adam_grif wrote:Yes, the result of being constantly quizzed on the subject as this thread went off the rails faster than the Beijing to Qingdao express.
I count ONE [1] person actually quizzing you on the first statement before you replied with the second. TWO [2] if you count Stark making a comment that seemed (to me anyway) more a comment on the national character of the debate than it was addressing you individually. I guess when you come from a place where everyone has five heads, you start to think that one person asking you to clarify is being "constantly quizzed", since you always imagine every statement coming out of five mouths.
I would indeed one day like to live somewhere else, ideally somewhere that can give me any one of a number of things. But despite wanting it for a variety of reasons, many of which are quite legitimate, you insist that I deserve to be hated for this, that I'm stupid for this, and so on. It's like you've recognized that you're being a douche, so you're trying to salvage dignity by insisting that the less-serious or superficial reasons are the only ones I have, and taking lighthearted or obviously joking remarks as though I'm being deadly serious. I can't emphasize enough just how amusing the intense butthurt you are displaying is.
Don't expect me to be continuing this discussion, people may make up their minds about it as they please.
Let's list your reasons for leaving, shall we, and see why people disagreed with you, shall we?
Lack of bill of rights
- Doesn't actually affect the upholding of rights in the country
Dichotomy between "authoritarian" Liberal and "authoritarian" Labor
- not everyone shares your opinion on what constitutes "authoritarian"
- the same dichotomy exists in almost every country (and is thus not a particularly good reason for
going elsewhere)
Internet speeds
- minor inconvenience, and is in the process of being improved by the government
Video game prices
- lol
- seriously, lol
Gun rights
- oh no, you can't get a dangerous luxury good
Marijuana
- doesn't actually affect you
- you could just move to SA (but I'd rather you don't, it is a nice state)
Gay rights
- doesn't actually affect you
- in the process of improving
Now, of the above, the most legitimate is the Labor/Liberal dichotomy one, but nobody is buying your "they are super-authoritarian" argument or your underlying assumption that increased authoritarianism is automatically a bad thing. (I, for one, fully support increased authoritarianism when it comes to enforcing road rules, for example.) Nor is anyone buying the idea that the two-party dichotomy is not a common phoenomenon.
One (bill of rights) is a symbolic measure: nothing more.
Three (guns, video games and the internet) are because you want some of your
hobbies to be more convenient.
And the last two (marijuana and gay marriage) impact your life in no way, shape or form.
I would hardly call that "many" legitimate complaints.
Stark indicated that he himself wanted to leave the country - but that your reasons were petty. I have already left the country, for reasons that I elaborated on earlier. However, the reasons that you gave for choosing to leave consisted mainly of the petty, and despite claiming to want to leave, you have obviously put no thought into the matter aside from "I am mildly dissatisfied". If everyone's really jumping down the throat of everyone who wants to leave Australia, why are they jumping down yours and not mine or Stark's?
And we don't hate you because you want to leave: we hate you because over your posting, you have indicated that you are a libertarian wanker.