[Member] Stark removal vote comments

Moderator: CmdrWilkens

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Darth Wong »

Thanas wrote:I move to declare this vote invalid due to the following reasons:

1. The motion and second are not present. Secret motions and seconds are not allowed in the rules and go in fact against the spirit of this body.
2. There was no discussion. In fact, the only evidence was presented after the vote had already happened.

Do I have a second?

*******************
In other news, this also raises serious doubts about the competence of our chancellor, IMO. I thought there was supposed to be fair discussion in here, not some people just making a vote because they feel like it? That the chancellor just starts a vote without even a mediocrum of discussion on it IMO reflects very badly upon his integrity and professionalism.
Don't blame Wilkie. I think it was my fault for not communicating correctly. Mr Bean wanted to simply remove Stark from the Senate. I told him it should go to a vote instead. That was apparently interpreted as authorization to go straight to a vote.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Thanas »

Alright. My apologies to Wilkens.

I still think we should have had a discussion first, so the motion stands (without the blaming it on Wilkens part). My apologies for that, again.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Stuart
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2935
Joined: 2004-10-26 09:23am
Location: The military-industrial complex

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Stuart »

Procedural issues aside, I feel seriously uncomfortable about this motion from a moral point of view. It sits ill with me that Stark wasn't given a chance to defend himself or his comments. Whether he could mount an effective defense is another matter of course but he should have been allowed the chance. I'm also very uneasy about expelling people because they say things other people don't like. That's not a good precedent.

Having said all that, the "do this or I'm out" line is employmentally suicidal; any competent management given that ultimatum will reply "sorry to see you go, your paycheck to date and papers will be in the post." My guess is that Stark's attitude and general behavior were as important to this decision as the minutia of what he actually said. It's notable that there is no comparable motion applied to Hotfoot who said much the same things but did so in a reasonable, thoughtful and considered way then discussed the points raised in opposition in a like manner.
Nations do not survive by setting examples for others
Nations survive by making examples of others
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Darth Wong »

Yes, the fact that this vote was handled very poorly should not be interpreted as proof that the proposal itself was completely without merit. Those are separate issues.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Thanas »

So what, we are just going to go ahead with the vote nevertheless because the proposal might have some merit, without giving him any chance to defend himself against whatever is levelled against him?

That is not fair, neither to Stark nor to the members deciding it.

Furthermore, if we go down that route, procedure does not matter at all anymore if the claim has some merit...which is to be decided by the vote bypassing the procedure.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Dalton
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
For Those About to Rock We Salute You
Posts: 22637
Joined: 2002-07-03 06:16pm
Location: New York, the Fuck You State
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Dalton »

I am of the opinion that the vote should be declared invalid until after further deliberations and discussions are held. The proposal is not without merit, but proper procedure has not been followed.
Image
Image
To Absent Friends
Dalton | Admin Smash | Knight of the Order of SDN

"y = mx + bro" - Surlethe
"You try THAT shit again, kid, and I will mod you. I will
mod you so hard, you'll wish I were Dalton." - Lagmonster

May the way of the Hero lead to the Triforce.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Darth Wong »

Thanas wrote:So what, we are just going to go ahead with the vote nevertheless because the proposal might have some merit, without giving him any chance to defend himself against whatever is levelled against him?
When did I say anything remotely like that? I'm just pointing out that the merits of the proposal are not invalidated by the fact that we went about it the wrong way. By all means, go through proper procedure first.
That is not fair, neither to Stark nor to the members deciding it.

Furthermore, if we go down that route, procedure does not matter at all anymore if the claim has some merit...which is to be decided by the vote bypassing the procedure.
So I'm not allowed to express an opinion on this idea at all, for fear that it will be interpreted as an attempt to short-circuit the process? If I wanted to short-circuit this process, I wouldn't be offering my opinion here. I would just do it.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Thanas »

My apologies, I misread your statement as voicing support for the vote as it is.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Coyote »

Well, we're discussing it now, so let's unban him (I have to admit that was an unusual turn of events) and invite him to speak. The vote can be nullified in the meantime if there's a chance he'll bring something up that may alter the perspective.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Simplicius
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2031
Joined: 2006-01-27 06:07pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Simplicius »

If that's a motion, I'll second.
User avatar
Imperial Overlord
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11978
Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
Location: The Tower at Charm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Imperial Overlord »

The Duchess of Zeon says things that are at least twice as inflammatory and extreme as anything Stark has ever said and no one has disputed her right to be in the Senate. Stark is doing his job as a senator to criticize the direction that the Senate and the Administration are going in when he believes that it is going in the wrong direction.

I second (or third, depending on Simplicius's intent) Thanas's motion.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by NecronLord »

I find this an ambiguous topic. The only thing that keeps me from truly despising Stark is the fact that I only have to deal with him in a form where I can happily skim or skip his words. I would happily support removing Stark from the Senate simply to enforce a standard of membership, and voted against his initial application. While I support the efforts to reform and renew the Senate, and would happily eject him simply on the worthless spam-like quality of much of his meme-littered posting, I find myself persuaded by Thanas' argument. Darth Wong is however, correct; Similarly Imperial Overlord raises an excellent point; my issue personally with Stark is not the contempt he holds the Senate in - he has grounds for doing so, especially given the rampancy of the House of Commons since it has existed - but my own offense at the poor quality of his posts (primarily in OSF).

In summary, this is no way to run the house.

I hereby give my support to Thanas' motion for dismissal of this vote and immediate reinstatement of Stark's posting rights in this forum.

Of course, I would prefer Stark using that opportunity to account for his contemptuous attitude before I or some other formally propose his removal on the grounds that he has all-but indicated a wish to leave in the posts Bean mentioned. He has all but shat on our metaphorical senate upholstery in many posts, after all. I for one would be prepared to vote for his remaining in the Senate if he were to make some effort in a reasonable timeframe (say a week or two) to respond to his critics in a cogent way. Which is to say, in posts not consisting entirely of ‘LOL’ and ‘SERUS BIZNIS’ or some other textual garbage.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Darth Wong »

Imperial Overlord wrote:The Duchess of Zeon says things that are at least twice as inflammatory and extreme as anything Stark has ever said and no one has disputed her right to be in the Senate.
Actually, DOZ realized herself that she was getting out of line and so she asked me to remove her from the Senate. She is no longer a Senate member even though there was no vote, and that's why: she asked for her own removal. I did it for her quietly, but if she's going to become a subject of dispute, then I'm afraid I must say it publicly, lest people start making up their own theories.

For whatever reason, people have been very reluctant to remove Senate members, even when they were flagrantly trolling. DOZ simplified the situation by recognizing her own misbehaviour and asking to be removed.
Stark is doing his job as a senator to criticize the direction that the Senate and the Administration are going in when he believes that it is going in the wrong direction.

I second (or third, depending on Simplicius's intent) Thanas's motion.
It would have been nice if Stark would actually do so properly, with reasoned arguments in the Senate, instead of making passive/aggressive digs at people all over the place. Nevertheless, I've already agreed that this was handled wrongly.

PS. I don't see Stark's name in the banlist right now anyway.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
fgalkin
Carvin' Marvin
Posts: 14557
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:51pm
Location: Land of the Mountain Fascists
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by fgalkin »

CmdrWilkens wrote: Stark no longer wishes to be part of the Senate. A motion has been made and seconded that he be removed from the Senate. His access has been suspended pending the outcome of this vote. A separate comment thread will be opened so for once I AM going to enforce the no chatter rule. This includes "Voted" posts. If you have comments please go here.
I checked, and Stark is no longer listed as a member of the Senators usergroup. I think he has a good excuse for not defending himself in the Senate.

Have a very nice day.
-fgalkin
User avatar
AdmiralKanos
Lex Animata
Lex Animata
Posts: 2648
Joined: 2002-07-02 11:36pm
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by AdmiralKanos »

fgalkin wrote:I checked, and Stark is no longer listed as a member of the Senators usergroup.
Oh, I see what happened. Stark was never banned; he was just dropped from the group for the vote. That's why his name didn't show up in the banlist. I got confused because everyone was acting as if he'd been banned. Anyway, I reinstated him.
For a time, I considered sparing your wretched little planet Cybertron.
But now, you shall witnesss ... its dismemberment!

Image
"This is what happens when you use trivia napkins for research material"- Sea Skimmer on "Pearl Harbour".
"Do you work out? Your hands are so strong! Especially the right one!"- spoken to Bud Bundy
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Alyeska »

Senate process aside. I vote for the removal of Stark. As others have noted, Stark was voted in and it seems condescending that they now vote him out. I voted against Stark's very entry into the Senate for the same reason I am voting for the removal of Stark. I do not consider him a good candidate as clearly demonstrated by his behavior and actions against the senate repeatedly. He was elected because the Senate felt obligated to vote for someone on the list that the HOC selected. Rather then simply vote against him, he was voted in out of apathy in my opinion.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Tiriol
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2038
Joined: 2005-09-15 11:31am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Tiriol »

If anything, I think I must bear the brunt of blame here: I had become fed up with Stark's attitude and posts and the recent half-ultimatum about leaving the Senate (I'm not calling it an actual ultimatum, although it was very close to it) and inquired both Wilkens and Mr Bean about the possibility of removing him from the Senate by bringing the case before the Senate itself. Now, I can't be sure did Wilkens and Mr Bean or did they not act because of my inquiries, but certainly I was (at least probably) a contributing factor.

All in all, though, Thanas's criticism about the handling of the case is valid and I wouldn't be adverse of reversing the vote in order to start an actual discussion about removing Stark (or me, for that matter, since I had a hand in this whole ruckus). But that, I think, is up to the Chancellor.
Darth Wong wrote:For whatever reason, people have been very reluctant to remove Senate members, even when they were flagrantly trolling. DOZ simplified the situation by recognizing her own misbehaviour and asking to be removed.
I think it is because people don't like to single out others here. Some have known each other for a long time, long before there was any Senate; and some may have other reasons (for example: not wanting to become an open target for everyone who likes the Senator in question). And it may feel like a personal attack to suggest that someone is not up to the Senate standards.
Confiteor Deo omnipotenti; beatae Mariae semper Virgini; beato Michaeli Archangelo; sanctis Apostolis, omnibus sanctis... Tibit Pater, quia peccavi nimis, cogitatione, verbo et opere, mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa! Kyrie Eleison!

The Imperial Senate (defunct) * Knights Astrum Clades * The Mess
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Stark »

Stuart wrote:Having said all that, the "do this or I'm out" line is employmentally suicidal; any competent management given that ultimatum will reply "sorry to see you go, your paycheck to date and papers will be in the post."
My intention was never any kind of 'ultimatum'; the position in the Senate is purely an advisory one. It simply appeared at the time that the mods had declared the discussion useless and moved to action directly. In this situation, there didn't seem much point holding an advisory position. It was later revealed that this was certainly not the case, and Mike's decisions regarding this forum are always the final say.
Stuart wrote:My guess is that Stark's attitude and general behavior were as important to this decision as the minutia of what he actually said. It's notable that there is no comparable motion applied to Hotfoot who said much the same things but did so in a reasonable, thoughtful and considered way then discussed the points raised in opposition in a like manner.
While this is possibly the case, the final authority on the board rests with Mike, and this is something I've always supported. Whatever the circumstances yesterday, I was wrong about what happened.
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by CmdrWilkens »

So a couple things:

The Chancellor is granted a pretty wide berth of leeway in interpreting when a matter can come to a vote. The way this developed, as DW mentioned, there was a very strong push to have Stark summarily removed and I stated that I would rather have a vote instead at which point we find ourselves at the junction of last night.

The reason Stark was removed from the list was to disable voting to retain himself. I don't care if folks think that is some sort of lack of faith on my part but I'd prefer not to place a person in a situation where they have all the ability to engage in an anonymous conflict of interest.

So all that said with the board software one can, near as I can tell, change their vote up until the end of the poll which is still 6 days away. Votes do not close unless the 7 days have expired. Now if folks think this merits additional discussion I am open to extending the voting period but holding a complete re-vote is not needed because, again, you can change your vote all the way up until the poll closes. In particular because a removal vote requires a 60% super-majority so the threshold is high enough that discussion and the given time frame should be sufficient in this case.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Thanas »

My motion still stands and has been seconded or thirded. I remind the chair of that.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by CmdrWilkens »

Since the motion was to invalidate the actions of the chair before I could respond I'd like a second at this point. If someone else does wish to second the motion at this point we will proceed to a vote to invalidate during which time voting on the original motion will be suspended.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by Thanas »

Ah, so blatant procedural misuse can be instantly healed as long as the members are in agreement. Good to know.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23423
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by LadyTevar »

CmdrWilkens wrote:Since the motion was to invalidate the actions of the chair before I could respond I'd like a second at this point. If someone else does wish to second the motion at this point we will proceed to a vote to invalidate during which time voting on the original motion will be suspended.
I second Thanas' motion to invalidate the Vote to Remove Stark.

As Admiral Kane stated, there was no reason for this step to be taken at this time.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23423
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by LadyTevar »

PS: I have locked the Vote Thread for the time being
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
User avatar
CmdrWilkens
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9093
Joined: 2002-07-06 01:24am
Location: Land of the Crabcake
Contact:

Re: [Member] Stark removal vote comments

Post by CmdrWilkens »

Motion seconded, we will proceed with a vote to void the initial vote.
Image
SDNet World Nation: Wilkonia
Armourer of the WARWOLVES
ASVS Vet's Association (Class of 2000)
Former C.S. Strowbridge Gold Ego Award Winner
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE

"I put no stock in religion. By the word religion I have seen the lunacy of fanatics of every denomination be called the will of god. I have seen too much religion in the eyes of too many murderers. Holiness is in right action, and courage on behalf of those who cannot defend themselves, and goodness. "
-Kingdom of Heaven
Locked