The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

User avatar
Phantasee
Was mich nicht umbringt, macht mich stärker.
Posts: 5777
Joined: 2004-02-26 09:44pm

The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Phantasee »

It's pretty long, but it's a good read. There are some nice portraits of the people as well, which you can get larger versions of through a link in the sidebar.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2009/ ... inkel-text
The Hadza
They grow no food, raise no livestock, and live without rules or calendars. They are living a hunter-gatherer existence that is little changed from 10,000 years ago. What do they know that we've forgotten?
By Michael Finkel

"I'm hungry," says Onwas, squatting by his fire, blinking placidly through the smoke. The men beside him murmur in assent. It's late at night, deep in the East African bush. Singing, a rhythmic chant, drifts over from the women's camp. Onwas mentions a tree he spotted during his daytime travels. The men around the fire push closer. It is in a difficult spot, Onwas explains, at the summit of a steep hill that rises from the grassy plain. But the tree, he adds, spreading his arms wide like branches, is heavy with baboons. There are more murmurs. Embers rise to a sky infinite with stars. And then it is agreed. Everyone stands and grabs his hunting bow.

Onwas is an old man, perhaps over 60—years are not a unit of time he uses—but thin and fit in the Hadza way. He's maybe five feet tall. Across his arms and chest are the hieroglyphs of a lifetime in the bush: scars from hunts, scars from snakebites, scars from arrows and knives and scorpions and thorns. Scars from falling out of a baobab tree. Scars from a leopard attack. Half his teeth remain. He is wearing tire-tread sandals and tattered brown shorts. A hunting knife is strapped to his hip, in a sheath made of dik-dik hide. He's removed his shirt, as have most of the other men, because he wants to blend into the night.

Onwas looks at me and speaks for a few moments in his native language, Hadzane. To my ear it sounds strangely bipolar—lilting and gentle for a phrase or two, then jarring and percussive, with tongue clicks and glottic pops. It's a language not closely related to any other that still exists: to use the linguists' term, an isolate.

I have arrived in the Hadza homeland in northern Tanzania with an inter­preter, a Hadza woman named Mariamu. She is Onwas's niece. She attended school for 11 years and is one of only a handful of people in the world who can speak both English and Hadzane. She interprets Onwas's words: Do I want to come?

Merely getting this far, to a traditional Hadza encampment, is not an easy task. Years aren't the only unit of time the Hadza do not keep close track of—they also ignore hours and days and weeks and months. The Hadza language doesn't have words for numbers past three or four. Making an appointment can be a tricky matter. But I had contacted the owner of a tourist camp not far outside the Hadza territory to see if he could arrange for me to spend time with a remote Hadza group. While on a camping trip in the bush, the owner came across Onwas and asked him, in Swahili, if I might visit. The Hadza tend to be gregarious people, and Onwas readily agreed. He said I'd be the first foreigner ever to live in his camp. He promised to send his son to a particular tree at the edge of the bush to meet me when I was scheduled to arrive, in three weeks.

Sure enough, three weeks later, when my interpreter and I arrived by Land Rover in the bush, there was Onwas's son Ngaola waiting for us. Apparently, Onwas had noted the stages of the moon, and when he felt enough time had passed, he sent his son to the tree. I asked Ngaola if he'd waited a long time for me. "No," he said. "Only a few days."

At first, it was clear that everyone in camp—about two dozen Hadza, ranging from infants to grandparents—felt uncomfortable with my presence. There was a lot of staring, some nervous laughs. I'd brought along a photo album, and passing it around helped mitigate the awkwardness. Onwas was interested in a picture of my cat. "How does it taste?" he asked. One photo captured everyone's attention. It was of me participating in a New Year's Day polar bear swim, leaping into a hole cut in a frozen lake. Hadza hunters can seem fearless; Onwas regularly sneaks up on leopards and races after giraffes. But the idea of winter weather terrified him. He ran around camp with the picture, telling everyone I was a brave man, and this helped greatly with my acceptance. A man who can leap into ice, Onwas must have figured, is certainly a man who'd have no trouble facing a wild baboon. So on the third night of my stay, he asks if I want to join the hunting trip.

I do. I leave my shirt on—my skin does not blend well with the night—and I follow Onwas and ten other hunters and two younger boys out of camp in a single-file line. Walking through Hadza country in the dark is challenging; thornbushes and spiked acacia trees dominate the terrain, and even during the day there is no way to avoid being jabbed and scratched and punctured. A long trek in the Hadza bush can feel like receiving a gradual full-body tattoo. The Hadza spend a significant portion of their rest time digging thorns out of one another with the tips of their knives.

At night the thorns are all but invisible, and navigation seems impossible. There are no trails and few landmarks. To walk confidently in the bush, in the dark, without a flashlight, requires the sort of familiarity one has with, say, one's own bedroom. Except this is a thousand-square-mile bedroom, with lions and leopards and hyenas prowling in the shadows.

For Onwas such navigation is no problem. He has lived all his life in the bush. He can start a fire, twirling a stick between his palms, in less than 30 seconds. He can converse with a honeyguide bird, whistling back and forth, and be led directly to a teeming beehive. He knows everything there is to know about the bush and virtually nothing of the land beyond. One time I showed Onwas a map of the world. I spread it open on the dirt and anchored the corners with stones. A crowd gathered. Onwas stared. I pointed out the continent of Africa, then the country of Tanzania, then the region where he lived. I showed him the United States.

I asked him what he knew about America—the name of the president, the capital city. He said he knew nothing. He could not name the leader of his own country. I asked him, as politely as possible, if he knew anything about any country. He paused for a moment, evidently deep in thought, then suddenly shouted, "London!" He couldn't say precisely what London was. He just knew it was someplace not in the bush.

About a thousand Hadza live in their traditional homeland, a broad plain encompassing shallow, salty Lake Eyasi and sheltered by the ramparts of the Great Rift Valley. Some have moved close to villages and taken jobs as farmhands or tour guides. But approximately one-quarter of all Hadza, including those in Onwas's camp, remain true hunter-gatherers. They have no crops, no livestock, no permanent shelters. They live just south of the same section of the valley in which some of the oldest fossil evidence of early humans has been found. Gene­tic testing indicates that they may represent one of the primary roots of the human family tree—perhaps more than 100,000 years old.

What the Hadza appear to offer—and why they are of great interest to anthropologists—is a glimpse of what life may have been like before the birth of agriculture 10,000 years ago. Anthro­pologists are wary of viewing contemporary hunter-gatherers as "living fossils," says Frank Marlowe, a Florida State University professor of anthropology who has spent the past 15 years studying the Hadza. Time has not stood still for them. But they have maintained their foraging lifestyle in spite of long exposure to surrounding agriculturalist groups, and, says Marlowe, it's possible that their lives have changed very little over the ages.

For more than 99 percent of the time since the genus Homo arose two million years ago, everyone lived as hunter-gatherers. Then, once plants and animals were domesticated, the discovery sparked a complete reorganization of the globe. Food production marched in lockstep with greater population densities, which allowed farm-based societies to displace or destroy hunter-gatherer groups. Villages were formed, then cities, then nations. And in a relatively brief period, the hunter-gatherer lifestyle was all but extinguished. Today only a handful of scattered peoples—some in the Amazon, a couple in the Arctic, a few in Papua New Guinea, and a tiny number of African groups—maintain a primarily hunter-gatherer existence. Agriculture's sudden rise, however, came with a price. It introduced infectious-disease epidemics, social stratification, intermittent famines, and large-scale war. Jared Diamond, the UCLA professor and writer, has called the adoption of agriculture nothing less than "the worst mistake in human history"—a mistake, he suggests, from which we have never recovered.

The Hadza do not engage in warfare. They've never lived densely enough to be seriously threatened by an infectious outbreak. They have no known history of famine; rather, there is evidence of people from a farming group coming to live with them during a time of crop failure. The Hadza diet remains even today more stable and varied than that of most of the world's citizens. They enjoy an extraordinary amount of leisure time. Anthropologists have estimated that they "work"—actively pursue food—four to six hours a day. And over all these thousands of years, they've left hardly more than a footprint on the land.

Traditional Hadza, like Onwas and his camp mates, live almost entirely free of possessions. The things they own—a cooking pot, a water container, an ax—can be wrapped in a blanket and carried over a shoulder. Hadza women gather berries and baobab fruit and dig edible tubers. Men collect honey and hunt. Nighttime baboon stalking is a group affair, conducted only a handful of times each year; typically, hunting is a solo pursuit. They will eat almost anything they can kill, from birds to wildebeest to zebras to buffalo. They dine on warthog and bush pig and hyrax. They love baboon; Onwas joked to me that a Hadza man cannot marry until he has killed five baboons. The chief exception is snakes. The Hadza hate snakes.

The poison the men smear on their arrowheads, made of the boiled sap of the desert rose, is powerful enough to bring down a giraffe. But it cannot kill a full-grown elephant. If hunters come across a recently dead elephant, they will crawl inside and cut out meat and organs and fat and cook them over a fire. Sometimes, rather than drag a large animal back to camp, the entire camp will move to the carcass.

Hadza camps are loose affiliations of relatives and in-laws and friends. Each camp has a few core members—Onwas's two sons, Giga and Ngaola, are often with him—but most others come and go as they please. The Hadza recognize no official leaders. Camps are tra­ditionally named after a senior male (hence, Onwas's camp), but this honor does not confer any particular power. Individual autonomy is the hallmark of the Hadza. No Hadza adult has authority over any other. None has more wealth; or, rather, they all have no wealth. There are few social obligations—no birthdays, no religious holidays, no anniversaries.

People sleep whenever they want. Some stay up much of the night and doze during the heat of the day. Dawn and dusk are the prime hunting times; otherwise, the men often hang out in camp, straightening arrow shafts, whittling bows, making bowstrings out of the ligaments of giraffes or impalas, hammering nails into arrow­heads. They trade honey for the nails and for colorful plastic and glass beads that the women fashion into necklaces. If a man receives one as a gift, it's a good sign he has a female admirer.

There are no wedding ceremonies. A couple that sleeps at the same fire for a while may eventually refer to themselves as married. Most of the Hadza I met, men and women alike, were serial monogamists, changing spouses every few years. Onwas is an exception; he and his wife, Mille, have been with each other all their adult lives, and they have seven living children and several grandchildren. There was a bevy of children in the camp, with the resident grandmother, a tiny, cheerful lady named Nsalu, running a sort of day care while the adults were in the bush. Except for breast-feeding infants, it was hard to determine which kids belonged to which parents.

Gender roles are distinct, but for women there is none of the forced subservience knit into many other cultures. A significant number of Hadza women who marry out of the group soon return, unwilling to accept bullying treatment. Among the Hadza, women are frequently the ones who initiate a breakup—woe to the man who proves himself an incompetent hunter or treats his wife poorly. In Onwas's camp, some of the loudest, brashest members were women. One in particular, Nduku, appointed herself my language teacher and spent a good percentage of every lesson teasing me mercilessly, often rolling around in laughter as I failed miserably at reproducing the distinct, tongue-tricky clicks.

Onwas knows of about 20 Hadza groups roaming the bush in his area, constantly swapping members, like a giant square dance. Most conflicts are resolved by the feuding parties simply separating into different camps. If a hunter brings home a kill, it is shared by everyone in his camp. This is why the camp size is usually no more than 30 people—that's the largest number who can share a good-size game animal or two and feel decently sated.

I was there during the six-month dry season, May through October, when the Hadza sleep in the open, wrapped in a thin blanket beside a campfire—two to six people at each hearth, eight or nine fires spread in a wide semicircle fronting a brush-swept common area. The sleep groupings were various: families, single men, young women (with an older woman as minder), couples. During the rainy season, they construct little domed shelters made of interwoven twigs and long grasses: basically, upside-down bird's nests. To build one takes no more than an hour. They move camp roughly once a month, when the berries run low or the hunting becomes tough or there's a severe sickness or death.

No one sleeps alone in Onwas's camp. He assigned his son Ngaola, the one who had waited a few days by the tree, to stay with me, and Ngaola recruited his friend Maduru to join us. The three of us slept in a triangle, head to toe to head around our fire, though when the mosquitoes were fierce, I slept in my tent.

Ngaola is quiet and introspective and a really poor hunter. He's about 30 years old and still unmarried; bedeviled, perhaps, by the five-­baboon rule. It pains him that his older brother, Giga, is probably the most skilled archer in camp. Maduru is a solid outdoorsman, an espec­ially good honey finder, but something of a Hadza misfit. When a natural snakebite remedy was passed around camp, Maduru was left out of the distribution. This upset him greatly, and Onwas had to spend an hour beside him, an arm slung avuncularly over his shoulder, calming him down.

Maduru is the one who assumes responsibility for me during the nighttime baboon quest. As we move through the bush, he snaps off eye-level acacia branches with thorns the size of toothpicks and repeatedly checks to make sure I'm keeping pace. Onwas leads us to the hill where he'd seen the tree full of baboons.

Here we stop. There are hand signals, some clipped chatter. I'm unsure of what is going on—my translator has remained back at camp. The hunt is only for men. But Maduru taps me on the shoulder and motions for me to follow. The other hunters begin fanning out around the base of the hill, and I tail Maduru as he plunges into the brush and starts to climb. The slope seems practically vertical—hands are required to haul yourself up—and the thickets are as dense as Brillo pads. Thorns slice into my hands, my face. A trickle of blood oozes into my eye. We climb. I follow Maduru closely; I do not want to become separated.

Finally, I understand. We are climbing up, from all sides, toward the baboons. We are trying to startle them, to make them run. From the baboons' perch atop the hill, there is no place to go but down. The Hadza have encircled the hill; therefore, the baboons will be running toward the hunters. Possibly toward Maduru and me.

Have you ever seen a baboon up close? They have teeth designed for ripping flesh. An adult male can weigh more than 80 pounds. And here we are, marching upward, purposely trying to provoke them. The Hadza are armed with bows and arrows. I have a pocketknife.

We move higher. Maduru and I break out of the undergrowth and onto the rocks. I feel as though I've emerged from beneath a blanket. There is a sickle of moon, a breeze. We are near the summit—the top is just over a stack of boulders, maybe 20 feet above our head. The baboon tree is up there, barely out of eyesight.

Then I hear it—a crazed screeching sound. The baboons are aware that something is amiss. The sound is piercing, panicked. I do not speak baboon, but it is not difficult to interpret. Go away! Do not come closer! But Maduru clambers farther, up onto a flat rock. I follow. The baboons are surrounded, and they seem to sense it.

Abruptly, there's a new sound. The crack of branches snapping overhead. The baboons are descending, shrieking. Maduru freezes, drops to one knee, slides an arrow into position, pulls back the bowstring. He is ready. I'm hiding behind him. I hope, I fervently hope, that no baboons run at us. I reach into my pocket, pull out my knife, unfold it. The blade is maybe two inches long. It feels ridiculous, but that is what I do.

The screeching intensifies. And then, directly over us, in stark silhouette against the backdrop of stars, is a baboon. Scrambling. Moving along the rock's lip. Maduru stands, takes aim, tracking the baboon from left to right, the arrow slotted, the bowstring at maximum stretch. Every muscle in my body tenses. My head pulses with panic. I grip my knife.

The chief reason the Hadza have been able to maintain their lifestyle so long is that their homeland has never been an inviting place. The soil is briny; fresh water is scarce; the bugs can be intolerable. For tens of thousands of years, it seems, no one else wanted to live here. So the Hadza were left alone. Recently, however, escalating population pressures have brought a flood of people into Hadza lands. The fact that the Hadza are such gentle stewards of the land has, in a way, hurt them—the region has generally been viewed by outsiders as empty and unused, a place sorely in need of development. The Hadza, who by nature are not a combative people, have almost always moved away rather than fight. But now there is nowhere to retreat.

There are currently cattle herders in the Hadza bush, and goat herders, and onion farmers, and corn growers, and sport hunters, and game poachers. Water holes are fouled by cow excrement. Vegetation is trampled beneath cattle's hooves. Brush is cleared to make way for crops; scarce water is used to irrigate them. Game animals have migrated to national parks, where the Hadza can't follow. Berry groves and trees that attract bees have been destroyed. Over the past century, the Hadza have lost exclusive possession of as much as 90 percent of their homeland.

None of the other ethnic groups living in the area—the Datoga, the Iraqw, the Isanzu, the Sukuma, the Iramba—are hunter-gatherers. They live in mud huts, often surrounded by livestock enclosures. Many of them look down on the Hadza and view them with a mix of pity and disgust: the untouchables of Tanzania. I once watched as a Datoga tribesman prevented several Hadza women from approaching a communal water hole until his cows had finished drinking.

Dirt roads are now carved into the edges of the Hadza bush. A paved road is within a four-day walk. From many high points there is decent cell phone reception. Most Hadza, including Onwas, have learned to speak some Swahili, in order to communicate with other groups. I was asked by a few of the younger Hadza hunters if I could give them a gun, to make it easier to harvest game. Onwas himself, though he's scarcely ventured beyond the periphery of the bush, senses that profound changes are coming. This does not appear to bother him. Onwas, as he repeatedly told me, doesn't worry about the future. He doesn't worry about anything. No Hadza I met, in fact, seemed prone to worry. It was a mind-set that astounded me, for the Hadza, to my way of thinking, have very legitimate worries. Will I eat tomorrow? Will something eat me tomorrow? Yet they live a remarkably present-tense existence.

This may be one reason farming has never appealed to the Hadza—growing crops requires planning; seeds are sown now for plants that won't be edible for months. Domestic animals must be fed and protected long before they're ready to butcher. To a Hadza, this makes no sense. Why grow food or rear animals when it's being done for you, naturally, in the bush? When they want berries, they walk to a berry shrub. When they desire baobab fruit, they visit a baobab tree. Honey waits for them in wild hives. And they keep their meat in the biggest storehouse in the world—their land. All that's required is a bit of stalking and a well-shot arrow.

There are other people, however, who do ponder the Hadza's future. Officials in the Tanzanian government, for starters. Tanzania is a future-oriented nation, anxious to merge into the slipstream of the global economy. Baboon-hunting bushmen is not an image many of the country's leaders wish to project. One minister has referred to the Hadza as backward. Tanzania's president, Jakaya Kikwete, has said that the Hadza "have to be transformed." The government wants them schooled and housed and set to work at proper jobs.

Even the one Hadza who has become the group's de facto spokesperson, a man named Richard Baalow, generally agrees with the government's aims. Baalow, who adopted a non-Hadza first name, was one of the first Hadza to attend school. In the 1960s his family lived in government-built housing—an attempt at settling the Hadza that soon failed. Baalow, 53, speaks excellent English. He wants the Hadza to become politically active, to fight for legal protection of their land, and to seek jobs as hunting guides or park rangers. He encourages Hadza children to attend the regional primary school that provides room and board to Hadza students during the academic year, then escorts them back to the bush when school is out.

The school-age kids I spoke with in Onwas's group all said they had no interest in sitting in a classroom. If they went to school, many told me, they'd never master the skills needed for survival. They'd be outcasts among their own people. And if they tried their luck in the modern world—what then? The women, perhaps, could become maids; the men, menial laborers. It's far better, they said, to be free and fed in the bush than destitute and hungry in the city.

More Hadza have moved to the traditionally Hadza area of Mangola, at the edge of the bush, where, in exchange for money, they demonstrate their hunting skills to tourists. These Hadza have proved that their culture is of significant interest to outsiders and a potential source of income. Yet among the Hadza of Mangola there has also been a surge in alcoholism, an outbreak of tuberculosis, and a distressing rise in domestic violence, including at least one report of a Hadza man who beat his wife to death.

Though the youngsters in Onwas's group show little interest in the outside world, the world is coming to them. After two million years, the age of the hunter-gatherer is over. The Hadza may hold on to their language; they may demonstrate their abilities to tourists. But it's only a matter of time before there are no more traditional Hadza scrambling in the hills with their bows and arrows, stalking baboons.

Up on the hill Onwas has led us to, clutching my knife, I crouch behind Maduru as the baboon moves along a fin of rock. And then, abruptly, the baboon stops. He swivels his head. He is so close we could reach out to each other and make contact. I stare into his eyes, too frightened to even blink. This lasts maybe a second. Maduru doesn't shoot, possibly because the animal is too close and could attack us if wounded—it's often the poison, not the arrow, that kills. An instant later the baboon leaps away into the bushes.

There is silence for a couple of heartbeats. Then I hear frantic yelping and crashing. It's coming from the far side of the rock, and I can't tell if it is human or baboon. It's both. We thrash through bushes, half-tumbling, half-running, until we reach a clearing amid a copse of acacias.

And there it is: the baboon. On his back, mouth open, limbs splayed. Shot by Giga. A nudge with a toe confirms it—dead. Maduru whistles and shouts, and soon the other hunters arrive. Onwas kneels and pulls the arrow out of the baboon's shoulder and hands it back to Giga. The men stand around the baboon in a circle, examining the kill. There is no ceremony. The Hadza are not big on ritual. There is not much room in their lives, it seems, for mysticism, for spirits, for pondering the unknown. There is no specific belief in an afterlife—every Hadza I spoke with said he had no idea what might happen after he died. There are no Hadza priests or shamans or medicine men. Missionaries have produced few converts. I once asked Onwas to tell me about God, and he said that God was blindingly bright, extremely powerful, and essential for all life. God, he told me, was the sun.

The most important Hadza ritual is the epeme dance, which takes place on moonless nights. Men and women divide into separate groups. The women sing while the men, one at a time, don a feathered headdress and tie bells around their ankles and strut about, stomping their right foot in time with the singing. Supposedly, on epeme nights, ancestors emerge from the bush and join the dancing. One night when I watched the epeme, I spotted a teenage boy, Mataiyo, sneak into the bush with a young woman. Other men fell asleep after their turn dancing. Like almost every aspect of Hadza life, the ceremony was informal, with a strictly individual choice of how deeply to participate.

With the Hadza god not due to rise for several hours, Giga grabs the baboon by a rear paw and drags the animal through the bush back to camp. The baboon is deposited by Onwas's fire, while Giga sits quietly aside with the other men. It is Hadza custom that the hunter who's made the kill does not show off. There is a good deal of luck in hunting, and even the best archers will occasionally face a long dry spell. This is why the Hadza share their meat communally.

Onwas's wife, Mille, is the first to wake. She's wearing her only set of clothes, a sleeveless T-shirt and a flower-patterned cloth wrapped about her like a toga. She sees the baboon, and with the merest sign of pleasure, a brief nod of her chin, she stokes the fire. It's time to cook. The rest of camp is soon awake—everyone is hungry—and Ngaola skins the baboon and stakes out the pelt with sharpened twigs. The skin will be dry in a few days and will make a fine sleeping mat. A couple of men butcher the animal, and cuts of meat are distributed. Onwas, as camp elder, is handed the greatest delicacy: the head.

The Hadza cooking style is simple—the meat is placed directly on the fire. No grill, no pan. Hadza mealtime is not an occasion for politeness. Personal space is generally not recognized; no matter how packed it is around a fire, there's always room for one more, even if you end up on someone's lap. Once a cut of meat has finished cooking, anyone can grab a bite.

And I mean grab. When the meat is ready, knives are unsheathed and the frenzy begins. There is grasping and slicing and chewing and pulling. The idea is to tug at a hunk of meat with your teeth, then use your knife to slice away your share. Elbowing and shoving is standard behavior. Bones are smashed with rocks and the marrow sucked out. Grease is rubbed on the skin as a sort of moisturizer. No one speaks a word, but the smacking of lips and gnashing of teeth is almost comically loud.

I'm ravenous, so I dive into the scrum and snatch up some meat. Baboon steak, I have to say, isn't terrible—a touch gamy, but it's been a few days since I've eaten protein, and I can feel my body perking up with every bite. Pure fat, rather than meat, is what the Hadza crave, though most coveted are the baboon's paw pads. I snag a bit of one and pop it in my mouth, but it's like trying to swallow a pencil eraser. When I spit the gob of paw pad out, a young boy instantly picks it up and swallows it.

Onwas, with the baboon's head, is comfortably above the fray. He sits cross-legged at his fire and eats the cheeks, the eyeballs, the neck meat, and the forehead skin, using the soles of his sandals as a cutting board. He gnaws the skull clean to the bone, then plunges it into the fire and calls me and the hunters over for a smoke.

It is impossible to overstate just how much Onwas—and most Hadza—love to smoke. The four possessions every Hadza man owns are a bow, some arrows, a knife, and a pipe, made from a hollowed-out, soft stone. The smoking material, tobacco or cannabis, is acquired from a neighboring group, usually the Datoga, in exchange for honey. Onwas has a small amount of tobacco, which is tied into a ball inside his shirttail. He retrieves it, stuffs it all into his pipe, and then, holding the pipe vertically, plucks an ember from the fire and places it atop his pipe. Pulsing his cheeks in and out like a bellows, he inhales the greatest quantity of smoke he possibly can. He passes the pipe to Giga.

Then the fun begins. Onwas starts to cough, slowly at first, then rapidly, then uncontrollably with tears bursting from his eyes, then with palms pushing against his head, and then, finally, rolling onto his back, spitting and gasping for air. In the meantime, Giga has begun a similar hacking session and has passed the pipe to Maduru, who then passes the pipe to me. Soon, all of us, the whole circle of men, are hacking and crying and rolling on our backs. The smoke session ends when the last man sits up, grinning, and brushes the dirt from his hair.

With the baboon skull still in the fire, Onwas rises to his feet and claps his hands and begins to speak. It's a giraffe-hunting story—Onwas's favorite kind. I know this even though Mariamu, my translator, is not next to me. I know because Onwas, like many Hadza, is a story performer. There are no televisions or board games or books in Onwas's camp. But there is entertainment. The women sing songs. And the men tell campfire stories, the Kabuki of the bush.

Onwas elongates his neck and moves around on all fours when he's playing the part of the giraffe. He jumps and ducks and pantomimes shooting a bow when he's illustrating his own role. Arrows whoosh. Beasts roar. Children run to the fire and stand around, listening intently; this is their schooling. The story ends with a dead giraffe—and as a finale, a call and response.

"Am I a man?" asks Onwas, holding out his hands.

"Yes!" shouts the group. "You are a man."

"Am I a man?" asks Onwas again, louder.

"Yes!" shouts the group, their voices also louder. "You are a man!"

Onwas then reaches into the fire and pulls out the skull. He hacks it open, like a coconut, exposing the brains, which have been boiling for a good hour inside the skull. They look like ramen noodles, yellowish white, lightly steaming. He holds the skull out, and the men, including myself, surge forward and stick our fingers inside the skull and scoop up a handful of brains and slurp them down. With this, the night, at last, comes to an end.

The baboon hunt, it seems, was something of an initiation for me. The next day, Nyudu hacks down a thick branch from a mutateko tree, then carefully carves a bow for me, long and gracefully curved. Several other men make me arrows. Onwas presents me with a pipe. Nkulu handles my shooting lessons. I begin to carry my bow and arrows and pipe with me wherever I go (along with my water-purification kit, my sunscreen, my bug spray, and my eyeglass-cleaning cloth).

I am also invited to bathe with the men. We walk to a shallow, muddy hole—more of a large puddle, with lumps of cow manure bobbing about—and remove our clothes. Handfuls of mud are rubbed against the skin as an exfoliant, and we splash ourselves clean. While Hadza have a word for body odor, the men tell me that they prefer their women not to bathe—the longer they go between baths, they say, the more attractive they are. Nduku, my Hadza language teacher, said she sometimes waits months between baths, though she can't understand why her husband wants her that way. I also discover, by listening to Mille and Onwas, that bickering with one's spouse is probably a universal human trait. "Isn't it your turn to fetch water?" "Why are you napping instead of hunting?" "Can you explain why the last animal brought to camp was skinned so poorly?" It occurs to me that these same arguments, in this same valley, have been taking place for thousands of years.

There are things I envy about the Hadza—mostly, how free they appear to be. Free from possessions. Free of most social duties. Free from religious strictures. Free of many family responsibilities. Free from schedules, jobs, bosses, bills, traffic, taxes, laws, news, and money. Free from worry. Free to burp and fart without apology, to grab food and smoke and run shirtless through the thorns.

But I could never live like the Hadza. Their entire life, it appears to me, is one insanely committed camping trip. It's incredibly risky. Medical help is far away. One bad fall from a tree, one bite from a black mamba snake, one lunge from a lion, and you're dead. Women give birth in the bush, squatting. About a fifth of all babies die within their first year, and nearly half of all children do not make it to age 15. They have to cope with extreme heat and frequent thirst and swarming tsetse flies and malaria-­laced mosquitoes.

The days I spent with the Hadza altered my perception of the world. They instilled in me something I call the "Hadza effect"—they made me feel calmer, more attuned to the moment, more self-sufficient, a little braver, and in less of a constant rush. I don't care if this sounds maudlin: My time with the Hadza made me happier. It made me wish there was some way to prolong the reign of the hunter-gatherers, though I know it's almost certainly too late.

It was my body, more than anything, that let me know it was time to leave the bush. I was bitten and bruised and sunburned and stomach­achy and exhausted. So, after two weeks, I told everyone in camp I had to go.

There was little reaction. The Hadza are not sentimental like that. They don't do extended goodbyes. Even when one of their own dies, there is not a lot of fuss. They dig a hole and place the body inside. A generation ago, they didn't even do that—they simply left a body out on the ground to be eaten by hyenas. There is still no Hadza grave marker. There is no funeral. There's no service at all, of any sort. This could be a person they had lived with their entire life. Yet they just toss a few dry twigs on top of the grave. And they walk away. 

Like I said, a long read, but it's an interesting glimpse into the life humans lived all those years ago. I really dig these stories where the writer lives with the group for a period (whether it's hunter-gatherers like this or some people in a city like Tokyo), would anyone recommend others?
XXXI
User avatar
LadyTevar
White Mage
White Mage
Posts: 23348
Joined: 2003-02-12 10:59pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by LadyTevar »

I have to wonder if the author got to be a good shot with the bow.
Image
Nitram, slightly high on cough syrup: Do you know you're beautiful?
Me: Nope, that's why I have you around to tell me.
Nitram: You -are- beautiful. Anyone tries to tell you otherwise kill them.

"A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP" -- Leonard Nimoy, last Tweet
[R_H]
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2894
Joined: 2007-08-24 08:51am
Location: Europe

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by [R_H] »

Really interesting article, thanks for posting it Phantasee.
User avatar
Edi
Dragonlord
Dragonlord
Posts: 12461
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:27am
Location: Helsinki, Finland

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Edi »

Moved to SLAM.
Warwolf Urban Combat Specialist

Why is it so goddamned hard to get little assholes like you to admit it when you fuck up? Is it pride? What gives you the right to have any pride?
–Darth Wong to vivftp

GOP message? Why don't they just come out of the closet: FASCISTS R' US –Patrick Degan

The GOP has a problem with anyone coming out of the closet. –18-till-I-die
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

LadyTevar wrote:I have to wonder if the author got to be a good shot with the bow.
Probably not; as I understand it it takes a lifetime to get truly good with a bow.

What I don't understand is why, as a practical matter, the hunter-gatherers can't live on the game preserves. Or rather why they mustn't. There's no danger that they'll cause the populations of wildlife to collapse; they don't hunt enough game to do that or they would have already done it some time in the past hundred thousand years.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Zixinus »

A quite interesting article. I am not that great a fan of hunter-gatherer lifestyle, but I can understand the appeal.

Perhaps the practise and knowledge of these societies and people could be made into the equivalent of boy-scouts or something?

I also find the bit about how the author feels different interesting. Certainly, the knowledge that one can survive under such harsh conditions and becoming accepted by such people can help one's self-esteem and/or confidence. I wonder whether such experiences could be used to a therapeutic effect?
Probably not; as I understand it it takes a lifetime to get truly good with a bow.
I would rather say that you need to be in good strength, some eyesight and a lot of practise to be good with a bow. What kind and what strength bow, that is more of a key question.
If these people use relatively low-strength bows and rely on poison, than its not necessarily that hard to be a good archer.
Of course, the people who have done it all their life will beat you any day, but you can still be able to hit the wide side of the barn with modest amount and good quality training and practise.
What I don't understand is why, as a practical matter, the hunter-gatherers can't live on the game preserves. Or rather why they mustn't. There's no danger that they'll cause the populations of wildlife to collapse; they don't hunt enough game to do that or they would have already done it some time in the past hundred thousand years.
Well, first off, there is simply less and less land for them.
Second, for them to be responsible game preservers, they would have to educated.
As for why they "must" be ended, is simply because they have less and less space for them. More and more land will be turned for cultivation and these people will no longer be able to live off the land as they did before.

So, I guess the politicians see it that they must either educate them now, so at least some of their culture survives, or watch them die a more painful death of forced "civilizing". I am not sure though, because I am not familiar with the local way of thinking.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
Ziggy Stardust
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3114
Joined: 2006-09-10 10:16pm
Location: Research Triangle, NC

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Ziggy Stardust »

I read the article with the pictures in my issue of Nat Geo this morning. It was a great read, and I am glad that the author included the high infant mortality rate. Until he through that in, I was afraid the article was just going to be some primitivist wanking bullshit.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

Zixinus wrote:I would rather say that you need to be in good strength, some eyesight and a lot of practise to be good with a bow. What kind and what strength bow, that is more of a key question.
If these people use relatively low-strength bows and rely on poison, than its not necessarily that hard to be a good archer.
Of course, the people who have done it all their life will beat you any day, but you can still be able to hit the wide side of the barn with modest amount and good quality training and practise.
Ah, but can you hit the broad side of a baboon? That's the real test of archery in the Hadza context...
What I don't understand is why, as a practical matter, the hunter-gatherers can't live on the game preserves. Or rather why they mustn't. There's no danger that they'll cause the populations of wildlife to collapse; they don't hunt enough game to do that or they would have already done it some time in the past hundred thousand years.
Well, first off, there is simply less and less land for them.
Second, for them to be responsible game preservers, they would have to educated.
I'm not sure I understand why. We don't try to educate the elephants, and the Hadza probably wouldn't cause much more harm to the habitat on the preserve than the elephants do... especially not if some of what I've heard about dangerous overpopulation of elephants in some African wildlife preserves is true. At most, you need to have someone drop in every few months and say "no hunting this animal, that animal, or the other animal, or we kick you back into the thorn bushes and let you argue with the goatherds over waterholes."

The Hadza, or people broadly similar to them, lived in those areas for a long time before the Gunpowder Age shifted the balance of power between small crafty humans and big ferocious animals by giving the humans guns. I don't see why it would be all that dangerous to let them continue to do so.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Zixinus »

Ah, but can you hit the broad side of a baboon? That's the real test of archery in the Hadza context...
How far is it and under what light conditions? Because if I wanted to, I can get my skills up in a few weeks.
I'm not sure I understand why. We don't try to educate the elephants, and the Hadza probably wouldn't cause much more harm to the habitat on the preserve than the elephants do... especially not if some of what I've heard about dangerous overpopulation of elephants in some African wildlife preserves is true. At most, you need to have someone drop in every few months and say "no hunting this animal, that animal, or the other animal, or we kick you back into the thorn bushes and let you argue with the goatherds over waterholes."
The Hadza are not elephants. The issue isn't harm to the ecosystem. Its the harm that others cause to the Hadza's ecosystem.

And I don't get the thorn bush and goatherds thing.
The Hadza, or people broadly similar to them, lived in those areas for a long time before the Gunpowder Age shifted the balance of power between small crafty humans and big ferocious animals by giving the humans guns. I don't see why it would be all that dangerous to let them continue to do so.
You don't get it, do you? They can't continue this lifestyle, not because they should not, but because the natural wildlife these people live off of is disappearing due to agriculture. The lands these people inhabit is viewed as potential farmland that has been begun to be utilised. Read here:
The chief reason the Hadza have been able to maintain their lifestyle so long is that their homeland has never been an inviting place. The soil is briny; fresh water is scarce; the bugs can be intolerable. For tens of thousands of years, it seems, no one else wanted to live here. So the Hadza were left alone. Recently, however, escalating population pressures have brought a flood of people into Hadza lands. The fact that the Hadza are such gentle stewards of the land has, in a way, hurt them—the region has generally been viewed by outsiders as empty and unused, a place sorely in need of development. The Hadza, who by nature are not a combative people, have almost always moved away rather than fight. But now there is nowhere to retreat.

There are currently cattle herders in the Hadza bush, and goat herders, and onion farmers, and corn growers, and sport hunters, and game poachers. Water holes are fouled by cow excrement. Vegetation is trampled beneath cattle's hooves. Brush is cleared to make way for crops; scarce water is used to irrigate them. Game animals have migrated to national parks, where the Hadza can't follow. Berry groves and trees that attract bees have been destroyed. Over the past century, the Hadza have lost exclusive possession of as much as 90 percent of their homeland.
The issue here would be, if I understand the situation correctly, is that these people should be tried to be educated so they have an idea of the change that is coming to them and try to adopt. Perhaps many will become "civilised", with only fragments of their culture. Perhaps there will be a clan of these educated semi-nomads that still live in the bush. Perhaps these people will go and try to make a business that allows them to retain most of their lifestyle. Perhaps most of the population will adopt, with a few dedicated men and women who focus on maintaining this lifestlye and skills for any who wish to learn it. I hope that this Richard Baalow guy is able to do what he wants to do and sounds like what you to happen.

But things will change. Tanzania will develop, it wants to. The age of hunter-gatherers is over. Perhaps Jared Diamond is right about developing agriculture, but the cat is out of the bag and we live as we live.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

Zixinus wrote:
Ah, but can you hit the broad side of a baboon? That's the real test of archery in the Hadza context...
How far is it and under what light conditions? Because if I wanted to, I can get my skills up in a few weeks.
I'll take your word for it.
_____
I'm not sure I understand why. We don't try to educate the elephants, and the Hadza probably wouldn't cause much more harm to the habitat on the preserve than the elephants do... especially not if some of what I've heard about dangerous overpopulation of elephants in some African wildlife preserves is true. At most, you need to have someone drop in every few months and say "no hunting this animal, that animal, or the other animal, or we kick you back into the thorn bushes and let you argue with the goatherds over waterholes."
The Hadza are not elephants. The issue isn't harm to the ecosystem. Its the harm that others cause to the Hadza's ecosystem.

And I don't get the thorn bush and goatherds thing.
That's because you seem to be misunderstanding my point.

Many African nations already have large areas of land set aside where no construction is allowed and where wild animals are plentiful: the wildlife preserves. From the point of view of a hunter-gatherer group like the Hadza, that's the best place they could possibly go at the moment. As you say, everywhere outside the wildlife preserves is increasingly full of African farmers and herdsmen who are trying to take over the land occupied by hunter-gatherers.

So we have a people who are constantly forced to retreat from the advance of farmers and herdsmen, and a region where farmers and herdsmen are not allowed to go. Sounds like a match made in Heaven to me.
______

My argument is NOT "I don't understand why the Hadza are doomed if the status quo is unchanged." My argument is "I don't understand why the Hadza are not allowed to move onto the wildlife preserves, which were already established to avoid the same kind of ecological damage and economic development that are forcing the Hadza to fall back into a fraction of their original territory."

If the Hadza were a threat to the wildlife population in the preserve, this would make sense; but if the Hadza were a threat to African wildlife in its native habitat, that wildlife would already be extinct, because the Hadza have had millenia to kill it off.

And you appear to have completely missed this, which is my main point. If we are going to have wildlife preserves, why not let them double as hunter-gatherer preserves? The hunter-gatherers are threatened by the spread of today's civilization just as surely as the wildlife is, after all.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
GrandMasterTerwynn
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6787
Joined: 2002-07-29 06:14pm
Location: Somewhere on Earth.

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by GrandMasterTerwynn »

Simon_Jester wrote:
What I don't understand is why, as a practical matter, the hunter-gatherers can't live on the game preserves. Or rather why they mustn't. There's no danger that they'll cause the populations of wildlife to collapse; they don't hunt enough game to do that or they would have already done it some time in the past hundred thousand years.
Well, first off, there is simply less and less land for them.
Second, for them to be responsible game preservers, they would have to educated.
I'm not sure I understand why. We don't try to educate the elephants, and the Hadza probably wouldn't cause much more harm to the habitat on the preserve than the elephants do... especially not if some of what I've heard about dangerous overpopulation of elephants in some African wildlife preserves is true. At most, you need to have someone drop in every few months and say "no hunting this animal, that animal, or the other animal, or we kick you back into the thorn bushes and let you argue with the goatherds over waterholes."

The Hadza, or people broadly similar to them, lived in those areas for a long time before the Gunpowder Age shifted the balance of power between small crafty humans and big ferocious animals by giving the humans guns. I don't see why it would be all that dangerous to let them continue to do so.
Humans being crafty shifted the balance of power between bipedal primates and big ferocious animals. When Stone Age hunter-gatherers were introduced into ecosystems under pressure due to climate change and the resulting habitat destruction (paleolithic North America,) the native megafauna all vanished much more quickly than they might've without humans being around.

Hunter-gatherers may have lived in those areas for a long time, but they had no land constraints; and could move from area to area when they hunted the local game populations below the levels needed to sustain them. Moving them onto the game preserves . . . which are, by their nature, small, restricted areas surrounded by habitat destruction, and whose animal populations are already under pressure from poaching . . . well, that isn't going to help the species we're trying to not wipe out, and only buys the hunter-gatherers a couple more generations before growing populations and land usage force them into the 21st century, such as it is in that part of the world.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

GrandMasterTerwynn wrote:Humans being crafty shifted the balance of power between bipedal primates and big ferocious animals. When Stone Age hunter-gatherers were introduced into ecosystems under pressure due to climate change and the resulting habitat destruction (paleolithic North America,) the native megafauna all vanished much more quickly than they might've without humans being around.
A compromise: humans being crafty created a balance of power between humans and big ferocious animals, wherein the humans could generally kill big ferocious animals when they felt appropriate, but the big ferocious animals were still dangerous enough that they had to be handled with care. You didn't go into the woods to exterminate the giant bears, because the bears were quite capable of exterminating right back if pressed too hard. Yes, Stone Age human hunters could contribute to the extinction of giant ground sloths and the like, but as I understand it, this only happened when other pressure was on the species.

The invention of gunpowder took that kind-of-sort-of balance and destroyed it entirely, insofar as it ever existed; with firearms it became so trivial to kill even the largest and toughest animals that we wound up nearly driving them into extinction by accident, even when there was no major pressure on them except us.
Hunter-gatherers may have lived in those areas for a long time, but they had no land constraints; and could move from area to area when they hunted the local game populations below the levels needed to sustain them. Moving them onto the game preserves . . . which are, by their nature, small, restricted areas surrounded by habitat destruction, and whose animal populations are already under pressure from poaching . . . well, that isn't going to help the species we're trying to not wipe out, and only buys the hunter-gatherers a couple more generations before growing populations and land usage force them into the 21st century, such as it is in that part of the world.
That's a point. You'd have to keep an eye on the tribes and place some restrictions on their hunting of endangered species, and it might well not last if the preserves themselves don't last.

It's just that I can' think of anything else that doesn't leave people like the Hadza in the same lamentable position as Australian aborigines or Native Americans, and I'd like to. I recognize that there may honestly be no solution, but I think it's at least worth giving the possibilities a quick study.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Zixinus »

Many African nations already have large areas of land set aside where no construction is allowed and where wild animals are plentiful: the wildlife preserves. From the point of view of a hunter-gatherer group like the Hadza, that's the best place they could possibly go at the moment.
Oh, that. I think that's pretty simple: why should the government concern itself with preserving a hunter-gatherer culture and endanger its little wildlife (that is already made somewhat under outside pressure, or at least I think so) by mixing the two?

Why should the government delay turning these people to effective, educated workforce in favour of preserving a lifestyle? Tourist attraction at best, and for that you still need to educate these people to make them realise that they are to run a business.

I believe that is what basically this Richard Baalow guy wants to do: educate these people enough that they can join modern society but leave their way enough so that they can still preserve their lifestyle if they chose to do so.
If the Hadza were a threat to the wildlife population in the preserve, this would make sense; but if the Hadza were a threat to African wildlife in its native habitat, that wildlife would already be extinct, because the Hadza have had millenia to kill it off.
They were not a treat when that wildlife dominated the scene. In enclosed, relatively small wildlife preserves where its a challenge to keep the animal population level?

I don't think the equation favours the humans. Plus, having humans hunt on these grounds, even if out of tradition, kind of defeats the purpose of a wildlife preserve.
And you appear to have completely missed this, which is my main point. If we are going to have wildlife preserves, why not let them double as hunter-gatherer preserves? The hunter-gatherers are threatened by the spread of today's civilization just as surely as the wildlife is, after all.
The simple thing, and this is possibly what confused me when you, is that these are humans that must join modern society one way or another.

Their way of life appeals to us and we may find it pleasing to experience or even read about, but we cannot expect these people to just stay the same when the modern world is on their doorstep and half a foot in.

These people are hunter-gatherers, yes, but they are also humans that can adopt and should adopt if they want to live happily in modern society.

The alternative is... preserving them in reservations? I think anyone who is familiar with the history of American Indians or Australian Aborigines or other such groups can tell you how well that went.

Besides, how can you archive that? Packing them up in trucks and dropping them off in wildlife preserves? How are you going to do that, especially in view that these people are used to the idea that they go wherever they want? Bribery? Deceiving them? Force?

And even if you do, what makes you think that these people will keep to their lifestyle in the face of change? Look at the article, even a guy who's complete knowledge of the outside appears to be the idea of "London" existing knows that change is coming. They will change and arguably, already have by moving away from their lands when it became agricultural.

Because, to me, artificially trying to stop the process of educating and integrating these people for the sake of aesthetic appeal seems somehow morally wrong.

The best course of action, as far as I understand the situation, has to involve trying to educate these people. Making a claim for the land these people live on is a must, for starters. Getting these people realize just how much the outside world is looming over them is another, as well as trying to make a system where the children want to be educated (travelling schools?). But if these people are to preserve their lifestyle in the modern world, they must do it under their own will and choice.

That is what Richard Baalow seems to advocate and that appears to be best and most moral solution.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by PeZook »

I'm afraid that attempting to educate them is a lost cause, though. These are people who have no concept of the passage of time, they move about however they please, they don't worry or plan for the future, their language doesn't even have words for numbers larger than three or four.

Add to this the fact that children who go to school (like the government would like them to) won't learn the skills they need to survive. The best course of action would seem to send teachers to them, but how do you make them bother with listening to some guy ramble on about writing and maths and geography?
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Zixinus »

That, is the centre of the challenge and I wouldn't want to walk in the shoes of someone actually responsible trying to solve that.

Perhaps there is a ray of hope with already-educated Hadza. These people understand how these hunger-gatherers think, their way of life and even the language they speak. That allows some common ground to try and educate them, to develop travelling teachers or spots where people can go and become educated or learn if they wish to. Trying to put these people trough classrooms would be moronic: but perhaps if they could be taught by leading them trough their own curiosity, enough can get trough for these people to realise the scope of their problem and how must they change it.

I am curious about the history of similar people and similar situations. Perhaps the stories of the Aborigines and Native Americans could be of use?
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Broomstick »

Zixinus - the word you want to use is adapt, not adopt in this context. Just a friendly language use tip.

Alright, the MAIN reason for this post: "Why can't we move the Hadza to a game preserve for them to continue their way of life?" There are actually several reasons, in no particular order of importance:

1) Jealousy from neighbors/poachers - the "If THEY can hunt game why can't WE hunt game?" question, which is by no means unique to Africa. For another example, see the conflict between allowing arctic subsistence hunters go after whales vs. commercial whaling operations. There is profit in killing some things. There is also the matter of poor farmers desiring protein for their families, which is no less subsistence hunting than what the Hadza do. Allowing one group to hunt at will while barring another in the same area from doing so is going to create a lot of conflict. Non-confrontational people like the Hadza, who are already at a disadvantage technologically, are not going to win. Past history from other encounters of this sort between hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists is very grim, from biological warfare (taking blankets and clothing from the sick and giving them to hunter-gatherers) to poisoning wells/water holes to outright wars of extermination. Guess which side wins due to superior technology, disease resistance, and sheer numbers.

2) Not enough land - it takes an enormous amount of land to support a hunter-gatherer, much more than an agriculturalist. This is true even in very fertile and lush areas which, by now, have been completely taken over by civilization. In a low-productivity area - the only places where hunter-gatherers remain today - even more land is needed. The game preserves are simply not large enough to allow a viable group of hunter-gatherers to survive without inbreeding or slow extinction from attrition.

3) Disease - the Hadza have little disease because they come into contact with so few people of any sort. This will not continue to be the case in the future, nor would it be so on a game preserve which will inevitably attract tourists and poachers. The Hadza likely have little or no immunity to human crowd diseases from the common cold and influenza to measles and even worse diseases.

4) The Hadza are just as smart and capable of using technology as anyone else - they're just as human as anyone else, after all. NO tribe of hunter-gatherers have rejected modern technology if they have access to it. After all the article mentions the Hadza using nails as arrowheads, not chipped flint. Steel knives, metal arrowheads, and metal pots are better than chipped stone and pottery for nomads and that is why they trade for them. With closer contact inevitable if moved to a game park they're going to acquire firearms - it's a HELL of a lot safer to stand off and shoot a big animal, and the Hadza aren't stupid. Once they get guns it will alter the balance between Hadza and game animals in a way that won't favor the animals.

5) Not everyone wants to be a pure hunter-gatherer - even the best of them. It will start will better knives and arrows then move to guns then medicine both to treat the injuries the Hadza have always suffered but also because with more contact there will be more illness. Sure, in the past they toughed it out but that's because they had no choice and no alternatives. Does anyone honestly think the Hadza like burying so many children? They're going to want to save those kids if they can, which is going to mean a rising Hadza population but with no more room to spread out that will become a problem in a single generation. On top of that, while the mighty hunters and the expert gatherers may wish to continue in the bush the not-so-good hunters and the inept gatherers will start to trickle away into a perceived easier existence in the modern world. The maimed will also gravitate towards the modern world. The problem is that someone raised to live as a hunter-gatherer is ill-equipped to work in the modern world. At best they'll wind up as some sort of ward of the state, more likely they will be mercilessly exploited by less than savory human beings. The upside will be that this will relieve population pressures in the preserves, but past experience has shown that eventually the distinction between Hadza and non-Hadza will soon blur and while they may still hunt and live off the land it will not be with traditional survival skills. They will become more and more dependent on technology and less on archaic skills.

6) Education - You can't learn the necessary stone-age skills without a long childhood of practice, and that sort of education is incompatible with sitting in a classroom to gain a modern world education.

7) Location, location, location - Hunter-gatherer survival is HIGHLY dependent on knowing the local environment. You can't simply uproot these folks and transport them elsewhere and expect them to survive - they won't know where the local water is, they won't know where the local plants are, they won't know the habits of the local game in the new location. While they learn the attrition rates will be enormous, possibly enough to wipe them out. Even with technological support Europeans migrating to new territories like the North American plains and Australian suffered significant losses, stone-age level hunter-gatherers will fare even worse. At best you could make their current territory a preserve, but they'll still experience a lot of pressure from neighbors.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Broomstick »

Zixinus wrote:I am curious about the history of similar people and similar situations. Perhaps the stories of the Aborigines and Native Americans could be of use?
The history of these encounters is pretty damn awful, to be honest. I'll speak of the Native Americans as I'm more familiar with that than elsewhere.

Actually, I'll start with a group of NA's that were also agriculturalists, sort of a best-case scenario. The Cherokee were once known as one of the "Five Civilized Tribes". When they met the Europeans they were actually eager to adopt the new technology and knowledge, from firearms to European clothing to European housing to cotton farming with slaves on plantations. They developed a writing system and in less than 10 years went from being wholly illiterate to nearly everyone in their nation being able to at least write their name in their native tongue. They sent their children to European-style schools. Then the jealousy kicked in and they were forcibly evicted from their homes and lands - rounded up, forced-marched with the clothes on their back from Georgia to Oklahoma, on foot in winter with enormous losses of population. Meanwhile, their white neighbors simply moved into their empty but well-furnished homes, appropriated livestock, land, and slaves. That's what happened with a group of natives that were MUCH more advanced than the Hadza, who even had firearms equal to that of their European natives by the time this all went down - they were overwhelmed simply by numbers, and by superior resistance to disease. The Cherokee do still exist, but even today they have a higher burden of disease - this is true even of those fully assimilated who were never forced onto a reservation (a small group now known as the "Eastern Band" escaped forced relocation, in some cases by simply hiding and in others by sneaking away from the forced march).

The American Plains Indians were in no way a peaceful people - some of them were masterful military strategists. They had horses and firearms. They were primarily hunter-gatherers and their European derived neighbors wanted their territory. It took decades in some cases (the final surrender of Geronimo that ended the Apache wars for both US and Mexico wasn't until 1886, nearly 40 years after the massacre of Apaches by the Mexican army that started him down the warpath) but absolutely NONE of those tribes roams free today. They are all either on reservations choked with poverty and social dysfunction or assimilated into the larger society. Some of their traditions survive, but for the most part their languages and cultures are in sharp decline. These were the technology advanced hunter-gatherers, which the Hadza are not.

The North American Hadza-level hunter-gatherers are all extinct now. Every last tribe and individual. The last was believed to be Ishi of the Yahi of California. He died in 1916. Over his lifetime most of his tribe was simply killed outright by encroaching Euro-descended settlers and cattlemen (it's that land jealousy thing again) By 1865 the Yahi were down to 30 people, and by the time Ishi walked out of the bush into the modern world in 1911 he was the very last of his tribe and the very last stone-age level hunter-gatherer in North America (Ishi actually did flintknap his arrowheads and knives, so in that respect he's even more of stone age survival than the modern Hadza).

In that respect the Africa hunter-gatherers have survived MUCH better than the North American ones, probably because they had much more time to adjust to technologically advanced neighbors. That, and no one wanted their land. Now people do want their land. This will not end well for the Hadza. In many respects they are fortunate that this is the 21st Century when at least some people value their way of life and culture and have some interest in defending/protecting them. That is a very recent viewpoint that simply did not exist anywhere 200 years ago.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

Zixinus wrote:The simple thing, and this is possibly what confused me when you, is that these are humans that must join modern society one way or another.

Their way of life appeals to us and we may find it pleasing to experience or even read about, but we cannot expect these people to just stay the same when the modern world is on their doorstep and half a foot in.

These people are hunter-gatherers, yes, but they are also humans that can adopt and should adopt if they want to live happily in modern society.
Certainly. What bothers me is that they don't seem to be getting offered a choice. Realistically, they have one option: live happily in the Stone Age until modernity pushes them off their land completely, and then live unhappily in modern society. The history of native people who wind up incorporated into modern societies is not encouraging; attempts to push education on them often wind up making things worse, or at least conspicuously failing to make things better. Even once they know how to live in a modern society, they still have to face that fact that the people around them think of them as being a group of primitives who just took the bone out of their noses.

I'd like to see them being offered at least one "happy" alternative to choose, either the option of living in a premodern environment where they are free from being forced against their will to live in a modern environment where they will not be respected, or the option to live in a modern environment where they will be respected. I consider the latter option even less realistic than the former, because it requires the widespread change in attitude on the part of Tanzanians as a whole.

The idea of letting the Hadza live on the wildlife preserves was merely a suggestion towards the former option.
The best course of action, as far as I understand the situation, has to involve trying to educate these people. Making a claim for the land these people live on is a must, for starters. Getting these people realize just how much the outside world is looming over them is another, as well as trying to make a system where the children want to be educated (travelling schools?). But if these people are to preserve their lifestyle in the modern world, they must do it under their own will and choice.
Again, agreed; my concern is that the choice will be made for them by default as development pushes them into a smaller and smaller space. To make the choice they need a certain amount of breathing room. I briefly considered the notion of letting them live on wildlife preserves as a way to give them that breathing room, and now I begin to see reasons why this is a bad idea (what happens when the Hadza start trading pots of honey for AK-47s being chief among them).
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Lusankya
ChiCom
Posts: 4163
Joined: 2002-07-13 03:04am
Location: 人间天堂
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Lusankya »

If they're not getting the education they need to be able to integrate into modern society, they're not being given a choice either. Skills that you take for granted like basic literacy and numeracy, and mental training in sitting in a chair for long hours, focussing on a task that provides no immediate reward and without clearly defined goals will not be easy for them to pick up later in life, which will severely hamper their opportunities. It's really one of those situations where they can't be provided with a choice, because hunter-gatherer lifestyles and our lifestyles are fundamentally incompatible.
"I would say that the above post is off-topic, except that I'm not sure what the topic of this thread is, and I don't think anybody else is sure either."
- Darth Wong
Free Durian - Last updated 27 Dec
"Why does it look like you are in China or something?" - havokeff
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

Lusankya wrote:If they're not getting the education they need to be able to integrate into modern society, they're not being given a choice either. Skills that you take for granted like basic literacy and numeracy, and mental training in sitting in a chair for long hours, focussing on a task that provides no immediate reward and without clearly defined goals will not be easy for them to pick up later in life, which will severely hamper their opportunities. It's really one of those situations where they can't be provided with a choice, because hunter-gatherer lifestyles and our lifestyles are fundamentally incompatible.
I agree.

On some level I find the "drag them all into modernity whether they like it or not now, assuring ourselves that they'll like it later" unsatisfactory. This does not mean that there is a better solution.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Lagmonster »

Zixinus wrote:
Ah, but can you hit the broad side of a baboon? That's the real test of archery in the Hadza context...
How far is it and under what light conditions? Because if I wanted to, I can get my skills up in a few weeks.
Bear in mind that it's not just target practice. From the article, these men are naked, in the dark, crawling through a dense thorn bush, with an angry adult animal capable of tearing their arms from their sockets and biting through their skulls bearing down on them.

Hell, I don't think I'd want to hunt in those conditions if I were armed with a gun, let alone a stone-age shortbow.
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
User avatar
Zixinus
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 6663
Joined: 2007-06-19 12:48pm
Location: In Seth the Blitzspear
Contact:

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Zixinus »

Zixinus - the word you want to use is adapt, not adopt in this context. Just a friendly language use tip.
Ah. Sorry. You would think that after many years of practise, I wouldn't make such simple mistakes.
I'd like to see them being offered at least one "happy" alternative to choose, either the option of living in a premodern environment where they are free from being forced against their will to live in a modern environment where they will not be respected, or the option to live in a modern environment where they will be respected.
As far as I understand it, there is no choice in regards about whether they will join modern society. The only difference is between whether they will join it out of their own will and thus still preserve some of their identity or because they have run out of lands to go away to.

Their lifestyle is simply put, no longer sustainable due to human pressures. Even temporarily. Once these people run out of land, the best they can hope for is being integrated into the rest of Tasmania. The worst? These people become a historical anthropogenic interest.

The best hope will be the few among them that are educated and when these people realise that they are fucked and have to change, try to adopt. This process might be a bit more gradual than we hope and it is promising that they realise that something is changing in the world and that it is coming to them.

As for respect, it could be possible for the politicians to make the Hadza a bit of a prestige case once some initial successes are made. "Look, we had these primitive people and how well we treated them! Tell me, are we not a fair and good country?" The fact that there were efforts in the direction to adept these people before is also a bit promising.

EDIT: Sorry if I am just repeating the obvious and already known.
Bear in mind that it's not just target practice.
Of course. I was talking purely from the standpoint of archery, not practise under such conditions. I merely consider the archery feat itself a different skill than surviving under these conditions.
Credo!
Chat with me on Skype if you want to talk about writing, ideas or if you want a test-reader! PM for address.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Simon_Jester »

Zixinus wrote:Their lifestyle is simply put, no longer sustainable due to human pressures. Even temporarily. Once these people run out of land, the best they can hope for is being integrated into the rest of Tasmania. The worst? These people become a historical anthropogenic interest.
Nitpicks: "Tanzania" not "Tasmania." The hunter-gatherers of Tasmania were more primitive than the Hadza, were largely destroyed by British colonists, and the remnants completely assimilated. By contrast, the Hadza, being more technologically sophisticated and living in less desirable terrain, managed to survive British colonization, but are now in danger of being edged out by their own neighbors.

Also, "anthropological" not "anthropogenic." "Anthropogenic" means "man-made" or "originating with man," as in "anthropogenic climate change." While historical interest in the Hadza might well be man-made, since no other animal studies history, this is not one of its main characteristics. I infer that you are referring to the science of "anthropology," the "discourse of man" or "study of man."
The best hope will be the few among them that are educated and when these people realise that they are fucked and have to change, try to adopt. This process might be a bit more gradual than we hope and it is promising that they realise that something is changing in the world and that it is coming to them.
I understand. Suffice to say that I wish it were possible to preserve a niche for hunter-gatherers somewhere in the world that wasn't doomed to be crushed and absorbed by other societies, and that I regret the fact that this does not appear to be possible.

And yes, I understand that it is unjust to force people to live like hunter-gatherers against their will; this is one of the reasons I agree that preserving hunter-gatherer groups does not appear to be possible. But on some level it bothers me that out of the whole Earth, humanity cannot agree to set aside any significant space for these kinds of people. Especially when they are arguably the only people on Earth who are doing something they're evolved for, as opposed to something that they invented for themselves in the hope (sometimes well-founded, sometimes not) that it would be viable over millenial time scales.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28822
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Broomstick »

A possible alternative might be to transport the Hadza to a different place entirely. This is far from an ideal solution, but it would enable them to escape the historical prejudice of their neighbors and become simply another group of foreigners. Granted that also brings issues.

One example I can point to is the Hmong. Hundreds of thousands have been relocated to the United States (there were 270,000 as of the 2000 Census, although quite a few of those were born in the US as immigration began in 1975 and accelerated since the mid 1980's). In Asia the Hmong were not isolated and thus there was already considerable variation in levels of education and technology, and they are agriculturalists, so there are notable differences between them and the Hadza, but they were certainly yanked from a relatively primitive level of subsistence to the late 20th/early 21st Century. The advantage is that they escaped persecution back in Asia (most notably Laos) and in the US they are just another group of Asians. Thus, for the most part, they escape the baggage of being "primitive".

On the other hand, the change has been wrenching for the adults. For awhile significant numbers of Hmong men were simply up and dying for no apparent cause - there is a theory it was from overwhelming stress and culture shock, or at the very least it contributed towards their deaths. Those who came here as adults have largely lived as wards of the state, frequently were (and remain) illiterate, and are dependent on the benevolence of the US government for survival (yes, when I hear that I laugh nervously, too). They don't adapt well, despite having lived a settled life "back home". The bright spot is that their children are adapting to modern life in the US. Not perfectly, and not universally, but the kids seem to be moving briskly towards self-sufficiency where they haven't achieved it already. Hmong culture and language is surviving among the Hmong-Americans.

Would this work for the Hadza? That's a huge question. The technological leap they would have to make would be even greater. Many of the Hmong in the US came here because they were being killed back in Asia - while the Hadza are under stress they are not being systematically persecuted, hunted, and killed by the government of Tanzania or their neighbors. While the Hmong are able, at least in theory, to resume a life of agriculture with a little hunting on the side in the US (and some have achieved this) it is not possible for the Hadza to resume a hunter gatherer lifestyle anywhere in the world. A quarter of a million Hmong in the US allows a sufficient population to continue as Hmong even with a significant portion of their children entirely assimilating into the larger culture - are their even a hundred thousand Hadza in all the world? Even ten thousand?

The US has also attempted to absorb many former nomads/subsistence refugrees from Africa, such as the "Lost Boys" of Sudan. Again, the cultural and technological changes have been tremendously wrenching even for teenagers and young men who are resourceful survivors. It goes beyond mere literacy. These people have to be taught how to use a light switch - AFTER they are taught to identify one! They don't know what a flush toilet is, or how to operate one. They don't know how to use a western stove. They have to be taught how to dress for a temperate climate. They don't know how to cross a street safely. Some of them don't know how to open doors when they arrive here because they have no experience with them. They can and do learn all these things but it is tremendously hard even on those who want to come here and are highly motivated to adapt. Trying to do this forcibly to a people...? I can't see much success happening. You would have to convince the Hadza to move elsewhere. Some might actually prefer to die where they are.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: The Hadza (Hunter-Gatherers in Tanzania) NatGeo Article

Post by Stark »

Why does anyone care? They're a tiny community of primitives. If they died out, so what? What's the point in trying to 'uplift' them? If they're primitive and doomed, and doomed BECAUSE they're primitive, you can't 'save' them without just 'saving' the individuals, but people tend to want to save the doomed culture too, which is a terrible conflict.
Post Reply