What I found confusing about this article was the part where the court didn't find any of his anti-religious remarks such as "religion was invented when the first con man met the first fool" to be a problem, but what did him in was a relatively inoffensive anti-creationism statement. Can anyone explain the legal reasoning behind this decision?Student Wins Suit After Teacher Says Creationism 'Superstitious Nonsense'
Monday, May 04, 2009
SANTA ANA, Calif. — A federal judge ruled that a public high school history teacher violated the First Amendment when he called creationism "superstitious nonsense" during a classroom lecture.
U.S. District Judge James Selna issued the ruling Friday after a 16-month legal battle between student Chad Farnan and his former teacher, James Corbett.
Farnan sued in U.S. District Court in 2007, alleging that Corbett violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment by making repeated comments in class that were hostile to Christian beliefs.
The lawsuit cited more than 20 statements made by Corbett during one day of class, all of which were recorded by Farnan, to support allegations of a broader teaching method that "favors irreligion over religion" and made Christian students feel uncomfortable.
During the course of the litigation, the judge found that most of the statements cited in the court papers did not violate the First Amendment because they did not refer directly to religion or were appropriate in the context of the classroom lecture.
But Selna ruled Friday that one comment, where Corbett referred to creationism as "religious, superstitious nonsense," did violate Farnan's constitutional rights.
Farnan is not interested in monetary damages, said his attorney, Jennifer Monk of the Murrieta-based Christian legal group Advocates for Faith & Freedom.
Instead, he plans to ask the court to prohibit Corbett from making similar comments in the future. Farnan's family would also like to see the school district offer teacher training and monitor Corbett's classroom for future violations, Monk said.
There are no plans to appeal the judge's rulings on the other statements listed in the litigation, she said.
"They lost, he violated the establishment clause," she told The Associated Press in a phone interview. "From our perspective, whether he violated it with one statement or with 19 statements is irrelevant."
In making his decision, Selna wrote that he tried to balance Farnan's and Corbett's rights.
"The court's ruling today reflects the constitutionally permissible need for expansive discussion even if a given topic may be offensive to a particular religion," the judge wrote.
"The decision also reflects that there are boundaries. ... The ruling today protects Farnan, but also protects teachers like Corbett in carrying out their teaching duties."
Corbett, a 20-year teaching veteran, remains at Capistrano Valley High School.
Farnan is now a junior at the school, but quit Corbett's Advanced Placement European history class after his teacher made the comments.
The establishment clause of the First Amendment prohibits the government from making any law establishing religion. The clause has been interpreted by U.S. courts to also prohibit government employees from displaying religious hostility.
Selna said that although Corbett was only found to have violated the establishment clause in a single instance, he could not excuse or overlook the behavior.
In a ruling last month, the judge dismissed all but two of the statements Farnan complained about, including Corbett's comment that "when you put on your Jesus glasses, you can't see the truth."
Also dismissed in April were comments such as, "Conservatives don't want women to avoid pregnancies — that's interfering with God's work" and "When you pray for divine intervention, you're hoping that the spaghetti monster will help you get what you want."
On Friday, Selna also dismissed one of the two remaining statements, saying that Corbett may have been attempting to quote Mark Twain when he said religion was "invented when the first con man met the first fool."
Corbett has declined to comment throughout the litigation. His attorney, Dan Spradlin, did not immediately return a message left Monday by The Associated Press.
Spradlin has said, however, that Corbett made the remark about creationism during a classroom discussion about a 1993 case in which a former Capistrano Valley High science teacher sued the school district because it required instruction in evolution.
Spradlin has said Corbett was simply expressing his own opinion that the former teacher shouldn't have presented his religious views to students.
Farnan's family released a statement Friday calling the judge's ruling a vindication of the teen's constitutional rights.
The Capistrano Unified School District, which paid for Corbett's attorney, was found not liable for Corbett's classroom conduct.
Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Lagmonster
- Master Control Program
- Posts: 7719
- Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
Fox News Link
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
Re: Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
Yeah it seemed odd that a lot of the statements thrown out were worse than the bit that was kept. Doesn't seem like a full quote though, maybe "religious, superstitious nonsense" was part of a broader rant :p
Re: Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
So this happened by calling the christian version of creationism 'Superstitious Nonsense'. Offcourse, the same would have happened if the teacher was talking about Norse creationism and offended a Viking am I rite?
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
It appears that the US courts have ruled in the past that a government employee may not express any opinion hostile to religion. Strangely enough, they have never ruled that a government employee may not express any opinion favourable to religion; this is a pretty clear case of the US courts being obviously inconsistent in their rulings (read: run by fundie assholes).
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
- Darth Wong
- Sith Lord
- Posts: 70028
- Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
- Location: Toronto, Canada
- Contact:
Re: Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
I just created a new thread in the Library forum where I link here:
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 9&t=134353
The idea is to collect links for threads like this so that they can be easily referenced if necessary. I know we've had plenty of threads before about parents letting their kids die or people dying during exorcisms or other problems related to religion, but they always disappear into the vastness of the forum's history over time. Feel free to find links to old threads about religious problems and add them to the thread above.
http://bbs.stardestroyer.net/viewtopic. ... 9&t=134353
The idea is to collect links for threads like this so that they can be easily referenced if necessary. I know we've had plenty of threads before about parents letting their kids die or people dying during exorcisms or other problems related to religion, but they always disappear into the vastness of the forum's history over time. Feel free to find links to old threads about religious problems and add them to the thread above.
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC
"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness
"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.
http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Re: Student sues teacher for denouncing creationism
Lagmonster wrote:Fox News Link
I'm watching the FOX news report on youtube where that dumbshit student is telling his version of the story. Suprisingly they've seem to have "forgotten" to interview the teacher.
Fair and balanced indeed