Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

OT: anything goes!

Moderator: Edi

User avatar
Thanas
Magister
Magister
Posts: 30779
Joined: 2004-06-26 07:49pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Thanas »

So we have one guy wearing armor, has a large shield and weapons designed for melee combat vs a guy with....what, exactly?
Whoever says "education does not matter" can try ignorance
------------
A decision must be made in the life of every nation at the very moment when the grasp of the enemy is at its throat. Then, it seems that the only way to survive is to use the means of the enemy, to rest survival upon what is expedient, to look the other way. Well, the answer to that is 'survival as what'? A country isn't a rock. It's not an extension of one's self. It's what it stands for. It's what it stands for when standing for something is the most difficult! - Chief Judge Haywood
------------
My LPs
User avatar
Stuart
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2935
Joined: 2004-10-26 09:23am
Location: The military-industrial complex

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Stuart »

I've watched a couple of these and they're fit only for laughs. The IRA vs Taliban was pathetic - they gave the IRA a flamethrower as one of their standard weapons and there is just one - one - recorded case of the IRA using one. Didn't give the IRA a sniper rifle when that was one of their primary weapons.

As for the SS vs Vietcong, that was beneath contempt. Firstly, with the weapons set in question, that wasn't the Vietcong, that was the Viet Minh. And we know what happened when the SS met the Viet Minh, the jungle floor got wiped with German ass.

Yuch, a waste of perfectly good electrons.
Nations do not survive by setting examples for others
Nations survive by making examples of others
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10687
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Elfdart »

Stuart wrote:I've watched a couple of these and they're fit only for laughs. The IRA vs Taliban was pathetic - they gave the IRA a flamethrower as one of their standard weapons and there is just one - one - recorded case of the IRA using one. Didn't give the IRA a sniper rifle when that was one of their primary weapons.

As for the SS vs Vietcong, that was beneath contempt. Firstly, with the weapons set in question, that wasn't the Vietcong, that was the Viet Minh. And we know what happened when the SS met the Viet Minh, the jungle floor got wiped with German ass.

Yuch, a waste of perfectly good electrons.
My dad had a photo of an MG-34 (what was left of it) being used by a VC (what was left of him). I always assumed the weapon was somehow obtained by the VC via the black market or possibly the Russians or Chinese. Did the French use them in the early 50s?
Image
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10687
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Elfdart »

Thanas wrote:So we have one guy wearing armor, has a large shield and weapons designed for melee combat vs a guy with....what, exactly?
A guy with armor, shield and weapons designed for melee. Oh and a killer Frisbee, so naturally he won.
Image
User avatar
Marcus Aurelius
Jedi Master
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008-09-14 02:36pm
Location: Finland

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

Thanas wrote: It was. The MP40 was only ever issued to elite units, paratroopers, tank crews and assault infantry. The SS, which was equipped with second-rate stuff due to the Wehrmacht hating them and thinking them unprofessional rabble (an assesment which generally was true, though it changed later on), likely only used the MP40 in very limited numbers. Note that this however changed, you can see pics of the battle of warsow with whole squads of SS men having MP40s, but for the vast majority of SS men, the MP28 is a far better representative.

That said, why anybody would pick the SS and make it the subject of a glorified "TOUGH GUYS" competition is beyond me. Far better to have picked elite Wehrmacht formations like the Panzer-Lehr or the Grossdeutschland division.
The MP40 was manufactured in much larger numbers than the MP28, and once the Waffen SS was moved up on the weapons priority list due to Hitler's increasing mistrust of the Wehrmacht after Stalingrad, it started to receive more MP40s. So before 1943 the Waffen SS would not have many MP38/40s, but in 1944 the situations would be quite different already. Of course this upgrading of weaponry included primarily the small numbered Waffen SS divisions, many of which were also refitted to full Panzer Divisions in 1943. The new Waffen SS Divisions formed in late 1942 and 1943 also received good equipment, but the higher numbered divisions formed in 1944 and 1945 were equipped with anything that was available at the moment. Many of them had mostly non-German enlisted men and were often issued with captured weapons.

As for why the SS was picked: "everybody" knows that German WW2 elite force = Waffen SS. Shows like the one in question are not made for people with more than skin deep knowledge of history.
User avatar
Stuart
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2935
Joined: 2004-10-26 09:23am
Location: The military-industrial complex

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Stuart »

Elfdart wrote:My dad had a photo of an MG-34 (what was left of it) being used by a VC (what was left of him). I always assumed the weapon was somehow obtained by the VC via the black market or possibly the Russians or Chinese. Did the French use them in the early 50s?
Most likely was war-captured MG-34s from Russia. Second would be MG-34s from China; pre WW2 the Chinese had (IIRC) eight divisions trained and equipped by the Germans. It's just slightly possible they came from Thailand; the Thais intended to manufacture the MG-34 under license but only a handful were ever made. Postwar, they made some chambered for 7.62x51 NATO but they had M60s foisted off on them instead.

Most likely Russian war-capture and then shipped out as aid.
Nations do not survive by setting examples for others
Nations survive by making examples of others
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10687
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Elfdart »

Stargate Nerd wrote:I love how the Spartan won both his bouts because his opponents couldn't get past his shields, yet the Roman Centurion didn't even get to use his shield. So much for consistency.
That's because Romans are soooo old school 1950s oh-so-subtle Cinemascope homoerotic (Ben-Hur, Spartacus), where thanks to 300 the Spartans represent the kind of full-blown Frank Miller gay porn that fat guys in comic stores can really embrace.

It's like the Romans are Barbara Stanwyck in Double Indemnity while the Spartans are Shannon Tweed in <insert name of late-night erotic thriller skin flick here>. Sure Stanwyck was a better actress and Double Indemnity a better movie than Indecent Behavior 3, but guess which one masturbating fanboys want to watch?
Image
User avatar
Imperial528
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1798
Joined: 2010-05-03 06:19pm
Location: New England

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Imperial528 »

I wanted to vomit after the Alexander the Great V. Attila the Hun episode.
For the Hun bow, they get a world class horse archer. Yet the Greek crossbow is fired by some dude who doesn't even know how to load a crossbow correctly, let alone aim or fire any weapon of that size. Although, (I doubt they got this correct though) having to load it the way they did it would be a drawback.

But that's why they know that people get prepared before they try to kill each other, right?

I stopped watching after a few more episodes, since they will compare two weapons in one field, not considering the fact that one of those weapons may not have even been designed for that purpose. (Swords designed to slash being different from those meant to stab being something they apparently can't fathom.)

Anyone else notice they used Microsoft Excel 07 to run their "1000 wank-tastic battles"?
User avatar
Elfdart
The Anti-Shep
Posts: 10687
Joined: 2004-04-28 11:32pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Elfdart »

The show is a trainwreck, but entertaining in its badness -like a Steven Seagal movie. I'd like to see a parody version where it's some wanked-out fighting man (past or present) vs a fat slob in a wife-beater T-shirt. The slob wins every time by simply kicking the Mighty Warrior in the nuts, throwing sand or flour in his eyes or telling him his shoelaces are untied, then kneeing him in the face. Then the slob flexes his muscles rolls of flab.
Image
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Vympel »

I'm not sure how much longer this show can last, really, given the matchups they've already had. There's not really that many 'warriors' you can pit against each other before you run out.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Superman
Pink Foamin' at the Mouth
Posts: 9690
Joined: 2002-12-16 12:29am
Location: Metropolis

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Superman »

Vympel wrote:I'm not sure how much longer this show can last, really, given the matchups they've already had. There's not really that many 'warriors' you can pit against each other before you run out.
I think I read it's currently the highest rated show on the network. That pretty much means it isn't going anywhere, at least not for a while. But you're right, it will be interesting to see how the writers try to keep the show fresh.
Image
User avatar
LaCroix
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5196
Joined: 2004-12-21 12:14pm
Location: Sopron District, Hungary, Europe, Terra

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by LaCroix »

They will start ST vs SW comparisons, and then branch out to all other SF Merchandises...
A minute's thought suggests that the very idea of this is stupid. A more detailed examination raises the possibility that it might be an answer to the question "how could the Germans win the war after the US gets involved?" - Captain Seafort, in a thread proposing a 1942 'D-Day' in Quiberon Bay

I do archery skeet. With a Trebuchet.
User avatar
The Spartan
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4406
Joined: 2005-03-12 05:56pm
Location: Houston

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by The Spartan »

Or they could take some of their past winners and start matching them up. Knight (or was it the Pirate?) vs Spartan for example.
The Gentleman from Texas abstains. Discourteously.
Image
PRFYNAFBTFC-Vice Admiral: MFS Masturbating Walrus :: Omine subtilite Odobenus rosmarus masturbari
Soy un perdedor.
"WHO POOPED IN A NORMAL ROOM?!"-Commander William T. Riker
aieeegrunt
Jedi Knight
Posts: 512
Joined: 2009-12-23 10:14pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by aieeegrunt »

We could get some epic stupidity here, like Pirates verses Waffen SS
User avatar
spaceviking
Jedi Knight
Posts: 853
Joined: 2008-03-20 05:54pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by spaceviking »

I would actually like to see that just to hear the reasoning from the pirate guys who I’m sure would still argue in favour of the pirates. The pirates would just sidestep the machine gun fire.
User avatar
Oscar Wilde
Padawan Learner
Posts: 340
Joined: 2008-10-29 07:36pm

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Oscar Wilde »

I just wish they weren't too afraid of internet backlash to do Pirate vs Ninja, though the wank would drive me crazy again.
It's funny how every Cracked reader seems to change occupation in between reading each article, so that they always end up being irrefutable field experts in whatever topic is at hand.-Dirty_Bastard, cracked.com commentator
User avatar
Meest
Jedi Master
Posts: 1429
Joined: 2003-11-18 03:04am
Location: Toronto

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Meest »

I don't even think it's that, they just seem inept. Their website this week wasn't even changed to show it was a repeat, just simple things like that. Their blogs on the site are sloppy and sometimes shows how dumb these "experts" are. It's a bunch of young guys that got a hit show and want to milk it or it's them acting to please the low common denominator audience. The biomedical guy especially is acting dumbed down this season.
"Somehow I feel, that in the long run, Thanos of Titan came out ahead in this particular deal."
User avatar
Night_stalker
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 995
Joined: 2009-11-28 03:51pm
Location: Bedford, NH

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Night_stalker »

Spetznaz vs Green Berets.

Green Berets. Instead of using Delta, Rangers, Force Rec, or even SEALS, they pick Green Berets? WTF is wrong with the producers? Why bother comparing sniper rifles if you ARENT EVEN GOING TO HAVE THEM BE BLOODY USED?
If Dr. Gatling was a nerd, then his most famous invention is the fucking Revenge of the Nerd, writ large...

"Lawful stupid is the paladin that charges into hell because he knows there's evil there."
—anonymous

"Although you may win the occasional battle against us, Vorrik, the Empire will always strike back."
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by PeZook »

Night_stalker wrote: Green Berets. Instead of using Delta, Rangers, Force Rec, or even SEALS, they pick Green Berets? WTF is wrong with the producers? Why bother comparing sniper rifles if you ARENT EVEN GOING TO HAVE THEM BE BLOODY USED?
Uh...what exactly is the problem with using Green Berets?
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
Questor
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1601
Joined: 2002-07-17 06:27pm
Location: Landover

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Questor »

PeZook wrote:
Night_stalker wrote: Green Berets. Instead of using Delta, Rangers, Force Rec, or even SEALS, they pick Green Berets? WTF is wrong with the producers? Why bother comparing sniper rifles if you ARENT EVEN GOING TO HAVE THEM BE BLOODY USED?
Uh...what exactly is the problem with using Green Berets?
My understanding is that the Green Berets are known more for their original job of training guerrillas in occupied countries. Almost everything I've read about them has been in that role.
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by PeZook »

Jason L. Miles wrote: My understanding is that the Green Berets are known more for their original job of training guerrillas in occupied countries. Almost everything I've read about them has been in that role.
That's one of their primary jobs, but they're quite good at killing people by themselves, too. I'd have a bigger problem with facing off a specific unit (1st Special Forces) against an unspecified Spetznaz formation - since Spetznaz simply means "special force", and there's a fuckload of various units with different missions and equipment, you can have anything from units geared for anti-terrorism to full-blown nuclear sabotage. Lots of people forget that Spetznaz is not a specific formation.
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
Night_stalker
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 995
Joined: 2009-11-28 03:51pm
Location: Bedford, NH

Re: Who! Is! Deadliest?! (Deadliest Warrior Back for Blood)

Post by Night_stalker »

That's my point, they didn't do a whole lot of research about their subjects prior to filming.
If Dr. Gatling was a nerd, then his most famous invention is the fucking Revenge of the Nerd, writ large...

"Lawful stupid is the paladin that charges into hell because he knows there's evil there."
—anonymous

"Although you may win the occasional battle against us, Vorrik, the Empire will always strike back."
Post Reply