Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Moderator: NecronLord
- Drooling Iguana
- Sith Marauder
- Posts: 4975
- Joined: 2003-05-13 01:07am
- Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho. It also really cemented the awesomeness of the new Doctor and companion, with Eleven demonstrating that while he still has some pride he's not nearly as stuck up as Ten was and able to take a bit of a ribbing from River without entering into a session of self-righteous speechifying, and Amy asking the Doctor to leave her behind is something that neither Rose nor Donna would ever have done (and it'd have been moot with Martha as I doubt the Doctor would even have noticed if he left her behind on one of his adventures.)
I'm kinda hoping that Amy's transformation into an Angel isn't entirely in her head. It looks like they're making a second attempt at the sort of thing that they'd tried to set up with Ace but weren't able to follow through on due to the series's cancellation. It'd be interesting to have a companion that isn't strictly human.
I'm kinda hoping that Amy's transformation into an Angel isn't entirely in her head. It looks like they're making a second attempt at the sort of thing that they'd tried to set up with Ace but weren't able to follow through on due to the series's cancellation. It'd be interesting to have a companion that isn't strictly human.
"Stop! No one can survive these deadly rays!"
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash
"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash
"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
I mentioned that on page one, and I for one think it would be kind of awesome, especially since she'd be the kind of being that the Doctor simply can't really trust. There's allways going to be that bit of doubt.Drooling Iguana wrote:I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho. It also really cemented the awesomeness of the new Doctor and companion, with Eleven demonstrating that while he still has some pride he's not nearly as stuck up as Ten was and able to take a bit of a ribbing from River without entering into a session of self-righteous speechifying, and Amy asking the Doctor to leave her behind is something that neither Rose nor Donna would ever have done (and it'd have been moot with Martha as I doubt the Doctor would even have noticed if he left her behind on one of his adventures.)
I'm kinda hoping that Amy's transformation into an Angel isn't entirely in her head. It looks like they're making a second attempt at the sort of thing that they'd tried to set up with Ace but weren't able to follow through on due to the series's cancellation. It'd be interesting to have a companion that isn't strictly human.
And Angel Amy wouldn't be to difficult to do. Just have a stone-grey painted mannequin with two or three different Amy heads, and two sets of clothing for Amy: One normal, and the other painted dusty grey. Dress the mannequin up in the grey clothing, and tadaa, you've got weeping Angel Amy. How far those powers would go (might not be a good idea taking pictures of her...) would be interesting.
Might be a bit difficult to explain once she shows up for her wedding though
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
- Crossroads Inc.
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 9233
- Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
- Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
I don't get why people think the "Amy Angel" thing is going anywhere, Im about 99% sure it will magically be cured by the end of the second episode
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
It probably will be. Doesn't mean it wouldn't be an interesting thing to happen.Crossroads Inc. wrote:I don't get why people think the "Amy Angel" thing is going anywhere, Im about 99% sure it will magically be cured by the end of the second episode
"A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
Specialization is for insects."
R.A. Heinlein.
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head; the Angel's just making her hallucinate, probably to slow the team down. Whatever it is, I bet it won't even matter any more once she gets away from the maze.
- Captain Seafort
- Jedi Council Member
- Posts: 1750
- Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
- Location: Blighty
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Doesn't mean that the situation doesn't exist. While it'll all be resolved by the end of the next episode, I believe that the problem itself is real - the Doctor was most insistent that a) everything that records the image of an angel becomes an angel and b) that Amy not look into its eyes (which she ended up doing). I wouldn't be surprised if "everything" includes the human retina or brain. Looking the thing in the eye was probably required to cause the transformation.Bounty wrote:It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head
- Big Orange
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7108
- Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
- Location: Britain
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Not entirely, there's something amiss and"off" about Amy Pond - with the earlier relatively recent companions, grating as their lives and personality traits could be, they still felt like real people and we could sense some certain familarity with them. Not so with Amy Pond, we don't see her family, and despite claiming not being the clingy sort, she's built her teenage years around the Doctor, making somewhat disturbing little dolls of him. And she was unaware of the Daleks, which is pretty weird, considering they came out in force over contemporary London on two occasions. We'll find out more about Amy in "Amy's Choice" and I doubt she's turning into one of the Lonely Assassins (or hope not).El Moose Monstero wrote: I enjoy the banter between the Doctor and Amy, and I do like the fact that they have Amy actually being an old school assistant, instead of Rose doing the crush schtick, Martha doing whatever she did, as I've blanked her out, and Donna ranting about being a 'temp'. Amy does actually feel like she's a part of the team and is providing a level of thinking that the Doctor might miss.
Yeah, the first two parters in NuWho have always been rather cheesy, even the most enoyable one before "The Time of Angels"-"Flesh & Stone", featuring the Sontarans invading and UNIT kicking their asses. I get the sinking feeling that the formula has just been inverted, with *gulp* Chris Chibnal doing the Silurian two parter (it could be shambolic or just OK).Drooling Iguana wrote:I thought it was pretty good. Not really on the level of Blink but a hell of a lot better than any of the other early-season two-parters that we've seen on nuWho.
It's obvious that River Song and Dr. Isaacs are up to no good, with them having a brief conversation behind the Doctor's back insinuating they're not out to neutralise the Angels, they're likely trying to capture them for their own ends, which the Doctor would not tolerate. Also Song is a career criminal (instead of a legitimate explorer).
Here's my idea of what the Church's brothers could've looked like, if more money was spent inspired by Flash Gordon and 17th/18th century military uniforms:
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid
'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
- Gramzamber
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 777
- Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
- Dartzap
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5969
- Joined: 2002-09-05 09:56am
- Location: Britain, Britain, Britain: Land Of Rain
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Ye' know, the more I watch this series, the more the 11th starts to come across as being almost autistic in nature. All the clumsiness, rambling trains of thought which lead no where and the odd hyper moment, all add up to a spectrum disorder
EBC: Northeners, Huh! What are they good for?! Absolutely nothing!
Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus
Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
Cybertron, Justice league...MM, HAB SDN City Watch: Sergeant Detritus
Days Unstabbed, Unabused, Unassualted and Unwavedatwithabutchersknife: 0
- Admiral Valdemar
- Outside Context Problem
- Posts: 31572
- Joined: 2002-07-04 07:17pm
- Location: UK
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
*sigh*
I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.
Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!
Basically ... fuck off.
I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.
Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!
Basically ... fuck off.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Amy's an orphan and only child so she hasn't got much in the way of a family to see besides after only one episode on earth in her time period how much of her family could we really expect to have seen? Just how much of the other nuWho companions families was seen at such a stage? As for her being unaware of the daleks why do you assume this is specific to her instead of due to something (possibly related to the cracks) fucking with the entire time-line/everyone on earth or something?Big Orange wrote:Not entirely, there's something amiss and"off" about Amy Pond - with the earlier relatively recent companions, grating as their lives and personality traits could be, they still felt like real people and we could sense some certain familarity with them. Not so with Amy Pond, we don't see her family, and despite claiming not being the clingy sort, she's built her teenage years around the Doctor, making somewhat disturbing little dolls of him. And she was unaware of the Daleks, which is pretty weird, considering they came out in force over contemporary London on two occasions. We'll find out more about Amy in "Amy's Choice" and I doubt she's turning into one of the Lonely Assassins (or hope not).El Moose Monstero wrote: I enjoy the banter between the Doctor and Amy, and I do like the fact that they have Amy actually being an old school assistant, instead of Rose doing the crush schtick, Martha doing whatever she did, as I've blanked her out, and Donna ranting about being a 'temp'. Amy does actually feel like she's a part of the team and is providing a level of thinking that the Doctor might miss.
Well that's just fucking stupid, why the fuck would infantry in the future wear plate armour?Here's my idea of what the Church's brothers could've looked like, if more money was spent inspired by Flash Gordon and 17th/18th century military uniforms:
Why is everything but the face protected?
What's with the ridiculous pointing hat?
Why a brightly coloured tunic?
Why no pockets?
They're meant to be soldiers not attractions at a retarded theme park.
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
None of the review threads this year have roused me out of my desire to stay as far away from this show as possible.Vympel wrote:*sigh*
I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.
Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!
Basically ... fuck off.
- Shroom Man 777
- FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
- Posts: 21222
- Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
- Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Oh come on. Oh, right, you are STRAK and you STRAK everything, you STRAKKING STRAKKER you!Stark wrote:None of the review threads this year have roused me out of my desire to stay as far away from this show as possible.Vympel wrote:*sigh*
I haven't seen the episode yet, but once again I cringe at the self-aware nonsense of the Doctor pontificating about how awesome he is.
Don't ever put the Doctor in a trap!!!!
Basically ... fuck off.
Vympel, how on Earth can you like shit like Transformers 2 but roll your eyes at far-less-super-stupid stuff like nuWho? I find the Doctor pontificating bout how he's awesome to be pretty alright compared to bucktooth hillbillybots. And, I think Eleven's nowhere near like Ten's stupid indignation moments. Fucking Ten.
"DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
- NecronLord
- Harbinger of Doom
- Posts: 27384
- Joined: 2002-07-07 06:30am
- Location: The Lost City
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
SpoilerBounty wrote:It was blindingly obvious that there is no "Amy angel" 'situation'. As the Doctor clearly proved, it's all in her head; the Angel's just making her hallucinate, probably to slow the team down. Whatever it is, I bet it won't even matter any more once she gets away from the maze.
Superior Moderator - BotB - HAB [Drill Instructor]-Writer- Stardestroyer.net's resident Star-God.
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
"We believe in the systematic understanding of the physical world through observation and experimentation, argument and debate and most of all freedom of will." ~ Stargate: The Ark of Truth
- Shroom Man 777
- FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
- Posts: 21222
- Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
- Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Where can I see previews of the next episode, guys?
"DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Absolutely. I thought that was obvious as The Doctor made a point of stating her non-memory of the Daleks was a pretty big fucking issue.Plekhanov wrote:As for her being unaware of the daleks why do you assume this is specific to her instead of due to something (possibly related to the cracks) fucking with the entire time-line/everyone on earth or something?
As for the episode, it flew by. I loved the fact that they didn't just remake Blink. The coming out of the TV recording bit was new and brilliant. The whole starving army of angels was a nice idea. The battle clerics were great and River is awesome. Everyone complaining about the neck-snapping rather than zapping back in time killings are somewhat missing the point I think. It seemed pretty clear that there will be a reason for this unusual behaviour.
Amy is a bloody awesome companion so far. Intelligent, gutsy and nobody's fool. And sex on a stick to boot. Matt Smith is still fitting into the clothing but it's a hard role to fill with all the history and previous actors behind it. He's doing well I think.
Really looking forward to next week.
What is WRONG with you people
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
I liked it.
Am I the only one that interpreted River's discussion with the Bishop, and her being unable to answer what the Doctor is like, as a hint that River is not River, but some kind of impostor?
Am I the only one that interpreted River's discussion with the Bishop, and her being unable to answer what the Doctor is like, as a hint that River is not River, but some kind of impostor?
- Shroom Man 777
- FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
- Posts: 21222
- Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
- Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Nah. Militant cleric religious guys with some ulterior motive regarding "ANGELS"? For all we know, the clerics are pro-angel guys or some shit. Which could be WHY those corpses didn't get time-fucked. Or maybe those corpses didn't get time-fucked because the Angels wanted to use their vocal cords? Whatever.
My bet is that River is working with the Clerics, but only because of circumstances or shit that has forced her to, and when the situation changes she fucks them back and works with the Doctor and helps figure out a solution that ends up dealing with the Angels and whatever ulterior motive the Clerics have.
Maybe.
So, where can I see a preview?
My bet is that River is working with the Clerics, but only because of circumstances or shit that has forced her to, and when the situation changes she fucks them back and works with the Doctor and helps figure out a solution that ends up dealing with the Angels and whatever ulterior motive the Clerics have.
Maybe.
So, where can I see a preview?
"DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
- mr friendly guy
- The Doctor
- Posts: 11235
- Joined: 2004-12-12 10:55pm
- Location: In a 1960s police telephone box somewhere in Australia
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wl6ounxQceIShroom Man 777 wrote: So, where can I see a preview?
youtube is your friend.
Never apologise for being a geek, because they won't apologise to you for being an arsehole. John Barrowman - 22 June 2014 Perth Supernova.
Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.
Countries I have been to - 14.
Australia, Canada, China, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland, Germany, Malaysia, Netherlands, Norway, Singapore, Sweden, USA.
Always on the lookout for more nice places to visit.
- Gramzamber
- Jedi Knight
- Posts: 777
- Joined: 2009-10-09 01:49pm
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Yeah cause the church is all about practicality, and an outfit with clerics, bishops, brothers and "sacred names" would never be ostentatious in any way.Admiral Valdemar wrote:We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
Besides which, what's practical for today's soldier may not be for a soldier several thousand years in the future. So I prefer if people use their imaginations instead of completely replicating an early 21st century soldier's gear, only with a P-90 with a mixmaster attachment glued on. Because as we know, a WWI soldier has exactly the same gear a present day one does, only with tin foil wrapped around their rifle barrels. Or, you know, not.
"No it's just Anacrap coming to whine and do nothing." -Mike Nelson on Anakin Skywalker
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11950
- Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
- Location: Cheshire, England
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Looks like the same P90 variant we saw in season 2. Which IIRC was a similar timeframe. (51st Century?) So reusing props to save money? Say it ain't so!
- Zac Naloen
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5488
- Joined: 2003-07-24 04:32pm
- Location: United Kingdom
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Is it just me or are some of the visual effects a little bit hokey so far this season? (the deep space matte painting wouldn't haven't looked out of place in the late 90's)
I think it's mostly the stuff involving the tardis I'm talking about, some sort of homage?
I think it's mostly the stuff involving the tardis I'm talking about, some sort of homage?
Member of the Unremarkables
Just because you're god, it doesn't mean you can treat people that way : - My girlfriend
Evil Brit Conspiracy - Insignificant guy
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
High church CofE clergy men wear their rhobes & silly hats when actually performing religious duties in church or other controlled environments the rest of the time they dress normally except maybe for a clerical collar. They make rather more concessions to practically than you'd have us believe.Gramzamber wrote:Yeah cause the church is all about practicality, and an outfit with clerics, bishops, brothers and "sacred names" would never be ostentatious in any way.Admiral Valdemar wrote:We've had decades of pointless style over substance outfits in television sci-fi, it's nice to have something that is practical and not likely to go out of fashion save some total rewriting of warfare. Different for the sake of it is just asking for some bullshit art deco makeover that makes one cringe.Gramzamber wrote:Not a bad idea for a good sci-fi crusader look, though the Pope hat is a bit much.
Honestly I don't think it'd break the budget to slap some metal armour together, attach some furutistic thingies and paint some crosses on it. 80's era Doctor Who could've done it... it'd look terrible, but still.
And yes, WH40k designs would do that. Dumb design but gothic is still dumb design. You'd need a far larger budget than any TV series gets to pull anything like that off well, in which case, can we not just have Terminator armour?
The regular army don't go into combat in dress uniform why would an armed wing of the CofE do so in ceremonial garb? Particularly an armed wing of the CofE which whilst it may have religious ends seems thus far pretty practical in the means it uses to try and achieve those ends.
Please do explain to us how plate armour would feasibly by "practical" for infantry in the future? Besides they do have some new gear in those tri-corder type things which also seem work as radios.Besides which, what's practical for today's soldier may not be for a soldier several thousand years in the future. So I prefer if people use their imaginations instead of completely replicating an early 21st century soldier's gear, only with a P-90 with a mixmaster attachment glued on. Because as we know, a WWI soldier has exactly the same gear a present day one does, only with tin foil wrapped around their rifle barrels. Or, you know, not.
It just seems bizarre to me that all the whining about the equipment has focussed upon superficial looks whilst ignoring what would seem to be bigger issues - the lack of low light vision equipment & only having traditional hand-held torches, they should have something like zipkas at the very least.
- Shroom Man 777
- FUCKING DICK-STABBER!
- Posts: 21222
- Joined: 2003-05-11 08:39am
- Location: Bleeding breasts and stabbing dicks since 2003
- Contact:
Re: Doctor Who S05E04: "The Time Of Angels" [Spoilers]
Turns out some people like overlooking whether or not the constituent elements of a given work of fiction makes the whole piece enjoyable, and end up somehow obsessing over minute irrelevant useless piece of (often military) bullshit trivia that nobody really cares about? Who knew.
"DO YOU WORSHIP HOMOSEXUALS?" - Curtis Saxton (source)
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!
shroom is a lovely boy and i wont hear a bad word against him - LUSY-CHAN!
Shit! Man, I didn't think of that! It took Shroom to properly interpret the screams of dying people - PeZook
Shroom, I read out the stuff you write about us. You are an endless supply of morale down here. :p - an OWS street medic
Pink Sugar Heart Attack!