Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Post Reply
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Srelex wrote: I think the CIS invasion force for Coruscant was able to fly through the shields, although I need to confirm this. It is possible that how easily one can fly through a shield depends on the strength, and considering Sidious's involvement...
No they didn't. In fact in the X-wing novels Coruscant's shields had to be lowered to let ships pass through (and you had to coordinate it since there are TWO shields on Coruscant) And you're forgetting TESB, where they had to lower the shield to both fire through and let the transports out.
Veers was able to communicate with Vader on Hoth, and although Vader was merely in orbit, that at least shows that a shielded planet can chat with those above, even if not with those across the galaxy. And wasn't Anakin and Obi Wan contacted from shielded Coruscant even when it was under attack?
As far as I know they weren't using FTL signals to communicate at Hoth (Why would you outfit an expensive subspace or holonet/hyperwave receiver on a ground vehicle anyhow?) on top of which they can also use relays and satellites to boost signals. Or run a land line through the shield from orbit to ground. Or whatever. You can do alot when you control space outside the shield.
That would be logical, but as I doubt they'll have the shields on every single minute I'm not sure what you're getting at here.
The poitn being that the only way to guarantee safety from the Tyrnaids via planetary shields is to keep them on 24/7. Which you clearly cannot do. Not being able to keep them on constantly simply means that there is some chance, no matter how small, of the Tyranids getting through one way or another.
Er...what? Where did shields blocking light come from?
I'm highlighting the problems that "total shielding" would require. Sunlight is neccessary for a planet (to warm the world, to sustain plants, etc.) but letting it pass also creates a dangerous window to be exploited as you are letting something through, and that can also let a weapon of similar properties (IE a laser) pass through harmlessly.
Anyway, you're assuming people would be keeping their shields up perpetually. If you believe that this is the point I was trying to make earlier, I instead trying to suggest that the Empire could equip as many planets as possible with such shields, and of course that in the event of the attack a sufficient generator could envelope a good portion of a planet at least. If I did seem to suggest that the planets will be sitting there with their shields permenantly on, then that wasn't a suggestion I was trying intentionally to make.
Partial shielding would be easier to operate and have less problems than full planetary shielding, but then you're conceding ground to the Tyranids for them to land and attack. Might as well go with full planetary shielding.

End result: shields like most other defenses make things harder for the Tyranids, but they won't be a permanant deterrent.
Eviscerator
Padawan Learner
Posts: 267
Joined: 2009-12-30 05:02am
Location: Below the equator

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Eviscerator »

PainRack wrote: And YES. Shadow in the Warp will interfere with Jedi interstellar messages...... oh wait, the Jedi virtually never send any messages that way.
.
Er... then what's all the Instances shown of Jedi using the force to transmit distress or other messages mean then? Isnt that examples of interstellar communication? The whole Sense power?
Homer Simpson : SLobber .... (Insert random item here) :)
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

With regards to the capabilities and redundancies of SW personnel and industrial capacity, i think it is worth mentioning that the YV invasion, according to the new atlas, merely set back the core worlds a few years, with the core then approaching pre-invasion levels. That IMO speaks to a gigantic resilience and industrial capacity which should not be underestimated.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Eviscerator wrote: Er... then what's all the Instances shown of Jedi using the force to transmit distress or other messages mean then? Isnt that examples of interstellar communication? The whole Sense power?
Actually he's correct in claiming this. Jedi have shown an ability to communicate across interstellar distances with other Jedi, at least to some degree (They did this in NJO quite alot, the notable example being Star by STar that comes to mind.)
Thanas wrote: With regards to the capabilities and redundancies of SW personnel and industrial capacity, i think it is worth mentioning that the YV invasion, according to the new atlas, merely set back the core worlds a few years, with the core then approaching pre-invasion levels. That IMO speaks to a gigantic resilience and industrial capacity which should not be underestimated.
True, although I don't think they actually managed to torch or occupy a great deal of the Core. As I recall the bulk of their conflicts tended to take place in the outer rim, and even there there were places they didn't manage to occupy.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

Connor MacLeod wrote:True, although I don't think they actually managed to torch or occupy a great deal of the Core. As I recall the bulk of their conflicts tended to take place in the outer rim, and even there there were places they didn't manage to occupy.
Actually, the new atlas shows them as having taken about a quarter to a third of the core, including of course Coruscant and Fondor. It would make sense that they focused more on those worlds in relation to the outer rim anyway, as according to the same atlast the vast majority of people lives in the core (looking at the population map, I would say about 80-90%). And they did take the planets on the trade routes who are shown as being more populated than the others as well.

Nobody probably gives a damm about the non-core worlds because, save a few examples, they honestly do not seem to matter much. The vast majority of star wars space is drawn as having an average world population of 10-100mil. The core space has, according to the atlas, an average population of 50-100 billion, with about 20% of it as being colored with an average world population of 100-500 billion, with some sectors having an average world population exceeding 500 billion.

And the vong did take almost all of the 100-500 billion places. Of course, we also know of many worlds simply turning on their shields and laughing at the vong invasion for years (Anaxes and Axum come to mind), them being apparently capable of being self-sustaining.

So I posit that unless the Tyranids manage to gain as quickly a victory as the Vong did and actually manage to take those systems, they will simply get outproduced and outmatched in the long run. And there is - unless I am reading this thread wrong - no indication that the Tyranids can even breach the shields of a fortress planet like Axum/Anaxes.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Thanas wrote: Actually, the new atlas shows them as having taken about a quarter to a third of the core, including of course Coruscant and Fondor. It would make sense that they focused more on those worlds in relation to the outer rim anyway, as according to the same atlast the vast majority of people lives in the core (looking at the population map, I would say about 80-90%). And they did take the planets on the trade routes who are shown as being more populated than the others as well.
That's alot more than I thought admittedly, but that still leaves 3/4 to 2/3 of the worlds in the Core untouched.
Nobody probably gives a damm about the non-core worlds because, save a few examples, they honestly do not seem to matter much. The vast majority of star wars space is drawn as having an average world population of 10-100mil. The core space has, according to the atlas, an average population of 50-100 billion, with about 20% of it as being colored with an average world population of 100-500 billion, with some sectors having an average world population exceeding 500 billion.
True, although on the other hand, the Outer Rim was IIRC one of the reasons the Confederacy and the Republic clashed - they had alot of territory and control in the Outer Rim, so part of me suspects that the bulk of the resources in the SW galaxy probably come from their, but much of the industry (that matters) remains in the Core. Every other territory between that probably varies.

The only other thing that matters about the Outer Rim is perhaps that it's lower level of "development" cna allow for cheaper and more easily exploited labor (barring the use of droids of course, but that seems to be an inconsistent issue in Star Wars for some reason.)
And the vong did take almost all of the 100-500 billion places. Of course, we also know of many worlds simply turning on their shields and laughing at the vong invasion for years (Anaxes and Axum come to mind), them being apparently capable of being self-sustaining.
As I recall they didn't manage to take a very big chunk out of the industrial capability (for example they didn't do fuck all to Corellia or Kuat, although they evntually took Fondor IIRC.) That pretty much was what doomed them (well that and their penchant for Klingon-style Melee only tactics)
So I posit that unless the Tyranids manage to gain as quickly a victory as the Vong did and actually manage to take those systems, they will simply get outproduced and outmatched in the long run.
Conceivably, yes. But the problem is a bit different than the Vong. The Tyranids don't want territory, they just want the resources on the planet. That doesnt change things as far as "taking" systems goes (they still have to fight through the defenses) and it doesnt nullify their industrial advantages but it does create problems in actually employing those advantages - they have to basically "out last" the Tyranids in terms of resources, and the specifics of that is a large part of where the discussion lies and where some of the problems lie.
And there is - unless I am reading this thread wrong - no indication that the Tyranids can even breach the shields of a fortress planet like Axum/Anaxes.
Depends on how you quantify the shielding I suppose, and what sources you draw on. If we go by inferences from ANH then probably not, since a shield arguably takes a fraction of a second blast from the DS2's superlaser (although I have difficulties accepting that on the basis of momentum transfer. Then again you have the cases in the EU of substnaially less force being applied (the re-taking of Coruscant post Thrawn, the stuff mentioned in the Black Fleet Crisis as a danger, Star by STar's invasion of Coruscant..) But I consider that almost besides the point, since even if they DID have the firepower to do it, there's a good chance they'd simply sterilize the planet - lose-lose proposition.

Whether or not thye can bypass the shields some other way (teleportation, infiltration) I guess depends on your attitude towards Tyranid tactics (as in "how liberal you choose to be in interpreting tactics on both sides")

There are crazier problems though. Like how things change if the Tyranids start eating the weird SW lifeforms (eg vornskyrs or Ysalamiri. Or even freakier, the Oswaft, who have the most precise hyperdrive capability I've ever seen in SW.)
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

Connor MacLeod wrote:That's alot more than I thought admittedly, but that still leaves 3/4 to 2/3 of the worlds in the Core untouched.
Sure. Probably even more because the Vong certainly did not have the resources to crack a lot of city-worlds or high population centers, or heavily armored and automated worlds like Anaxes, which they could not take. Still, even if we say that 5-10% of the core worlds and/or their industrial capacity (a fair estimate IMO) are gone, that still is quite a lot to make up for. Though, granted, the loss of population was probably less heavy in relative numbers than in the outer rim, for we know that core worlders can and do own quite a lot of civilian ships. For example, we know that a lot of people fled Coruscant.
True, although on the other hand, the Outer Rim was IIRC one of the reasons the Confederacy and the Republic clashed - they had alot of territory and control in the Outer Rim, so part of me suspects that the bulk of the resources in the SW galaxy probably come from their, but much of the industry (that matters) remains in the Core. Every other territory between that probably varies.

The only other thing that matters about the Outer Rim is perhaps that it's lower level of "development" cna allow for cheaper and more easily exploited labor (barring the use of droids of course, but that seems to be an inconsistent issue in Star Wars for some reason.)
The new atlas does support this point of view, at least partly. It says specifically that in general the Rim provides raw materials, the colony region inbetween the core and the rim is a sort of middle ground and the core is the wealth and industrial powerhouse. However, it does not say whether the resources are drawn from the rim specifically because they are cheaper from there or whether there simply are no more resources to be found in the core. Still, we do know that the core is the center of agricultural production so at least they won't starve and I suspect that the deep core has a lot of undiscovered minerals as well. Plus, the fact that worlds survived for years seems to suggest that there is at least some local resource hording or gathering.

I think it might very well be similar to first/third world for many materials. One can theoretically get them in the first world (core) or in the second world (colonies) but it is much cheaper to just rip the third world (rim) of. Culture might also play a role in that - the snobbish core worlders probably do not very much like investing or even working in low-status jobs.

However, we know that the deep Core can sustain major ship production on its own resources, so the Core worlds might make do without rim worlds. One should note that the CIS, despite holding several of the most important resource manufacturers (the mining guild, for example), did not manage to outproduce the core or outmatch them. If we further assume they keep stock for several years, that might very well be enough to produce large enough fleets to secure the most important resource planets, which should be pretty easy to do since the trade routes offer quick access to them.

Or they might fortifying new resource planets or restart new operations.

As I recall they didn't manage to take a very big chunk out of the industrial capability (for example they didn't do fuck all to Corellia or Kuat, although they evntually took Fondor IIRC.) That pretty much was what doomed them (well that and their penchant for Klingon-style Melee only tactics)
Agreed. However, I do not know whether the Tyranids will fare any better against an Empire that has not wrecked most of its forces. In the time of the Vong, the galaxy was severely undermilitarized and the vong themselves admitted that the empire would have crushed them quite easily.
So I posit that unless the Tyranids manage to gain as quickly a victory as the Vong did and actually manage to take those systems, they will simply get outproduced and outmatched in the long run.
Conceivably, yes. But the problem is a bit different than the Vong. The Tyranids don't want territory, they just want the resources on the planet. That doesnt change things as far as "taking" systems goes (they still have to fight through the defenses) and it doesnt nullify their industrial advantages but it does create problems in actually employing those advantages - they have to basically "out last" the Tyranids in terms of resources, and the specifics of that is a large part of where the discussion lies and where some of the problems lie.
True. I guess then it depends whetehr the Tyranids can secure both the outer rim and the deep core/UR resource production centers (and the latter will be unknown to the galaxy at this point) to manage to starve the core industries. Can the Tyranids:

- take enough of these systems (who are pretty spread out) to starve out the imps before they fortify those systems?
- take protected key resource systems?
- survive against a mobilizing empire which might enjoy 1-5 years (probably closer to three though) of production before running out of resources?
- take the backup resource systems the empire will try to develop?

Note that all of this also hinges on the idea that resource production in the core is impossible rather than impractible or not done for cultural reasons.
And there is - unless I am reading this thread wrong - no indication that the Tyranids can even breach the shields of a fortress planet like Axum/Anaxes.
Depends on how you quantify the shielding I suppose, and what sources you draw on. If we go by inferences from ANH then probably not, since a shield arguably takes a fraction of a second blast from the DS2's superlaser (although I have difficulties accepting that on the basis of momentum transfer. Then again you have the cases in the EU of substnaially less force being applied (the re-taking of Coruscant post Thrawn, the stuff mentioned in the Black Fleet Crisis as a danger, Star by STar's invasion of Coruscant..)
I would submit the first two EU examples to be not applicable due to a) the first case being a case in which the IMP fleet destroyed several key defence buildings before the shields were up and us not knowing enough in general, b) the second example being somewhat idiotic and going against established canon. As for Star by Star, the vong would most likely not have taken the planet had the NR not been colossal whimps - guess what Vader would have done - and the shields did take a tremendous beeting iirc.
But I consider that almost besides the point, since even if they DID have the firepower to do it, there's a good chance they'd simply sterilize the planet - lose-lose proposition.
I had not considered that, I have to admit I know little of Tyranids besides "they have gigantic swarms, are reptilians and generally very nasty".
There are crazier problems though. Like how things change if the Tyranids start eating the weird SW lifeforms (eg vornskyrs or Ysalamiri. Or even freakier, the Oswaft, who have the most precise hyperdrive capability I've ever seen in SW.)
Will they even be able to capture the Oswaft? And I apologize if this was covered before in the thread, but what makes you certain they will be able to get Ysalamir characteristics? In any case, I doubt Ysalamiri characteristics do really help them much against Imperial fleets. It might protect them against Palpatine's force storm, but not much against a fleed lead by Thrawn or some other non-force-user genius.

And of course, I am a bit curious what would happen if Palpatine decided to go the seperatist way redux - spread out across the rim and manufacture a lot of automated ships/weapons/droids. Combine that with a full manufacturing burst from the core and the situation looks even worse for the Tyranids.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Thanas wrote: Sure. Probably even more because the Vong certainly did not have the resources to crack a lot of city-worlds or high population centers, or heavily armored and automated worlds like Anaxes, which they could not take. Still, even if we say that 5-10% of the core worlds and/or their industrial capacity (a fair estimate IMO) are gone, that still is quite a lot to make up for. Though, granted, the loss of population was probably less heavy in relative numbers than in the outer rim, for we know that core worlders can and do own quite a lot of civilian ships. For example, we know that a lot of people fled Coruscant.
I think they could have cracked them if it weren't for the fact they wanted territory. THey did smash Sernpidal after all, and shields can't stop momentum.

And yeah they do own alot of civilian ships. That isnt neccesarily a *good* thing mind, since that means a huge volume of traffic and infiltration can become a danger. (though not guaranteed, we know SW has medical sensor technology to scan or detect even disguised lifeforms, although I believe the Vongue and their Masuqers gave those defenses a bit of trouble early on til they adapted.)
The new atlas does support this point of view, at least partly. It says specifically that in general the Rim provides raw materials, the colony region inbetween the core and the rim is a sort of middle ground and the core is the wealth and industrial powerhouse. However, it does not say whether the resources are drawn from the rim specifically because they are cheaper from there or whether there simply are no more resources to be found in the core. Still, we do know that the core is the center of agricultural production so at least they won't starve and I suspect that the deep core has a lot of undiscovered minerals as well. Plus, the fact that worlds survived for years seems to suggest that there is at least some local resource hording or gathering.
There have to be at least SOME resources in the Core, since the Imperial remnants under Daala (and the Warlords before her) and were largely self sufficient. I suspect even the Core hasn't totally depleted their resources anyhow (I vaguely remember Coruscant has asteroid fields). But I suspect its more abundant in the Rim, possibly in some cases even easier to get at (Hyperdrive travel, even if we allow for lower grade stuff, ought to allow rapid enough transport for their purposes, and the supply line would almost certainly be constant.)

I think it might very well be similar to first/third world for many materials. One can theoretically get them in the first world (core) or in the second world (colonies) but it is much cheaper to just rip the third world (rim) of. Culture might also play a role in that - the snobbish core worlders probably do not very much like investing or even working in low-status jobs.
Agreed. I think its cheaper to get at stuff in the Rim than the Core. I am sure all core worlds can use their influence to gain an economic advantage over the Rim, and thus get cheaper materials. Or they could just take them - its not like the Rim could do anything to stop them. Whereas in the Core I'm sure everryone has pretty much staked out any available resources and to get hold of them would require dealing with someone on equal terms.

It may also simply be that the Core worlds are saving whatever resources they have left. They could even represent some sort of "strategic reserve" for some sort of emergency (War, or whatever.)

However, we know that the deep Core can sustain major ship production on its own resources, so the Core worlds might make do without rim worlds. One should note that the CIS, despite holding several of the most important resource manufacturers (the mining guild, for example), did not manage to outproduce the core or outmatch them. If we further assume they keep stock for several years, that might very well be enough to produce large enough fleets to secure the most important resource planets, which should be pretty easy to do since the trade routes offer quick access to them.

Or they might fortifying new resource planets or restart new operations.
True, especially given the fact the Speratists had something like a decade of military buildup prior. Although quality DOES offset that (most Separatist hardware was utter crap compared to what the Republic had.). but I have no doubt they could turn the Core even more fortress like with the resources they have, given time.

There is questions of things like agriculture and the economy. While they probably COULD do away with the Outer Rim, that would almost cretainly have an impact on galactic trade and transport, and that's going to cut into profits (and war does cost money) - nevermind that you have to convince people of the importance of this (and as I've said, the GE and evne the Republic have alot of parallels ot the US - they won't neccesarily do what is intelligent.) Does the atlas say anything about the providence of food and water (agriculture and such) and where much of that is located?

The other problem is that ceding the outer Rim would be almost certainly giving a ton of resources to the Tyranids - although it woudl take them quite awhile to assimilate it all and they might launch raids to disrupt things even - so it might not be a good idea to write it off totally unless they had to (but then again they may just write it off because of their view of the Rim anyhow. Alot of the "filthy aliens" are in the Rim after all...) And if they hav those resources on hand, that may give them an edge in outlasting the Core (I say "may" because how long it takes to outlast the 'Nids is one of those things being debated..)
Agreed. However, I do not know whether the Tyranids will fare any better against an Empire that has not wrecked most of its forces. In the time of the Vong, the galaxy was severely undermilitarized and the vong themselves admitted that the empire would have crushed them quite easily.
We dont even know or have yet to establish just how big a Tyranid force would be attacking, nevermind agreement on tactics. We can't even agree as to the exact usage of the resources they acquire from a planet (in brief, they tend to consume all the ocean ant atmospherea nd a fair chunk of the minerals in the upper part of the planet and carry it off, but to what purpose they put that is debated, but its still significant no matter how you spin it.) As far as size tho, we know they've launched millions/tens of millions of ships with billions/trillions of nid troops over a course of centuries (with greater numbers skewed towards the last decade or so) spaced over nearly a score of "fleetS" of varying size and speed. We only know that its been a small part of the overall force (basically just the scouting/fringe elements) but how big the rest is isnt known - it could be 10%, 1%, a perecent of a percent..
True. I guess then it depends whetehr the Tyranids can secure both the outer rim and the deep core/UR resource production centers (and the latter will be unknown to the galaxy at this point) to manage to starve the core industries.
Truthfully I doubt they'd bother initially. They mostly go after the biomass, but they'll destroy anything that resists or anything artificial if they're getting at it (Crews onboard stations, or shipyards.) But ther'es a good chance they'd leave the materials or infrastructure intact unless something occured to give them an idea that attacking it might be a good idea (They don't seem to innovate on their own, but they're capable of adapting their tactics to fit new information they obtain)
Can the Tyranids:

- take enough of these systems (who are pretty spread out) to starve out the imps before they fortify those systems?
No clue. I'm not even sure how to figure out how long it would take them to fortify against the Nids. Alot of this is still speculative at this point because there's a ton of information to sift through.
- take protected key resource systems?
If those are what I am thinking of (core systems) probably not. I'm fairly certain that a direct assault on the Core without assimilating the resources of the Outer Rim would be suicide, although this is based on my own gueses about how big the entire Tyranid force might be.
- survive against a mobilizing empire which might enjoy 1-5 years (probably closer to three though) of production before running out of resources?
It might. Part of the problem is that the Empire can probably fend off any individual fleet attack (even one of millions of ships) but they wouldn't neccesarily annihilate the entire Tyranid fleet. Given the way Tyranid fleets act, the Empire could face years or decades between assaults.

alot of this is me guessing at it from what I know about the Tyranids, but its not really different than guessing at the sorts of forces the Empire could throw back given what we can imply from their logistical or industrial capability.
- take the backup resource systems the empire will try to develop?
Maybe not right away, although if they're manned they might get attracted to them eventually.
Note that all of this also hinges on the idea that resource production in the core is impossible rather than impractible or not done for cultural reasons.
True.
I would submit the first two EU examples to be not applicable due to a) the first case being a case in which the IMP fleet destroyed several key defence buildings before the shields were up and us not knowing enough in general, b) the second example being somewhat idiotic and going against established canon. As for Star by Star, the vong would most likely not have taken the planet had the NR not been colossal whimps - guess what Vader would have done - and the shields did take a tremendous beeting iirc.
Perhaps. I'd have to look at the exact cases again, but that just gets put on the back burner with other things. Like I said, this is a huge fucking issue, and part of what has been driving my 40K analysis has been a comparison of how they'd fare against the Empire. As it is, I'm several years in and I still don't have a definitive answer if that tells you anything.)

Hell, 90% of this debate has been deciding on what does and doesnt constitute "accuratE" repreesnstations of Tyranid capabilities and tactics.
I had not considered that, I have to admit I know little of Tyranids besides "they have gigantic swarms, are reptilians and generally very nasty".
They're not reptilian per se, but some resemble them. They're just your general "organically grown terror race" like the Aliens from Aliens or the Zerg from STarcraft. Only not nearly as retarded. Cerrtainly less retared than the Vong. But still magical. :lol:
Will they even be able to capture the Oswaft?
Possibly. The Oswaft can ceratinly stay away if they want, but they won't abandon the Starcave IIRC, so they could be forced into a battle. Then again, the Oswaft can also destroy fully shielded Imperial warships with their voices, so that wouldn't necesarily be a pushover. and there's a fuck ton of oswaft. I also vaugely recall the Oswaft as being a bit curious, nonviolent and rather trusting.
And I apologize if this was covered before in the thread, but what makes you certain they will be able to get Ysalamir characteristics? In any case, I doubt Ysalamiri characteristics do really help them much against Imperial fleets. It might protect them against Palpatine's force storm, but not much against a fleed lead by Thrawn or some other non-force-user genius.
Tyranids came to the 40K galaxy from another one and havent had difficulties assimilating their genetics, so I dont see much reason to assume they would have problems with Star Wars lifeforms (that's not neccesarily all to an advantage. I mean if they assimilate Force sensitive creatures, they start exhibiting Force powers, they can probably be more easily detected now via the Force.) I do agree that Ysalamiri would be of limited benefit, but that was just an example, really.
And of course, I am a bit curious what would happen if Palpatine decided to go the seperatist way redux - spread out across the rim and manufacture a lot of automated ships/weapons/droids. Combine that with a full manufacturing burst from the core and the situation looks even worse for the Tyranids.
My guess? If the GE went all out on nothing but automated mass produced droid tech like they possibly could, they'd almost certainly win no matter how long it took, simply because there are more inorganic resources than organic even if the Tyranids suck up all available organic matter in the gaalxy.

That siad, I dont consider the "all out" option too terribly likely, since it represents an "ideal" response, and that largely devolves into "tactical considerations" (as in, how long before he might figure it out, why they never used this before, etc. etc. etc. which just introduces a whole nother layer of complexity to the issue..)
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

Connor MacLeod wrote:I think they could have cracked them if it weren't for the fact they wanted territory. THey did smash Sernpidal after all, and shields can't stop momentum.
Yes, but if the Vong could have replicated that trick easily, I wonder why they did not do so when their backs were against the wall and they pulled out all stops otherwise. From the sources, this sort of operation seems to require a Vong presence on the target of the surface, in fact a giant gravity generator. Setting these up on a rim world like Sernpidal is possible, but I do not think this would remain undiscovered by a core world.
And yeah they do own alot of civilian ships. That isnt neccesarily a *good* thing mind, since that means a huge volume of traffic and infiltration can become a danger. (though not guaranteed, we know SW has medical sensor technology to scan or detect even disguised lifeforms, although I believe the Vongue and their Masuqers gave those defenses a bit of trouble early on til they adapted.)
Sure, but on the other hand it might also alert them to a Tyranid attack if ships start disappearing or people start behaving funnily. It is worth noting that a succesful infiltration of a shield system is the exception in star wars, not the norm.
There have to be at least SOME resources in the Core, since the Imperial remnants under Daala (and the Warlords before her) and were largely self sufficient.
Nitpick: That is the deep core, but they do have safe trade lanes. In fact, with those trade lanes being few and heavily guarded, I submit that potentially the core could ward itself off and use the deep core for resources to supply them.
I suspect even the Core hasn't totally depleted their resources anyhow (I vaguely remember Coruscant has asteroid fields).
Coruscant has not only resouces, it has a whole lot of planets insystem that are unsettled.
But I suspect its more abundant in the Rim, possibly in some cases even easier to get at (Hyperdrive travel, even if we allow for lower grade stuff, ought to allow rapid enough transport for their purposes, and the supply line would almost certainly be constant.)
Agreed and the routine transports of miners and ore in the outer rim seen in TIE Fighter might support that viewpoint.

It may also simply be that the Core worlds are saving whatever resources they have left. They could even represent some sort of "strategic reserve" for some sort of emergency (War, or whatever.)
Or to prevent the outer rim from suddenly dictating terms to them (for example, what if the mining guild decides to strike etc). In fact, the more I think there are plenty of reasons for the core worlds to stack up, last but not least the possibility of being under siege by a fellow core power for several years. It would make sense to be able to rebuild your forces under a planetary shield.

There is questions of things like agriculture and the economy. While they probably COULD do away with the Outer Rim, that would almost cretainly have an impact on galactic trade and transport, and that's going to cut into profits (and war does cost money) - nevermind that you have to convince people of the importance of this (and as I've said, the GE and evne the Republic have alot of parallels ot the US - they won't neccesarily do what is intelligent.) Does the atlas say anything about the providence of food and water (agriculture and such) and where much of that is located?
The atlas mentioned that the majority of agri-worlds are located in the core itself. In fact, the atlas outlines that several major core worlds gained their power specifically through exporting foodstuff to other core powers. The atlas also mentioned that core agricultural worlds are pressuring rim worlds to let them export more food to them iirc.

Again, most likely a first world/third world paralel - the industrially manufactured food destroys local food production (with the case that the core worlds can apparently do so without subsidies).
The other problem is that ceding the outer Rim would be almost certainly giving a ton of resources to the Tyranids - although it woudl take them quite awhile to assimilate it all and they might launch raids to disrupt things even - so it might not be a good idea to write it off totally unless they had to (but then again they may just write it off because of their view of the Rim anyhow. Alot of the "filthy aliens" are in the Rim after all...) And if they hav those resources on hand, that may give them an edge in outlasting the Core (I say "may" because how long it takes to outlast the 'Nids is one of those things being debated..)
I think replacement rates would also factor into this. If the core can potentially train several trillions of beings every year just based on a standard population growth rate and once they learn the aliens are a huge freaking threat that wants to eat them and assuming they have the manufacturing capacity to actually build enough ships to crew them, would they be able to outproduce the nids? If they launch massive rainds intent on BDZ'ing the rim worlds that have been taken over by the NIds, every battle lost is a major blow to the nids, for they are essentially fighting on the defensive.

And what is even more worrying for the nids is that with the core-centric empire, they might just as well have the willpower to do so. I defer to your knowledge on the nids, but to me the side that has a potential manufacturing disadvantage and loses even more of that advantage every time a battle is lost is at a clear strategic disadvantage and will usually lose the war. (kinda like strategic bombing campaigns by the US. They lose planes but the enemy cannot touch the industrial centers).
As far as size tho, we know they've launched millions/tens of millions of ships with billions/trillions of nid troops over a course of centuries (with greater numbers skewed towards the last decade or so) spaced over nearly a score of "fleetS" of varying size and speed. We only know that its been a small part of the overall force (basically just the scouting/fringe elements) but how big the rest is isnt known - it could be 10%, 1%, a perecent of a percent..
For the sake of argument, let us assume the nids can invade with 100 million ships and a total of 10 trillion troopers. This should still be less than the core worlds combined, even the standard birth rate of the core worlds should outnumber the entire nid force in one or two years. All they really need is to manufacture enough ships. I have no doubt the core worlds could manufacture that much in a few years. So the question is whether the nids can double their ship/population numbers in three years. Because this battle will be decided in space, there is no way that the nids will win this by ground troops.

And finally the biggie - assuming this is the empire, can the nids stop a death star? What about ten or fifty of them? Conceivably, the core worlds could build several squadrons, if not hundreds of them.
Truthfully I doubt they'd bother initially. They mostly go after the biomass, but they'll destroy anything that resists or anything artificial if they're getting at it (Crews onboard stations, or shipyards.) But ther'es a good chance they'd leave the materials or infrastructure intact unless something occured to give them an idea that attacking it might be a good idea (They don't seem to innovate on their own, but they're capable of adapting their tactics to fit new information they obtain)
Hmmm. That leaves them at another disadvantage methinks.
- take protected key resource systems?
If those are what I am thinking of (core systems) probably not. I'm fairly certain that a direct assault on the Core without assimilating the resources of the Outer Rim would be suicide, although this is based on my own gueses about how big the entire Tyranid force might be.
Hmmm. Then this gets down to nid replacement rates and how quick they can built up their forces.
Will they even be able to capture the Oswaft?
Possibly. The Oswaft can ceratinly stay away if they want, but they won't abandon the Starcave IIRC, so they could be forced into a battle. Then again, the Oswaft can also destroy fully shielded Imperial warships with their voices, so that wouldn't necesarily be a pushover. and there's a fuck ton of oswaft. I also vaugely recall the Oswaft as being a bit curious, nonviolent and rather trusting.
Agreed.
I do agree that Ysalamiri would be of limited benefit, but that was just an example, really.
Problem is though, I cannot think of any biological force which, if they assimilate it, gives them a great enough power to negate the industrial advantage. Unless they assimilate the Vong, but given the Vongs talent at genetics and the resillience of their genetic engineereing (see Coruscant), I am not sure the nids can pull that off.

However, we also know that creating biological weapons that are specifically targeted at one species can be done relatively cheap and within months in SW (heck, a single doctor could do so with a droid lab) - can the nids resist such attacks?

That siad, I dont consider the "all out" option too terribly likely, since it represents an "ideal" response, and that largely devolves into "tactical considerations" (as in, how long before he might figure it out, why they never used this before, etc. etc. etc. which just introduces a whole nother layer of complexity to the issue..)
Agreed. My personal guess is that Palpy might very well decide to sacrifice a few systems in order to study them or to shore up support behind his ideas.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
Biotitan
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2010-02-02 07:54pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Biotitan »

Jumping in fairly late here, but I don't see how the GE can win in space, even the smallest hive ship (which is about the size of a star destroyer) is boasting high gigatons/low terratons of firepower, well over a thousand times (perhaps even 10 thousand times) the firepower a star destroyer, and they have armour to match. The larger Hive ships would rival the size of the a super star destroyer while having the firepower and armour to slug it out with a 40k imperial battleship one on one.
Biotitan
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2010-02-02 07:54pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Biotitan »

Thanas wrote:However, we also know that creating biological weapons that are specifically targeted at one species can be done relatively cheap and within months in SW (heck, a single doctor could do so with a droid lab) - can the nids resist such attacks?
Yes, theres a small story about a similar attack, some imperial ships on there way to virus bomb a world and used some of the weapons against the hive fleet it space, it did nothing to them. The tyranids had even added that specific virus to their toxins and acids when they attacked again the next day.
Eviscerator
Padawan Learner
Posts: 267
Joined: 2009-12-30 05:02am
Location: Below the equator

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Eviscerator »

*wrinkles eyebrows
Does this mean that the Tyranids now possess the Anti-Life equation? :mrgreen:
Paraphrasing there but the Life-eater virus has certainly been used against them before, do they now have its formula/composition and can use it if they wish?
Homer Simpson : SLobber .... (Insert random item here) :)
User avatar
PainRack
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7583
Joined: 2002-07-07 03:03am
Location: Singapura

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by PainRack »

Connor MacLeod wrote:
PainRack wrote:And? There is still no reason why Han and co does not represent the normal speeds in the SWU.
As for hyperdrive endurance, we already know from Paradise snare that reduced speed and etc leads to fuel economy. That STILL doesn't argue against SW warships not being able to achieve the speeds Han achieved.
Are you trying to claim that the Falcon is a unmodified, civilian freighter? now?
SW WARSHIPS numbnuts.
Since your entire passage appears to be trollish, let me requote my begining posts.
So? There is no indication that for longer distances, the Imperium speed is on par with hyperdrive.
While Maul, Anakin/Obiwan and Yoda speeds may be taken as outlier, why should the Falcon be regarded as such? Because she's a smuggler ship?
Han was BROKE and massively in debt. Despite the Falcon speed records, there is no reason to assume that any well designed military craft built for speed could not achieve the same.

MILITARY craft.
It's a "false position" to demand you clarify your nebulous responses, and expect an answer rather than another question? You failed to clarify how hit and run bio-warfare attacks are supposd to automatically deprive them of biomass, unless you really ARE thinking that the entire SW galaxy is going to go turtle under planetary shielding and try to outlast the Nids. And that I was proposing the 'Nids would automatically send repeated attacks against active planetary shielding until they ran out of resources.
Poster came up with a scenario/tactic. Fortify Core worlds.
Your response, Tyrannids can develop new tactics such as hit and run.
My response, Then they're expending valuable bio-material, fuel and etc without harvest
Your reply was Is there some reason we should assume that such efforts automatically end in failure?

So, you're now screaming bloody murder because an objection to your counter-tactic to what was an admittedly stupid scenario popped up?
Fine. Concede.
1.) you're claiming gravity sensors are FTL. This is going to require proof since this is an EXTREMELY exceptional claim.
The very fact that they can detect mass shadows in hyperspace so that hyperdrive can be cut off?
2.) what makes you think that if such is neccesary, they're neccesarily the same sorts of sensors used at Sernpidal? Again, evidence is required.
Because its explictly stated that gravitic sensors detect no Vong ships around Sernpidal. The next passage then has an internal passage about its limitations.
How do you jump from "technology and supernatural powers cross over to the universes involved" to "powers involved must be the same thing?" Are you going to claim that Hyperdrive and warp travel are the same? Or that all forms of hyperdrive are the same because they're called hyperdrive? That's just about the same level of logic as you are proposing.
No. I'm assuming that the Warp PYSCHIC effect can also be picked up by SW PSYKERS. Who by the way, are not all Force users.
I like how you ignored the fact Tyranid's ability to disrupt the warp in their proximity fucks over psyker stuff besides astrotelepathy (nevermind the OTHER logical conclusions to your supposition, IE the danger of force users becoming possesssed just like psykers can, etc.)
Excuse me? I'm the FIRST FUCKING PERSON TO STATE THAT WH40k VS HAS THE COMMON OP CAVEAT THAT JEDI/SITH AREN"T POSSESSED BY CHAOS.
What the fuck made you claim that I'm ignoring the danger of Force users becoming possessed? Is it that very opening statement I made?
Hell, isn't this one of the reasons why standard Wh40k vs GE always has the caveat "Chaos don't get involved", otherwise, the standard WH40k poster response is Chaos God screw up Jedi/Sith and fuck everyone?

You have proof of this, I assume? Because both the games fluff AND the novels (and likely the comics) have a nice habit of recycling older material when it suits their purposes (modified and unmodified both.)
Conceded.
Let him land on any Lyran world to taste firsthand the wrath of peace loving people thwarted by the myopic greed of a few miserly old farts- Katrina Steiner
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

Biotitan wrote:Jumping in fairly late here, but I don't see how the GE can win in space, even the smallest hive ship (which is about the size of a star destroyer) is boasting high gigatons/low terratons of firepower, well over a thousand times (perhaps even 10 thousand times) the firepower a star destroyer, and they have armour to match.
A single Star destroyer has a pentaton volley per broadside and has shields to match.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Sarevok
The Fearless One
Posts: 10681
Joined: 2002-12-24 07:29am
Location: The Covenants last and final line of defense

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Sarevok »

Imperials can convert entire planetary masses into warships and armies using world devastators and droid mining techniques if need be. How does Tyranid industrial production compare ? They only eat living things right ? Biomatter compromises a tiny percentage of a planets mass. I think the Imperials could outnumber the tyranids thousands or millions of times in ships and robot soldiers if they wanted to.
I have to tell you something everything I wrote above is a lie.
Eviscerator
Padawan Learner
Posts: 267
Joined: 2009-12-30 05:02am
Location: Below the equator

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Eviscerator »

There is more than ample precedent for Freighters or other such civilian vessels serving in frontline or in an support capacity.
There is also more than ample precedent for this in real history and also in SW. I remind you that the Falcon is so heavily modded it no longer should be considered an Freighter anymore, and it had a role in the bringing down of two Death Stars. That's just the original trilogy, there is also enough evidence that Freighters can be equipped with capital ship class weapons and serve as escorts or even missile platforms to assault an Capital ship (SSD Lusankya).

Why then can't Freighters, suitably upgraded and converted be included as Q-ships at least?
Homer Simpson : SLobber .... (Insert random item here) :)
Eviscerator
Padawan Learner
Posts: 267
Joined: 2009-12-30 05:02am
Location: Below the equator

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Eviscerator »

The MF is a more extrme piece of modification, and it can be considered in the NJO to be the equivalent of an light corvette at the very least.
It;s no longer armed with the ligth blaster cannon :)

Taken from Wookiepedia
addition to the hidden laser cannon, the Falcon was equipped with a pair of dorsal and ventrally mounted Corellian Engineering Corporation AG-2G quad laser cannons, which drew their power directly from her Quadex power core. They were originally installed by Lando to replace the mandible mounted blasters. When Han took over ownership of the Falcon, he modified the cannons extensively by adding enhanced powercyclers, high-volume gas feeds, and custom laser actuators. This increased the cannons' output to the point where they were able to destroy a TIE Fighter with a single shot. These cannons, though typically manually operated, could be remotely accessed and controlled from the cockpit by Solo. He once found himself in need of this capability during the Blockade of Kashyyyk in 0 ABY. The ship also had a pair of Arakyd ST2 concussion missile launchers mounted between the forward mandibles, which were technically illegal for a civilian to possess; these were used in the Battle of Endor, destroying the Reactor Core of the second Death Star.

After becoming the diplomatic courier ship for the Skywalker-Organa-Solo family, the Falcon was refitted with military-grade power generators, propulsion, and weaponry. The quad blaster cannons were replaced by light turbolasers. The turbolaser turrets were destroyed by the Star Destroyer Anakin Solo's long-range turbolaser in one shot under a false transponder code Longshot during the Battle of Hapes in 40 ABY. The turbolaser turrets were then eventually replaced with newer light turbolasers.

So is this proof enough Freighters can be converted into at least littoral-scale combatants ? :lol:
Homer Simpson : SLobber .... (Insert random item here) :)
Biotitan
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2010-02-02 07:54pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Biotitan »

Thanas wrote:
Biotitan wrote:Jumping in fairly late here, but I don't see how the GE can win in space, even the smallest hive ship (which is about the size of a star destroyer) is boasting high gigatons/low terratons of firepower, well over a thousand times (perhaps even 10 thousand times) the firepower a star destroyer, and they have armour to match.
A single Star destroyer has a pentaton volley per broadside and has shields to match.
Where do those numbers come from?, I've only been able to find stuff that puts star destroy broadsides at only several hundred megatons?
Sarevok wrote:Imperials can convert entire planetary masses into warships and armies using world devastators and droid mining techniques if need be. How does Tyranid industrial production compare ? They only eat living things right ? Biomatter compromises a tiny percentage of a planets mass. I think the Imperials could outnumber the tyranids thousands or millions of times in ships and robot soldiers if they wanted to.

They don't just take biological matter, in the final stages of consumption to take even fossil fuels and any useful minerals (various metals and such) in huge quantities before drinking all the oceans and even the atmosphere. They have been known to reduce a planets mass by something like 4-14%. And they take all this with them, the sum total of the hive fleets comprises of pretty much all the planetary resources of 12 entire galaxies, lack of resources won't be a long term problem for them in this fight.
Minischoles
Jedi Knight
Posts: 566
Joined: 2008-04-17 10:09pm
Location: England

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Minischoles »

Sarevok wrote:Imperials can convert entire planetary masses into warships and armies using world devastators and droid mining techniques if need be. How does Tyranid industrial production compare ? They only eat living things right ? Biomatter compromises a tiny percentage of a planets mass. I think the Imperials could outnumber the tyranids thousands or millions of times in ships and robot soldiers if they wanted to.
Well if you go by where the Tyrannids got their name (Tyran) the planet was actually smaller when they were done with it, so it's more than simply biomass they're taking off of the planet.

The problem is as Thanas sort of pointed out, what numbers are we going with for the Tyrannids? are we going a single hive fleet, multiple hive fleets or the whole shebang of Tyrannids from WH40K (galaxies worth of biomatter)? if we're going with the last, then the scenario Connor outlined is the most likely. Yes they'll fortify entire planets, but you could have years or decades between attacks. They can't leave shields on forever and they can't have the Imperial Navy on alert constantly, so it comes down to attrition, with the Tyrannids simply wearing down the GE.
“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that the English language is as pure as a crib-house whore. It not only borrows words from other languages; it has on occasion chased other languages down dark alley-ways, clubbed them unconscious and rifled their pockets for new vocabulary. “
- James Nicoll
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Serafina »

Biotitan wrote:
Thanas wrote:
Biotitan wrote:Jumping in fairly late here, but I don't see how the GE can win in space, even the smallest hive ship (which is about the size of a star destroyer) is boasting high gigatons/low terratons of firepower, well over a thousand times (perhaps even 10 thousand times) the firepower a star destroyer, and they have armour to match.
A single Star destroyer has a pentaton volley per broadside and has shields to match.
Where do those numbers come from?, I've only been able to find stuff that puts star destroy broadsides at only several hundred megatons?
RTFMS - Read the fucking main site.
It has lot's of excellent, detailed analyses about the firepower of imperial ships.
Biotitan wrote: And they take all this with them, the sum total of the hive fleets comprises of pretty much all the planetary resources of 12 entire galaxies, lack of resources won't be a long term problem for them in this fight.
Ah - yes, of course, YOU know the backstory of the Tyranids that no one else knows. :roll:
Look, back up the claim about "planetary resources of 12 galaxies" or shut up.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Thanas »

Minischoles wrote:The problem is as Thanas sort of pointed out, what numbers are we going with for the Tyrannids? are we going a single hive fleet, multiple hive fleets or the whole shebang of Tyrannids from WH40K (galaxies worth of biomatter)? if we're going with the last, then the scenario Connor outlined is the most likely. Yes they'll fortify entire planets, but you could have years or decades between attacks. They can't leave shields on forever and they can't have the Imperial Navy on alert constantly, so it comes down to attrition, with the Tyrannids simply wearing down the GE.
I doubt very much that the Tyranids have galaxies of biomatter, for otherwise they would have overrun the Imperium already. And even if they had several galaxies worth of biomatter, I am still betting that all that biomatter will not measure up very well against the percentage of non-biomatter the Imps have. Look at our own stellar surrounding - how much biomatter is there in contrast to normal rocks? Very, very little. To measure up to the Imps on sheer scale of resources alone, the nids would have to most likely have several hundreds of galaxies.

Also - and this is my point - you either win a quick victory against the core, taking out those planets, or you are toast. You actually have got a very small window here - a few years at most - before the Imps start pushing you back with enormous fleets.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by NecronLord »

Serafina wrote:Ah - yes, of course, YOU know the backstory of the Tyranids that no one else knows. :roll:
Look, back up the claim about "planetary resources of 12 galaxies" or shut up.
The last tyranid codex had something about a dozen dead galaxies behind them. That's where he gets that from. However, the new one raises a different possibility, mentioning that they might have been driven out of the last galaxy they were in. Given that I rather liked the description of the corpse of a fourteen thousand year old soldier found on a hive ship in Space Marine, I favour the idea that his people defeated the tyranids and are still out there.

But then, I'm not a tyranid player. :)
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
Biotitan
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2010-02-02 07:54pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Biotitan »

Serafina wrote:
RTFMS - Read the fucking main site.
It has lot's of excellent, detailed analyses about the firepower of imperial ships.
This is where I got the hundreds of megatons figure, http://www.stardestroyer.net/tlc/Power/index.html
Biotitan wrote: And they take all this with them, the sum total of the hive fleets comprises of pretty much all the planetary resources of 12 entire galaxies, lack of resources won't be a long term problem for them in this fight.
Ah - yes, of course, YOU know the backstory of the Tyranids that no one else knows. :roll:
Look, back up the claim about "planetary resources of 12 galaxies" or shut up.[/quote]

The 5th ed rule book states that "the barren husks of a dozen galaxies lie in their wake."
Thanas wrote:
Minischoles wrote:The problem is as Thanas sort of pointed out, what numbers are we going with for the Tyrannids? are we going a single hive fleet, multiple hive fleets or the whole shebang of Tyrannids from WH40K (galaxies worth of biomatter)? if we're going with the last, then the scenario Connor outlined is the most likely. Yes they'll fortify entire planets, but you could have years or decades between attacks. They can't leave shields on forever and they can't have the Imperial Navy on alert constantly, so it comes down to attrition, with the Tyrannids simply wearing down the GE.
I doubt very much that the Tyranids have galaxies of biomatter, for otherwise they would have overrun the Imperium already. And even if they had several galaxies worth of biomatter, I am still betting that all that biomatter will not measure up very well against the percentage of non-biomatter the Imps have. Look at our own stellar surrounding - how much biomatter is there in contrast to normal rocks? Very, very little. To measure up to the Imps on sheer scale of resources alone, the nids would have to most likely have several hundreds of galaxies.

Also - and this is my point - you either win a quick victory against the core, taking out those planets, or you are toast. You actually have got a very small window here - a few years at most - before the Imps start pushing you back with enormous fleets.
I didn't mean actually galactic masses, but the mass of the resources in 12 galaxies, and actually bio-matter is not the majority of what they take, where talking about entire oceans and mineral deposits too, they don't just digest the inhabitants of a city but most of the metals and stuff that make up the city itself too.
Also the imperium of man hasn't lost yet because the hive fleets that have made it to the galaxy so far are only the vangaurd, the scouts if you will of the main "super-hive", these are vanguard/scout fleets that comprise millions of ships each. Just how big is the GE's fleet?
User avatar
Ryan Thunder
Village Idiot
Posts: 4139
Joined: 2007-09-16 07:53pm
Location: Canada

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Ryan Thunder »

Jesus Christ, they're even stupider than I thought...
SDN Worlds 5: Sanctum
User avatar
Srelex
Jedi Master
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2010-01-20 08:33pm

Re: Tyranids vs the Galactic Empire

Post by Srelex »

Ryan Thunder wrote:Jesus Christ, they're even stupider than I thought...
Who is?
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
Post Reply