
Oh and for reference, Mark Rain is a bit of a far right crazy but thre is a lot of fear of CATO, rational or irrational. I hope his words entertained you though.
That is because Wilkonia has some shell corporations backed by WISH helping the university grant study programs involved in itMariusRoi wrote:Alaska has working Turbo-Scram-Rockets, and Not a single person complained.phongn wrote:EDIT: SABRE engines? Good luck on the R&D for that.
Done. I suppose one of us will have to put it in a post to make it legit and that should do it.SiegeTank wrote:Alright, well, let's say we sell you a 15-year production license on the bomber variant for an unspecified but fair sum (I have no clue how much something like that would cost). You can produce as many as you want, for a modest per-airframe cut, and a slightly larger cut of any profits should you sell the aircraft to any foreign nation. There'll be a stipulation forbidding sales to Japanistan or any MESS country, but I doubt that'll be an issue.Raj Ahten wrote:Well lets draw up some terms thenIndhopal is interested in the bomber variant.
Probably not on the inspections, but yeah at some point your just going have to trust me on that issue. Of course there is always the standby of cutting all military sales to me if it even looks like Japanistan is getting any of the tech though. That would play merry hell with Indhopal given the amount of crap I've bought from you.SiegeTank wrote:We'd prefer the Japanistani's don't even so much as get a look at the exterior of the thing. Ultimately though a guarantee on that subject will have to do, we can't very well have inspectors crawling around your air bases looking for possible spies now can we?You can certainly get your guarantees. What do you have in mind?
I think I'll take you up on those tankers. It looks like I'm probably going to get AWACS craft from Tonkin or Langley though, depending on what exactly they can offer.SiegeTank wrote:I'll happily sell you 24 tankers. And if you can make the AWACS conversion work then sure, why not -- I'll gladly sell you those airframes too. The KC-767 is certainly large enough.I'm intersted in the tankers, I need 24 new ones or so; its unfortunate to hear about the AWACS though. Perhaps I could buy an airframe and convert it to an AWACS role myself?
I'm not averse to retconning any of this, but it made sense in my mind (which admittedly knows almost nothing about these things, so yeah, you're probably right.RogueIce wrote:Pollux, I think you really need to rethink this post of yours. 60,000 troops killed? What did the UCSR do, nuke 'em? Or from the looks of the images you provided, and the death toll, they would've had to pretty well level most of the city. I suppose that's one way to deal with the refugee problem...kill 'em all.
Seriously, that post is just...wrong on so many levels. And since you're the one who set up with this 80,000 strong militia fighting, wiping them out in bombing strikes which kill 60,000 of them and send the rest running or surrendering? Uh, powergame a little?
Note I'm not going after the UCSR here, or Shady. Since AFAIK he had nothing to do with the post. But seriously. That needs to be retconned heavily.
The NDF lack heavy gear and air support. The Army did win the conventional fight because the NDF decided to actually "stand up" to it. It's kinda like Tet Offensive.Steve wrote:Still questionable for the Army to win that fast.
The new government of Misteria won't have much of a problem with high casualties among the refugees because that can be handily blamed on the NDF.RogueIce wrote:Or from the looks of the images you provided, and the death toll, they would've had to pretty well level most of the city. I suppose that's one way to deal with the refugee problem...kill 'em all.
That's pretty much how it happened. What's left of the NDF will be routed by the Misterian army, with continued air support from the UCSR, and perhaps limited special forces involvment.PeZook wrote:Uh...I read Pollux's post as the NDF being routed by the Army, thanks to USCR air support, hence the casualty rate.
People are idiots. Naturally, that won't occur to them.Stas Bush wrote:I guess the logical reply to that would be "Would you rather have the NDF burn down your home and you alongside?"
True. And since the NDF are gone it may be difficult to direct it towards them rather than the UCSR...PeZook wrote:More precisely, they won't care. Their homes are ruined, perhaps some of their relatives are dead, they're angry and anguished and need someone to focus their anger on.
Well yes. There's no disputing that.I'm just being realistic. Warfare is ugly.
It's a communist revolution, isn't it? And they probably still took thousands of NDF militants prisoner. So, one word: showtrials!Ryan Thunder wrote:And since the NDF are gone it may be difficult to direct it towards them rather than the UCSR...
"Blaspheming against God? Off with his head!SiegeTank wrote:It's a communist revolution, isn't it? And they probably still took thousands of NDF militants prisoner. So, one word: showtrials!Ryan Thunder wrote:And since the NDF are gone it may be difficult to direct it towards them rather than the UCSR...
Oh, but who could possibly argue with Revolutionary Justice™?PeZook wrote:Naturally, there's probably some countries which will be spinning this their own way.