This was a double show, with Samurai vs Spartan, and IRA vs Spetsnaz.
Spoiler
Moderator: Edi
85 meters for a scoped rifle? That is a horrible test. I'd say 300 meters is more like it, or whatever the standard range is for sniper school...Knife wrote:I was happy to see Japan wankers smacked around, though Spartan wankers are just as bad. As far as the gun v gun fights, of course the well trained spec ops dudes were going to win, though the H&K v Dragunov was dumb. More about the dope behind the weapon than the weapon and even then they were shooting sniper rifles at 85 meters, hardly a good test.
The rifle qualification for my department is a course that starts at 100 yards and is for qualifying on both open sights and optics. We even had a 300 meter iron sight competition (some of us got 10 out of 10 hits). So, yeah 85 meters is hardly a test for a rifle and more so a test for the person...and that person would have to really suck.Knife wrote:I'm pretty sure they said 85 meters in the show. I'd like to see a 500 meter test, if it's a KD course, for a sniper rifle test. At that range, variations in the weapons will stand out more with the ordinate of the round, beaten zone, etc...
That's your problem - you're taking this show too seriously.PeZook wrote:Seriously?
They started the clock on the first shot and ended the clock when the shooter yelled clear at shooting all targets. Russian got 29 seconds and change, Irish dude got 36 seconds and change. Targets seemed to be moving at casual walking speed.Raxmei wrote: What were the time constraints like and how fast were the targets moving?
See, I'd love a Samurai V Knight but...Last season they missed the opportunity to do pirate vs ninja. Most obvious confrontation ever and they passed it up.
Isn't that the guy who narrates "300"? No guessing necessary then to figure out who their target audience was.PeZook wrote:Well, I don't anymore. I watched a short clip on youtube, and man...the narrator's voice itself destroys any credibility
You don't even need to watch the tests themselves.
I'm pretty sure it's not the same person, but the announcer is certainly doing his damnedest to sound like him.Isn't that the guy who narrates "300"? No guessing necessary then to figure out who their target audience was.
True, but I would defend the short distance as being closer to the ones at which police snipers shoot. They usually set up across the street from the target rather than a mile away like a military sniper.So, yeah 85 meters is hardly a test for a rifle and more so a test for the person...and that person would have to really suck.
I caught a glimpse of that episode but never bothered watching the whole thing. However, as long as we're going to mention this, it's worth pointing out that those old pirate guns were godawful shitty weapons, and should not in any way be thought of as comparable to modern firearms. Those guns were ridiculously inaccurate and stood a pretty good chance of misfiring even under ideal conditions. If it was raining, you could probably charge the guy and be fairly confident that you would reach him without a bullet coming anywhere near you, or even leaving his barrel.Superman wrote:I like this show. And holy Jebus people were pissed off on Youtube about that episode where the pirate beat the knight. What's with all the knight wankers anyway? The pirate had a damn gun! Pfff... knights.
To be fair, he managed to do it with a blunderbuss, not the pistol, which could not penetrate the plate IIRC.Superman wrote:I like this show. And holy Jebus people were pissed off on Youtube about that episode where the pirate beat the knight. What's with all the knight wankers anyway? The pirate had a damn gun! Pfff... knights.
Oh, that's absolutely true. Even the act of firing a primitive firearm like a blunderbuss was often dangerous to the user; the powder sometimes had a tendency to ignite and explode when it wasn't supposed to. This fight's result was supposedly determined by the fact that the knight would have to fight at a close range. If the knight was close enough to try and take out the pirate with his sword, then he was also close enough to be killed by a single shot from the pirate's firearm. The short distance would also improve the pirate's accuracy and help to ensure a lethal shot, like to the knight's unprotected face.Darth Wong wrote:I caught a glimpse of that episode but never bothered watching the whole thing. However, as long as we're going to mention this, it's worth pointing out that those old pirate guns were godawful shitty weapons, and should not in any way be thought of as comparable to modern firearms. Those guns were ridiculously inaccurate and stood a pretty good chance of misfiring even under ideal conditions. If it was raining, you could probably charge the guy and be fairly confident that you would reach him without a bullet coming anywhere near you, or even leaving his barrel.