I much prefer DD over Spider-Man. I agree that Spider-Man is a better concept, but over the years, DD has just been realized better (not to say that Spidey hasn't been done well). DD would be the best hero ever if only for Miller's work, but there happen to be many great DD stories beyond Miller's. The current run of DD has only had maybe one mediocre issue, with the rest kicking major fucking ass.AdmiralKanos wrote:I was never a big fan of the Daredevil concept. Spiderman's big strength is the hero-s journey/coming of age tale of nerdy, bookish Peter Parker: a character we've all known and identified with for a long time.
Daredevil, on the other hand ... well, let's just say there's a reason Daredevil comics never sold as well as Spiderman comics.
Spider-Man, on the other hand, is slowly getting better from the absolute shit that his titles were during the bulk of the nineties.
The DD movie was good if you like DD. If you don't, then I'm not surprised if you don't like the movie. It's like when critics complain about Star Wars, but then you find out that they don't like sci-fi in the first place. If you do like DD, or probably comics in general, you'll enjoy the movie.
Spider-Man was by far a better movie, and it is rightly considered the greatest superhero movie yet, edging out the first Burton Batman and the first Christopher Reeve Superman. But DD is still good, if you like superhero movies. Best of all, like the X-Men movie, it sets up for sequels that are even better than the first one.
I think the real problem with making a DD movie is that it's almost impossible to work Stick and The Hand into the first movie without making it too long. But without them, DD's story is weaker.