So let the theories fly. Remember, the more absurd the theory true more likely it is to be true!

Moderator: Edi
But then the question comes up, if its being abandon then why was a new runway built in the mid 1990's....Alferd Packer wrote:Well, it used to be a testbed for much of our top-secret spy/stealth aircraft since the 50s, but with all the publicity it's gotten in the last 15 years, it's probably being slowly phased out of use, in favor of more remote locations. Still, if you're a pilot and you fly in the restricted airspace, you WILL be met on the runway by military officers and chewed out/forced to sign an NDA for possible exposure to sensitive materials.
The new runway was supposedly for the Aurora and/or other hypersonic aircraft that need those 6 miles to take off/land.Sea Skimmer wrote: But then the question comes up, if its being abandon then why was a new runway built in the mid 1990's....
That will most likely happen if you fly over any restricted airspace over a military base, especially a military research base. The same would most likely happen if you flew over Edwards AFB or Eglin AFB.Alferd Packer wrote:Well, it used to be a testbed for much of our top-secret spy/stealth aircraft since the 50s, but with all the publicity it's gotten in the last 15 years, it's probably being slowly phased out of use, in favor of more remote locations. Still, if you're a pilot and you fly in the restricted airspace, you WILL be met on the runway by military officers and chewed out/forced to sign an NDA for possible exposure to sensitive materials.
[/url]
I've heard that one. And its one of the easier one to send spiraling down in flames.Alferd Packer wrote:The new runway was supposedly for the Aurora and/or other hypersonic aircraft that need those 6 miles to take off/land.Sea Skimmer wrote: But then the question comes up, if its being abandon then why was a new runway built in the mid 1990's....
Naw, these guys do it.Darth Wong wrote:They're trying to figure out the Caramilk secret.
Given the heat, its more likely they're looking into the secret Coca-Cola formulaneoolong wrote:Naw, these guys do it.Darth Wong wrote:They're trying to figure out the Caramilk secret.
http://www.revealthesecret.com/
Actually, it came into being when someone saw the Fiscal Year 1986 budget request, with $80 million assigned to a line item "Aurora" under "air breathing reconaissance," with a projected FY 1987 cost of $2.272 billion. The reason it's believed by many to be a Lockheed recce platform is due to the A-12 Cygnus and SR-71 Oxcart. Like Aurora, both were single name astronomical objects, and were used for Lockheed reconnaisance aircraft. No other similar code name has been used before or since. In general, the fewer words used in a code name, the more "black" it is. Oxcart is a good example when compared to the F-117A program, SENIOR TREND. Aurora won't be the official name, of course, but it is likely that it was the code name until it appeared on the budget (much like the F-117's number being changed after the President mentioned it on television). It is believed Auroras (for lack of a better name, I'm sticking with that) have flown from Nevada to Machrihanish, Scotland. Interestingly enough, Lockheed did submit a proposal in the mid-1980s for an aircraft named Aurora, a Mach 7-8 TransAtmospheric Vehicle designed to replace the SR-71. Projected first flights by independent aerospace defense analysts was 1995. The SR-71 did return to service in 1995, but it was removed again within a few years, despite analysis stating that aerial reconaissance was still vital in gaining data satellites cannot.Sea Skimmer wrote:I've heard that one. And its one of the easier one to send spiraling down in flames.Alferd Packer wrote:The new runway was supposedly for the Aurora and/or other hypersonic aircraft that need those 6 miles to take off/land.Sea Skimmer wrote: But then the question comes up, if its being abandon then why was a new runway built in the mid 1990's....
Funny thing about Aurora, why would the US name a reconnaissance aircraft that, when there already is a reconnaissance aircraft called that flying from North American and often US bases? It happens to be what Canada calls its P-3 patrol aircraft.
I'm willing to bet the name Aurora came into being when someone saw information related to some exported upgrade for Canada aircraft, there have been several and they all go through the DoD. They then looked through a listing of US planes and found nothing by that name, the US calls the P-3 Orion. It then made the leap of logic to being a secret aircraft and got attached to some late 80's Lockheed concept study into hypersonic aircraft.
BattleTech for SilCoreStanley Hauerwas wrote:[W]hy is it that no one is angry at the inequality of income in this country? I mean, the inequality of income is unbelievable. Unbelievable. Why isn’t that ever an issue of politics? Because you don’t live in a democracy. You live in a plutocracy. Money rules.
Poll options two and three. These days they're probably into UCAV development, some of which will come out into the grey (i.e. like the F-117 did) eventually, some of which will stay secret on long-term basis. Maybe a bit of life-fire testing of aircraft mounted tactical directed energy weapons thrown into the mix, too.Sea Skimmer wrote:What do you think the USAF installations at Groom Lake, also known as Area 51, are used for?