ANTIcarrot wrote:All other professionals at DIMO(N) were offered healthy compensation, yes? That stage seems to have been skipped for Chestnut. So they saving money argument doesn't really hold water. Nor does the 'and use force if needed' part, since he *was* willing to work if they paid him a salary appropiet to the uniqueness of his skill. There are thousands of executives in America with 6 figure incomes. His requests were extravigent, but not completely unreasonable since (once again) the US government effectively pays the baulk of those salaries already to the Boeing and LockMart CEOs.
Chestnut was offered fair rates as a civilian contractor for DIMO(N), he tried to play hard ball by (I believe) slamming a portal shut dangerously close to human beings and putting critical operations in hell at risk. He was drafted (and yes, you can draft specific people) to expedite his contribution to the war efforts.
Sparky, well, during general draft times it can be unlawful for men of age without a good excuse to NOT be in the military, so he would have been snatched up.
Except that the
specifics of her charge was that she was 'talking to an inhabitant of heaven' an act more usually referred to as prayer; and considered by many a vital part of Christianity. So in effect she was arrested for being a
practicing Christian in a time when the 'christian' god was an enemy of the state. Now turning to the law books, we have part of the constitution saying
you can't talk to god (because of treason), and another part of the constitution stating that
we specifically cannot legally stop you talking to your god (because of the 1st amendment). That appears to be a conflict/loophole, one that is present because no one has ever considered god as a potential enemy of the state. Also, if what you said about precedence is true, then the 1st amendment overrides the whole constitution when it comes to religion, including the part about treason. So that would make her not a traitor.
That's bull freaking crap and you know it. She wasn't asking God to take care of her mommy and daddy and make the monsters go away and help her tummyache, she was giving specific, detailed information of a military nature to an agent of a foreign power. Your first ammendment rights do NOT supercede laws against treason. Moreover, constitutional rights can be suspended during times of national crisis (Lincoln suspended Habeas Corpus), and you are taking VERY liberal use of the phrase 'talking to god', and any judge worth his salt would have you disbarred for making such a ludicrous argument:
Your honor, treason is protected under my client's right to religious freedom.
Pedophiles, rapists, and drug users have all tried that defense at one time or another, and we like them BETTER than traitors. At best she's an enemy spy if she considers herself a citizen of heaven, but we have laws against espionage, too. If you think you can get away with EITHER of those crimes on a technicality while Detroit and New York are still smouldering, you need a boot to the head.
Are you sure Branch helped with attacks on Earth? Has Michael actually used any information she's passed on? Did she pass on any information beyond DEMO(N)'s location? Given that he doesn't seem to have noticed her capture, she can't have been passing him information that regularly.
Given it was her information allowed heaven to correctly target the attack of the second beast on a critical military installation, I don't think anyone is doubting her complicity in the attack.
But the image of some DEMO(N) officials that springs to mind isn't a Dirty Harry style cop, but rather a giggling child. "HeHeHe! I got to hurt someone I don't like and got away with it! Aren't I clever! HeHeHe!" It is poor logic to use the excuse that there are worse people out there as an excuse for acts which are at best morally questionable.
I think you've got some 'morally questionable' issues of your own. First off, DIMO(N) had fuckall to do with Sparky, that was Pentagon regular. Second, the forced conscription of Chestnut (which was legal) was vital to the war effort. It wasn't a question of like or dislike, it was necessity, and most of the corrections doled out to him were on behalf of his superiors in the Marines, who are also not a part of DIMO(N).
Then we come back to Branch. The traitor. The woman who has confessed to giving classified military knowledge to the enemy. The greatest, most dangerous enemy our nation (or any nation) has ever faced, in a time when major cities with populations in the millions are getting levelled at a rate of roughly one a month. To get critical information out of her, we allowed her to be terrified to the core of her very soul. She wasn't harmed during her interrogation, and the information she gave saved lives.
You can climb up on a horse and say 'One act of cruelty is one too many' but if it were me in that room with her and I was the only one who could do it, I'd burn her with a hot iron if I thought it would save a thousand lives. If you can't say the same, well, that's why the government has people who do this job. DIMON isn't petty children satisfying grudges, it is a collection of intelligent people making impossible decisions several times a day, knowing full well that no matter what they choose some people will die. Its just like with Tel Aviv; sometimes there is no good choice or right answer, so you take your acceptable losses and move on.