Only because they are at it again.

SteelDragoon · Post by **SteelDragoon** » 2003-02-17 04:31am

Hello! New user ... er, yeah. I've been lurking for a while ... and such ... anyway ...

Darth Servo wrote:Damn. I'm to page 33 of the debate and I already have 15 pages on the word file archive.

DW, Angelblade and SSG 1000 were practically BEGGING for the Imperial smackdown (tm) throughout that debate.

SSJG1000's been a joke for a long time. His arguments were (if you can believe it) even more pathetic than what you've seen. He was on the Star Wars board on GFaqs and was making rediculous arguments. Eventually people beat him into a corner, but then he claimed victory.

Jim Raynor · Post by **Jim Raynor** » 2003-02-17 08:28am

LOL, Now SuperSaiyanGoku is quitting because he's tired of dealing with our "ignorance".

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2003-02-17 11:45am

Really...he's tired of our ignorance?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I wish I had some of the older debates and quote...this one as seen by now is beyond even RSA level of WoI(I mean at least RSA tries something) SSJG1000 just spews spittle.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-17 03:31pm

AngelBlade is now demanding that I disregard the ENTIRE FUCKING SCENE with Shinzon ordering the Scimitar "hard to port" in order to make his pet-theory work. According to him, the entire scene was "added for dramatic effect" and did not happen.

Darth Yoshi · Post by **Darth Yoshi** » 2003-02-17 05:31pm

Isn't that ignoring canon policy and proper "suspension of disbelief?"

Jim Raynor · Post by **Jim Raynor** » 2003-02-17 05:35pm

Darth Yoshi wrote:Isn't that ignoring canon policy and proper "suspension of disbelief?"

Angelblade doesn't seem to understand "suspension of disbelief." See his retarded arguments against the Death Star's superlaser.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-17 06:11pm

Darth Yoshi wrote:Isn't that ignoring canon policy and proper "suspension of disbelief?"

He ignores EVERYTHING if it suits his single-minded task of rebutting my "Nemesis" calculation. Here's his quote, if anyone wants it.

Angelblade wrote:Also even two things that are cannon has different levels of truth. Picard ordering the E-E at full impulse? Absolute truth. Shinzon being able to react to it? Truth for dramatic effect.

He's also demanding that I define for him such obscure debating terms as "Ad hominem," "Strawman," and other such logical fallacies, as he finds them irrelevant to the debate at hand, claiming that they have nothing to do with anything.

Shadow · Post by **Shadow** » 2003-02-17 08:06pm

SteelDragoon wrote:SSJG1000's been a joke for a long time. His arguments were (if you can believe it) even more pathetic than what you've seen. He was on the Star Wars board on GFaqs and was making rediculous arguments. Eventually people beat him into a corner, but then he claimed victory.

That was over a year ago. Texas Pete and Vendetta were the only people I remember who debated against SW regularly. There was also someone with a long name beginning with P, but he didn't actually debate.

Shadow · Post by **Shadow** » 2003-02-17 08:07pm

That is a mistake. It should say "for," not against.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-17 09:44pm

I'm tired of debating this moron. Someone want to tag in for a while?

Enforcer Talen · Post by **Enforcer Talen** » 2003-02-17 09:51pm

Im tired just reading.

Jim Raynor · Post by **Jim Raynor** » 2003-02-17 10:48pm

Master of Ossus wrote:I'm tired of debating this moron. Someone want to tag in for a while?

Frustrating, isn't it? It doesn't matter how much you refute Angelblade's inane arguments, he'll just erect his Wall of Ignorance and keep repeating the same crap for hundreds and hundreds of posts. I spent well over two dozen pages arguing canon policy and against his stupid idea about the Death Star's heat. Everything that is worth bringing up in the debate has already been brought up, but Angelblade doesn't care. He just wants to drag things on and troll for eternity. Heck, he damn near admits it:

First off, I was never here to "win" a debate.

As I have said many times before in the last thread and ones before that, I argue for the sake of arguing, well because I find it fun.

There you have it. The little shit doesn't intend to win. He'll argue just to argue, because he enjoys it. Most people would call this trolling, although he apparently doesn't see anything wrong with it.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-18 11:26am

Master of Ossus wrote:[Angelblade's] also demanding that I define for him such obscure debating terms as "Ad hominem," "Strawman," and other such logical fallacies, as he finds them irrelevant to the debate at hand, claiming that they have nothing to do with anything.

Actually, I already told him the definition of 'Strawman fallacy' in the last debate.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-18 12:47pm

I/m still working on the archive. Its up to 42 pages of stupidity. Fortunately I only have a couple more pages on the original debate left. Sorting out the best gems of idiocy is going to be the biggest task. Should I start new threads for each idiot?

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-02-18 09:16pm

Darth Servo wrote:I/m still working on the archive. Its up to 42 pages of stupidity. Fortunately I only have a couple more pages on the original debate left. Sorting out the best gems of idiocy is going to be the biggest task. Should I start new threads for each idiot?

Yes, I'm sure that would make it more organized, and easier to read. There must have been a good amount of Trekkies in the debate, and most of them probably said a lot of stupid stuff worth preserving for a good laugh.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2003-02-19 12:19am

Darth Servo wrote:I/m still working on the archive. Its up to 42 pages of stupidity. Fortunately I only have a couple more pages on the original debate left. Sorting out the best gems of idiocy is going to be the biggest task. Should I start new threads for each idiot?

Yes...each of them should get their own...literally when seperated they appear that much dumber.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-19 12:51am

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:
Darth Servo wrote:I/m still working on the archive. Its up to 42 pages of stupidity. Fortunately I only have a couple more pages on the original debate left. Sorting out the best gems of idiocy is going to be the biggest task. Should I start new threads for each idiot?
Yes, I'm sure that would make it more organized, and easier to read. There must have been a good amount of Trekkies in the debate, and most of them probably said a lot of stupid stuff worth preserving for a good laugh.

Yes. Definitely. Then we can point to each one individually and laugh.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-19 10:43am

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:There must have been a good amount of Trekkies in the debate, and most of them probably said a lot of stupid stuff worth preserving for a good laugh.

There were three or four primary idiots, but there were several one-post-'wonders' as well.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-19 11:42am

OK. Both debates are saved to three different Word files. SSG 1000 weighs in at 11 pages of stupidity. Everyone else except Angelblade at 20 pages of stupidity. And Angelblade is the grand champion at 33 pages of stupidity!!!

Angel outweighs all other's combined!!!

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2003-02-19 12:37pm

Link to this compiled "Database of Dumb" ?

Eaglewood · Post by **Eaglewood** » 2003-02-19 04:53pm

Ender wrote:Link to this compiled "Database of Dumb" ?

I'd like to take a look at that as well. If these guys are as bad as you guys say, oh boy. I can't imagine people being that stupid.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2003-02-19 10:31pm

Angelblades first topic is up.
Thread
Let the flames begin

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2003-02-23 08:16pm

Darth Servo wrote:Angelblades first topic is up.
Thread
Let the flames begin

I've read it, and his arguments are pretty pathetic. However, but the way you worded your post, I thought that Angelblade decided to grow a pair of testicles and come over here to defend his points for a second.

Jim Raynor · Post by **Jim Raynor** » 2003-02-23 11:42pm

The day Angelblade grows balls and defends his points is the day pigs fly out of my ass. This little pussy has actually taken the complete opposite position. He has now stated that he doesn't intend to, nor does he have to, defend any of his arguments, because he's only doing this for fun. It's quite scary, but he has somehow descended to sub-Darkstar levels. At least DS thinks the evidence supports him, Angelblade is openly disregarding evidence but still can't admit he's in the wrong.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2003-02-23 11:43pm

Jim Raynor wrote:The day Angelblade grows balls and defends his points is the day pigs fly out of my ass. This little pussy has actually taken the complete opposite position. He has now stated that he doesn't intend to, nor does he have to, defend any of his arguments, because he's only doing this for fun. It's quite scary, but he has somehow descended to sub-Darkstar levels. At least DS thinks the evidence supports him, Angelblade is openly disregarding evidence but still can't admit he's in the wrong.

That's when I quit debating him. When he admitted he was just arguing for the hell of it, and intended on presenting no points or attempting to win, I knew that nothing I said or did could affect him in any way.