Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

GEC: Discuss gaming, computers and electronics and venture into the bizarre world of STGODs.

Moderator: Thanas

User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Stark »

I was playing FC2 the other day (no I won't stop saying that) and the FPS staple happened; I ran out of bullets at close range to a guy with a shotgun. I'm used to Gears, so I pulled right and pressed A... but it was just a stupid bunnyhop.

So do any first person games have evasive moves? In this situation, a sideways dive (as is common in third person) woudl have put me behind cover where I could have reloaded in safety, instead of being shot twince in the face (which left me pulling a piece of wire out of my knee). I imagine this sort of thing would make all the motion-sickness guys really upset, however.
User avatar
Brother-Captain Gaius
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6859
Joined: 2002-10-22 12:00am
Location: \m/

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Brother-Captain Gaius »

Vegas has some, although it's a 1st/3rd hybrid (more games should do this, btw).

There's Mirror's Edge, I guess, not that I played it enough to say if they were effective or not.

Also, for lulz: GoldenEye and Perfect Dark, using the ol' "aim and side step" trick. :D

EDIT: America's Army has/had some degree of rolling about.
Agitated asshole | (Ex)40K Nut | Metalhead
The vision never dies; life's a never-ending wheel
1337 posts as of 16:34 GMT-7 June 2nd, 2003

"'He or she' is an agenderphobic microaggression, Sharon. You are a bigot." ― Randy Marsh
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Stark »

FC2 is a good example of a game that should be 1st/3rd toggleable, since it's chockers with body awareness anyway.

FC2 does have the Gears 'slide to cover' thing when sprinting... I wish they just used the same control to do other such rapid moves. I think it's an artefact of FPS evolution - in oldschool twitch shooters, such moves are useless because you can glide sideways or bunnyhop just fine. In the more 'tacticool' games people probably think OMG U SHOULD HAVE PLANNED BETTER or something. It's just daft that your options at close range in most games are a) walk slowly to one side or b) get shot directly in the face. In this situation, I would have been fine taking damage to evade/losing stamina/etc.

Actually, using the game's pre-existing blurred vision/eye adjustment shit could allow them to have crazy action-movie moves without pissing off the simhard idiots too much. :D
User avatar
HSRTG
Jedi Knight
Posts: 651
Joined: 2005-04-12 10:01pm
Location: Meh

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by HSRTG »

In Star Wars Battlefront 2 you can roll in any direction you're moving in. So sidestepping into a sideroll is quite possible. Other than that I haven't played anything else that has it.
Kill one man, you're a murderer. Kill a million, a king. Kill them all, a god. - Anonymous
User avatar
Darth Raptor
Red Mage
Posts: 5448
Joined: 2003-12-18 03:39am

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Darth Raptor »

You can toggle between first and third when you're a mooktrooper, just not when you're a hero.
weemadando
SMAKIBBFB
Posts: 19195
Joined: 2002-07-28 12:30pm
Contact:

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by weemadando »

In GRAW on the PC you had some dives and slides you could use and that was an FPS game. Actually very useful when you are sprinting and really, really want to get into cover right now.
User avatar
defanatic
Jedi Knight
Posts: 627
Joined: 2005-09-05 03:26am

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by defanatic »

UT2k3 and 2k4 had the dodge move (double tap in a direction to leap or something that way).
>>Your head hurts.

>>Quaff painkillers

>>Your head no longer hurts.
User avatar
Ford Prefect
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8254
Joined: 2005-05-16 04:08am
Location: The real number domain

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Ford Prefect »

Brother-Captain Gaius wrote:There's Mirror's Edge, I guess, not that I played it enough to say if they were effective or not.
From memory, I don't think it has anything quite like what Stark is suggesting. However, the game is mostly an avoid getting shot simulator, so ... :)
What is Project Zohar?

Here's to a certain mostly harmless nutcase.
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Zixinus »

Jedi Knight and Jedi Academy had a roll move too.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
Joviwan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 580
Joined: 2007-09-09 11:02pm
Location: Orange frapping county, Californeea

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Joviwan »

Zixinus wrote:Jedi Knight and Jedi Academy had a roll move too.
Again, those are 3rd person shooters at their core. The first person mode was fundamentally useless with the only weapon worth using.
Image
Drooling Iguana: No, John. You are the liberals.
Phantasee: So extortion is cooler and it promotes job creation!
Ford Prefect: Maybe there can be a twist ending where Vlad shows up for the one on one duel, only to discover that Sun Tzu ignored it and burnt all his crops.
User avatar
Ace Pace
Hardware Lover
Posts: 8456
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:04am
Location: Wasting time instead of money
Contact:

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Ace Pace »

I think theres a reason we're not really finding many FPSes using dodge moves is because it's very hard to communicate the results of a dodge from a first person viewpoint.

Let me try and explain by using UT's dodge moves as an example. When I hit double-left on my keyboard, my character usually leaps sideways, vaults, swivels, anything. But I have no idea, because all I know is my camera moved 2 units to the left instead of one. Why not? Well, motion sickness is one thing. Can you imagine seeing your viewpoint swivel on a screen at high speed multiple times in a minute? I'm fairly immune to motion sickness and I think that'd be problematic.

You can also see this with the high amount of people I've encountered who left Half Life 2 at the air-boat sequence due to high percentage of motion sickness. The camera was not stable and had no other reference points and therefore it left quite a few people feeling bad.

Theres also a question of what information it would impart and how it would do it. When you play GoW (or so I assume, having never played it), you can still see the world despite your character being crouched near a concrete barrier. You can swivel the camera without moving the character. In an FP viewpoint, you can't easily do it, nor is it really helpful. I'm hiding behind something, if I take a peek, I've moved myself and exposed myself to fire. It would also involve a novel control scheme to let yourself take a look without using the body movement keys.

I'm not really sure what the conclusion is, is the FP viewpoint incapable of demonstrating these moves and therefore abstracts them? Or are we just dumb and can't think up of a way to do it that is natural?
Brotherhood of the Bear | HAB | Mess | SDnet archivist |
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Themightytom »

Stark wrote:I was playing FC2 the other day (no I won't stop saying that) and the FPS staple happened; I ran out of bullets at close range to a guy with a shotgun. I'm used to Gears, so I pulled right and pressed A... but it was just a stupid bunnyhop.

So do any first person games have evasive moves? In this situation, a sideways dive (as is common in third person) woudl have put me behind cover where I could have reloaded in safety, instead of being shot twince in the face (which left me pulling a piece of wire out of my knee). I imagine this sort of thing would make all the motion-sickness guys really upset, however.
unreal tournament GOTYE has commando rolls if I remember correctly. The XBOX unreal tournament i=only has "Lie on the ground dead". Which is actually kind of useful as it conffuses AIs

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Oskuro »

If MODs count, there's Action Half-Life and The Specialists.
unsigned
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22463
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Mr Bean »

Stark wrote:What does 'MOD' stand for?
Mods, shorthand for Modification. A popular PC game only activity of taking the base game and modifying it in various ways. The Specialists was FUN, pure fun as it was made during the height of the Matrix movie popularizations and it had all those sorts of crazy dodges, dives and lunges and "slow-mo" except you only got about three second worth and it put everyone near you into slow mo not just yourself, and it recharged so slowly it could not be abused. Being HL1 they both looked uglier than hell but damn if they were not just old fashion fun random FPS shoot em ups.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Rawtooth
Padawan Learner
Posts: 344
Joined: 2006-05-02 01:29pm
Location: Anchorage, Alaska

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Rawtooth »

F.E.A.R. had the slide-kick which I used to travel from cover to cover on occasion. Definitely not deliberate on the part of the developers, but the only example I can think of.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Stark »

Mr Bean wrote:
Stark wrote:What does 'MOD' stand for?
Mods, shorthand for Modification. A popular PC game only activity of taking the base game and modifying it in various ways. The Specialists was FUN, pure fun as it was made during the height of the Matrix movie popularizations and it had all those sorts of crazy dodges, dives and lunges and "slow-mo" except you only got about three second worth and it put everyone near you into slow mo not just yourself, and it recharged so slowly it could not be abused. Being HL1 they both looked uglier than hell but damn if they were not just old fashion fun random FPS shoot em ups.
no shit. The point is that capitalising 'mod' is stupid. And Specialists has sucked since 2.0 sadly.
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22463
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Mr Bean »

Stark wrote: no shit. The point is that capitalising 'mod' is stupid. And Specialists has sucked since 2.0 sadly.
Blaim the press then it's either MOD's or Mod's. It's always capitalized one way or the other and I've seen it both in "Mod Community" or "Player made MOD" in various video game publications. MOD is MoD. The fact you asked indicates your lack of contact with the community.

Also yes, after 2.0 it got all wonky and to fluid and was less fun to play then Acton. But by then it was Natural Selection or Counter-Strike for good HL-1 mods. Ah Natural selection(No dodge moves there thank you)

Also as for game don't forget the Maxy Payne series and the MOD's for both games which made the dodging even more insane. MX-2 toned down the John Woo-ness the first had. The first mod out toned it back up.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Oskuro »

Before Stark points it out, Max Payne is 3rd person really, but both installments had a very good dodge/stunt system. I think Remedy missed an oppoortunity there by not adding a multiplayer component, Max Payne 2 could've had a sweet coop mode too.

Are there any multiplayer games out there with similar gameplay to both Max Payne or Action Half-Life /The Specialists?
unsigned
User avatar
Manus Celer Dei
Jedi Master
Posts: 1486
Joined: 2005-01-01 06:30pm
Location: I need you to relax your anus.

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Manus Celer Dei »

Perfect Dark Zero had dodge-roll moves, and in relation to what Ace Pace was saying the camera pulls out to a third-person view during the roll to let you see what you're doing.

Unfortunately the distance you moved was so small as the make the move almost totally useless. Oh well.
Image
"We will build cities in a day!"
"Man would cower at the sight!"
"We will build towers to the heavens!"
"Man was not built for such a height!"
"We will be heroes!"
"We will BUILD heroes!"
[/size][/i]
User avatar
Mad
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1923
Joined: 2002-07-04 01:32am
Location: North Carolina, USA
Contact:

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Mad »

The Metroid Prime series has a first-person mode dodge move.
Later...
Medic
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2632
Joined: 2004-12-31 01:51pm
Location: Deep South

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Medic »

Ace Pace wrote:I'm not really sure what the conclusion is, is the FP viewpoint incapable of demonstrating these moves and therefore abstracts them? Or are we just dumb and can't think up of a way to do it that is natural?
Just a though, in an FPS, whenever the hypothetical dodge button is invoked, the camera can zoom out to 3rd person for a brief moment, then come back in. I'm not sure I can convey this in words properly but you should get the gist in your mind's eye, I hope.

This would balance the dodge button too: by removing the 1st-person perspective for a moment, it's simulating the fact that you probably just took a bullet-like trajectory to the ground and can't yet pick up your weapon to fire down the sights. Similar to how you cannot fire and sprint in CoD, for example. The biggest problem I can think of is the camera going through walls in tight places and in buildings, but maybe a sufficiently skilled programmer team could get around that.

Or you stay 1st person the whole time and maybe you see your arms brace yourself to the ground for an instance as you scramble to get back on your feet. I suppose this is where motion-sickness occurs? I'm not familiar with a game that does this so I don't know how bad it looks.
User avatar
Ryushikaze
Jedi Master
Posts: 1072
Joined: 2006-01-15 02:15am
Location: Chapel Hill, NC

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Ryushikaze »

Mad wrote:The Metroid Prime series has a first-person mode dodge move.
Yeah, the lock on-sidestep. Works well, but gets prioritized over jump at times, which isn't always a good thing.

It also sends you into 3rd person mode for bits where 1st would be impractical or disorienting, like Morphball and Screw attack.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Do any first person shooter have 'evasive' moves?

Post by Stark »

SPC Brungardt wrote:Just a though, in an FPS, whenever the hypothetical dodge button is invoked, the camera can zoom out to 3rd person for a brief moment, then come back in. I'm not sure I can convey this in words properly but you should get the gist in your mind's eye, I hope.

This would balance the dodge button too: by removing the 1st-person perspective for a moment, it's simulating the fact that you probably just took a bullet-like trajectory to the ground and can't yet pick up your weapon to fire down the sights. Similar to how you cannot fire and sprint in CoD, for example. The biggest problem I can think of is the camera going through walls in tight places and in buildings, but maybe a sufficiently skilled programmer team could get around that.
Why is this necessary? Every FPS that isn't shit already restricts actions depending on movement, and constantly changing cameras are arguably going to disorient people more than just rolling the camera or whatever. I think dodge moves are a great way to demonstrate body awareness; I love all that shit in Far Cry 2, and flying through the air and crashing your shoulder into a box and having to pick yourself up/go into a crouch is good stuff. I can't imagine the thought process behind allowing people to shoot while doing (outside TS-style stuff anyway).
SPC Brungardt wrote:Or you stay 1st person the whole time and maybe you see your arms brace yourself to the ground for an instance as you scramble to get back on your feet. I suppose this is where motion-sickness occurs? I'm not familiar with a game that does this so I don't know how bad it looks.
I get the impression you almost exclusively play competitive twitch shooters. :) It is true that people seem to dislike anything that isn't 'camera on a stick' Doom-style viewpoint, but I love games with body awareness that do cool things with your viewpoint.

Actually, Ace's post makes me think this comes back to the same reason most games don't have climbing - people are just too used to camera on a stick. People complain that reversing is hard in FC2 because you have to look out the back window of your car... just like when you actually reverse. :D
Post Reply