Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Cykeisme
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2416
Joined: 2004-12-25 01:47pm
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Cykeisme »

What do you guys think about the Heavy Gear universe from Dream Pod 9?
Despite being set pretty far in the future, they still use a lot of present-day technology that is identical or just slightly improved, so I'm not talking about those.. just the Gears and Striders themselves.
"..history has shown the best defense against heavy cavalry are pikemen, so aircraft should mount lances on their noses and fly in tight squares to fend off bombers". - RedImperator

"ha ha, raping puppies is FUN!" - Johonebesus

"It would just be Unicron with pew pew instead of nom nom". - Vendetta, explaining his justified disinterest in the idea of the movie Allspark affecting the Death Star
User avatar
Darwin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1177
Joined: 2002-07-08 04:31pm

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Darwin »

Cykeisme wrote:What do you guys think about the Heavy Gear universe from Dream Pod 9?
Despite being set pretty far in the future, they still use a lot of present-day technology that is identical or just slightly improved, so I'm not talking about those.. just the Gears and Striders themselves.
They had to basically design a whole world to be ideal walker terrain, (tons of rough, broken terrain and soft sand) and even then, when you've got some hard dirt or any open country, tanks and air power are still going to own the day. I ran a demo game back in the day, and a couple of southern light tanks were able to completely stop an urban northern gear attack with their AA lasers. The gears themselves are probably about the maximum of what actually could be practical for walking fighting vehicles. Striders may be a bit overboard, but at least nearly everyone has secondary wheeled or tracked movement.
User avatar
Gunhead
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1715
Joined: 2004-11-15 08:08am

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Gunhead »

Cykeisme wrote:What do you guys think about the Heavy Gear universe from Dream Pod 9?
Despite being set pretty far in the future, they still use a lot of present-day technology that is identical or just slightly improved, so I'm not talking about those.. just the Gears and Striders themselves.
Well they had to make some concessions so the tabletop game made any sense. Now aside from the usual humanoid mecha don't make any sense stuff, they did get some concepts right like the effects of high powered laser weaponry on air superiority, use of combined arms and atleast they made a plausible excuse why combat takes place at relatively short range.
Now if talking according to SOD and normal gears take the place of IFVs on the battlefield, it still leaves striders that to me are a bit of a mystery. They're like light tanks but don't really have the functionality of a tank.

They do make a lot more sense than say BT. But that's like saying the sky is blue.

-Gunhead
"In the absence of orders, go find something and kill it."
-Generalfeldmarschall Erwin Rommel

"And if you don't wanna feel like a putz
Collect the clues and connect the dots
You'll see the pattern that is bursting your bubble, and it's Bad" -The Hives
User avatar
VF5SS
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3281
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:14pm
Location: Neither here nor there...
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by VF5SS »

I thought the whole point of Heavy Gear was to steal as much as possible from Armored Trooper Votoms and get away with it because the only people watching Votoms in the US are friends of Tim Eldred. Because that's basically what it is.
プロジェクトゾハルとは何ですか?
ロボットが好き。
User avatar
TheMuffinKing
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
Location: Ultima ratio regum
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by TheMuffinKing »

For some of the better designs in fiction, I turn to stories such as Hammer's Slammers by David Drake. Their hovercraft tanks seem a little far fetched, but not out of the realm of plausibility and most of the vehicle and equipment designs are evolutions of what we have today. Actually, a lot of stuff can almost be considered a sort of Vietnam in space...owing to the author's experience in Vietnam.

The Orphan's Journey series of novels is pretty good, though the main antagonists are a little bland. Much of the designs are existing designs or a kind of "in the next decade" sort of stuff.
Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Darth Wong »

Peptuck wrote:
The ME guns aren't as bad in my mind as the big fuck off cannon on the IFV, I'm still trying to figure out where they store the huge block of ammo it must use.
Considering their rifles can fire thousands of rounds when they're about the size of a submachinegun when fully compacted, I wouldn't be surprised if the ammo block on the Mako wasn't too large. Most of the rounds fired by ME weapons are the size of a grain of sand anyway.
If the rounds are so tiny, how can they do any damage? They'll slow down rapidly due to air resistance.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Peptuck
Is Not A Moderator
Posts: 1487
Joined: 2007-07-09 12:22am

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Peptuck »

Darth Wong wrote:
Peptuck wrote:
The ME guns aren't as bad in my mind as the big fuck off cannon on the IFV, I'm still trying to figure out where they store the huge block of ammo it must use.
Considering their rifles can fire thousands of rounds when they're about the size of a submachinegun when fully compacted, I wouldn't be surprised if the ammo block on the Mako wasn't too large. Most of the rounds fired by ME weapons are the size of a grain of sand anyway.
If the rounds are so tiny, how can they do any damage? They'll slow down rapidly due to air resistance.
They're apparently fired at hypersonic speeds through use of "mass effect" fields and magnetic accelerators. In other words, technobabble coilguns. :roll:

Judging by in-game ranges, most of the hypervelocity rounds in ME seem to have shorter effective ranges than comparable real-life weaponry anyway, though the sniper rifle seems to fire larger rounds - the in-game firing animation involves the shooter pulling some kind of charging handle to load the next round.
X-COM: Defending Earth by blasting the shit out of it.

Writers are people, and people are stupid. So, a large chunk of them have the IQ of beach pebbles. ~fgalkin

You're complaining that the story isn't the kind you like. That's like me bitching about the lack of ninjas in Robin Hood. ~CaptainChewbacca
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Patrick Degan »

One of the most elegant SF designs was Klaatu's saucer from the 1951 The Day The Earth Stood Still. Simple and clean. Not only because the filmakers did a really terrific job effecting the "seamless" opening of the craft, but because of the overall plan of the vehicle. A single semicircular corridor leading to the central command deck, and within it a pod which could close over with it's own bubble-top. I'd bet that would make it possible to depressurise the rest of the ship which would be under Gort's monitoring and management while Klaatu sits in his lifepod doing the actual piloting.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Darth Wong »

Peptuck wrote:They're apparently fired at hypersonic speeds through use of "mass effect" fields and magnetic accelerators. In other words, technobabble coilguns. :roll:
That doesn't solve the problem: the particles will still be rapidly decelerated by atmospheric drag and heavily affected by wind, only now they'll be rapidly heated to melting point too.
Judging by in-game ranges, most of the hypervelocity rounds in ME seem to have shorter effective ranges than comparable real-life weaponry anyway, though the sniper rifle seems to fire larger rounds - the in-game firing animation involves the shooter pulling some kind of charging handle to load the next round.
Videogames are full of useless short-ranged weapons. It's really aggravating.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Stark »

It's probably a design decision to enable players to see the five million shaders or polygons on the badguy's nose. After all Flashpoint had decent ranges in the 90s, and it was basically 'shoot at green dots'. :)
User avatar
Darth Onasi
Jedi Knight
Posts: 816
Joined: 2008-03-02 07:56pm
Location: On a beach beating Gackt to death with a parasol

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Darth Onasi »

Stark wrote:It's probably a design decision to enable players to see the five million shaders or polygons on the badguy's nose. After all Flashpoint had decent ranges in the 90s, and it was basically 'shoot at green dots'. :)
More likely it's so that the Krogans can bumrush you.
Much like Klingons with knives in Star Trek, few things in Mass Effect can withstand the almighty power of an unarmed hunchbacked lizard. God they're annoying.
If I had something interesting, profound or incredibly stupid to say, it would go here.
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Aaron »

Darth Wong wrote: If the rounds are so tiny, how can they do any damage? They'll slow down rapidly due to air resistance.
It doesn't match up with the size of the weapons barrel in game anyways, which appears little different then a conventional firearm.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
SAMAS
Mecha Fanboy
Posts: 4078
Joined: 2002-10-20 09:10pm

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by SAMAS »

I still think the funniest thing about the various "Sword" Gundams in SEED was that, out of all of them, only one actually used those Anti-Ship swords on an actual ship. (Seen here at about 2:30).

But need I remind you all of the true worst Gundam Mechanical Design of all?

The Adrastea-class Land Battleship from Victory Gundam.
Image
Not an armored Jigglypuff

"I salute your genetic superiority, now Get off my planet!!" -- Adam Stiener, 1st Somerset Strikers
User avatar
Sidewinder
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5466
Joined: 2005-05-18 10:23pm
Location: Feasting on those who fell in battle
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Sidewinder »

There's also the monumental stupidity in the Gundam Epyon's design philosophy.
GundamOfficial.Com wrote:In keeping with Treize's philosophy, the Gundam Epyon eschews cowardly long-range weapons in favor of chivalrous close combat.
Have cowardly soldiers wielding long-range weapons, ever triumphed over warriors wielding heroic hand-to-hand combat weapons? Oh, yeah: they did so repeatedly in the Hundred Years' War, the Mongol invasions, trench warfare in WWI (saber & bayonet versus machine gun), jungle warfare in WWII (katana versus M1 Garand)...
Please do not make Americans fight giant monsters.

Those gun nuts do not understand the meaning of "overkill," and will simply use weapon after weapon of mass destruction (WMD) until the monster is dead, or until they run out of weapons.

They have more WMD than there are monsters for us to fight. (More insanity here.)
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

SAMAS wrote:The Adrastea-class Land Battleship from Victory Gundam.
Jeez, land battleships in Gundam are usually awesome but that is just the worst.

Since they're usually built like giant hovercraft or tanks, a motorcycle configuration doesn't even make any sense. It's like they're begging for it to fall over.

EDIT: I see, Zanscare's ground forces had an emphasis on bike designs. It's still totally mental.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Isolder74
Official SD.Net Ace of Cakes
Posts: 6762
Joined: 2002-07-10 01:16am
Location: Weber State of Construction University
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Isolder74 »

How does that land battleship stay upright?
Hapan Battle Dragons Rule!
When you want peace prepare for war! --Confusious
That was disapointing ..Should we show this Federation how to build a ship so we may have worthy foes? Typhonis 1
The Prince of The Writer's Guild|HAB Spacewolf Tank General| God Bless America!
User avatar
VF5SS
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3281
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:14pm
Location: Neither here nor there...
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by VF5SS »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
EDIT: I see, Zanscare's ground forces had an emphasis on bike designs. It's still totally mental.
It's one of those things that looks better in motion. Even the MS sized wheels look pretty nifty tearing up the place.
プロジェクトゾハルとは何ですか?
ロボットが好き。
User avatar
Ford Prefect
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8254
Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
Location: The real number domain

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Ford Prefect »

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:EDIT: I see, Zanscare's ground forces had an emphasis on bike designs. It's still totally mental.
That's Victory Gundam for you. It's full of patently ridiculous shit, like beam rotors. As I hear it, Tomino really wanted it to fail. It has a great looking Gundam, though. The V2 is amazing.
What is Project Zohar?

Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Stark »

Sidewinder wrote: Have cowardly soldiers wielding long-range weapons, ever triumphed over warriors wielding heroic hand-to-hand combat weapons? Oh, yeah: they did so repeatedly in the Hundred Years' War, the Mongol invasions, trench warfare in WWI (saber & bayonet versus machine gun), jungle warfare in WWII (katana versus M1 Garand)...
ITT we learn that yes, Sidewinder really is that stupid. It's called a dramatic conciet.
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5928
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Zor »

For the worst, i am going to say the ISA Indruder Landing craft from Killzone-2 as the most god-awful airborne transports ever. This ugly little number has the men sitting on top of it with no more fastening than a guard rail and is used to deliver men into the heat of battle. If it was a civilian vehicle working on the moon, it might have been passable, but as it stands it is the air transport equivelent of those mechs in the last two matrix movies.

A good look at these peices of shit

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
Commander 598
Jedi Knight
Posts: 767
Joined: 2006-06-07 08:16pm
Location: Northern Louisiana Swamp
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Commander 598 »

Ford Prefect wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:EDIT: I see, Zanscare's ground forces had an emphasis on bike designs. It's still totally mental.
That's Victory Gundam for you. It's full of patently ridiculous shit, like beam rotors. As I hear it, Tomino really wanted it to fail. It has a great looking Gundam, though. The V2 is amazing.
The beam rotors themselves aren't THAT ridiculous, the fact that the mech they're on is a transforming helicopter AND combiner however is exceptionally ridiculous.
User avatar
TheMuffinKing
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2368
Joined: 2005-07-04 03:34am
Location: Ultima ratio regum
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by TheMuffinKing »

Zor wrote:For the worst, i am going to say the ISA Indruder Landing craft from Killzone-2 as the most god-awful airborne transports ever. This ugly little number has the men sitting on top of it with no more fastening than a guard rail and is used to deliver men into the heat of battle. If it was a civilian vehicle working on the moon, it might have been passable, but as it stands it is the air transport equivelent of those mechs in the last two matrix movies.

A good look at these peices of shit

Zor
Just about every vehicle has issues in that game. The ISA and Helghast tanks at least seem well enough in design, though I seriously question the armaments. 400 years in the future and now CROWS? No gunshields? WTF?
Image
User avatar
Sidewinder
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5466
Joined: 2005-05-18 10:23pm
Location: Feasting on those who fell in battle
Contact:

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Sidewinder »

Stark wrote:
Sidewinder wrote: Have cowardly soldiers wielding long-range weapons, ever triumphed over warriors wielding heroic hand-to-hand combat weapons? Oh, yeah: they did so repeatedly in the Hundred Years' War, the Mongol invasions, trench warfare in WWI (saber & bayonet versus machine gun), jungle warfare in WWII (katana versus M1 Garand)...
ITT we learn that yes, Sidewinder really is that stupid. It's called a dramatic conciet.
You are equally stupid if you buy Sunrise's belief that a killer robot with a lightsaber-wannabe is more "dramatic" than one with a dozen guns, i.e., the swords-bot is more popular among the kids and tweens who watch Gundam and buy action figures and model kits of their favorite robots than the gun-bot.
Please do not make Americans fight giant monsters.

Those gun nuts do not understand the meaning of "overkill," and will simply use weapon after weapon of mass destruction (WMD) until the monster is dead, or until they run out of weapons.

They have more WMD than there are monsters for us to fight. (More insanity here.)
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4144
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Formless »

Zor wrote:For the worst, i am going to say the ISA Indruder Landing craft from Killzone-2 as the most god-awful airborne transports ever. This ugly little number has the men sitting on top of it with no more fastening than a guard rail and is used to deliver men into the heat of battle. If it was a civilian vehicle working on the moon, it might have been passable, but as it stands it is the air transport equivelent of those mechs in the last two matrix movies.

A good look at these peices of shit

Zor
Good greif! It looks like they wanted to have an air analogue to a Normandy style invasion, and then forgot all the armor those D-day boats were covered with.
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Best and worst Mechanical Designs in science fiction

Post by Stark »

Sidewinder wrote:You are equally stupid if you buy Sunrise's belief that a killer robot with a lightsaber-wannabe is more "dramatic" than one with a dozen guns, i.e., the swords-bot is more popular among the kids and tweens who watch Gundam and buy action figures and model kits of their favorite robots than the gun-bot.
ITT we learn Sidewinder doesn't know what 'dramatic conceit' means. It's pretty sad that he's so retarded he thinks someone should make a show HE LIKES even though the market is SOMETHING ELSE. Oh wait, people make anime robot shows without melee combat all the time! I guess it's some kind of signature or deliberate style of Gundam at work here!

WHO KNEW?
Post Reply