Tom_Aurum wrote:Well, then, the web hates me or something, because I can't go there myself. Maybe some dip@#$# from a Cox server tried to hack it, but the link is:
I think that has the article that I read about this topic in it. And actually, I wasn't mistaking nanotechnology for microfusion. Anyways, the method I read in there isn't that far off.
Castigating, mind you, is what you children are doing to me.
How you know the hacker was from a Cox server? Also, please refrain from censoring yourself here. Censorship is childish and immature. Back on topic: You sure you're not talking about sonoluminescence-powered fusion?
Because the message on internet exploder was that that web site was "forbidden". Which means one of two things. One someone from a Cox server, being that I have service from Cox, managed to do something unacceptable concerning that site, such as hacking it, or the government decided the information on there was verboten after the world trade center incident.
Oh, and I could go into a long diatribe concerning saving the shock value of my swears for when I actually mean them. But that would be an <entirely> new topic.
Please kids, don't drink and park: Accidents cause people!
Aurum, its not the castigation, its why we do it. I rip on you because you're a retard, you rip on me because i use the word noob in its appropriate context. Grow up, child.
Sì! Abbiamo un' anima! Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot.
Tom; you see, now, why I warned you about your arguments. I have learned a valuable and painful (at times) lesson at the hands of the people I would like to think of as my friends here on SDN. They're an erudite bunch, and you must do the following in order to present a position to them:
1. Think it through.
2. Research it.
3. Think it through some more.
4. If you still doubt your full grasp of the logic behind your position, say so. If you can't back up your statements with facts or logic, don't try to bluff as if you can.
5. If we still call your position stupid, find out why and then modify your future approach to moral or intellectual positions. In other words, when you're wrong, concede the point and learn from it.
Sorry, everyone, but I know Tom IRL (I DID NOT bring him here.) and I'd like to give him the Cliff's Notes version of what you all have helped me to achieve here, if that's possible. If not... well, I did my good deed for the year.
Back on topic: You sure you're not talking about sonoluminescence-powered fusion?
