Anyway, here is the text of his piece, interspersed with my commentary:
This is an odd way to begin, because what Pelosi said doesn't in any way strike me as an "obituary for the Republican Party." If anything, it is the most reasonable thing I've heard Pelosi say in a while."It is important for us to have a strong Republican Party," Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi tauntingly told a press conference on April 23. "And I hope that the next generation will take back the Republican Party for the Grand Old Party that it used to be."
Thanks Mrs. Pelosi, for your best wishes. But be careful what you wish for. I wouldn't write the obituary for the Republican Party quite yet.
While I agree that a massive fuck-up on the part of the Democrats is the only way the Republicans can salvage their reputation in the short term, Feehery's take on this is rather puzzling. He just mumbles vaguely about socialized medicine and gay marriage (without providing any evidence as to why these particular issues will lead to the downfall of the Democrats, despite the utter failure of the Republican's value campaigning strategy last November). I do not know much about the economic crisis in California, but is it fair to say it was "liberal governance" that caused it? I was under the impression it had more to do with across the board mismanagement of the budget gap, among other things.Sure, things are looking grim at the moment. Yes, our Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele stumbled out of the starting gate, making several verbal gaffes, and raising questions about his competence. Yes, the latest poll numbers are in the toilet, showing only 21 percent of the American people call themselves Republicans. Yes, Arlen Specter decided the GOP was a drag on his personal political future. And yes, we lost a special election in upstate New York that maybe we should have won.
But things change. Remember a year-and-a-half ago, when everybody thought the election would be a referendum on the Iraq war. Remember 10 months ago, when everyone thought that expensive gas was going to drive people to the polls. It turned out that, by the time of the election, the most important thing that people cared about was their declining 401ks or their lost job.
Here are five reasons why the Republican Party will be back and perhaps sooner than anyone thinks:
1) Overreach: Several of my Democratic friends over the last several months have tried to comfort me when discussing the fall of the Republican Party with one consoling thought: Don't worry, we will screw it up. And on that one thing I agree with them. The liberal Democrats that currently run the Congress are destined to overreach on the legislative front. Pelosi and her California allies, like Reps. Henry Waxman, George Miller and Pete Stark, tend to think the rest of America wants the same things they do, from higher taxes on energy to a national health care plan that could be a blueprint for socialized medicine, from abortion on demand to gay marriage. But most Americans actually look at California as an economic basket case and social mess. It is a beautiful state, but it is also completely screwed-up, thanks largely to liberal governance. The Democrats are certain to overdo it on the liberalism, and that will make the Republicans much more attractive in two to four years.
Does anybody have any idea what polls he is citing? I can not find any evidence of what he claims. This reason seems utterly insubstantial, except for a vague reference to the American system being better than the European one.2) Checks and balances: Unlike the parliamentary governments of Europe, where one party runs everything until they mess up, the American system actually gives a preference to both parties having skin in the game. While most voters don't actually think "divided government" when they go to the polls, they do think that one-party government tends to lead to excess and corruption. That is why the people have a chance a mere two years after the president gets elected to give him a midterm report card in the form of Congressional elections. Most polls now show voters prefer a candidate who will serve as a check on President Obama's power. And for most voters, who see Pelosi and Nevada Sen. Harry Reid as even more liberal than the president, Republicans will serve as that check.
It is true that the mid-90s forced the Democratic party to move more to the center, but that does not necessarily mean this will happen again. If anything, the opposite is happening for the Republicans. Between Specter's defection and Limbaugh's bitch slapping of the party, it seems that the GOP is discouraging independent thought and enforcing philosophical orthodoxy DURING its time of crisis. Feehery makes the point of what the Republicans SHOULD do, but I see no evidence that this is actually what they ARE doing.3) Crisis breeds renewal: When things are going well, a political party tends to discourage independent thought and enforce philosophical orthodoxy. But when a political party faces crisis, all of that goes out the window. It is a wide-open world right now for Republicans as they debate amongst themselves what the party truly stands for. The debate will be painful, as neoconservatives, paleo-conservatives, progressive conservatives, moderates and libertarians battle it out to chart the course for a new and more vibrant party. Republicans can afford to have these debates now when they are in the minority, because frankly, they have nothing else to do. The Democrats went through this process in the mid-90s, and they built a new party that attracted centrists like Mark Warner, without alienating old-line liberals like Pelosi or Waxman.
This he is mostly pulling out of his ass. A lot of Republicans hate Cantor, and Limbaugh has already bitch slapped him into place for supposedly diverging from the party line ("we don't listen, we teach!"). He desperately ignores the important example of Specter in all of this: it is true that some of the old guard have been wiped out, but they are being replaced by what amount to fanatics like Jindal. New faces, same ideas.4) Talent senses opportunity: Investors know that the time to buy is not when the market is at its peak, but when the market is at the bottom. But it is not always easy to know when the bottom hits. In politics, it is pretty easy to know when a party has hit the bottom. And for the Republicans, it is now. Talented political entrepreneurs look to the GOP and see nothing but opportunity. The old bulls have been wiped out. The new guard is ready to start leading. In the House, young guns like Eric Cantor, Kevin McCarthy and Paul Ryan are charting the future for the next Republican takeover. Adam Putnam of Florida and Mark Kirk of Illinois are getting ready for state-wide runs. But it is not just the young guns. It also more experienced politicians, John Kasich and Rob Portman of Ohio, Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania, Jeb Bush of Florida, who see an opportunity to lead the party back to power.
This last point is ... well, I am just going to let it stand for itself. It amounts to nothing more than, "Hey, remember the last eight years? Me neither!"5) The Republican Party is the de facto Libertarian Party: Most people I talk to think of themselves not as Republicans or Democrats, but as libertarians. Not libertarians in the political party sense, but libertarians in a deeper philosophical sense. They tend to want government to stay out of their lives as much as possible. They tend to distrust all politicians, and when they hear someone say, "I am from the government, and I am here to help," they tend to laugh uproariously. It was Will Rogers who said, "I don't make jokes. I just watch the government and report the facts." The Republican Party does best when it seeks to reform government, to lessen the power of the bureaucrat, and to fight to give more freedom to the people. When the GOP returns to that philosophical creed -- which it will do in the face of the Obama administration's vast expansion of government power -- its fortunes will brighten again.
The one thing I must give Feehery credit for is that he at least acknowledges, unlike most Republicans, that it is not merely an issue of branding and marketing, and that the party is going to have to undergo a fundamental ideological overhaul. That doesn't change the fact that I think he's a misguided idiot, however.If the Republican Party were a stock, the smart investor would start buying it now. Yes, things look grim at the present time, but things change. The GOP is not dead yet, and Speaker Pelosi may see her wish of a resurgent Republican Party come true quicker than she anticipated.
Thoughts?
