Thanas wrote:
Fact is, when the game began, everybody was at peace with another.
Perhaps, but when I joined that ceased to be the case. It's sort of your fiat that it's a state of general peace- why is it so hard to imagine Republic forces which still consider the Galactic Civil War to be going on?
We may scheme with each other and engage in skirmishes etc,
That's more or less what I intend on doing; an uncompromising, highly populist anti-Imperial stance is part of that scheming.
but we did not just outright declare war at each other. Now, my ambassador arrives, is perfectly civil and then gets pelted not only with a declaration of war,
More accurately, an assertion that there was never a declaration of *peace*.
but with demands for surrender and a demand for extradition of nation leaders.
Well, yeah. My goals are no more or less fanatical than those displayed by the Rebel Alliance through 3 movies and a decade of EU material.
When a war would be hopeless. That is national suicide.
There is no tradition finer among revolutionaries and idealists than the impossible struggle!
The Remnant is not pursuing an aggressive policy against anyone (okay, we have the sith, true, but we do not actually build aggressive alliances against them).
This is certainly true, the Imperial Remnant are an entirely reasonable, non-brutal, normal society which has been quite peaceful and progressive. But then, that's always been the prerogative of those who are already on top!
Your leaders have to realize that they cannot change the strategic situation overnight.
Both my in-character leaders and I myself realize this. Perhaps my almost
absurdly provocative stance so far is... purposeful?
The smart thing to do is to sign a peace treaty, built alliances, then try again.
That has been your (highly successful!) plan so far. My position, I believe, requires a different approach. Time will tell, my friend, if it is the correct one!