RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

PSW: discuss Star Wars without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10707
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Elfdart »

Jim Raynor wrote: This seems to me like he's making (another) criticism out of nothing.
The very essence of Nerd Rage.

It takes a special form of retardation to be unable to follow the plot of a movie aimed at 10-year-old boys.

If you want to see truly great YouTube satire (rather than the mewlings of a Teabagger), check out the comments on this video:

User avatar
Gramzamber
Jedi Knight
Posts: 777
Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Gramzamber »

Elfdart wrote: It takes a special form of retardation to be unable to follow the plot of a movie aimed at 10-year-old boys.
Who cares who the movie is aimed at? If the plot is all over the place then it will be hard to follow.
Are you honestly defending it on the basis that it's simple-minded?
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Rye »

RLM makes several very good points on the target audience problems AotC has; I think his analysis as business and toys first, story second is dead on, as is the point about trying to appeal to everyone and ending up with a mish-mash, and finally, the fairest one is how a film aimed at ten year olds probably shouldn't have mass murder, violent dismemberment and boring political scenes.
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3317
Joined: 2004-10-15 08:57pm
Location: Regina Nihilists' Guild Party Headquarters

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Nieztchean Uber-Amoeba »

Elfdart wrote:
Jim Raynor wrote: This seems to me like he's making (another) criticism out of nothing.
The very essence of Nerd Rage.

It takes a special form of retardation to be unable to follow the plot of a movie aimed at 10-year-old boys.
All this nerd rage about RedLetterMedia's prequel reviews is just more proof that RLM is the greatest film analyst of all time.
User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Oskuro »

Intentional trolling seems to be the "in" thing now for online reviewers (see Yatzhee).


Regarding the overuse of lightsabers, even though I loved Yoda's duel with Dooku, I agree. It reminds me of the Jedi Knight games in multiplayer, where absolutely everyone got a lightsaber, and thus the weapon kind of lost its mystique:

Image
unsigned
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Channel72 wrote:Yeah, Anakin found it slightly difficult to jump out of a flying car and land on a specific vehicle moving at high-speeds thousands of feet below. Please, is that supposed to actually address the point here?
Anakin obviously knew where the target vehicle was coming out from, given the fact that he didn't follow the assassin into the tunnel and calmly waited outside where he could get the drop on her as she came out the exit he knew she was going to use. He looked down, TWICE, before jumping, and then adjusted his course as he fell down. The target vehicle was moving but in a predictable straight line, and Anakin had a LOT of distance to work out his intercept with.

Turns out Jedi have enhanced timing and physical attributes? What bullshit! I mean, this was totally less believable and more scene-ruining than Batman crushing Scarecrow's car with his feet, or Kirk negating all fucking wind as he dropped a shitload of kilometers down in a perfectly straight line and landed on a platform no more than a couple dozen meters across!

And don't dodge the main point of our discussion, which was RLM's opinion that this feat made Anakin too godlike and negated the sense of danger for the rest of the scene. Which is bullshit, because as I pointed out in my last post, Anakin was immediately challenged and shown to be in danger upon reaching the assassin's speeder.

Maybe instead of grunting and gritting his teeth, Anakin should have screamed "Oh shit what the fuck!" for the monotone-voiced geek reviewers out there who just don't get it.
The entire scene is riddled with implausibly reckless stunts which erode away any sense that these characters are in any real danger. Obi-Wan jumps out of the window into mid-air traffic, hangs on to a small droid (which he apparently somehow knew would be able to carry his weight),
Hmm, maybe someone in the SW universe is aware of the capabilities of SW tech?
then falls thousands of feet only to safely land in Anakin's car. Then, Anakin jumps out of the car and falls thousands of feet, and Obi-Wan just basically rolls his eyes.
It's an action scene in the sky. What the fuck are they supposed to do if not fall? The characters clearly don't think it's no big deal, unless they happen to be in control of how it happens, like Anakin. Who was shown to be cocky, and whose actions Obi-Wan disapproved of anyway.
The two most obvious plot-related problems in the entire movie (waiting 10 years to rescue Anakin's mother and the obvious connection between the Clone army and the Separatists)
These are not plot holes. Does The Jedi are opposed to fear and attachment (as Yoda himself makes clear when talking to Anakin), and just don't give a shit about buying Anakin's mom off of her relatively comfortable state of slavery. She wasn't in mortal, life-threatening danger as far as they knew.

The clones are not a plot hole either. The Jedi are aware of the army's suspicious origins. As shown when Yoda and Mace Windu discuss how their ability to use the Force has been clouded, and how they must have been blind if they couldn't see the army's creation. But what the fuck are they supposed to do when Dooku assembles the most powerful military force in galactic history, and the Republic has nothing else to respond with?
Gramzamber wrote:As for the assassination business, it's all retarded. Why do they want to kill Amidala? Because of her anti-military bill? So they want to make her a martyr?
Elfdart had it right, the movies really AREN'T that hard for people to understand, including kids. Prequel bashers seem to be the exception though.

Kill Padme, and you've removed an obstacle in the Palpatine's way. Also, you can blame the Separatists and use her death to justify the Republic's militarization.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10707
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Elfdart »

Rye wrote:RLM makes several very good points on the target audience problems AotC has; I think his analysis as business and toys first, story second is dead on, as is the point about trying to appeal to everyone and ending up with a mish-mash, and finally, the fairest one is how a film aimed at ten year olds probably shouldn't have mass murder, violent dismemberment and boring political scenes.
Please. There's nothing in AOTC that you wouldn't find in a typical Errol Flynn movie.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Another point (that I read in this thread, because I'm not putting up with this guy's droning voice) I'd like to dispute: SW is too dark and scary for the kids now? I didn't know relatively clean and instantly cauterized sword cuts were too much to handle. I guess I must have been really brave for sitting through movies where people were stabbed or shot with all the associated blood when I was a near-teen! Those people at the MPAA must have also been full of shit for giving this movie a PG rating. I also guess the original trilogy couldn't decide on its target audience either, given the fact that they had the same exact level of violence.

"Boring" political scenes. A few minutes (tops) spent on showing the deterioration of democracy as the Republic geared up for total war are boring now. Differen't strokes, I guess.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Oskuro »

Jim Raynor wrote:Another point (that I read in this thread, because I'm not putting up with this guy's droning voice) I'd like to dispute
So if you don't like the review to the point of not even watching it through, why are you posting on a thread devoted to discussing the review itself?
unsigned
User avatar
Kane Starkiller
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1510
Joined: 2005-01-21 01:39pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Kane Starkiller »

LordOskuro wrote:Elfdart had it right, the movies really AREN'T that hard for people to understand, including kids. Prequel bashers seem to be the exception though.

Kill Padme, and you've removed an obstacle in the Palpatine's way. Also, you can blame the Separatists and use her death to justify the Republic's militarization.
But why was Amidala convinced that Count Dooku, the separatist leader, was behind the assassination? How did she arrive at that conclusion other than reading the script? And after they reveal to the audience that Dooku is a prime suspect in the first 2 minutes of the film before the audience even knows who the fuck Dooku is the film then makes a halfassed attempt at being a political thriller.
Why the fuck do they want the kill Amidala anyway? How is she an obstacle? By the time opening credits in AOTC roll out separatists already have thousands of systems, the factory on Geonosis is churning out droids at full capacity and the first batch of clones and Acclamators is ready having been ordered 10 years ago. Which reminds me: who in the fuck is Sifodiyas? Who ordered him to order the clone army? Was he also in cahoots with Palpatine or was he duped?
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Vympel »

Which reminds me: who in the fuck is Sifodiyas? Who ordered him to order the clone army? Was he also in cahoots with Palpatine or was he duped?
I thought the film made it clear that Sifo-Dyas was just a dead Jedi Master whom Dooku impersonated to place the order. Since Jango Fett admits flat out he was hired "by a man called Tyranus".

Of course, the fuckwit EU didn't get the memo and constructed the stupidest most contrived explanation possible.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

LordOskuro wrote:So if you don't like the review to the point of not even watching it through, why are you posting on a thread devoted to discussing the review itself?
What the fuck is this? I can't sit through Glenn Beck's bullshit show either. I'm not allowed to criticize his crap if I read about it online?
Kane Starkiller wrote:But why was Amidala convinced that Count Dooku, the separatist leader, was behind the assassination?
Padme: "I think that Count Dooku is behind it."

Is someone not allowed to speculate now? At the beginning of the movie, it is clear that tensions are rising between both sides and that there are people on both sides pushing for an escalation of hostilities. Padme is part of the faction in the Republic pushing for peaceful negotiations. It's not hard to to guess that those negotiations don't involve giving away a sizable chunk of the Republic's territory. Dooku is the leader of the Separatist movement, and the creation of a Republic Army would be just what he needs to justify secession.
And after they reveal to the audience that Dooku is a prime suspect in the first 2 minutes of the film before the audience even knows who the fuck Dooku is the film then makes a halfassed attempt at being a political thriller.
The Jedi don't believe he's a suspect at all (and quickly tell you everything you need to know about him), and Obi-Wan's entire job is to uncover the conspiracy. A conspiracy that's really about the creation of the Clones, and helping Palpatine secure his power. Dooku is a pawn.

EDIT: Fixed quotes.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Kane Starkiller
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1510
Joined: 2005-01-21 01:39pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Kane Starkiller »

Vympel wrote:I thought the film made it clear that Sifo-Dyas was just a dead Jedi Master whom Dooku impersonated to place the order. Since Jango Fett admits flat out he was hired "by a man called Tyranus".
I don't remember any indication that Dooku impersonated Sifodyas. Obviously Sifodyas and Tyranus were somehow connected but what the connection was never explained.
Jim Raynor wrote:Padme: "I think that Count Dooku is behind it."

Is someone not allowed to speculate now? At the beginning of the movie, it is clear that tensions are rising between both sides and that there are people on both sides pushing for an escalation of hostilities. Padme is part of the faction in the Republic pushing for peaceful negotiations. It's not hard to to guess that those negotiations don't involve giving away a sizable chunk of the Republic's territory. Dooku is the leader of the Separatist movement, and the creation of a Republic Army would be just what he needs to justify secession.
That is not speculation but pure guesswork. If there is no army then there is no chance of opposing secession if a world so desires. Therefore the goal of every secessionist would be to prevent the creation of an army. Unless he is in cahoots with Palpatine which Padme isn't supposed to know. She might as well suspect a pro-republic guy like Palpatine since he could use her death even more easily.
Jim Raynor wrote:The Jedi don't believe he's a suspect at all, and Obi-Wan's entire job is to uncover the conspiracy. A conspiracy that's really about the creation of the Clones, and helping Palpatne secure his power. Dooku is a pawn.
The Jedi don't believe but the audience already treats him as a suspect even before he is first seen because Padme said so with conviction and Jedi only provide a standard movie lameass "he was our friend so he couldn't have done that" defense. The viewer is lightyears ahead of the clueless Jedi as to who is ultimately behind the creation of the army and for what reasons while at the same time having no clue how exactly it was pulled off since it was never explained in the film.
Plot holes+incompetent looking Jedi doesn't exactly equate to a great political thriller. They might as well have Luke go on a mission to uncover the conspiracy of who killed aunt Beru and uncle Owen.
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Kane Starkiller wrote:That is not speculation but pure guesswork.
Same shit. Padme has a hunch and none of the other characters believe her anyway. This has no actual effect on the plot, other than to set up a few quick lines where the Jedi give their opinions on Dooku.
If there is no army then there is no chance of opposing secession if a world so desires. Therefore the goal of every secessionist would be to prevent the creation of an army.
Seriously, it's not that hard. Padme is striving for peaceful negotiations; if she has her way then the Separatist movement is deflated without a fight and they just stay under the Republic's control. A hawk who wants to secede would very understandably want her dead.

Nevermind that the Separatists consist of several amoral big businesses, including the one that tried to kill her ten years ago.
The Jedi don't believe but the audience already treats him as a suspect even before he is first seen because Padme said so with conviction and Jedi only provide a standard movie lameass "he was our friend so he couldn't have done that" defense.
A few lines to set up a new henchman villain of the movie, what a "half-assed political thriller." Give me a break. There was very little shown on Dooku at that point; for all you know he might have been another victim of Palpatine's manipulations. Regardless, even IF the viewer wants to guess ahead there are still the questions of what the Separatist's plans are, and how Obi-Wan is supposed to trace the assassination back to them...and SW isn't even a freaking mystery. It's an action series full of spaceship chases and magical sword fights. Big deal if some minor villain gets name-dropped early in the movie.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Kane Starkiller
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1510
Joined: 2005-01-21 01:39pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Kane Starkiller »

Jim Raynor wrote:Same shit. Padme has a hunch and none of the other characters believe her anyway. This has no actual effect on the plot, other than to set up a few quick lines where the Jedi give their opinions on Dooku.
No it's not. Speculation implies some kind of reasoning. Padme provides none. And it's true it doesn't have an effect on the plot so why give it away? Why mention Dooku in the first place?
Jim Raynor wrote:Seriously, it's not that hard. Padme is striving for peaceful negotiations; if she has her way then the Separatist movement is deflated without a fight and they just stay under the Republic's control. A hawk who wants to secede would very understandably want her dead.
That doesn't make any sense. Separatist movement was created because starsystems wanted to get out of the Republic and by the time AOTC starts they are already churning out droids to deal with any possible Republic attempts to stop them. Now the movement is in danger of being deflated? Why because Padme asks them nicely to stay? They were ready to have her publicly executed by animal mutilation in front of cheering crowds. Seems to me the sentiment in the separatist worlds isn't exactly favorable for Padme. Of course this is yet another stupidity: all that sneaky assassination attempts through 10 intermediaries only to have her executed Roman style in public and with the attendance of the entire separatist leadership. It doesn't make any fucking sense.
Jim Raynor wrote:Nevermind that the Separatists consist of several amoral big businesses, including the one that tried to kill her ten years ago.
Yes although now the times have changed and the only reason Trade Federation would want her dead is personal revenge. Which is actually the case making the movie even more stupid. In any case Padme should then suspect Nute Gunray and not jump immediately to Dooku since back then separatist alliance didn't even exist.
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman
Channel72
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2010-02-03 05:28pm
Location: New York

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Channel72 »

Jim Raynor wrote:Anakin obviously knew where the target vehicle was coming out from, given the fact that he didn't follow the assassin into the tunnel and calmly waited outside where he could get the drop on her as she came out the exit he knew she was going to use. He looked down, TWICE, before jumping, and then adjusted his course as he fell down. The target vehicle was moving but in a predictable straight line, and Anakin had a LOT of distance to work out his intercept with.
Thanks. I saw the movie.
Jim Raynor wrote:Turns out Jedi have enhanced timing and physical attributes? What bullshit! I mean, this was totally less believable and more scene-ruining than Batman crushing Scarecrow's car with his feet, or Kirk negating all fucking wind as he dropped a shitload of kilometers down in a perfectly straight line and landed on a platform no more than a couple dozen meters across!
Again, thanks. I already know the Jedi have enhanced timing and physical attributes. Nothing you say here addresses the point. You're just describing what happens in the scene. The point is the scene is totally uncompelling, because the Jedi never seem to be in any actual danger. Obi-Wan doesn't even really give a shit that Anakin jumped out of a car and fell thousands of feet.
Jim Raynor wrote:And don't dodge the main point of our discussion, which was RLM's opinion that this feat made Anakin too godlike and negated the sense of danger for the rest of the scene. Which is bullshit, because as I pointed out in my last post, Anakin was immediately challenged and shown to be in danger upon reaching the assassin's speeder.
Yeah, so Anakin struggled somewhat when he landed on the speeder. So what? What's the worst that could happen? If he falls again he'll probably just use the force to land safely on some other vehicle. Sorry, but I just don't buy that he's ever in any danger here. Apparently, neither does Obi-Wan.
Jim Raynor wrote:Hmm, maybe someone in the SW universe is aware of the capabilities of SW tech?
You're right; it completely makes sense that Obi-Wan would be familiar with the weight capacity of that particular model of assassin droid. Silly me, Obi-Wan probably reads assassin droid manuals all the time, just in case something like this happens.
Jim Raynor wrote:These are not plot holes. Does The Jedi are opposed to fear and attachment (as Yoda himself makes clear when talking to Anakin), and just don't give a shit about buying Anakin's mom off of her relatively comfortable state of slavery. She wasn't in mortal, life-threatening danger as far as they knew.
Oh boy. Yeah, she wasn't in mortal life-threatening danger; she was just a human slave with a bomb in her brain.
Jim Raynor wrote:The clones are not a plot hole either. The Jedi are aware of the army's suspicious origins. As shown when Yoda and Mace Windu discuss how their ability to use the Force has been clouded, and how they must have been blind if they couldn't see the army's creation. But what the fuck are they supposed to do when Dooku assembles the most powerful military force in galactic history, and the Republic has nothing else to respond with?
An internal investigation into the creation of these clones would have been a good fucking start, considering: 1) the insanely fucking suspicious circumstances behind their creation, 2) the obvious link between the Separatists and the clones, and 3) their sudden appearance coinciding with the outbreak of a galactic war and the reemergence of the Sith no less.
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Channel72 wrote:Thanks. I saw the movie.
Got any actual points besides smarmy sacrasm?
Jim Raynor wrote:Again, thanks. I already know the Jedi have enhanced timing and physical attributes. Nothing you say here addresses the point. You're just describing what happens in the scene.
Fuck you and your bullshit. I very directly addressed the claim that Anakin's feat made him invincible for the rest of the scene, by showing how much preparation (full stop, 12 seconds, prior knowledge of the exit location, looking down twice) that went into accomplishing it. Proving that it was nowhere near something that Anakin could pull out at any other moment of the scene.
The point is the scene is totally uncompelling, because the Jedi never seem to be in any actual danger. Obi-Wan doesn't even really give a shit that Anakin jumped out of a car and fell thousands of feet.
"Obi-Wan doesn't even really give a shit." No, he very clearly says he "hates" it when Anakin does things like that. Is Obi-Wan supposed to get emotional or something? People like you would probably complain that he's being out-of-character then.
Jim Raynor wrote:Yeah, so Anakin struggled somewhat when he landed on the speeder. So what? What's the worst that could happen? If he falls again he'll probably just use the force to land safely on some other vehicle.
Because Jedi have no limits, and they have no need for preparation or concentration in order to use their powers. And Anakin's immune to blaster fire. And it doesn't matter if the assassin gets away.
Jim Raynor wrote:You're right; it completely makes sense that Obi-Wan would be familiar with the weight capacity of that particular model of assassin droid. Silly me, Obi-Wan probably reads assassin droid manuals all the time, just in case something like this happens.
Because floating droids are an oddity in SW now, and "that particular model" of droid must somehow be completely different.
Jim Raynor wrote:Oh boy. Yeah, she wasn't in mortal life-threatening danger; she was just a human slave with a bomb in her brain.
Point? The Jedi don't give a fuck about Anakin's attachments to his previous life, as Yoda tells Anakin himself.
Jim Raynor wrote:An internal investigation into the creation of these clones would have been a good fucking start,
Is that before Yoda was forced to activate them to rescue the other Jedi on Geonosis?
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Kane Starkiller wrote:No it's not. Speculation implies some kind of reasoning. Padme provides none.
First of all, it doesn't matter at all if Padme was just arbitrarily naming Dooku. She's guessing and nobody believes her. Secondly, I provided reasons: Separatist hawks would want her dead, and those Separatists include the Trade Federation who already tried to kill her in the past.
And it's true it doesn't have an effect on the plot so why give it away? Why mention Dooku in the first place?
It was a quick way to get some expository lines in. I saw a few minutes of Retarded Loser Media's review, and he even argued for the addition of a "fish out of water" character who would have things explained to him, so that the audience would have things explained to him. Guess what role Padme was playing in this very scene?
That doesn't make any sense. Separatist movement was created because starsystems wanted to get out of the Republic and by the time AOTC starts they are already churning out droids to deal with any possible Republic attempts to stop them. Now the movement is in danger of being deflated? Why because Padme asks them nicely to stay?
The Techno Union was churning out battledroids, and furthermore it doesn't matter if the rest of the Separatist worlds were building up arms. If the negotiations work and their citizens agree to some compromise that they could live with (while still living under the Republic's rule), then the Separatist movement falls apart. No war, no secession.
They were ready to have her publicly executed by animal mutilation in front of cheering crowds. Seems to me the sentiment in the separatist worlds isn't exactly favorable for Padme.
One alien culture with a barbaric gladiator tradition in the Outer Rim. After Padme and Anakin got caught breaking into one of their war factories.
Of course this is yet another stupidity: all that sneaky assassination attempts through 10 intermediaries only to have her executed Roman style in public and with the attendance of the entire separatist leadership. It doesn't make any fucking sense.
It makes sense just fine, except to you. A clandestine assassination can light a fire under the Republic's ass, without being directly attributable to the Separatists so that they can still maintain their populist image. After Padme gets caught breaking into a factory? Execute her on some trumped up charges of espionage and sabotage and get the war you wanted anyway.
Yes although now the times have changed and the only reason Trade Federation would want her dead is personal revenge. Which is actually the case making the movie even more stupid.
And get the war, since they're a part of the Separatists. Jesus Christ man.
In any case Padme should then suspect Nute Gunray and not jump immediately to Dooku since back then separatist alliance didn't even exist.
Opening crawl wrote:Several thousand solar systems have declared their intention to leave the Republic.

This separatist movement, under the leadership of Count Dooku,
I actually made a mistake earlier. As of the beginning of AOTC, the Trade Federation's membership in the Separatists isn't a known fact yet. Later, when Padme arrives on Naboo, she states her belief that the Separatists will turn to the Trade Federation and the other big businesses for help. Likely because the Trade Fed was already pulling the Tea Bagger, anti-tax, "fuck the Republic" shit years ago. So if Padme's thinks the Separatists want her dead, Dooku is the one she'll point to.

EDIT: Fixed quotes
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
Channel72
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2068
Joined: 2010-02-03 05:28pm
Location: New York

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Channel72 »

Jim Raynor wrote:Fuck you and your bullshit. I very directly addressed the claim that Anakin's feat made him invincible for the rest of the scene, by showing how much preparation (full stop, 12 seconds, prior knowledge of the exit location, looking down twice) that went into accomplishing it. Proving that it was nowhere near something that Anakin could pull out at any other moment of the scene.
This is tiresome; you keep missing the point. Please give me a reason to believe that Anakin would die if he fell from the speeder at any arbitrary point during this scene. If he can survive falling thousands of feet by safely landing on a moving vehicle, there's no particular reason to suppose he wouldn't survive if he fell again, and landed on yet another car, or even on the ground. He can obviously use the force to glide and control his fall on a whim. Therefore, there's no sense of danger in this scene.
Jim Raynor wrote:"Obi-Wan doesn't even really give a shit." No, he very clearly says he "hates" it when Anakin does things like that. Is Obi-Wan supposed to get emotional or something? People like you would probably complain that he's being out-of-character then.
I refuse to believe you're actually this dense. Anakin jumps out of a flying vehicle and Obi-Wan just quips "I hate it when he does that", as if Anakin merely changed the radio to another station or something. If Obi-Wan believed Anakin was in serious danger he would have jumped into the driver seat and tried to intercept his fall. Instead, he just sits there looking mildly pissed.
Jim Raynor wrote:
Channel72 wrote:Yeah, so Anakin struggled somewhat when he landed on the speeder. So what? What's the worst that could happen? If he falls again he'll probably just use the force to land safely on some other vehicle.
Because Jedi have no limits, and they have no need for preparation or concentration in order to use their powers. And Anakin's immune to blaster fire. And it doesn't matter if the assassin gets away.
Blaster fire has nothing to do with this. We're talking about the chase scene in Episode II. Please stay focused. Also, I never said it doesn't matter if the assassin gets away.
Jim Raynor wrote:Because floating droids are an oddity in SW now, and "that particular model" of droid must somehow be completely different.
Are you retarded or something? Obviously, since you live on Earth in the real world, you must automatically know the weight capacity of every model of forklift. (Hint: you don't.)
Jim Raynor wrote:Point? The Jedi don't give a fuck about Anakin's attachments to his previous life, as Yoda tells Anakin himself.
Now you're just backpedaling. You made it a point to mention that the Jedi believed that "[Anakin's mother] wasn't in mortal, life-threatening danger", implying that if she was in mortal, life-threatening danger, the Jedi might have saved her. So the whole anti-attachment bullshit is simply a red-herring. The fact is, she was a human-slave with a bomb in her brain, living on a backwards planet controlled by gangsters, and she could be treated like property and sold to anyone at any time. Far from living in a "relatively comfortable state of slavery", her comfort was quite precarious.

Also, considering that Qui-Gon specifically tried to free her in Episode I, failing only due to temporary circumstances, it's hard to believe that nobody else tried to do so in the intervening 10 years. Of course, the real reason nobody returned to save her was because of pure plot contrivance.
Jim Raynor wrote:
Channel72 wrote:An internal investigation into the creation of these clones would have been a good fucking start,
Is that before Yoda was forced to activate them to rescue the other Jedi on Geonosis?
That would obviously be after Geonosis, or any time really during the war. Just because the Republic was forced into using the army doesn't excuse their collective amnesia regarding the whole conspiracy behind the creation of the army.
User avatar
adam_grif
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2755
Joined: 2009-12-19 08:27am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by adam_grif »

Rye wrote:RLM makes several very good points on the target audience problems AotC has; I think his analysis as business and toys first, story second is dead on, as is the point about trying to appeal to everyone and ending up with a mish-mash, and finally, the fairest one is how a film aimed at ten year olds probably shouldn't have mass murder, violent dismemberment and boring political scenes.
Was I dreaming this all up, or was the reason Sam Jackson was in the movie because he begged George to let him play a role, any role?

I agree he was miscast though. Imagine how badass it would have been if the clone trooper army was modeled on Samuel Motherfucking Jackson instead of that douchebag Jango Fett guy!!!
A scientist once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the Earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the centre of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy.

At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: 'What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.

The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, 'What is the tortoise standing on?'

'You're very clever, young man, very clever,' said the old lady. 'But it's turtles all the way down.'
Jim Raynor
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2922
Joined: 2002-07-11 04:42am

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Jim Raynor »

Channel72 wrote:This is tiresome; you keep missing the point.
Bull fucking shit. You're not bringing up valid points.
Please give me a reason to believe that Anakin would die if he fell from the speeder at any arbitrary point during this scene.
I can give you a fucking list:
1. Because he's violently thrown from the vehicle into something else, rather than making a controlled, intentional fall.
2. Because his Force powers aren't limitless.
3. Because he won't have the time to concentrate and use his powers again. His big drop required prior knowledge of where the target was coming from, a target moving in a straight line, a long look at where he was going, and about 12 full seconds to make his decision.
4. Because another speeder might not be conveniently located in the right spot for him to latch on to. Again, Anakin knew where he was going when he jumped. Notice that Obi-Wan was fucked when he fell, and required Anakin to save his ass just a couple minutes earlier? Or did you and Retarded Loser Media conveniently forget that little fact?
5. Because Anakin might have a few fucking blaster holes burned into his body.
6. Because Anakin dying is only one of several possible bad outcomes; he could also get hurt or the assassin could escape.
If he can survive falling thousands of feet by safely landing on a moving vehicle, there's no particular reason to suppose he wouldn't survive if he fell again, and landed on yet another car, or even on the ground.
What kind of no-limits stupidity is this? Nevermind that he needed time and preparation to make his first big fall, as I've brought up again and again.
I refuse to believe you're actually this dense.
I fully believe that you ARE this dense.
Anakin jumps out of a flying vehicle and Obi-Wan just quips "I hate it when he does that", as if Anakin merely changed the radio to another station or something. If Obi-Wan believed Anakin was in serious danger he would have jumped into the driver seat and tried to intercept his fall. Instead, he just sits there looking mildly pissed.
Changing the radio station? Glad to see that you're just pulling bullshit analogies out of your ass now. No, Obi-Wan doesn't fucking freak out; he's a Jedi and trained to suppress his emotions. The implication of the line itself is that Anakin has done such things before, but that these things still concern Obi-Wan. Like a father seeing his teenage son attempting stupid ass stunts.

And it's a false dilemma to demand that Anakin be portrayed as being in grave danger when he makes a jump that he obviously intended to do. If it wasn't in Anakin's capabilities he wouldn't have made the move. The danger comes after he lands on the villain's speeder, where he's CLEARLY not in control like he was before and nearly gets shot.
Blaster fire has nothing to do with this. We're talking about the chase scene in Episode II. Please stay focused.
God fucking damn it, the assassin shoots at Anakin in the fucking chase scene.
Are you retarded or something? Obviously, since you live on Earth in the real world, you must automatically know the weight capacity of every model of forklift. (Hint: you don't.)
Hint: I have a general certainty that the forklift can support the weight of a single human.
Now you're just backpedaling. You made it a point to mention that the Jedi believed that "[Anakin's mother] wasn't in mortal, life-threatening danger", implying that if she was in mortal, life-threatening danger, the Jedi might have saved her. So the whole anti-attachment bullshit is simply a red-herring. The fact is, she was a human-slave with a bomb in her brain, living on a backwards planet controlled by gangsters, and she could be treated like property and sold to anyone at any time. Far from living in a "relatively comfortable state of slavery", her comfort was quite precarious.
Backpedaling my ass. We fucking SAW their slave life in TPM; it includes living in your own house, non-grueling work, and down time with which you can pursue hobbies such as building your own fucking droid or pod racer. Is slavery of any kind fair? No. But the Jedi don't give a flying fuck.

And your "mortal danger" argument is bullshit, Shmi OBVIOUSLY wasn't in danger of dying at any given moment bomb or not.
Also, considering that Qui-Gon specifically tried to free her in Episode I, failing only due to temporary circumstances, it's hard to believe that nobody else tried to do so in the intervening 10 years.
Qui-Gon, the guy who's explictly stated to be a maverick who was shut out of the Council because of organizational politics? Did you even watch the fucking movies before subscribing to such bullshit beliefs about them?
That would obviously be after Geonosis,
All several minutes of the movie, which were spent on a single fucking Jedi talk (where they express their concerns about the situation), Palpatine's Nazi-like military march and Anakin and Padme's wedding?
or any time really during the war.
The Jedi KNOW there's another Sith Lord out there already. And did you miss those parts where they're distrustful of the Chancellor and try to use Anakin as a spy? Nevermind that they have their hands full fighting the first all-out war in a thousand years.
"They're not triangular, but they are more or less blade-shaped"- Thrawn McEwok on the shape of Bakura destroyers

"Lovely. It's known as impugning character regarding statement of professional qualifications' in the legal world"- Karen Traviss, crying libel because I said that no soldier she interviewed would claim that he can take on billion-to-one odds

"I've already laid out rules for this thread that we're not going to make these evidential demands"- Dark Moose on supporting your claims
User avatar
Gramzamber
Jedi Knight
Posts: 777
Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Gramzamber »

Jim Raynor wrote:
Kill Padme, and you've removed an obstacle in the Palpatine's way. Also, you can blame the Separatists and use her death to justify the Republic's militarization.
So nobody might be suspicious that the person opposing Palptaine's desires is conveniently killed?
Why would the Seperatists want to kill someone who's blocking a bill that would hurt them?
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
User avatar
Kane Starkiller
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1510
Joined: 2005-01-21 01:39pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Kane Starkiller »

Jim Raynor wrote:First of all, it doesn't matter at all if Padme was just arbitrarily naming Dooku. She's guessing and nobody believes her. Secondly, I provided reasons: Separatist hawks would want her dead, and those Separatists include the Trade Federation who already tried to kill her in the past.
It matters to the audience since it was never explained why she thinks Dooku specifically is behind the attack rather than a pro republic hawk or Nute Gunray etc.
Jim Raynor wrote:It was a quick way to get some expository lines in. I saw a few minutes of Retarded Loser Media's review, and he even argued for the addition of a "fish out of water" character who would have things explained to him, so that the audience would have things explained to him. Guess what role Padme was playing in this very scene?
Plenty of ways to provide exposition to Dooku, a supposedly mysterious figure, without making him a suspect in the first two minutes if political intrigue is the way the movie is supposed to go.
Jim Raynor wrote:The Techno Union was churning out battledroids, and furthermore it doesn't matter if the rest of the Separatist worlds were building up arms. If the negotiations work and their citizens agree to some compromise that they could live with (while still living under the Republic's rule), then the Separatist movement falls apart. No war, no secession.
Techno Union was still a part of the separatist alliance and they were obviously gearing up for war. Padme was a dupe who had no clue clonetroopers were donning their helmets and boarding the Acclamators even as she fought against the creation of the Clone Army. How is such an irrelevant figure supposed to make anything happen? All Dooku had to do was send spies to Kamino and have them return with stories of a huge ass army ready for battle and voila Padme is a fucking liar trying to lull the separatists into a false sense of security.
Jim Raynor wrote:It makes sense just fine, except to you. A clandestine assassination can light a fire under the Republic's ass, without being directly attributable to the Separatists so that they can still maintain their populist image. After Padme gets caught breaking into a factory? Execute her on some trumped up charges of espionage and sabotage and get the war you wanted anyway.
No still doesn't make any fucking sense at all. If they wanted her dead why not simply put a blaster bolt through her head and dump her in a smelting pit? Why the very public and gory execution of a Republic senator? She was spying? Jedi and a Republic senator were spying? The only way that is a valid accusation is if the separatist planets are already de iure as well de facto independent in which case what the fuck was Padme supposed to accomplish by talks?
Jim Raynor wrote:And get the war, since they're a part of the Separatists. Jesus Christ man.
You are confusing Palpatine's master plan with what separatist plan was. Separatists wanted to...well...separate. Preferably without a war. And certainly without Darth Vader executing them after they have served Palpatine's plans. So again: why were they itching for Padme's death.
Jim Raynor wrote:I actually made a mistake earlier. As of the beginning of AOTC, the Trade Federation's membership in the Separatists isn't a known fact yet. Later, when Padme arrives on Naboo, she states her belief that the Separatists will turn to the Trade Federation and the other big businesses for help. Likely because the Trade Fed was already pulling the Tea Bagger, anti-tax, "fuck the Republic" shit years ago. So if Padme's thinks the Separatists want her dead, Dooku is the one she'll point to.
None of this explains why they would want to kill a senator which they thought was actually preventing the Republic from taking decisive action.
But if the forces of evil should rise again, to cast a shadow on the heart of the city.
Call me. -Batman
User avatar
takemeout_totheblack
Padawan Learner
Posts: 358
Joined: 2010-01-26 03:59pm
Location: Knowing where you are is no fun! Back to adventure!

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by takemeout_totheblack »

Jim Raynor wrote:Another point (that I read in this thread, because I'm not putting up with this guy's droning voice) I'd like to dispute: SW is too dark and scary for the kids now? I didn't know relatively clean and instantly cauterized sword cuts were too much to handle. I guess I must have been really brave for sitting through movies where people were stabbed or shot with all the associated blood when I was a near-teen! Those people at the MPAA must have also been full of shit for giving this movie a PG rating. I also guess the original trilogy couldn't decide on its target audience either, given the fact that they had the same exact level of violence.

"Boring" political scenes. A few minutes (tops) spent on showing the deterioration of democracy as the Republic geared up for total war are boring now. Differen't strokes, I guess.
I believe the context of that was in relation to George Lucas' tirade against his older fans because they felt he had made it too kiddy with Jar Jar and silly droids and stuff like that, George said something along the lines of 'Star Wars has always been for children'. It's not that it's too violent, its just that if it's a movie that's supposed to be 'kiddy' as opposed to 'family friendly' why does it have all the mass murder, implied rape, death at child birth, slaughtered children, dismemberment, political drama, dry politics talk, senate meetings, etc. It's not that all that is inappropriate or offensive, it was just a jab at Lucas for misinterpreting his own creation's target audience. It's fine for Star Wars to have all that stuff, just take out the cringe-inducing 'kiddy' stuff so that it can get back to being 'family friendly', that pointless and jarringly stupid stuff alienates everyone but the young children.
There should be an official metric in regard to stupidity, so we can insult the imbeciles, morons, and RSAs out there the civilized way.
Any ideas for units of measure?

This could be the most one-sided fight since 1973 when Ali fought a 80-foot tall mechanical Joe Frazier. My memory isn't what it used to be, but I think the entire earth was destroyed.
~George Foreman, February 27th 3000 C.E.
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10707
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: RedLetterMedia's Attack of the Clones review

Post by Elfdart »

takemeout_totheblack wrote: I believe the context of that was in relation to George Lucas' tirade against his older fans because they felt he had made it too kiddy with Jar Jar and silly droids and stuff like that, George said something along the lines of 'Star Wars has always been for children'. It's not that it's too violent, its just that if it's a movie that's supposed to be 'kiddy' as opposed to 'family friendly' why does it have all the mass murder, implied rape, death at child birth, slaughtered children, dismemberment, political drama, dry politics talk, senate meetings, etc.
You are one dumb twat.

Have you ever seen The Adventures of Robin Hood? It is clearly a movie for kids, yet it has a lot of violence, including:

peasants being hanged on camera
beatings and floggings
close-ups of peasants who had their hands cut off and eyes gouged out
the attempted rape of an inn keeper's daughter

How about The Mark of Zorro, another kid-friendly classic. This movie features multiple stabbings and shootings, a man whose tongue is cut out, several political meetings as well as a married middle-aged woman trying to seduce her daughter's fiancee.

I could go on, but the point should be plain to anyone who isn't a complete fucktard.

It's not that all that is inappropriate or offensive, it was just a jab at Lucas for misinterpreting his own creation's target audience.
You and Heathcliffe know more about Star Wars than George Lucas. Right. :wanker:
It's fine for Star Wars to have all that stuff, just take out the cringe-inducing 'kiddy' stuff so that it can get back to being 'family friendly', that pointless and jarringly stupid stuff alienates everyone but the young children losers afflicted with chronic Nerd Rage.
You stand corrected.
Post Reply