From this thread over at the SDMB:
http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/sho ... st11450980
Lets look at space at the Planck scale, where space is supposedlydivided into discrete chunks.
Move up one Planck length, from the origin and to the side one planck length.
You are now 1.414...PLs from the origin.
Can you move diagonally back to the origin? Will the distance be 1 OR 1.414... PLs?
Furthermore, if at the Planck Scale, can such motion in quantized linear measurement be governed by an equally quantized angular measurement?
The Planck scale
Moderator: Alyrium Denryle
- Enola Straight
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 793
- Joined: 2002-12-04 11:01pm
- Location: Somers Point, NJ
The Planck scale
Masochist to Sadist: "Hurt me."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Sadist to Masochist: "No."
Re: The Planck scale
Based on my intuitive (that is to say, bullshit) understanding of QM, a particle "1.414" PL from the origin point would have a 58.5% chance of being detected 1 PL away, and 42.4% of being 2 away.
But like I said, "intuitive".
But like I said, "intuitive".
- Wyrm
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2206
- Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
- Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.
Re: The Planck scale
Planck length doesn't mean that space is divided into discrete chunks. Physics is arranged such that any attempt to measure distances smaller than the Planck length will fail, but that doesn't mean that space is divided into Planck-length chunks any more than the 1 mm graduations of your ruler mean that space is divided into 1 mm chunks. There is nothing theoretically preventing you from measuring back to the origin with precision fine enough to tell it's (probably) equal to √2 Planck lengths, although since particles are characterized by their wavefunctions, you can only get a distribution on the distances at best.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. "
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."
Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. "
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."
Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
Re: The Planck scale
Remember that the Planck length is ridiculously small. Consider this: if we scaled up the universe so that the Planck length was 1 cm, the diameter of an electron would be equal to 1 light year! So even without the Uncertainty Principle it's pretty much meaningless to talk about measuring anything to that level of precision.
Planck Length ≈ 10^-35 m, Electron ≈ 10^-18 m, Light Year ≈ 10^15 m
Planck Length ≈ 10^-35 m, Electron ≈ 10^-18 m, Light Year ≈ 10^15 m
- Wyrm
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 2206
- Joined: 2005-09-02 01:10pm
- Location: In the sand, pooping hallucinogenic goodness.
Re: The Planck scale
In the standard model, electrons are treated as point particles. The measurement you cite is the upper bound on the diameter of the electron. That is, the electron can be localized into spaces not more than 1e-18 m wide. That doesn't mean that the electron is 1e-18 m wide.
Protons have a definite diameter because they are known to have structure. We do not know that electrons have a structure more detailed than a point.
Protons have a definite diameter because they are known to have structure. We do not know that electrons have a structure more detailed than a point.
Darth Wong on Strollers vs. Assholes: "There were days when I wished that my stroller had weapons on it."
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. "
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."
Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy
wilfulton on Bible genetics: "If two screaming lunatics copulate in front of another screaming lunatic, the result will be yet another screaming lunatic. "
SirNitram: "The nation of France is a theory, not a fact. It should therefore be approached with an open mind, and critically debated and considered."
Cornivore! | BAN-WATCH CANE: XVII | WWJDFAKB? - What Would Jesus Do... For a Klondike Bar? | Evil Bayesian Conspiracy