Stop the trolling, douchebag. You took it from BLACKSUN2000 who created and based that name off the criminal syndicate in Star Wars called 'Black Sun.' Besides which, you write and think exactly like slicktyler, and you both also joined within a week apart of 'each other.'blacksun2175 wrote:No. I have used the name Blacksun from my p&p role playng days. Black Sun was my characters name from RIFTS the number comes from the year he was born.Boeing 757 wrote:First off, I want to inform everyone on this board that this user here--supposedly Blacksun2175--may in fact be user slicktyler, who has opened up this blacksun2175 account in order to aggravate SD.net user Blacksun2000, whose youtube username has been Blacksun2175 for several months on there until now. On top of the idiocy displayed by user slicktyler in this thread, this troll idiot 2175 gives away his true identity by reiterating the SAME crap, discarded arguments that user slicktyler had given credence, too, even after in this very thread those arguments were torn up by numerous posters. Several others and I have already alerted the mods as to what is happening here, but no response as of yet.
That is weird that someone else has the same name on a youtube account well not as weird as someone actually having a youtube account. Why would u need one do you subscire to the Jonahs brothers or something. But it is not the wierdest thing I have seen I once met someone wit the same first name and birthday as me.
Again, I can think of several reasons as to why that would be, some of which I've already mentioned:that doesnt stike you at all as being werid that it can shake the decks but not damage the surfaceBoeing 757 wrote:1)Red leader's torpedoes didn't just impact on the surface--they caused the adjoining decks surrounding the port to shudder. That isn't any thing to scoff at.
1)We know that the Death Star's defenses are designed to defend against large-scale attacks (i.e. many capital ships) and that they can handle a mindnumbingly huge amount of kinetic energy, so it isn't all too far fetched that two fighter torpedoes couldn't inflict much damage. That is one possibility. Have you considered it at all?
2)Further, not once do we get a detailed view of the impact site, but rather we are left only with a closeup of the exhaust port which we can't even presume to have been hit dead on since we know that Red leader missed the target. Watch. So, I have to ask myself how you would know anyway to what degree the armor had been effected.
3)Also for what it's worth, one can clearly see that the exhaust port does indeed appear to have heavier armor around its vicinity, which makes sense since the Empire went through the effort to install ray shielding over the area. Apparently the entire end of the trench necessitates heavier armor and shields for some unknown reason.
Either way that one goes with it, your idea that proton torpedoes can't threaten large warships because of lack of effects near the exhaust port seems to be completely blown out of the water....
I highlighted the relevant part for you. They blew up several structures on the surface, but did they penetrate the armor or do any major damage to it? HARDLY. Watch. The X-wing laser cannons barely inflict any damage. So as I said, starfighters won't be achieving any appreciable damage against them. Sorry, but point one therefore still stands.i will have to watch the movie again but i remember the x-wings doing damage to the death star with just their lasers. They blow up a few towers and do some straffing runs.Boeing 757 wrote:2)The Death Star's defenses were built in mind to thwart large-scale capitalship attacks, and besides which, they can manage an enormous amount of energy--hint: Alderaan debris. starfighters won't be achieving any appreciable damage against them any time soon.
EXACTLY. Consequently we don't know what the yield was for those torpedoes, and if that is so, what makes you think then that proton torpedoes can not threaten capships?They used MG7-A proton torpedoes there is no yield for these or at least no printed yieldBoeing 757 wrote:3)Provide us evidence of what the yield of Red Squadron's torpedoes were. Red Squadron wasn't up against a capital ship, if you hadn't noticed. There was no point whatsoever in carrying megaton/gigaton-yield missles against the Death Star since they weren't planning on destroying it by using conventional attacks.
I know which is why there should be some damage to the sourounding area.
For fuck's sake, you're an idiot. The proton torpedo did create a fireball, but we aren't shown what the result was. And as for the lasers, they accomplished jack, pal. At least know what you're talking about when you want to make a claim. You're wrong on every single detail.yes if they are a threat then why dosn't the proton torpedo damage the death star when the xwings lasers will.Boeing 757 wrote:4)Explain why fighters are even used against capital ships if they don't manifest a threat to capships. Remember how in ROTJ the first wave of assault against the Rebel fleet consisted of fighters? We even know that a TIE bomber launched a thermonuclear device at Home One and made the the entire ship vibrate.
Further, fighter torpedoes are indeed a threat to capital ships. Remember that scene in ROTJ where the A-wings blew up one of the Executor's sensor domes, and the other one prior where fighters blew up an ISD's sensor dome?
BTW, I'm glad to see that you completely glossed over my canonical examples of torpedoes harming capital ships. Your true trollish nature is showing more and more clearly....
Those should be enough to prove that my opinion is in the right. CONCESSION ACCEPTED
I back batman up and i get called names. TerrifeicFucking idiot