Reprehensible Movies

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Wong »

General Zod wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
General Zod wrote:Pretty much anything with Adam Sandler in it.
That's a good addition but a bit over-broad. Some of his films, like "Happy Gilmour" and "Big Daddy", try to make heroes out of complete douchebags, without ever really making them see what was so wrong with their behaviour. "School of Rock" with Jack Black is very similar in that way. I can't stand it because the guy is such a fucking asshole, and nothing he does later in the film redeems him.

However, Sandler does have other films which don't follow that mould. "The Wedding Singer" and "50 First Dates" both include a character who seems like a basically decent guy, rather than celebrating extreme selfishness as some of his other films do. There's also "Bedtime Stories", which is a kind of a lukewarm family film but which I certainly wouldn't call "reprehensible" in a moral sense.
I haven't generally bothered to watch most of his films because I can't stand him. The few that I've seen bits and pieces of pretty much turned me off to wanting to see anything else with him in it.
Maybe you didn't bother reading the fucking OP. This is about films you actually find genuinely offensive, not just your opportunity to grandstand about actors you don't like. If you didn't bother watching most of them, you can't say you find all of them offensive, can you?
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by General Zod »

Darth Wong wrote: Maybe you didn't bother reading the fucking OP. This is about films you actually find genuinely offensive, not just your opportunity to grandstand about actors you don't like. If you didn't bother watching most of them, you can't say you find all of them offensive, can you?
I suppose not, but movies like Waterboy did leave a rather bad taste in my mouth for their portrayal of the mentally handicapped.
Last edited by General Zod on 2010-03-11 02:54pm, edited 1 time in total.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
salm
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 10296
Joined: 2002-09-09 08:25pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by salm »

Saw is pretty much the only film i´ve ever seen that i found honestly reprehensible. It´s been a while but i remember walking out and thinking that the makers just sat together, got drunk and thought up bizarr ways to kill people. After that they made a stupid story around it and sold it to whomever wanted to see that crap.

I think that was one of the first torture porn movies that went mainstream. Never saw another torture porn afterwards. That´s just fucked up and at the same time pretty boring crap.
User avatar
Lagmonster
Master Control Program
Master Control Program
Posts: 7719
Joined: 2002-07-04 09:53am
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Lagmonster »

I personally hate any movie whose only goal is to shock me. Not to tell a story, not to advance a character, not even to make a political or social point - just to see if they can shock me or upset me emotionally. There are dozens of these movies - everyone dies crying and screaming and in pain, the bad guy gets away with it and probably goes on to torture some other innocent young family to death, the end. What the fuck did you want me to get out of that?
Note: I'm semi-retired from the board, so if you need something, please be patient.
User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Thanas »

Pretty much every torture porn movie.
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Darth Yan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2494
Joined: 2008-12-29 02:09pm
Location: California

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Yan »

Darth Wong wrote:That's a good addition but a bit over-broad. Some of his films, like "Happy Gilmour" and "Big Daddy", try to make heroes out of complete douchebags, without ever really making them see what was so wrong with their behaviour. "School of Rock" with Jack Black is very similar in that way. I can't stand it because the guy is such a fucking asshole, and nothing he does later in the film redeems him.

However, Sandler does have other films which don't follow that mould. "The Wedding Singer" and "50 First Dates" both include a character who seems like a basically decent guy, rather than celebrating extreme selfishness as some of his other films do. There's also "Bedtime Stories", which is a kind of a lukewarm family film but which I certainly wouldn't call "reprehensible" in a moral sense.
Jack Black's character in School Of Rock is sort of redeemed in that he actually starts to care about his students, and he sort of gets a job. And did you like Scary Movie, because apparently the guy who directed it actually is black (he has a cameo in the Amistad 2 trailer).
User avatar
Darth Yan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2494
Joined: 2008-12-29 02:09pm
Location: California

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Yan »

Also, films that are only possible because the heroes are morons. Case in point Haloween. The police are more focused on teen vandals then an escaped serial killer, they neglect to inform the sister of the killer. End result: 3 horny teenagers are dead, including the sheriffs daughter. And Jamie Lee drops the knife EVEN WHEN SHE'S SEEN MICHAEL MYERS GET UP FROM IMPOSSIBLE INJURIES TWICE!!!!! The villian is also an idiot. "Ohh, I'll wait until she's in her car, where she can bang her horn and attract attention." And he misses Jamie Lee at close range twice AND TRIES TO THROTTLE HER WHEN HE HAS THE ELEMENT OF SURPRISE!!!!!!!! God I don't know why that film is cited as a classic. The film Shredder's honestly better.
User avatar
Simplicius
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2031
Joined: 2006-01-27 06:07pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Simplicius »

Darth Yan wrote:Also, films that are only possible because the heroes are morons.
This is a thread about reprehensible movies, not reprehensibly bad ones. Rants about dumb genre contrivances should go elsewhere.
User avatar
RogueIce
_______
Posts: 13388
Joined: 2003-01-05 01:36am
Location: Tampa Bay, Florida, USA
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by RogueIce »

Darth Yan wrote:Beverly Hills Cop. It seemed to be saying "It's a ok to break the rules" Funny as hell but the message left a bad taste in my mouth.
You know that's a comedy, right? And while he probably did violate some due process along the way, it's certainly no worse than a "message" sent by pretty much any action movie where the lead cop 'doesn't play by the rules' and leaves a higher bodycount than the entire LAPD combined on a bad year, and gets away with it. Because apparently those movies are saying that taking personal vengeance and leaving a trail of bodies behind you is OK?
Image
"How can I wait unknowing?
This is the price of war,
We rise with noble intentions,
And we risk all that is pure..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, Forever (Rome: Total War)

"On and on, through the years,
The war continues on..." - Angela & Jeff van Dyck, We Are All One (Medieval 2: Total War)
"Courage is not the absence of fear, but rather the judgment that something else is more important than fear." - Ambrose Redmoon
"You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain." - Harvey Dent, The Dark Knight
User avatar
Darth Yan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2494
Joined: 2008-12-29 02:09pm
Location: California

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Yan »

fair enough.
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Simplicius wrote:This is a thread about reprehensible movies, not reprehensibly bad ones. Rants about dumb genre contrivances should go elsewhere.
Yeah, to be clear, I want to see discussion of movies that are offensive in some way, such as the decidedly inappropriate movie that was ostensibly marketed to children I talked about at the start. I haven't seen any sort of Saw-esque or other torture porn-type films, but they seem like the sort of thing that apply. Similarly, Rye was recently talking about Martys and that also seems to fit (though I haven't seen it and certainly don't plan to).

Talk about movies you've seen, not just heard about. Discuss specifically what it is in the movie that bothers you, if you care to share.
Image
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

I'm surprised no one's mentioned it yet: The Twilight series, for a number of self-evident reasons.

There's also been a few parts of the Harry Potter series that have bothered me. Pretty much the implied assumption that it's a-okay to consistently put children in very dangerous situations, and for the 'bad' teachers to display blatant favouritism and the 'good' teachers to play fair, which inevitably results in a pointless net loss for the students who aren't complete douches. In the end, neither issue is addressed, so I can only assume that the movie is trying to tell us these sorts of things are perfectly fine.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by General Zod »

Oni Koneko Damien wrote:I'm surprised no one's mentioned it yet: The Twilight series, for a number of self-evident reasons.
It's also too easy, really.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
User avatar
Big Phil
BANNED
Posts: 4555
Joined: 2004-10-15 02:18pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Big Phil »

Kids
Gummo

and similar movies about shitty kids doing shitty things to themselves and other people. Supposedly these films have meaning, but I don't see it.
In Brazil they say that Pele was the best, but Garrincha was better
User avatar
spaceviking
Jedi Knight
Posts: 853
Joined: 2008-03-20 05:54pm

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by spaceviking »

General Zod wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: Maybe you didn't bother reading the fucking OP. This is about films you actually find genuinely offensive, not just your opportunity to grandstand about actors you don't like. If you didn't bother watching most of them, you can't say you find all of them offensive, can you?
I suppose not, but movies like Waterboy did leave a rather bad taste in my mouth for their portrayal of the mentally handicapped.
Was we mentally handicapped? I believe he was of normal intellegence but overly sheltered. The movie also ends with him choosing to finnish college rather then enter the NFL.
User avatar
Oni Koneko Damien
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3852
Joined: 2004-03-10 07:23pm
Location: Yar Yar Hump Hump!
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Oni Koneko Damien »

General Zod wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: Maybe you didn't bother reading the fucking OP. This is about films you actually find genuinely offensive, not just your opportunity to grandstand about actors you don't like. If you didn't bother watching most of them, you can't say you find all of them offensive, can you?
I suppose not, but movies like Waterboy did leave a rather bad taste in my mouth for their portrayal of the mentally handicapped.
Really? Of all the Adam Sandler movies out there, this one always seemed to be one of the better ones in my view. The closed-minded, overprotective mother learns to open up and let her kid go. The sheltered (possibly retarded) kid learns to stick up for himself and even open up a little sexually. The burnout coach recovers the talent and ingenuity he had before his fall. The closed-minded small town learns a little tolerance, and in the end, the kid chooses education over sports.
Gaian Paradigm: Because not all fantasy has to be childish crap.
Ephemeral Pie: Because not all role-playing has to be shallow.
My art: Because not all DA users are talentless emo twits.
"Phant, quit abusing the He-Wench before he turns you into a caged bitch at a Ren Fair and lets the tourists toss half munched turkey legs at your backside." -Mr. Coffee
User avatar
General Zod
Never Shuts Up
Posts: 29211
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:08pm
Location: The Clearance Rack
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by General Zod »

spaceviking wrote: Was we mentally handicapped? I believe he was of normal intellegence but overly sheltered.
The way it looked to me is he had some sort of handicap going on. The whole movie just rubbed me the wrong way either way.
"It's you Americans. There's something about nipples you hate. If this were Germany, we'd be romping around naked on the stage here."
Channel72
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2010-02-03 05:28pm
Location: New York

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Channel72 »

I doubt anyone else will agree with this, but I was actually vaguely offended by a scene in Iron Man. There's a scene where Iron Man flies in to some impoverished Middle Eastern village where warlords are exterminating the local villagers. Prior to Iron Man's arrival, the whole ambience of the scene, and the way it was filmed, was so realistic that it had almost a documentary-like feel to it. Innocent people in the Middle East have been slaughtered in very similar circumstances over the years due to various tribal conflicts. So when Iron Man arrived, the inclusion of a silly comic-book element amidst this all-too-realistic tragedy was jarring, and gave me the sense that the movie had exploited a very real situation for the sake of a silly, Hollywood super-hero gimmick. In real life, there was never any Iron-Man to save any of these people.

However, I didn't find the overall movie reprehensible. It was an enjoyable movie, but that scene bothered me.
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9776
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Steve »

Given the scene was about Tony Stark deciding to man up and deal with a mess his company was helping to make (due to his corrupt "mentor" Obadiah Stane), I'm not sure I follow the logic of real life horror being "exploited" by Hollywood.

Seriously, why get upset because a superhero movie shows a superhero character intervening in a situation that would, normally, have ended far more tragically?.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Alyeska »

Another thing I like about that scene. Most Super Heroes spend their time and effort protecting Western countries that already have relatively working law and order. They could save far more lives working in those 3rd world countries.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
FSTargetDrone
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7878
Joined: 2004-04-10 06:10pm
Location: Drone HQ, Pennsylvania, USA

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by FSTargetDrone »

Channel72 wrote:I doubt anyone else will agree with this, but I was actually vaguely offended by a scene in Iron Man. There's a scene where Iron Man flies in to some impoverished Middle Eastern village where warlords are exterminating the local villagers. Prior to Iron Man's arrival, the whole ambience of the scene, and the way it was filmed, was so realistic that it had almost a documentary-like feel to it. Innocent people in the Middle East have been slaughtered in very similar circumstances over the years due to various tribal conflicts. So when Iron Man arrived, the inclusion of a silly comic-book element amidst this all-too-realistic tragedy was jarring, and gave me the sense that the movie had exploited a very real situation for the sake of a silly, Hollywood super-hero gimmick. In real life, there was never any Iron-Man to save any of these people.
I think it would be more objectionable if Stark had been quipping the whole time, cracking jokes as he effortlessly tossed the gunmen around. Stark is a playboy and a thrill-seeker, but when he was doing battle, he wasn't was getting his jollies from it. I didn't see that scene as silly at all. It was portrayed as a grim, serious incident and not done for kicks, clearly. Surely you remember his reaction as he was watching the news reports before that scene. The bloodshed really pissed him off.
Image
User avatar
Vastatosaurus Rex
BANNED
Posts: 231
Joined: 2010-01-14 05:28am
Location: Monterey, CA
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Vastatosaurus Rex »

Darth Wong wrote:"Gods and Generals". Wow, I had no idea that the South was so fucking morally superior in the Civil War.
The fact that neo-Confederates were able to get away with a major movie glorifying the Confederacy as recently as 2003 shocks and appalls me. Do neo-Confederates still have that much influence?

As for movies I find problematic from a moral perspective, I have to nominate The Lion King. It's got great music and animation, but I don't like the blatant anti-hyena bias.
And lo, the beast looked upon the face of beauty. And it stayed its hand from killing. And from that day, it was as one dead.
---Old Arabian Proverb
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Darth Wong »

Vastatosaurus Rex wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:"Gods and Generals". Wow, I had no idea that the South was so fucking morally superior in the Civil War.
The fact that neo-Confederates were able to get away with a major movie glorifying the Confederacy as recently as 2003 shocks and appalls me. Do neo-Confederates still have that much influence?
They do among the right wing. They always did; I don't even know if you can call it neo-Confederacy; the pro-Confederate movement never really went away in the first place.
As for movies I find problematic from a moral perspective, I have to nominate The Lion King. It's got great music and animation, but I don't like the blatant anti-hyena bias.
Surely you can find more compelling victims of negative stereotyping in movies than hyenas.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Xon
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6206
Joined: 2002-07-16 06:12am
Location: Western Australia

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by Xon »

Oni Koneko Damien wrote:There's also been a few parts of the Harry Potter series that have bothered me.
The Harry Potter series has some truely nasty aspects to it if you look. Widespread use of memory editing and love potions put a whole new perspective on where the "muggle-born" actually come from.
"Okay, I'll have the truth with a side order of clarity." ~ Dr. Daniel Jackson.
"Reality has a well-known liberal bias." ~ Stephen Colbert
"One Drive, One Partition, the One True Path" ~ ars technica forums - warrens - on hhd partitioning schemes.
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Re: Reprehensible Movies

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

General Zod wrote:
spaceviking wrote: Was we mentally handicapped? I believe he was of normal intellegence but overly sheltered.
The way it looked to me is he had some sort of handicap going on. The whole movie just rubbed me the wrong way either way.
In the water boy, he's just slow/shy. I've known plenty of people like that, they're just on the down side of the bell curve.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
Post Reply