
Pride Manufacturing

Amity
This camera has its drawbacks, but has distinct advantages as well. I like 6x9, and its triplet lens looks good both unsharp and at critical focus, where it is not tack-sharp but pleasantly clear.
Moderator: Beowulf
Was that shot taken at low light, or is it an effect? If it's a night shot, then I have to say that's very impressive for a folder. I would have thought they'd be awful in low light. Even the reflection is pristine.Simplicius wrote:Amity
Taken in the middle of the night with lighting from some street lamps. Exposure time was three seconds, which is why all the ripples on the water are invisible. I just set the camera right down on the float and only touched the shutter release.Bounty wrote:Was that shot taken at low light, or is it an effect? If it's a night shot, then I have to say that's very impressive for a folder. I would have thought they'd be awful in low light. Even the reflection is pristine.
Nice. It's a lovely effect.Simplicius wrote:Taken in the middle of the night with lighting from some street lamps. Exposure time was three seconds, which is why all the ripples on the water are invisible. I just set the camera right down on the float and only touched the shutter release.Bounty wrote:Was that shot taken at low light, or is it an effect? If it's a night shot, then I have to say that's very impressive for a folder. I would have thought they'd be awful in low light. Even the reflection is pristine.
Nice. Is it a large format camera more or less prone to camera shake? Did you use the mirror lock up?Bounty wrote:Nice. It's a lovely effect.Simplicius wrote:Taken in the middle of the night with lighting from some street lamps. Exposure time was three seconds, which is why all the ripples on the water are invisible. I just set the camera right down on the float and only touched the shutter release.Bounty wrote:Was that shot taken at low light, or is it an effect? If it's a night shot, then I have to say that's very impressive for a folder. I would have thought they'd be awful in low light. Even the reflection is pristine.
A 515 is medium format, and why would it have mirror lockup? Not every camera is an SLR, you know.Is it a large format camera more or less prone to camera shake? Did you use the mirror lock up?
This is beautiful. Absolutely beautiful. The light, the colours... I didn't think it was possible to make a good photo of those small candles (Offer candles? Don't know what you call offerkaarsen in English) but this is great.DaveJB wrote:Candles
Don't let Death's gear obsession get to you. Lens quality is hardly relevant at this point.RRoan wrote:I'm too poor to afford anything but the kit lens right now.
Silence heathen! Yoy shall fail at preventing my faith from spreading and gaining new eager zealots to spread my word with fire and zeal!Simplicius wrote:Don't let Death's gear obsession get to you.RRoan wrote:I'm too poor to afford anything but the kit lens right now.
It's Always relevantLens quality is hardly relevant at this point.
True that, but good zoom upgrades are expensive, and a prime is a very specific tool, for general everyday use Zooms aer just superior unless you know exactly what you want to do (available light shooting for example, people shots in parties, etc'). It'll take more than a year if you ask me, he should keep the kit lens and then later on get a 50mm prime if he feels like it. (or 35mm)For instance, I do almost all of my work on only three lenses: 28mm, 55mm, and 135mm. Sometimes I need 300mm, because I like to go to airshows. Recently I've considered the merits of something wider than 28mm for a few landscapes, but I don't actually need one yet. So with only three possible focal lengths, I can do almost everything I want. Some photographers are satisfied with only one focal length. It all comes down to personal preference, and you should take the time to discover yours before you are bitten by the upgrade bug.
Who said I'd want something in the same focal range? A reasonably priced wide-angle lens is what I really want. I can get a sharper lens later.Simplicius wrote:Don't let Death's gear obsession get to you. Lens quality is hardly relevant at this point.
That's definitely true. For example, I should probably find a bag before I worry about a new lens.Simplicius wrote:It all comes down to personal preference, and you should take the time to discover yours before you are bitten by the upgrade bug.
It's excellent as a second lens if you ask me. I've thought about it. And I'd hardly call a hundred dollars cheap when I just spent all my money on a camera.The Grim Squeaker wrote:Anyway, a "basic" prime lens is uber cheap (around a hundred bucks for a Canon 50mm "Plastic fantastic"), offers image quality superior to all but the most stupidly expensive zooms, and it's extremely light, perfect for practicing with available light and wide apertures as well as spectacular colours and IQ.
Who are you calling a he?The Grim Squeaker wrote:It'll take more than a year if you ask me, he should keep the kit lens and then later on get a 50mm prime if he feels like it. (or 35mm)