For those who don't know about Section 28. Good for Cameron but it sheds a light on yet another bad thing in the Tory's grubby past.Cameron says sorry for Section 28
Conservative leader David Cameron has apologised for Section 28 and predicted his party will have the first openly gay prime minister, Pink Paper can exclusively reveal.
1 July 2009
Conservative leader David Cameron has apologised for Section 28 and predicted his party will have the first openly gay prime minister, Pink Paper can exclusively reveal.
He made the comments on 30 June at an evening Tory fundraising event, to mark gay Pride in London on 4 July.
And he defended the party’s new European allies, saying they have shifted from their previous homophobic views.
When asked about tackling homophobic bullying in schools he said in future, he wanted binding home-school contracts, to regulate behaviour and to be signed before pupils start at a school. And he said headteachers should be able to exclude bullies without an endless right to appeal about expulsions.
Apologising for Section 28, a Conservative law introduced in the late 1980s which effectively prevented teaching about gay issues, he said: “Yes we may have sometimes been slow and yes we may have made mistakes, including Section 28, but the change has happened.”
He described the section as “offensive to gay people”.
Among the guests at the event was Robin Squire, who was the only Conservative MP at the time to vote against the hated law.
Cameron went on to defended his new European allies, the Polish Law and Justice Party, who have been branded homophobic by campaigners.
He said: “The aim of forming a new group in the European Parliament is to have centre right parties who want to belong to Europe but who do not believe in endless further integration. In order to get partners, we have had to go all across Europe.
“We have spoken to [Polish Law and Justice Party] about these issues. They do believe in equal rights and they have made that very clear. Did they, in the past, call for the banning of gay Pride marches? Yes they did. Did every other party in Poland do that? Yes they did. But I think they do take a more modern view now.”
He admitted he didn’t have a “perfect record” on gay rights himself but also insisted his own party had changed and praised the openly gay Conservatives who are standing for winnable UK parliament seats at the next general election.
He told the guests: “It does give me great pride to be standing here to celebrate gay Pride and all you have achieved.
“If five years ago we had a Conservative and gay Pride party, I don’t think many gay people would have come or many Conservatives would have come. In wanting to make the party representative of the country, I think we have made some real progress.
“If we do win the next election, instead of being a white middle class middle-aged party, rather like me really [laughing], we will be far more diverse.”
He said this had been achieved through “positive action” including changing selection rules, but also said it was the grass-roots Tory activists who chose parliamentary candidates so the selection of openly gay men and women indicated the wider party had changed their attitudes.
Cameron went on: “If you genuinely want to be a party for the whole country, it is no good unless everyone in that country can see people like them in your party.
“Of course the argument about equality and respect is important but we can quite often win by using quite Conservative arguments. Every Conservative believes in a meritocracy in which you can rise higher according to your talents. We also believe in one nation, that we are all in it together.
“One of the things I was most proud of doing was standing up at that first party conference and saying commitment to marriage was an important thing whether its between a man and a woman, a man and a man or a woman and a woman.
“I am proud I said it and I am proud of my party for supporting me.”
He indicated his would be a party of diversity in the future and boasted: “The Conservatives had the first woman prime minister, and we are bound to have the first black prime minister and the first gay prime minister.”
And speaking of the future for lesbians, gays, bisexuals and trans people in Britain, he pledged to support changes in people’s every day life.
“The Labour government has made some important changes. I think we have further to go, not just in passing laws but in realising what we need is a cultural change,” he said.
Ben Summerskill, of the gay lobby group Stonewall, which is neutral on party-political issues, spoke after Cameron and described the Tory leader’s speech as “historic”: “We have heard the leader of the Conservative party say the words ‘Section 28’ and ‘sorry’.”
The event was held at the Paramount club, on the top of the Centre Point tower on New Oxford Street in central London. The Tory party faithful who attended paid £50 for a ticket for the drinks reception.
It is one of a number of political events happening around the London Pride festival. Prime Minister Gordon Brown is hosting a small gathering of the gay great-and-good in Downing Street on the morning of 4 July, Pride day itself.
Pink Paper is a media partner of Pride London.
David Cameron Apologises For Section 28...
Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
- Big Orange
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7108
- Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
- Location: Britain
David Cameron Apologises For Section 28...
Pink Paper
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
Re: David Cameron Apologises For Section 28...
This is good, overall I think. This is potentially evidence of a paradigm-shift away from the old Right to a new Right; from authoritarian, traditionalist, christianised capitalism to a more libertarian capitalism. If the "opposition" (and if we do what the press tells us, future overlords) have truly jettisoned their more illiberal sentiments, that reflects a change in society since the 80s and 90s to the point where the old ways are held as less populist than the new liberal status quo.
This makes an annoying situation in my head. I think this is good, and a good political move by Cameron. Still, I want to hate the conservatives for being the douchebags that put these sorts of legislations in action in the first place, and they're killing off one of the major routes of attack for people like me.
Still, if all three major parties are pro gay rights, leaving only shitbag parties like the BNP or Christian parties hating gays enough to say they'll do anything about it, I can't be against that.
This makes an annoying situation in my head. I think this is good, and a good political move by Cameron. Still, I want to hate the conservatives for being the douchebags that put these sorts of legislations in action in the first place, and they're killing off one of the major routes of attack for people like me.
Still, if all three major parties are pro gay rights, leaving only shitbag parties like the BNP or Christian parties hating gays enough to say they'll do anything about it, I can't be against that.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
- Big Orange
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7108
- Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
- Location: Britain
Re: David Cameron Apologises For Section 28...
And before you know a shit storm is stirred...
inthenews.co.ukConservatives reject Labour homophobia claims
Saturday, 04 Jul 2009 12:25
The Conservative party has rejected claims by two Labour MPs that many of its MPs were homophobic.
Last week, David Cameron apologised for the party's support of Section 28 which banned the promotion of homosexuality by schools.
However, Harriet Harman, leader of the House of Commons, and foreign office minister Chris Bryant said voters shouldn't trust the Conservative party to protect the rights of gay people.
In response, Tory MP Alan Duncan said Ms Harman and Mr Bryant said the Labour party was "stirring up hatred and division", adding that he believed there were many Labour MPs who were antagonistic to gay members of their party.
He said: "I have publicly paid tribute to Tony Blair for his achievements, particularly on introducing civil partnerships. David Cameron this week said that on Section 28 we had to admit we got it wrong.
"The party has changed. I bet in Labour backwaters there are plenty of people who don’t like the fact that Ben Bradshaw is gay."
Previously, Ms Harman said the apology from the Tory party was 25 years too late, adding that they were opposed to the Equalities Bill currently being discussing in parliament.
This week, the prime minister praised the contribution made by gay activists to securing their rights.
Pride London, a series of gay pride marches, are set to take place in London today.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor