Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

SF: discuss futuristic sci-fi series, ideas, and crossovers.

Moderator: NecronLord

Verdict?

5: Don't blink
32
51%
4: Mofftastic
26
41%
3: Trying to keep my eyes open
3
5%
2: *Yawn*
1
2%
1: I blunk
1
2%
 
Total votes: 63

User avatar
Drooling Iguana
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4975
Joined: 2003-05-13 01:07am
Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Drooling Iguana »

I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho. It also really cemented the awesomeness of the new Doctor and companion, with Eleven demonstrating that while he still has some pride he's not nearly as stuck up as Ten was and able to take a bit of a ribbing from River without entering into a session of self-righteous speechifying, and Amy asking the Doctor to leave her behind is something that neither Rose nor Donna would ever have done (and it'd have been moot with Martha as I doubt the Doctor would even have noticed if he left her behind on one of his adventures.)

I'm kinda hoping that Amy's transformation into an Angel isn't entirely in her head. It looks like they're making a second attempt at the sort of thing that they'd tried to set up with Ace but weren't able to follow through on due to the series's cancellation. It'd be interesting to have a companion that isn't strictly human.
Image
"Stop! No one can survive these deadly rays!"
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash

"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
User avatar
Atlan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 598
Joined: 2002-11-30 09:39pm

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Atlan »

Drooling Iguana wrote:I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho. It also really cemented the awesomeness of the new Doctor and companion, with Eleven demonstrating that while he still has some pride he's not nearly as stuck up as Ten was and able to take a bit of a ribbing from River without entering into a session of self-righteous speechifying, and Amy asking the Doctor to leave her behind is something that neither Rose nor Donna would ever have done (and it'd have been moot with Martha as I doubt the Doctor would even have noticed if he left her behind on one of his adventures.)

I'm kinda hoping that Amy's transformation into an Angel isn't entirely in her head. It looks like they're making a second attempt at the sort of thing that they'd tried to set up with Ace but weren't able to follow through on due to the series's cancellation. It'd be interesting to have a companion that isn't strictly human.
I mentioned that on page one, and I for one think it would be kind of awesome, especially since she'd be the kind of being that the Doctor simply can't really trust. There's allways going to be that bit of doubt.
And Angel Amy wouldn't be to difficult to do. Just have a stone-grey painted mannequin with two or three different Amy heads, and two sets of clothing for Amy: One normal, and the other painted dusty grey. Dress the mannequin up in the grey clothing, and tadaa, you've got weeping Angel Amy. How far those powers would go (might not be a good idea taking pictures of her...) would be interesting.
Might be a bit difficult to explain once she shows up for her wedding though :D
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

I don't get why people think the "Amy Angel" thing is going anywhere, Im about 99% sure it will magically be cured by the end of the second episode
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
Atlan
Jedi Knight
Posts: 598
Joined: 2002-11-30 09:39pm

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Atlan »

Crossroads Inc. wrote:I don't get why people think the "Amy Angel" thing is going anywhere, Im about 99% sure it will magically be cured by the end of the second episode
It probably will be. Doesn't mean it wouldn't be an interesting thing to happen.
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Bounty »

It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head; the Angel's just making her hallucinate, probably to slow the team down. Whatever it is, I bet it won't even matter any more once she gets away from the maze.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1750
Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
Location: Blighty

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Captain Seafort »

Bounty wrote:It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head
Doesn't mean that the situation doesn't exist. While it'll all be resolved by the end of the next episode, I believe that the problem itself is real - the Doctor was most insistent that a) everything that records the image of an angel becomes an angel and b) that Amy not look into its eyes (which she ended up doing). I wouldn't be surprised if "everything" includes the human retina or brain. Looking the thing in the eye was probably required to cause the transformation.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Big Orange »

El Moose Monstero wrote: I enjoy the banter between the Doctor and Amy, and I do like the fact that they have Amy actually being an old school assistant, instead of Rose doing the crush schtick, Martha doing whatever she did, as I've blanked her out, and Donna ranting about being a 'temp'. Amy does actually feel like she's a part of the team and is providing a level of thinking that the Doctor might miss.
Not entirely, there's something amiss and"off" about Amy Pond - with the earlier relatively recent companions, grating as their lives and personality traits could be, they still felt like real people and we could sense some certain familarity with them. Not so with Amy Pond, we don't see her family, and despite claiming not being the clingy sort, she's built her teenage years around the Doctor, making somewhat disturbing little dolls of him. And she was unaware of the Daleks, which is pretty weird, considering they came out in force over contemporary London on two occasions. We'll find out more about Amy in "Amy's Choice" and I doubt she's turning into one of the Lonely Assassins (or hope not).
Drooling Iguana wrote:I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho.
Yeah, the first two parters in NuWho have always been rather cheesy, even the most enoyable one before "The Time of Angels"-"Flesh & Stone", featuring the Sontarans invading and UNIT kicking their asses. I get the sinking feeling that the formula has just been inverted, with *gulp* Chris Chibnal doing the Silurian two parter (it could be shambolic or just OK).

It's obvious that River Song and Dr. Isaacs are up to no good, with them having a brief conversation behind the Doctor's back insinuating they're not out to neutralise the Angels, they're likely trying to capture them for their own ends, which the Doctor would not tolerate. Also Song is a career criminal (instead of a legitimate explorer).

Here's my idea of what the Church's brothers could've looked like, if more money was spent inspired by Flash Gordon and 17th/18th century military uniforms:

Image
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
Gramzamber
Jedi Knight
Posts: 777
Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Gramzamber »

Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
User avatar
Dartzap
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5969
Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Dartzap »

Ye' know, the more I watch this series, the more the 11th starts to come across as being almost autistic in nature. All the clumsiness, rambling trains of thought which lead no where and the odd hyper moment, all add up to a spectrum disorder :lol:
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing! :P

Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus

Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
User avatar
Admiral Valdemar
Outside Context Problem
Posts: 31572
Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
Location: UK

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Admiral Valdemar »

Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.

And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Vympel »

*sigh*

I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.

Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!

Basically ... fuck off.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Plekhanov »

Big Orange wrote:
El Moose Monstero wrote: I enjoy the banter between the Doctor and Amy, and I do like the fact that they have Amy actually being an old school assistant, instead of Rose doing the crush schtick, Martha doing whatever she did, as I've blanked her out, and Donna ranting about being a 'temp'. Amy does actually feel like she's a part of the team and is providing a level of thinking that the Doctor might miss.
Not entirely, there's something amiss and"off" about Amy Pond - with the earlier relatively recent companions, grating as their lives and personality traits could be, they still felt like real people and we could sense some certain familarity with them. Not so with Amy Pond, we don't see her family, and despite claiming not being the clingy sort, she's built her teenage years around the Doctor, making somewhat disturbing little dolls of him. And she was unaware of the Daleks, which is pretty weird, considering they came out in force over contemporary London on two occasions. We'll find out more about Amy in "Amy's Choice" and I doubt she's turning into one of the Lonely Assassins (or hope not).
Amy's an orphan and only child so she hasn't got much in the way of a family to see besides after only one episode on earth in her time period how much of her family could we really expect to have seen? Just how much of the other nuWho companions families was seen at such a stage? As for her being unaware of the daleks why do you assume this is specific to her instead of due to something (possibly related to the cracks) fucking with the entire time-line/everyone on earth or something?
Here's my idea of what the Church's brothers could've looked like, if more money was spent inspired by Flash Gordon and 17th/18th century military uniforms:

Image
Well that's just fucking stupid, why the fuck would infantry in the future wear plate armour?
Why is everything but the face protected?
What's with the ridiculous pointing hat?
Why a brightly coloured tunic?
Why no pockets?

They're meant to be soldiers not attractions at a retarded theme park.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Stark »

Vympel wrote:*sigh*

I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.

Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!

Basically ... fuck off.
None of the review threads this year have roused me out of my desire to stay as far away from this show as possible.
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Stark wrote:
Vympel wrote:*sigh*

I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.

Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!

Basically ... fuck off.
None of the review threads this year have roused me out of my desire to stay as far away from this show as possible.
Oh come on. Oh, right, you are STRAK and you STRAK everything, you STRAKKING STRAKKER you!

Vympel, how on Earth can you like shit like Transformers 2 but roll your eyes at far-less-super-stupid stuff like nuWho? I find the Doctor pontificating bout how he's awesome to be pretty alright compared to bucktooth hillbillybots. And, I think Eleven's nowhere near like Ten's stupid indignation moments. Fucking Ten.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
NecronLord
Harbinger of Doom
Harbinger of Doom
Posts: 27384
Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
Location: The Lost City

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by NecronLord »

Bounty wrote:It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head; the Angel's just making her hallucinate, probably to slow the team down. Whatever it is, I bet it won't even matter any more once she gets away from the maze.
Spoiler
Well, there's a scene in Confidential, I think, of her standing in some woodland surrounded by angels and freaking out. So it'll probably last outside the maze.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Where can I see previews of the next episode, guys?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
Hillary
Jedi Master
Posts: 1261
Joined: 2005-06-29 11:31am
Location: Londinium

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Hillary »

Plekhanov wrote:As for her being unaware of the daleks why do you assume this is specific to her instead of due to something (possibly related to the cracks) fucking with the entire time-line/everyone on earth or something?
Absolutely. I thought that was obvious as The Doctor made a point of stating her non-memory of the Daleks was a pretty big fucking issue.

As for the episode, it flew by. I loved the fact that they didn't just remake Blink. The coming out of the TV recording bit was new and brilliant. The whole starving army of angels was a nice idea. The battle clerics were great and River is awesome. Everyone complaining about the neck-snapping rather than zapping back in time killings are somewhat missing the point I think. It seemed pretty clear that there will be a reason for this unusual behaviour.

Amy is a bloody awesome companion so far. Intelligent, gutsy and nobody's fool. And sex on a stick to boot. Matt Smith is still fitting into the clothing but it's a hard role to fill with all the history and previous actors behind it. He's doing well I think.

Really looking forward to next week.
What is WRONG with you people
User avatar
D.Turtle
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1909
Joined: 2002-07-26 08:08am
Location: Bochum, Germany

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by D.Turtle »

I liked it.

Am I the only one that interpreted River's discussion with the Bishop, and her being unable to answer what the Doctor is like, as a hint that River is not River, but some kind of impostor?
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Nah. Militant cleric religious guys with some ulterior motive regarding "ANGELS"? For all we know, the clerics are pro-angel guys or some shit. Which could be WHY those corpses didn't get time-fucked. Or maybe those corpses didn't get time-fucked because the Angels wanted to use their vocal cords? Whatever.

My bet is that River is working with the Clerics, but only because of circumstances or shit that has forced her to, and when the situation changes she fucks them back and works with the Doctor and helps figure out a solution that ends up dealing with the Angels and whatever ulterior motive the Clerics have.

Maybe.

So, where can I see a preview?
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
User avatar
mr friendly guy
The Doctor
Posts: 11235
Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by mr friendly guy »

Shroom Man 777 wrote: So, where can I see a preview?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl6ounxQceI

youtube is your friend.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.

Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.
User avatar
Gramzamber
Jedi Knight
Posts: 777
Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Gramzamber »

Admiral Valdemar wrote:
Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.

And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
Yeah cause the church is all about practicality, and an outfit with clerics, bishops, brothers and "sacred names" would never be ostentatious in any way.

Besides which, what's practical for today's soldier may not be for a soldier several thousand years in the future. So I prefer if people use their imaginations instead of completely replicating an early 21st century soldier's gear, only with a P-90 with a mixmaster attachment glued on. Because as we know, a WWI soldier has exactly the same gear a present day one does, only with tin foil wrapped around their rifle barrels. Or, you know, not.
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11950
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Crazedwraith »

Looks like the same P90 variant we saw in season 2. Which IIRC was a similar timeframe. (51st Century?) So reusing props to save money? Say it ain't so!
User avatar
Zac Naloen
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5488
Joined: 2003-07-24 04:32pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Zac Naloen »

Is it just me or are some of the visual effects a little bit hokey so far this season? (the deep space matte painting wouldn't haven't looked out of place in the late 90's)

I think it's mostly the stuff involving the tardis I'm talking about, some sort of homage?
Image
Member of the Unremarkables
Just because you're god, it doesn't mean you can treat people that way : - My girlfriend
Evil Brit Conspiracy - Insignificant guy
User avatar
Plekhanov
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3991
Joined: 2004-04-01 11:09pm
Location: Mercia

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Plekhanov »

Gramzamber wrote:
Admiral Valdemar wrote:
Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.

And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
Yeah cause the church is all about practicality, and an outfit with clerics, bishops, brothers and "sacred names" would never be ostentatious in any way.
High church CofE clergy men wear their rhobes & silly hats when actually performing religious duties in church or other controlled environments the rest of the time they dress normally except maybe for a clerical collar. They make rather more concessions to practically than you'd have us believe.

The regular army don't go into combat in dress uniform why would an armed wing of the CofE do so in ceremonial garb? Particularly an armed wing of the CofE which whilst it may have religious ends seems thus far pretty practical in the means it uses to try and achieve those ends.
Besides which, what's practical for today's soldier may not be for a soldier several thousand years in the future. So I prefer if people use their imaginations instead of completely replicating an early 21st century soldier's gear, only with a P-90 with a mixmaster attachment glued on. Because as we know, a WWI soldier has exactly the same gear a present day one does, only with tin foil wrapped around their rifle barrels. Or, you know, not.
Please do explain to us how plate armour would feasibly by "practical" for infantry in the future? Besides they do have some new gear in those tri-corder type things which also seem work as radios.

It just seems bizarre to me that all the whining about the equipment has focussed upon superficial looks whilst ignoring what would seem to be bigger issues - the lack of low light vision equipment & only having traditional hand-held torches, they should have something like zipkas at the very least.
User avatar
Shroom Man 777
FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
Posts: 21222
Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
Contact:

Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]

Post by Shroom Man 777 »

Turns out some people like overlooking whether or not the constituent elements of a given work of fiction makes the whole piece enjoyable, and end up somehow obsessing over minute irrelevant useless piece of (often military) bullshit trivia that nobody really cares about? Who knew.
Image "DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people :D - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
Post Reply