Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

SLAM: debunk creationism, pseudoscience, and superstitions. Discuss logic and morality.

Moderator: Alyrium Denryle

Post Reply
User avatar
Justforfun000
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2503
Joined: 2002-08-19 01:44pm
Location: Toronto
Contact:

Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Justforfun000 »

Wow. Great news and I sincerely hope this gets out there as a standard treatment fast!

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/185482.php
Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks
rate icon Editor's Choice
Main Category: Cancer / Oncology
Also Included In: Clinical Trials / Drug Trials
Article Date: 15 Apr 2010 - 0:00 PDT

email icon email to a friend printer icon printer friendly write icon view / write opinions
<A HREF="http://www.mlclick.com/mlcl.php?aid=341 ... AACBEDB725" target="_blank"><IMG SRC="http://www.mlclick.com/mltr.php?aid=341 ... EDB725&b=2" WIDTH="300" HEIGHT="250" BORDER="0" alt="For free advice about opioid-induced constipation and treatment options click here."></A>


Current Article Ratings:

Patient / Public: 5 stars

4.96 (26 votes)
Health Professional: 5 stars

5 (4 votes)
Article Opinions: 0 posts

Like microscopic inchworms, cancer cells slink away from tumors to travel and settle elsewhere in the body. Now, researchers at Weill Cornell Medical College report in today's online edition of the journal Nature that new anti-cancer agents break down the looping gait these cells use to migrate, stopping them in their tracks.

Mice implanted with cancer cells and treated with the small molecule macroketone lived a full life without any cancer spread, compared with control animals, which all died of metastasis. When macroketone was given a week after cancer cells were introduced, it still blocked greater than 80 percent of cancer metastasis in mice.

These findings provide a very encouraging direction for development of a new class of anti-cancer agents, the first to specifically stop cancer metastasis, says the study's lead investigator, Dr. Xin-Yun Huang, a professor in the Department of Physiology and Biophysics at Weill Cornell Medical College.

"More than 90 percent of cancer patients die because their cancer has spread, so we desperately need a way to stop this metastasis," Dr. Huang says. "This study offers a paradigm shift in thinking and, potentially, a new direction in treatment."

Dr. Huang and his research team have been working on macroketone since 2003. Their work started after researchers in Japan isolated a natural substance, dubbed migrastatin, secreted by Streptomyces bacteria, that is the basis of many antibiotic drugs. The Japanese researchers noted that migrastatin had a weak inhibitory effect on tumor cell migration.

Dr. Huang and collaborators at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center then proceeded to build analogues of migrastatin -- synthetic and molecularly simpler versions. "After a lot of modifications, we made several versions that were a thousand-fold more potent than the original," Dr. Huang says. In 2005, they published a study showing that several of the new versions, including macroketone, stopped cancer cell metastasis in laboratory animals, but they didn't know how the agent worked.

In the current study, the researchers revealed the mechanism. They found that macroketone targets an actin cytoskeletal protein known as fascin that is critical to cell movement. In order for a cancer cell to leave a primary tumor, fascin bundles actin filaments together like a thick finger. The front edge of this finger creeps forward and pulls along the rear of the cell. Cells crawl away in the same way that an inchworm moves.

Macroketone latches on to individual fascin, preventing the actin fibers from adhering to each other and forming the pushing leading edge, Dr. Huang says. Because individual actin fibers are too soft when they are not bundled together, the cell cannot move.

The new animal experiments detailed in the study confirmed the power of macroketone. The agent did not stop the cancer cells implanted into the animals from forming tumors or from growing, but it completely prevented tumor cells from spreading, compared with control animals, he says. Even when macroketone was given after tumors formed, most cancer spread was blocked.

"This suggests to us that an agent like macroketone could be used to both prevent cancer spread and to treat it as well," Dr. Huang says. "Of course, because it has no effect on the growth of a primary tumor, such a drug would have to be combined with other anti-cancer therapies acting on tumor cell growth."

Also pleasing was the finding that the mice suffered few side effects from the treatment, according to Dr. Huang. "The beauty of this approach is that fascin is overexpressed in metastatic tumor cells but is only expressed at a very low level in normal epithelial cells, so a treatment that attacks fascin will have comparatively little effect on normal cells -- unlike traditional chemotherapy which attacks all dividing cells," he says.

Dr. Huang and his colleagues reported another key finding in the same Nature paper -- on X-ray crystal structures of fascin and of the complex of fascin and macroketone. They demonstrated how macroketone blocks the activity of fascin. The images showed precisely how macroketone snugly nestles into a pocket of fascin affecting the way it regulates actin filament bundling. "The molecular snapshots provide an approach for rational drug design of other molecules inhibiting the function of fascin, the therapeutic target," says Dr. Huang.

This work was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense.

Co-researchers include Dr. Lin Chen, Dr. Shengyu Yang and Dr. J. Jillian Zhang -- all of Weill Cornell Medical College, and Dr. Jean Jakoncic, from Brookhaven National Laboratory. The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Source: Weill Cornell Medical College

Copyright: Medical News Today
You have to realize that most Christian "moral values" behaviour is not really about "protecting" anyone; it's about their desire to send a continual stream of messages of condemnation towards people whose existence offends them. - Darth Wong alias Mike Wong

"There is nothing wrong with being ignorant. However, there is something very wrong with not choosing to exchange ignorance for knowledge when the opportunity presents itself."
User avatar
Temujin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1300
Joined: 2010-03-28 07:08pm
Location: Occupying Wall Street (In Spirit)

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Temujin »

This is fantastic news.

One guy I used to work with at my current job, one of the few really decent ones, passed away from lymphoma a while back. He had responded quite well to the chemo initially, but then had some complications and they stopped it. From what little I know of the medical reports, it seemed to quickly spread and get into his bones, and he went from being seemingly perfectly healthy to death in only a couple months, even though they had continued to treat him via radiation and other treatments.

I'm sure I'm not the only one, but its the way that shit spreads that scares the hell out of me.
Image
Mr. Harley: Your impatience is quite understandable.
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry... I wish it were otherwise.

"I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe.
If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other." – Frankenstein's Creature on the glacier[/size]
User avatar
cosmicalstorm
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1642
Joined: 2008-02-14 09:35am

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by cosmicalstorm »

Yeah lets hope it works on humans and does not need a decade to move out of lab-trials. I've met some cancer-patients while doing hospital dental check-ups recently, it's especially painful to see the children who had the diagnosis recently in there. They look perfectly healthy, but statistically speaking 1/10 might be dead a year from now :(
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Darth Wong »

This work was funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the Department of Defense.
What, not Pfizer? Not GlaxoSmithKline? Not Merck? Could it be, that government can actually do something good? Perish the thought!

I hate the way Big Pharma apologists always pretend that their continued ridiculous high profit margins are necessary for medical R&D. This dovetails nicely with the fact that Big Pharma spends far more on marketing than they do on R&D.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Darth Wong wrote: What, not Pfizer? Not GlaxoSmithKline? Not Merck? Could it be, that government can actually do something good? Perish the thought!

I hate the way Big Pharma apologists always pretend that their continued ridiculous high profit margins are necessary for medical R&D. This dovetails nicely with the fact that Big Pharma spends far more on marketing than they do on R&D.
Actually, a lot of projects I work on are combinations of government, university and private investments, usually with a government grant and lab working alongside a private one and both parties sharing the profits (like the NHS or Cancer Research UK) should it pan out. Given the shear cost of producing anything today, and the amount of work needed to be done in various niche areas, it just pays to have these things done as a conglomerate most of the time. A study we've just finished for pharmaceutical analysis NDA was commissioned by the US DoH, with links to Pfizer.

Though I hate this idea, namely in America, that government can't do anything by itself. The number of pure government studies passing through us may not be as big as pure Big Pharma work, or even academic institutions, but it does exist. Anyone would think government couldn't do anything by the way some of these lolbertarian schmucks go on about things.

I actually foresee a time when more work comes from government, given how potentially screwed Big Pharma is with so many patents coming to the end of their lives and so few new compounds in the pipeline. It's not unlike Big Oil and their dire prospects for future discoveries of oil.

For the record, I'm no fan of Big Pharma, but are by far the biggest party in this industry. The reason I'm even more against them now, is that my company has sucked off the Big Pharma cock for so long, that we're dealing mostly with the big guys like AZ, GSK, Pfizer, Boehringer and Nissan. But since this recession, they've all been feeling the pinch, while the smaller independent start-ups, focusing on novel biologics, have been shafted. Now we find they're looking for places to send work, but we're booked up with companies who are used to being catered for like kings, and who are bleeding us dry on studies, to the point that a two year carcinogenicity study is now a "buy one, get one free" deal for our rival Charles River. It's incredible how much we now rely on having so many eggs in one basket.

But hey, the guys in sales and marketing knew what they were doing, even if a ten-year-old could tell you diversification = a good idea.
[/rant]

But good on the OP.
User avatar
Temujin
Jedi Master
Posts: 1300
Joined: 2010-03-28 07:08pm
Location: Occupying Wall Street (In Spirit)

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Temujin »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:I actually foresee a time when more work comes from government, given how potentially screwed Big Pharma is with so many patents coming to the end of their lives and so few new compounds in the pipeline. It's not unlike Big Oil and their dire prospects for future discoveries of oil.
Obviously medical tech is one of the few areas where nanotechnology has a lot of potential applications without divulging into an unrealistic wankfest. As such, I'm curious how its potential applications may play into this, given the ability actually go in and deal with things on a cellular level, and thus potentially supplement or bypass more traditional medical treatments. For example, I recent heard about a more mundane processes just utilizing nanodiamonds to help deliver medication directly to tumors. Is this something Big Pharma is concerned about, has been thought of, etc.?
Image
Mr. Harley: Your impatience is quite understandable.
Klaatu: I'm impatient with stupidity. My people have learned to live without it.
Mr. Harley: I'm afraid my people haven't. I'm very sorry... I wish it were otherwise.

"I do know that for the sympathy of one living being, I would make peace with all. I have love in me the likes of which you can scarcely imagine and rage the likes of which you would not believe.
If I cannot satisfy the one, I will indulge the other." – Frankenstein's Creature on the glacier[/size]
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: Anti-Cancer Agent Stops Metastasis In Its Tracks

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Temujin wrote: Obviously medical tech is one of the few areas where nanotechnology has a lot of potential applications without divulging into an unrealistic wankfest. As such, I'm curious how its potential applications may play into this, given the ability actually go in and deal with things on a cellular level, and thus potentially supplement or bypass more traditional medical treatments. For example, I recent heard about a more mundane processes just utilizing nanodiamonds to help deliver medication directly to tumors. Is this something Big Pharma is concerned about, has been thought of, etc.?
Nanotechnological delivery is something very keenly looked into, although it is still using old school "blunt instrument" chemicals, it does mean they can be targeted at their delivery site quicker and, hopefully, with less side-effects from a more systemic dispersal. The work I focus on is inhalation stuff anyway, so it's not going to radically change the efficacy of the drug.

Really, though, the smart money is on biologics or "smart" drugs, such as stem cells (ESC/ASC), mono- polyclonal antibodies and transgenic viruses or bacteria. This is the work that is steadily growing and filling in the gaps where traditional New Chemical Entities, or basic chemical drugs, are losing ground.
Post Reply