Worst designed scifi creature?

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

User avatar
Srelex
Jedi Master
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2010-01-20 08:33pm

Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Srelex »

Which creature or species in scifi comes across the sort that evolution would reject or a sane god wouldn't bother with? Which is the most biologically impractical or impossible? The sort of things that aren't even saved by coolness for their ludicrous appearance?
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
User avatar
AK_Jedi
Padawan Learner
Posts: 441
Joined: 2005-12-14 11:26pm
Location: the middle of nowhere

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by AK_Jedi »

The Ocampa from ST voyager. They live only about a decade, and mate only once in their lives. Not only that but they refer to having "a child" rather than a litter. This means the population should decrease by half generation, even assuming every ocampa reproduces.

The only logical conclusion is that they are artificially created, and the caretaker was keeping them alive as some sort of cruel experiment.
Why does he keep looking at you in the same way a starving man looks at a packet of peanuts?
It's because he can't wait to get the wrapper off and taste the salty goodness! --Kryten, Red Dwarf

Understanding is a very loaded word. --Dr. Paul
User avatar
Mr Bean
Lord of Irony
Posts: 22455
Joined: 2002-07-04 08:36am

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Mr Bean »

Ocampa, they live nine years, they breed only once and despite post hoc theories after the fact even if they always have triplets, it's still a zero sum game as far as the Ocampa are concerned. Accidents and disease should quickly prune the herd down to nothing because of the absurd mating timeframe they have.

As a Chuck went into during the Voyager - Elogium Review
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kIR51YwObw

Ocampa fall under the impractical. Nine year lifespans, super mental powers and females can only breed once. And they fight among themselves.

"A cult is a religion with no political power." -Tom Wolfe
Pardon me for sounding like a dick, but I'm playing the tiniest violin in the world right now-Dalton
User avatar
hunter5
Padawan Learner
Posts: 377
Joined: 2010-01-25 09:34pm

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by hunter5 »

I have two alternative choices for this because the obvious one has been mention twice. First the bird aliens from the Voyager epsiode "Ex Post Facto" they are probably the most half-assed attempt to make an alien in trek I mean birds with teeth and breasts. Second the Pakled anything that stupid shouldn't be able to reproduce.
User avatar
Raxmei
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2846
Joined: 2002-07-28 04:34pm
Location: Davis, CA
Contact:

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Raxmei »

In 40k the Tyranid venomthrope is pretty impractical even for a Tyranid. It moves by floating around, but unlike the zoanthrope (which magically levitates) this is supposed to be accomplished through buoyancy in the air with a lifting gas. A cubic meter of air weighs about 1.2 kilograms, about 1/800 the density of water. This creature can have a mass of 1.2 kilograms per cubic meter of space it occupies and still float in the manner described. That basically means the venomthrope must be around 99.9% empty space. Judging by the model it should float about as well as a fat man holding a party balloon.
I prepared Explosive Runes today.
User avatar
Rama
Redshirt
Posts: 30
Joined: 2010-01-28 12:24am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Rama »

Highly infectious, triple-helix DNA possessing, telepathic, five gendered, mostly impervious tripods from an alternate dimension capable of shrugging off multi-megaton detonations to the organic walls of their vessels with ease.

I can't tell whether or not Species 8472 is either evolutionary feasible or just a really poor attempt at trying to one-up the Borg, my mind has simply been blown apart with the above description.
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5928
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Zor »

On the same note as the venomthrope, the Eosapiens from Darwin IV are bad (and yes, i know Darwin IV has a thick atmosphere and low gravity, still not enough).

Dishonorable mention to the Protoss, do they subsist by bathing in chocolate pudding?

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
open_sketchbook
Jedi Master
Posts: 1145
Joined: 2008-11-03 05:43pm
Location: Ottawa

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by open_sketchbook »

Of course, being Warhammer 40,000, I wouldn't put gasses with negative mass past them. :P

How about the Elder Things? They don't seem terribly mobile or practical for surviving before the development of technology; good thing they are horrors from beyond the stars, or they'd be pretty fucked.
1980s Rock is to music what Giant Robot shows are to anime
Think about it.

Cruising low in my N-1 blasting phat beats,
showin' off my chrome on them Coruscant streets
Got my 'saber on my belt and my gat by side,
this here yellow plane makes for a sick ride
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5928
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Zor »

open_sketchbook wrote:OHow about the Elder Things? They don't seem terribly mobile or practical for surviving before the development of technology; good thing they are horrors from beyond the stars, or they'd be pretty fucked.
Well they did evolve from a completely diferent liniage than humanity did and there are radial symetric creatures which have done well on earth.

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
Highlord Laan
Jedi Master
Posts: 1394
Joined: 2009-11-08 02:36pm
Location: Christo-fundie Theofascist Dominion of Nebraskistan

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Highlord Laan »

Zor wrote:
Dishonorable mention to the Protoss, do they subsist by bathing in chocolate pudding?

Zor
According to the Dark Templar Saga (about as close to canon as we're likely to get) they''re either photo or thermo-synthetic, or a mix of the two.
Never underestimate the ingenuity and cruelty of the Irish.
User avatar
open_sketchbook
Jedi Master
Posts: 1145
Joined: 2008-11-03 05:43pm
Location: Ottawa

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by open_sketchbook »

Zor wrote:
open_sketchbook wrote:OHow about the Elder Things? They don't seem terribly mobile or practical for surviving before the development of technology; good thing they are horrors from beyond the stars, or they'd be pretty fucked.
Well they did evolve from a completely diferent liniage than humanity did and there are radial symetric creatures which have done well on earth.

Zor
Most of them are

a) plants

-or-

b) have no brains at all

and most of them do not stand all upright and unbalanced. Then again, it's probable it's a War of the Worlds situation, having tampered with themselves to create a being perfect for handling technology, leaving the heavy lifting to those of the Shoggothian persuasion.
1980s Rock is to music what Giant Robot shows are to anime
Think about it.

Cruising low in my N-1 blasting phat beats,
showin' off my chrome on them Coruscant streets
Got my 'saber on my belt and my gat by side,
this here yellow plane makes for a sick ride
User avatar
Zor
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5928
Joined: 2004-06-08 03:37am

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Zor »

open_sketchbook wrote:
Most of them are

a) plants

-or-

b) have no brains at all
That is a fluke of natural selection and there are also mindless bilateral creatures. There is nothing which forbids the emergence of a Radial Symetric creature with advanced cognative abilities.

Zor
HAIL ZOR! WE'LL BLOW UP THE OCEAN!
Heros of Cybertron-HAB-Keeper of the Vicious pit of Allosauruses-King Leighton-I, United Kingdom of Zoria: SD.net World/Tsar Mikhail-I of the Red Tsardom: SD.net Kingdoms
WHEN ALL HELL BREAKS LOOSE ON EARTH, ALL EARTH BREAKS LOOSE ON HELL
Terran Sphere
The Art of Zor
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27383
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by NecronLord »

Zor wrote:Dishonorable mention to the Protoss, do they subsist by bathing in chocolate pudding?

Zor
Just because you can't see their mouthparts, doesn't mean they're not there. You'd be hard pressed to find the mouth on a slug, but it's there. For a larger example, you can't normally see a giant octopus' mouth, but again, it's there.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Lord of the Abyss
Village Idiot
Posts: 4046
Joined: 2005-06-15 12:21am
Location: The Abyss

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Lord of the Abyss »

The 11,000 mile Giant Space Amoeba from The Immunity Syndrome was more than slightly implausible.
Rama wrote:Highly infectious, triple-helix DNA possessing, telepathic, five gendered, mostly impervious tripods from an alternate dimension capable of shrugging off multi-megaton detonations to the organic walls of their vessels with ease.
Well, to be fair: Triple strand DNA is quite possible. There are slime molds with thousands of genders, not just 5. Telepathy and interdimensional travel while implausible are so common in sci-fi that you can't really single them out for it. And their ships shrugging off that kind of power was an implausibility of their ships, not them ( nit picking a bit, I know ); just another example of the bio-wank that seems so popular.
"There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs." - John Rogers
User avatar
Rama
Redshirt
Posts: 30
Joined: 2010-01-28 12:24am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Rama »

Lord of the Abyss wrote:The 11,000 mile Giant Space Amoeba from The Immunity Syndrome was more than slightly implausible.
Rama wrote:Highly infectious, triple-helix DNA possessing, telepathic, five gendered, mostly impervious tripods from an alternate dimension capable of shrugging off multi-megaton detonations to the organic walls of their vessels with ease.
Well, to be fair: Triple strand DNA is quite possible. There are slime molds with thousands of genders, not just 5. Telepathy and interdimensional travel while implausible are so common in sci-fi that you can't really single them out for it. And their ships shrugging off that kind of power was an implausibility of their ships, not them ( nit picking a bit, I know ); just another example of the bio-wank that seems so popular.
I wasn't debating the plausibility, just pointing out how much they pushed the "rule of cool" bar when trying to one-up the Borg with a new multi-episode villain.

In fact the entire crux of the second sentence of my post highlighted this very same point, which was not quoted for some reason.
User avatar
Xon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6206
Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
Location: Western Australia

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Xon »

open_sketchbook wrote:How about the Elder Things? They don't seem terribly mobile or practical for surviving before the development of technology; good thing they are horrors from beyond the stars, or they'd be pretty fucked.
Funny story that, they were fucked over hard. And the original source material speculates that they whitewashed thier own history in a fit of self-delusion.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
User avatar
D.Turtle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1909
Joined: 2002-07-26 08:08am
Location: Bochum, Germany

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by D.Turtle »

The Ood from Doctor Who: They carry their brains in their hands:
Image
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Themightytom »

FUCK you beat me to the Ood!

I guess that leaves me with

Image

There must have been really limited competition on his world while he was evolving.

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
Sheridan
Youngling
Posts: 71
Joined: 2009-11-03 01:36pm

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Sheridan »

How about the Newbies, from the Doom novelization, End Game?

These guys "evolve" right in front of you (without requiring offspring; each one can do it itself) and their "ultimate form" is a third strand of DNA that attaches to a human's, causing extreme selfishness and fear of death :banghead:. But, oh wait, they can be defeated by The Power of Faithtm.

Dude, I liked the Doom novelizations, mostly for their cheesiness, but this one was a bit much to take.
User avatar
Guardsman Bass
Cowardly Codfish
Posts: 9281
Joined: 2002-07-07 12:01am
Location: Beneath the Deepest Sea

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Guardsman Bass »

NecronLord wrote:
Zor wrote:Dishonorable mention to the Protoss, do they subsist by bathing in chocolate pudding?

Zor
Just because you can't see their mouthparts, doesn't mean they're not there. You'd be hard pressed to find the mouth on a slug, but it's there. For a larger example, you can't normally see a giant octopus' mouth, but again, it's there.
Unfortunately, if you read the novels (particularly the Dark Templar Saga, which is integrated into the storyline of Starcraft 2), they really don't have mouths. They replenish literally by bathing in sunlight (with no explanation given as to how this sustains them, particularly since they don't seem to consume or ingest anything else).

It's retarded, of course - they should have just said that the Protoss do have mouths (since their ancient primitive society is specifically referred to as a "hunting" one), but that you don't see them open because they communicate telepathically and breathe through parts of their skin. Before the above bit came out, I always assumed that was the case.
“It is possible to commit no mistakes and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life.”
-Jean-Luc Picard


"Men are afraid that women will laugh at them. Women are afraid that men will kill them."
-Margaret Atwood
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

Sheridan wrote:How about the Newbies, from the Doom novelization, End Game?

These guys "evolve" right in front of you (without requiring offspring; each one can do it itself) and their "ultimate form" is a third strand of DNA that attaches to a human's, causing extreme selfishness and fear of death :banghead:. But, oh wait, they can be defeated by The Power of Faithtm.

Dude, I liked the Doom novelizations, mostly for their cheesiness, but this one was a bit much to take.
The first two novels were great, then the third started wandering away from the simple demonic base that was Doom and into more sci-fi and pseudo-philosophical areas. Even aside from the 'Newbies', the Freds and Sears & Roebuck's race were bad enough on their own. The former had communism ingrained into their evolution (which is hilarious in and of itself, as apparently mankind's technology 'evolves' exponentially faster, despite these being interstellar races that have been at war for at least several centuries) and the latter could not process things that couldn't be put into binary relationships.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
Broomstick
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 28812
Joined: 2004-01-02 07:04pm
Location: Industrial armpit of the US Midwest

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Broomstick »

open_sketchbook wrote:
Zor wrote:
open_sketchbook wrote:OHow about the Elder Things? They don't seem terribly mobile or practical for surviving before the development of technology; good thing they are horrors from beyond the stars, or they'd be pretty fucked.
Well they did evolve from a completely diferent liniage than humanity did and there are radial symetric creatures which have done well on earth.
Most of them are

a) plants

-or-

b) have no brains at all
Although the octopus, squid, and cuttlefish are all very brainy invertebrates, and do exhibit radial symmetry. So the exceptions are exceptional in that regard.
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. Leonard Nimoy.

Now I did a job. I got nothing but trouble since I did it, not to mention more than a few unkind words as regard to my character so let me make this abundantly clear. I do the job. And then I get paid.- Malcolm Reynolds, Captain of Serenity, which sums up my feelings regarding the lawsuit discussed here.

If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich. - John F. Kennedy

Sam Vimes Theory of Economic Injustice
Sheridan
Youngling
Posts: 71
Joined: 2009-11-03 01:36pm

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Sheridan »

Oni Koneko Damien wrote:The first two novels were great, then the third started wandering away from the simple demonic base that was Doom and into more sci-fi and pseudo-philosophical areas. Even aside from the 'Newbies', the Freds and Sears & Roebuck's race were bad enough on their own. The former had communism ingrained into their evolution (which is hilarious in and of itself, as apparently mankind's technology 'evolves' exponentially faster, despite these being interstellar races that have been at war for at least several centuries) and the latter could not process things that couldn't be put into binary relationships.
Yep, but at least Sears & Roebuck had comedy going for them. The Freds, less so, but they didn't have as much "screen time" as the Newbies or S&R. And at least the difference between the Freds and S&R was able to "explain" the power-ups randomly available to Fly and Arlene throughout Phobos and Deimos (not that it was a good explanation, but at least it made some sense in-universe). Eh, as I said, I liked it mostly for the humor value.
Junghalli
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5001
Joined: 2004-12-21 10:06pm
Location: Berkeley, California (USA)

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Junghalli »

What's wrong with the Elder Thing design? It's a barrel-shaped body with tentacles on the bottom. Looks sensible enough for an intelligent creature. Doesn't really strike me as any worse than our rather kludgy design.
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Re: Worst designed scifi creature?

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

Junghalli wrote:What's wrong with the Elder Thing design? It's a barrel-shaped body with tentacles on the bottom. Looks sensible enough for an intelligent creature. Doesn't really strike me as any worse than our rather kludgy design.
And really, calling a design 'bad' that basically has all the benefits of a human body plus insane strength and durability, the ability to exist above and below water indefinitely, at one point the ability to fly through space without technological aid, and the ability to be preserved for well over one hundred million years in sediment and be revived afterwards with no apparent debilitating effect... is rather silly.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
Post Reply