22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Havok »

OK so I was on Wookiepiedia, yeah yeah I know, but they listed the AT-AT at 22.5 meters and I was all like 'What the fuck chuck! No way!' So I grabbed this screen cap and did some eyeballing...
Image

Now, Luke is about 1.7something meters. With his helmet on he gets closer to 1.8 meters. I am being generous and saying that, with his arm extended up, that the little Luke in this picture is 2 meters, even though he is undoubtedly longer than that. Now just with my original eyeball, I counted 14.5 Lukes from the spot where the rear right leg touches the snow to the middle of the top of the hump, given that it spits the difference between the high and low sides and is approximately the top if we were looking at the AT-AT straight on from the side with no angle.

Now I am no math whiz, but if little Luke, with his arm up is 2 meters and I counted 14.5 little Lukes, that makes the AT-AT 29 meters tall.

So how the fuck is the official measurement only 22.5 meters when it is clearly bullshit? How do those numb nuts miss three Shaqs worth of AT-AT?

P.S. My actual measurement was little Luke @ 4mm and the AT-AT @ 5.8cm, so my eyeball was pretty spot on.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
adam_grif
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2755
Joined: 2009-12-19 08:27am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by adam_grif »

Maybe 22.5m is their height when they're kneeling in their hyper efficient space saving mode giving rimjobs to the cargo bay hydraulics between deployments on populace intimidation missions.

Either that or somebody fucked up the scaling. Whichever fits better I guess.
A scientist once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy.

At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: 'What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.

The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, 'What is the tortoise standing on?'

'You're very clever, young man, very clever,' said the old lady. 'But it's turtles all the way down.'
User avatar
Azron_Stoma
Padawan Learner
Posts: 353
Joined: 2008-10-18 08:37am
Location: HIMS Korthox III, Assertor Class Star Dreadnought

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Azron_Stoma »

My guess is that it was put at 22.5 as a "compromise" between the 15m tall AT-AT crowd (The same people who believe the Executor is 7-12km long and the globes on SDs are shield generators) and the 29/30m tall AT-AT Crowd (people who have a brain) thus equally and unbiasedly pissing off both sides.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Havok »

Oh like Obama. :rimshot:

No but seriously folks... fix that shit.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
g_core18
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: 2008-12-31 10:53pm

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by g_core18 »

Its the same with alot of facts on that website. I got banned because I changed Home One from 1200m to 3800m and Awings from 9.6m to 4.8m. They said they were and online encyclopedia and not a fansite... :roll:
User avatar
Srelex
Jedi Master
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2010-01-20 08:33pm

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Srelex »

Well, if one wants to resort to outright fanon, you could say that for some reason that AT-AT was a couple of meters bigger than the norm...someone put the decimal point at the factory in the wrong place? :lol:
"No, no, no, no! Light speed's too slow! Yes, we're gonna have to go right to... Ludicrous speed!"
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Jim Raynor »

22.5 meters came from one of Saxton's books, the first official number greater than that 15 meter crap that was used for so long. On SWTC, Saxton stated an estimated height of 22.6 +/- 0.8 meters (7% precision). I don't know how he made the calculations, but that's what he came up with. The official number is now in line with what he came up with.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Azron_Stoma
Padawan Learner
Posts: 353
Joined: 2008-10-18 08:37am
Location: HIMS Korthox III, Assertor Class Star Dreadnought

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Azron_Stoma »

I was always under the impression that Saxton was the one who purported the 29/30m tall thing.
AniThyng
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2777
Joined: 2003-09-08 12:47pm
Location: Took an arrow in the knee.
Contact:

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by AniThyng »

Azron_Stoma wrote:I was always under the impression that Saxton was the one who purported the 29/30m tall thing.
Well, wherever he did that, it's not on his own website. See for yourself:

http://www.theforce.net/swtc/walkers.html#atat
# Long-range views of Luke Skywalker ascending a cable beneath an AT-AT indicate a height of 22.6m, with a precision of seven percent.
Well, Saxton isn't a God and this does look like a slip up, since looking at Havok's pic it does seem pretty clear that eyeballing it the AT-AT's got to be at least 28-30 meters...hmm...but 22 does seem right for measuring up to the top of the cockpit.
I do know how to spell
AniThyng is merely the name I gave to what became my favourite Baldur's Gate II mage character :P
User avatar
Dooey Jo
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3127
Joined: 2002-08-09 01:09pm
Location: The land beyond the forest; Sweden.
Contact:

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Dooey Jo »

Well it's pretty simple actually. That's not Luke's arm; it's his head. He holds his arms close to his body when he goes up. And if you measured directly to the hump thing, you did it wrong, because the low perspective would make that appear higher than it actually is, and Luke is not directly under it. A better estimate would probably be that place where the hump starts. I measured Luke as 23 pixels tall and the AT-AT to that point about 293 pixels. If Luke is 1.8 meters tall, that would make the AT-AT ~22.9 meters.
Image
"Nippon ichi, bitches! Boing-boing."
Mai smote the demonic fires of heck...

Faker Ninjas invented ninjitsu
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Damn, those AT-AT underbellies are so woefully undefended and their firing coverage is so totally just frontal. Man. What a terrible war machine.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Azron_Stoma
Padawan Learner
Posts: 353
Joined: 2008-10-18 08:37am
Location: HIMS Korthox III, Assertor Class Star Dreadnought

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Azron_Stoma »

Would love to see what the Empire could do using their technology and a Baneblade design.
Eleventh Century Remnant
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2361
Joined: 2006-11-20 06:52am
Location: Scotland

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Eleventh Century Remnant »

Power core off something like a Sienar 344/Guardian customs frigate, a semi-consistent guess at the thing's power output based on the known output of larger and smaller craft would be around the 1-2E17 W range; that would be the equivalent of a hundred and thirty to two hundred and seventy trillion horsepower.

Most of that would go on weapons, of course. This is actually a problem with any heavy energy weapon armed vehicle; the weapons require so much generating capacity that the motive power available is ludicrously far in excess of anything that makes intuitive sense now. The upper limits of the materials that make the drive train- and, I suppose, the ground- are the only limits.

Worth pointing out that AT-ATs are actually nowhere near this, and I doubt if any conventional ground fighting vehicle is. Artillery may be comparable to naval weapon powers, but most ground vehicles seem to be a few orders of magnitude less.

Although that is still hundreds of millions up to billions of horsepower. AT-ATs really ought to be able to do Road Runner and Wile. E. Coyote impressions.

Anyway, this Baneblade equivalent- probably SPHA-T in the turret, hull front weapon, hm, possibly short barrel LTL like those fitted to the Assault Shuttle? Single TIE fighter lasers in the sponsons. Shielded, of course.
AniThyng
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2777
Joined: 2003-09-08 12:47pm
Location: Took an arrow in the knee.
Contact:

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by AniThyng »

Dooey Jo wrote:Well it's pretty simple actually. That's not Luke's arm; it's his head. He holds his arms close to his body when he goes up. And if you measured directly to the hump thing, you did it wrong, because the low perspective would make that appear higher than it actually is, and Luke is not directly under it. A better estimate would probably be that place where the hump starts. I measured Luke as 23 pixels tall and the AT-AT to that point about 293 pixels. If Luke is 1.8 meters tall, that would make the AT-AT ~22.9 meters.
Point taken. ITT, we learn that kneejerking to lambast wookiepedia ("29 meters is the value people with a brain support!!!!") is bad, and that eyeballing = might be inaccurate. :D

EDIT: What we can do is scale the foot from the luke figure, then apply it where we have a dead on front view of an AT-AT, or to that one at the back that wouldn't suffer so much from the low perspective...
I do know how to spell
AniThyng is merely the name I gave to what became my favourite Baldur's Gate II mage character :P
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10707
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: 22 Meter Tall AT-AT? WTF?!

Post by Elfdart »

Maybe they measure walkers at the shoulder, like horses.
Post Reply