Interestingly, you could preserve the human race by assimilating them.

Moderator: NecronLord
Considering the city-destroyers were able to shrug off nuclear weapons, and keep on going, I'd say damn well.Darth Onasi wrote:I know it's way over the dimensions of the Galactica but, speaking of computer vulnerability, I'd like to see how long the mothership from Independance Day would last against the Cylons.
That was before they got cyber-raped by a mac laptop though.Solauren wrote:Considering the city-destroyers were able to shrug off nuclear weapons, and keep on going, I'd say damn well.Darth Onasi wrote:I know it's way over the dimensions of the Galactica but, speaking of computer vulnerability, I'd like to see how long the mothership from Independance Day would last against the Cylons.
Those New Macross ships have visibly superior shields (large, battleship-style secondary batteries glance off in 'F', while SDF-1 had that jury rigged ridiculous trackball system, and the thing that blows up Canada when shot.) Also, SDF-1's internal volume made no sense. If it's a bit more than a kilometer long, how does it have at least three-five kilos worth of city visible inside without including any of the machinery that makes the ship operate?Grasscutter wrote:The SDF-1 would probably perform better than a New Macross class in Galactica's place. We know for certain that the SDF-1 has dedicated manufacturing facilities while the New Macross fleets seemed to rely on Three Star factory ships. More importantly, the SDF-1 has capacity to house the ENTIRE Colonial population and then some (at its height the SDF-1 was home to 58,000 civilians plus 20,000 crew. Hell, they even had room for a small stadium).tim31 wrote:I'll see your SDF-1 and raise you a dedicated fleet defender: the New Macross-class transformable battle carrier.Kodiak wrote:I must confess, I wasn't a big BSG fan. B4 is 7.5km long, so if that makes it too big, I capitulate and submit for your approval The SDF-1
Plus, according to some fan estimates I've seen the SDF-1 has significantly more firepower than a New Macross since its primary role is a battleship as opposed to a fleet command/carrier. Not sure how they compare in terms of fighter wings but they both outstrip the number of Vipers Galactica held (SDF-1 had 300+ fighters, in addition to whatever the ARMDs/Daedalus and Prometheus held).
Knight Companion of the Order of King Roger, Steadholder-Dutchess Dame Admiral of the Fleet Honor Stephanie Alexander-Harrington's ship would collapse from the weight of her quarters nameplate if it ever entered the situation in the last episode of BSG.Dahak wrote:How about an Invictus-class Superdreadnought, with Her Grace "Mary Sue" Harrington in command?
She'd fit sizewise, and enough firepower in close combat (and can missile-spam quite well, too).
A Process that involvedDarth Onasi wrote:That was before they got cyber-raped by a mac laptop though.Solauren wrote:Considering the city-destroyers were able to shrug off nuclear weapons, and keep on going, I'd say damn well.Darth Onasi wrote:I know it's way over the dimensions of the Galactica but, speaking of computer vulnerability, I'd like to see how long the mothership from Independance Day would last against the Cylons.
There's apparently less machinery in the ship than you'd think thanks to the magic of anime physics:Nephtys wrote: Those New Macross ships have visibly superior shields (large, battleship-style secondary batteries glance off in 'F', while SDF-1 had that jury rigged ridiculous trackball system, and the thing that blows up Canada when shot.) Also, SDF-1's internal volume made no sense. If it's a bit more than a kilometer long, how does it have at least three-five kilos worth of city visible inside without including any of the machinery that makes the ship operate?
Also, it has a meaner uh. Punch. With a fist. Which matters for space carrier-on-carrier battles, uh huh.
While I generally agree with you they ARE idiots. They were actually surprised at AAMs not doing any significant damage to a vessel a dozen miles or more across...Solauren wrote: #3 - Flying the Fighter back into the mother ship, as they couldn't hack it via wireless communications (they had to have tried that, otherwise, they are idiots)
I think they were hoping the ships were not very well armored due to the shields.Batman wrote:While I generally agree with you they ARE idiots. They were actually surprised at AAMs not doing any significant damage to a vessel a dozen miles or more across...Solauren wrote: #3 - Flying the Fighter back into the mother ship, as they couldn't hack it via wireless communications (they had to have tried that, otherwise, they are idiots)
I'd choose a TARDIS. To fit with the thread limits, you just reconfigure the exterior dimensions so it's as big as the Galactica (or thereabouts).Crossroads Inc. wrote:From the start the Galactica was the heart of the fleet.. It servged as protector and command for the fleet, providing more services and materials then any other ship.. But, it was never Meant for the role it wasd eventually forced to play...
In this sub, YOU can pick from all of SciFi to choose a ship to replace Galactica, something that will provide resources, repair, machine shops, recycling, etc... You ar limited to a ship roughly the same over all size as Galactica.