Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

N&P: Discuss governments, nations, politics and recent related news here.

Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital

Post Reply
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Darth Wong »

Things are going swimmingly over there:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/07/3 ... eaths.html
Afghan civilian deaths up 24%: UN
Last Updated: Friday, July 31, 2009 | 10:10 AM ET
The Associated Press

The United Nations said Friday the number of civilians killed in conflict in Afghanistan has jumped 24 per cent so far this year, with bombings by insurgents and air strikes by international forces the biggest single killers.

In a grim assessment of the first half of 2009, the UN assistance mission in Afghanistan said the Taliban and other anti-government militants have become more deadly by shifting from ambush attacks to suicide bombings, roadside explosives and targeted assassinations.

It warned that more civilians would likely be killed as insurgents try to battle a troop increase by the U.S. administration and seek to destabilize the country before presidential and provincial council elections on Aug. 20. The summer is also typically the worst for fighting in Afghanistan.

Insurgent attacks are "frequently undertaken regardless of the impact on civilians in terms of deaths and injuries, or destruction of civilian infrastructure," the 21-page report said, ascribing 595 civilian deaths to the Taliban and other "anti-government elements" over the first six months.

Many of those died in suicide attacks or roadside bombs near "civilian traffic, residential compounds and marketplaces."

Foreign strikes have become more deadly, too, partly because insurgent groups are taking cover in residential areas or luring U.S.-led forces into unintentionally killing civilians, the UN said.

Insurgents set up in civilian areas, UN report says

The Taliban and others are "basing themselves in civilian areas so as to deliberately blur the distinction between combatants and civilians, and as part of what appears to be an active policy aimed at drawing a military response to areas where there is a high likelihood that civilians will be killed or injured."

The report said international forces have given high priority to minimizing civilian casualties, but along with Afghan forces have killed 310 civilians. Of those, 200 were killed in 40 air strikes. The total death toll — including those which couldn't be attributed to either side — of 1,013 civilians is 24 per cent higher than in the same period in 2008, and 48 per cent higher than in 2007.

The UN tally is higher than an Associated Press count of civilian deaths based on reports from Afghan and international officials showing that 453 civilians have been killed in insurgent attacks this year, and 199 civilians died from attacks by Afghan or international forces.

An Afghan human rights group says an additional 69 civilians died during a U.S. attack in Farah province in May, but the U.S. disputes those deaths.

Along with insurgents and Western nations, the government of Afghanistan shares responsibility "for a rising toll in terms of civilian deaths and injuries and destruction of infrastructure, including homes and assets, which are essential for survival and the maintenance of livelihoods."

The report said civilian deaths rose every month this year as compared with 2008 except February, as insurgent forces sustained attacks throughout the winter in a break from previous years when there was a lull in fighting.

Other factors were the increased fighting in urban areas, more complex Taliban attacks and the return of militants fleeing warfare across the border in Pakistan. The intensified operations by U.S. forces was also cited.

May was the deadliest month, with 261 civilians killed. The Taliban and other insurgents were responsible for most of the deaths, but 81 were killed by government or international forces, the UN said.

The south has been the worst region as a result of instability in Pakistan and the increase in U.S. activity. Only six civilians were killed in the west of the country in April, but that figure soared in May as a result of air strikes in Bala Baluk, Farah Province, that killed at least 63 women and children, according to the report.

The U.S. estimated that 60-65 Taliban and 20-30 civilians were killed in the battle.

Magnetic explosive devices attached to civilian vehicles

The UN also noted what it called a "new trend" in insurgent attacks. Since May, they have attached magnetic explosive devices to vehicles to target civilians who have worked with government or international military forces.

Examples were the killing of a provincial council candidate May 29 in Khost and, a month later in separate attacks, of a translator and another individual working for the international forces.

Insurgents have become increasingly sophisticated as well. The report said there has been a rise in co-ordinated attacks using explosive devices and suicide bombers to target government ministries and offices, "with the intention of incurring the largest amount of casualties."

In those attacks, civilian government workers were deliberated singled out and shot, despite clearly being noncombatants, it said.

Music shops and other places selling "immoral" goods such as DVDs have been targeted. In an April attack, a young boy was killed when a bomb placed in his wheelbarrow exploded prematurely 15 metres from a government building in Aybak city. The boy had no knowledge of the bomb, the report said.

Air strikes account for two-thirds of civilian deaths

On the other side, the report said that two-thirds of the deaths caused by the Afghan government forces or its international allies came in air strikes. Most casualties resulted from the use of close air support when troops met insurgents in villages or when armed fighters took up positions in residential areas.

The report said civilians in insurgent-dominated areas can rarely refuse shelter to a militant commander or his men, because of intimidation or traditional codes of hospitality. The Taliban and others take advantage of these factors to use civilian homes as cover and deter attacks, or to lead the government or international forces into killing civilians.

International forces have been more forthcoming about acknowledging civilian casualties, but the report expressed continued concern about their "capacity or willingness to provide information" about some incidents.

The UN said the report was compiled by its Afghan mission's human rights unit, and drew on independent monitoring and investigation of incidents where civilians were killed in conflict zones. It is the third year the global body has conducted such analysis in Afghanistan.

UN human rights chief Navi Pillay called on the Afghan government, international forces and insurgents to do more to spare civilians and to "ensure the independent investigation of all civilian casualties."
I didn't know air strikes were responsible for two thirds of civilian deaths. If the Taliban were not so downright evil, even to their own countrymen, I would tend to think that this would make the civilians more sympathetic to them.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Old Peculier
Padawan Learner
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-02-17 11:40am

Re: Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Old Peculier »

Darth Wong wrote:Things are going swimmingly over there:
http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2009/07/3 ... eaths.html
[snip]
I didn't know air strikes were responsible for two thirds of civilian deaths. If the Taliban were not so downright evil, even to their own countrymen, I would tend to think that this would make the civilians more sympathetic to them.
It does say "two-thirds of the deaths caused by the Afghan government forces or its international allies", if that wasn't clear.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Darth Wong »

Old Peculier wrote:
I didn't know air strikes were responsible for two thirds of civilian deaths. If the Taliban were not so downright evil, even to their own countrymen, I would tend to think that this would make the civilians more sympathetic to them.
It does say "two-thirds of the deaths caused by the Afghan government forces or its international allies", if that wasn't clear.
The Afghan government has an air force?!?

In any case, the point is that these people are all similarly arrayed against the Taliban, so the distinction is academic.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
Old Peculier
Padawan Learner
Posts: 159
Joined: 2006-02-17 11:40am

Re: Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Old Peculier »

I would have thought that the majority of the air strikes were performed by the air forces of the 'international allies', that is to say US, Britain et al.

The distinction is that 200 deaths caused by air strikes aimed against the Taliban, part of 310 total caused by all actions against the Taliban, is 'only' a fifth of the total 1013 civilian deaths in that period in time, not two thirds.

It is of course still an unconfortably large death toll, my peeve was with the misleading CBC header of "Air strikes account for two-thirds of civilian deaths".
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Darth Wong wrote: I didn't know air strikes were responsible for two thirds of civilian deaths. If the Taliban were not so downright evil, even to their own countrymen, I would tend to think that this would make the civilians more sympathetic to them.
It says two-thirds of the deaths caused by the Afghan government forces or its international allies came in air strikes. Doesn't mean air strikes are 2/3rds of all civilian deaths.

It’s not too surprising that jets dropping large bombs can kill a lot of civilians while our ground forces have little artillery or mortar support in the field. They pretty well must rely on air strikes for support, because otherwise we’d be stuck in the same strategy of manpower gobbling battery strength artillery firebases we used in Vietnam and the Soviets used themselves. The troops own rifles, machine guns and grenade launchers are just not sufficient firepower to deal with all situations, and the rough terrain rules out widespread deployment of main battle tanks. The Taliban chose when the battles begin, and you can’t just have small units out in the field with no quick response support at all.

It’d help a damn lot though if our very long ranged Crusader SPH hadn’t been sacrificed on the grail of shear stupidity.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Afghan civilian deaths up 24%

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Darth Wong wrote: The Afghan government has an air force?!?

In any case, the point is that these people are all similarly arrayed against the Taliban, so the distinction is academic.
Yeah it does. It only flies training and transportation missions at the moment but it does have a handful of L-39 advanced jet trainers which can carry 2,500lb of bombs apiece, as well as Hind helicopter gunships. The main focus will be on helicopter and fixed wing transport for the future

The Taliban actually kept a squadron of MiG-21 fighters flying right up until 2001 after all. Apparently some of them even got off the ground when the US first struck Kabul with cruise missiles, but all were ultimately destroyed in bombing attacks. Pretty absurd to think about, USN F-14s could well have had a shot at a fighter kill at the outbreak of this War on Terror. Clearly we need 70,000 F-22s to ensure we don’t miss the next chance!
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Post Reply