Reviews aren't first hand accounts?Stark wrote:First hand accounts are irrelevant?
Choices and consequences that don't affect the overall story, such as it is.Gramzamber wrote:No, AP's quality or magical bugs you claim it has but are invisible are irrelevant. AP is an example of a game with actual choice and consequences, in which your protaganist can be varied. In ME, this isn't the case because it's so railroaded.
How is that different from ME again? Okay you get an extra few gimmicks.. yay?
Exagerrate much? Maybe she just wants to fuck you because you might all die soon and hey it's one way to relieve stress.Gramzamber wrote:What are you talking about? First off I didn't see any horribly out-of-character things happen and you can't prove shit. Secondly, you can ignore Ashley the entire game and have her open her heart to you FOR NO FUCKING REASON. That's worse than 'a complex relationship results in the opportunity for sex' in forced-plot country, and is hardly the only example of things happening in ME because the plot demands.
If you can make excuses for AP's shallow relationships I can make excuses for ME's.
Yeah cause in the middle ages women existed only to bone weird silver haired men and give them pornographic trading cards. Misogymon! Gotta catch em all!Gramzamber wrote:Game set in middle ages is mysogynist? NO FUCKING WAY! It's also racist and involves terrorists!
Did.. did we play the same game?Luckily this doesn't alter the fact that Witcher has a more flexible protaganist and storyline despite having a LITERALLY fixed character!