Stark wrote:It's a shame he so clearly killed the guy after others had arrived and he'd realised the guy was a prisoner and was just going to prison. It's ironic that if he'd been MORE revenge motivated, he would have just killed the guy immediately with no witnesses.
Stark ..... Stark... stark....
Let me quote the relevant section back to you
Salam pored gasoline onto Loyd, lit her on fire then legged it. Ayala chased him down, took him down and restrained him in place. He had no idea what was going on with Ayala(Apparently Salam got a far distance away before he was tackled) and when told she was badly hurt he shot Salam. Until then he had no idea how badly Loyd was hurt, once he did, he shot Salam.OP wrote: Ayala chased Salam down, tackled him to the ground, and restrained him with plastic cuffs. ”After about 10 minutes,” according to an Army Criminal Investigation Division affidavit, “a soldier approached the location where Ayala had Salam detained and informed the personnel in the area that Loyd was burned badly. Ayala pushed his pistol against Salam’s head and shot Salam, killing him instantly.”
Here's a few more quotes from other news stories
Times John Stanton wrote: According to court documents, Salam "fled immediately from the scene and ran 50 meters towards Ayala. Ayala drew his sidearm but did not fire and instead pinned Salam on the ground on a commonly traveled path. Salam resisted violently but was eventually flex-cuffed and restrained with the assistance of members of the accompanying platoon. Ayala kept his sidearm "trained at Salam's head". Moments later, a US soldier and interpreter approached Ayala and Salam.
The interpreter "yelled at Salam, punched and kicked him and dragged him into an adjacent creek. Ayala retrieved Salam from the creek and put him back on the path," pinning him down with knee to chest. According to court documents, Ayala was advised of Loyd's status and subsequently shot Salam in the head killing him instantly. Ayala agreed to the factual nature of these events and entered a plea of voluntary manslaughter.
Finding a journey willing to convict in these circumstances would be hard and finding a prosecutor who would be willing to "win" the case would be hard as well, lucky this is America so they found one. However even this prosecutor only argued for a "lengthy" prison term and repeated the 8 years figure several times in court. In US law that close to minimum sentencing requirement.The defence is laughable, though. He killed a guy who was unarmed and restrained, and punishing him would 'compound the tragedy'? Pfft.
The only reason this did not go before a jury is because he plead guilty. Had he demanded his right to a jury trial he well could have been acquitted totally. Instead he's walking out with a suspended sentence.
OAN
In this sort of case is he still going to be VA OK? Will he be losing his benefits over this?