A central theme of the game, at least as far as I'm concerned, is how the Templars believe that the truth is whatever you make it, while the Assassin's believe nothing is true. I shouldn't have to point out how similar this is, conceptually. If nothing is true, as the Assassin's believe, then anything can be made true, as the Templars believe. Altair talks about this idea of making the truth a little in the Codex you collect. I think this duality is pretty much the saving grace of the whole Assassin/Templar secret war. I should note that this is mostly touched upon around the events of Ezio's life, as opposed to dealt with directly (at least so far, given that I've only killed the peon's of Borgia's conspiracy). Most notably, there's a conversation in the modern day where Desmond and one of the new characters are talking about fighting the good fight, and this other dude interjects with 'uh, guys, we're assassins'. The implication is of course that the Templars and Assassins are pretty similar, in that they kill for their creed, it's just that the Templars have way more money. Even Desmond's justification, that Assassins only kill when necessary, seems to deliberately harken back to the Crusdae Templars and their justification for their actions.Stark wrote:Can you explain a bit about the ideological side, which isn't touched on in anything I've read? I'm glad to see it's still there, because that's really the only thing that made Asscreed one interesting from a story perspective.
Also, while I'm pretty convinced that The Truth is going to be silly, some of it is actually quite interesting. At least, it's interesting in the sense that it implies that the Templars do want to forward humanity as a whole, given that they were apparently behind the moon landings. This is an element which is present in the historical stuff as well (the Templars worship reason in the same way the Assassins worship free will), but it's coloured by the way that the Templars will apparently use any asshole to get their job done. In a way, I think the duality is often handled in a more subtle way than the first game, in the sense that while ostensibly fighting for the good guys, Ezio also furthers the power and influence of Il Magnifico. And then we get stuff about Hitler being a Templar; it's uneven as a result.