends to be rather bad. The Israelis gave the A-4 Skyhawk a greatly extended jet pipe in part to migrate the threat of an SA-7 exploding inside it, the warhead was tiny enough for a couple extra feet to make a big difference in if the missile blew off the whole tail or not. It thus does not seem unreasonable that a future missile could be tough enough to survive the presumably much hotter and higher velocity exhaust of an advanced space engine. However if the engine is powerful enough, it might just stop the missile without destroying it, and blow it back away.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Shooting a rocket "up the arse"
That is not the logic underlying the argument. Read my post. If people are going to claim that their engine exhaust systems output relativistic accelerated particle streams, the weapons application is obvious.GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:This doesn't compute. To take a real-world example, a space shuttle launch has a power output of several gigawatts, with a total energy expenditure in the hundreds of terajoules. However, the only weaponry we have that can deliver that much energy are nuclear devices. Weapon power does not necessarily scale with propulsive power.Cykeisme wrote:What is being said is that when a given civilization with a given level of technology can generate that that amount of power for propulsion, it damn well should be able to arm its ships with weapons with similar power levels.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html